The Expression of Inflammatory Mediators in Bladder Pain Syndrome

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Advertisements

M. Fu, G. Huang, Z. Zhang, J. Liu, Z. Zhang, Z. Huang, B. Yu, F. Meng 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Transcriptome analysis of proton pump inhibitor–responsive esophageal eosinophilia reveals proton pump inhibitor–reversible allergic inflammation  Ting.
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages e5 (August 2018)
MicroRNAs in spent blastocyst culture medium are derived from trophectoderm cells and can be explored for human embryo reproductive competence assessment 
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Inflammatory phenotypes in patients with severe asthma are associated with distinct airway microbiology  Steven L. Taylor, BSc, Lex E.X. Leong, PhD, Jocelyn.
Single-Neuron Correlates of Atypical Face Processing in Autism
Identification of Bone Marrow-Derived Soluble Factors Regulating Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Bone Regeneration  Tsung-Lin Tsai, Wan-Ju Li  Stem Cell.
Low back pain and disc degeneration are decreased following chronic toll-like receptor 4 inhibition in a mouse model  Emerson Krock, Magali Millecamps,
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Histologic eosinophilic gastritis is a systemic disorder associated with blood and extragastric eosinophilia, TH2 immunity, and a unique gastric transcriptome 
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (September 2017)
Utility of circulating serum miRNAs as biomarkers of early cartilage degeneration in animal models of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis 
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages (May 2016)
CaMKII inhibition in human primary and pluripotent stem cell-derived chondrocytes modulates effects of TGFβ and BMP through SMAD signaling  B. Saitta,
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages (November 2018)
Genome-wide Transcriptome Profiling Reveals the Functional Impact of Rare De Novo and Recurrent CNVs in Autism Spectrum Disorders  Rui Luo, Stephan J.
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Temporal Control of Plant Organ Growth by TCP Transcription Factors
SIRT3 Mediates Multi-Tissue Coupling for Metabolic Fuel Switching
Blockade of nociceptive sensory afferent activity of the rat knee joint by the bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist fasitibant  A. Gomis, S. Meini, A. Miralles,
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e4 (November 2018)
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages (January 2014)
B. H. He, M. Christin, S. Mouchbahani-Constance, A. Davidova, R
Differential cardiac gene expression during cardiopulmonary bypass: Ischemia- independent upregulation of proinflammatory genes  Mihai V. Podgoreanu, MD,
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (May 2016)
Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Mediates One Component of Competitive, Experience- Dependent Plasticity in Developing Visual Cortex  Megumi Kaneko, David Stellwagen,
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 11, Pages (January 2019)
Transcriptional Profiling of Quiescent Muscle Stem Cells In Vivo
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages e7 (May 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Minimally invasive skin tape strip RNA sequencing identifies novel characteristics of the type 2–high atopic dermatitis disease endotype  Nathan Dyjack,
Volume 22, Issue 13, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Molecular Mechanisms Regulating the Defects in Fragile X Syndrome Neurons Derived from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells  Tomer Halevy, Christian Czech, Nissim.
Gene expression profiling in the remnant kidney model of wild type and kinin B1 and B2 receptor knockout mice  J.P. Schanstra, M. Bachvarova, E. Neau,
Laura S. Bisogno, Matthew B. Friedersdorf, Jack D. Keene
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (March 2018)
Michal Levin, Tamar Hashimshony, Florian Wagner, Itai Yanai 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 19, Issue 15, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages (June 2015)
Transcriptional Profiling of Psoriasis Using RNA-seq Reveals Previously Unidentified Differentially Expressed Genes  Ali Jabbari, Mayte Suárez-Fariñas,
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Maria S. Robles, Sean J. Humphrey, Matthias Mann  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2019)
SIRT3 Mediates Multi-Tissue Coupling for Metabolic Fuel Switching
Dynamic- and Frequency-Specific Regulation of Sleep Oscillations by Cortical Potassium Channels  Christine M. Muheim, Andrea Spinnler, Tina Sartorius,
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Presentation transcript:

The Expression of Inflammatory Mediators in Bladder Pain Syndrome Ifeoma Offiah, Athanasios Didangelos, John Dawes, Rufus Cartwright, Vik Khullar, Elizabeth J. Bradbury, Suzanne O'Sullivan, Dic Williams, Iain P. Chessell, Kenny Pallas, Gerry Graham, Barry A. O’Reilly, Stephen B. McMahon  European Urology  Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages 283-290 (August 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.058 Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Gene expression analysis of all patients. (A) Gene expression levels in bladder biopsies of bladder pain syndrome (BPS) patients versus controls. Each point represents the mean fold change (FC) for each gene transcript, displayed as the log2 of the FC. Each point is ranked in order of FC, commencing with the genes with the lowest FC to those that are most upregulated (compared to controls). The green box denotes genes with FC ±2. FC ranking revealed that a considerable number of genes were upregulated in the data set. (B) Volcano plot visualising the genes separated according to their expression FC (x-axis) and significance (y-axis: log10 p value) in BPS and controls. Genes highlighted in red had log2 FC >2 and log10 p values <0.01 in our data set. FC=fold change. European Urology 2016 70, 283-290DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.058) Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Correlation of gene relative expression with patient clinical phenotypes. Spearman rank correlation coefficient of the seven bladder pain syndrome patients, selected using principal component analysis, with the clinical phenotypes. There was a positive correlation between transcript expression for CCL21 and FGF7 and the O’Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom and Problem Index questionnaire scores (CCL21 ρ=0.93, p=0.0067; FGF7: ρ=0.61, p=0.17). BPS=bladder pain syndrome; ICS/PI=O’Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom and Problem Index. European Urology 2016 70, 283-290DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.058) Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering. (A) Principal component analysis of all patients analysed, evaluated based on their gene expression profiles. The first two principal components, consisting of two clusters of seven bladder pain syndrome (BPS) patients and seven controls, are circled in red. (B) Hierarchical clustering of differentially regulated genes of the seven BPS and seven control patients identified with the principal component analysis. Green denotes upregulated genes, whereas red denotes downregulated genes. BPS=bladder pain syndrome. European Urology 2016 70, 283-290DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.058) Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Replication study and correlation with primary study. (A) Hierarchical clustering of all participants, showing large biologic variability. (B) Hierarchical clustering of the principal component analysis–selected first two components, showing the correlation between patients and genes. (C) Each point represents the fold change (FC) difference for each gene from the discovery and replication study. The left panel corresponds to the correlation of the FCs for all patients included in both analyses (R2=0.23, p=0.03). The second panel represents the seven bladder pain syndrome versus seven controls from the initial study, correlated with the five pain patients and six controls from the replication study (R2=0.32; p=0.01). Significance was calculated using Pearson R with a 2-tailed t test and a 95% confidence interval. FC=fold change. European Urology 2016 70, 283-290DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.058) Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Cystometry and behaviour assessment. (A) Representative cystometric recordings of bladders, showing contraction frequency following baseline assessment, enzymatic proteoglycan deglycosylation, FGF7 treatment, and CCL21 treatment in permeabilised bladders. (B) Quantification of the cystometric number of bladder contractions. Displayed is the mean total number of contractions in a 20-min interval ±1 standard error of the mean (SEM; five rats per group). Statistical significance calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post-test correction. (C) Behavioural assessment. Each point represents the mean mechanical withdrawal threshold as a percentage of baseline ±1 SEM (five rats per group). Statistical significance was calculated using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. The CCL21 treatment withdrawal threshold is significantly lower than the control group and animals’ postenzymatic deglycosylation alone. BPS=bladder pain syndrome; Ch’ase=chondroitinase; H’ase=heparanase; ns=not significant; Tx=treatment. (B) * p<0.05; ** p<0.01. (C) * Significance difference in CCL21 from baseline: *** p<0.001; ** p<0.01; # significance difference in treatment from baseline: ## p<0.01. European Urology 2016 70, 283-290DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.058) Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 6 The effect of ligand treatment on c-fos–positive cell number. (A) Representative image of a spinal cord with c-fos staining plus high-power magnification of the dorsal commissure showing c-fos positivity in a wild-type and knockout mouse. (B) Quantification of c-fos–positive cell numbers in rats. Displayed is the mean number of c-fos–positive cells in the L6–S1 spinal cord (five rats per group). Statistical significance was calculated with one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni post-test correction. (C) Quantification of c-fos–positive cell numbers in CCL21 atypical receptor knockout mice and wild-type littermates. Displayed is the mean number of c-fos–positive cells in the L6–S1 spinal cord (six wild type, seven knockout). Statistical significance of p=0.039 was calculated with an unpaired Student t test. ns=not significant; Tx=treatment. * p<0.05. European Urology 2016 70, 283-290DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.058) Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions