Step 2. Degree of freedom (DOF) analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Exercise 3. Solutions From Fujio Kida, JGC Co. All cases
Advertisements

1 Outline Control structure design (plantwide control) A procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step 1: Degrees of freedom Step 2: Operational.
Dynamic modeling, optimization and control of a CO 2 stripper Marie Solvik Supervisors : Sigurd Skogestad and Marius Støre Govatsmark.
Advanced Controls Technology An Industrial and Academic Perspective on Plantwide Control James J. Downs Eastman Chemical Company Sigurd Skogestad Norwegian.
Self-Optimizing Control of the HDA Process Outline of the presentation –Process description. –Self-optimizing control procedure. –Self-optimizing control.
Plant-wide Control for Economic Operation of a Recycle Process
Step 1: Set the desired flow rate for each pipe. Step 2: Click on the stream which you wish to size the pipe. Select Sizing from the menu, then select.
1 Single-cycle mixed-fluid LNG (PRICO) process Part I: Optimal design Sigurd Skogestad & Jørgen Bauck Jensen Quatar, January 2009.
Verbal Modeling Anchors: Manganese  Matt Morabito Jamie Polan.
T&S Chapter 5, SS&D Chapter 20 Terry A. Ring University of Utah
Concentrator case SIGURD’S RULES FOR CV1-SELECTION 1.Always control active constraints! (almost always) 2.Purity constraint on expensive product always.
1 M. Panahi ’Plantwide Control for Economically Optimal Operation of Chemical Plants’ Plantwide Control for Economically Optimal Operation of Chemical.
Chapter 18 Control Case Studies. Control Systems Considered Temperature control for a heat exchanger Temperature control of a CSTR Composition control.
1 Single-cycle mixed-fluid LNG (PRICO) process Part II: Optimal operation Sigurd Skogestad & Jørgen Bauck Jensen Quatar, January 2009.
Controller Design Using CHEMCAD
CHAPTER II PROCESS DYNAMICS AND MATHEMATICAL MODELING
1 Active constraint regions for optimal operation of a simple LNG process Magnus G. Jacobsen and Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering NTNU.
Industrial Process Control: CONTROL OF HEAT EXCHANGER
Process Operability Class Materials Copyright © Thomas Marlin 2013
Optimal operation of distillation columns and link to control Distillation Course Berlin Summer Sigurd Skogestad. Part 3.
1 Coordinator MPC for maximization of plant throughput Elvira Marie B. Aske* &, Stig Strand & and Sigurd Skogestad* * Department of Chemical Engineering,
Part 3: Regulatory («stabilizing») control
1 Outline Skogestad procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step S1: Define operational objective (cost) and constraints Step S2: Identify degrees.
1 Plantwide control: Towards a systematic procedure Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology (NTNU)
Practical plantwide process control Part 1
1 1 V. Minasidis et. al. | Simple Rules for Economic Plantwide ControlSimple Rules for Economic Plantwide Control, PSE & ESCAPE 2015 SIMPLE RULES FOR ECONOMIC.
1 Single-cycle mixed-fluid LNG (PRICO) process Part II: Optimal operation Sigurd Skogestad & Jørgen Bauck Jensen Qatar, January 2009.
1 Structure of the process control system Benefits from MPC (Model Predictive Control) and RTO (Real Time Optimization) Sigurd Skogestad Department of.
1 Self-Optimizing Control HDA case study S. Skogestad, May 2006 Thanks to Antonio Araújo.
1 A Plantwide Control Procedure Applied to the HDA Process Antonio Araújo and Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University.
1 Active constraint regions for economically optimal operation of distillation columns Sigurd Skogestad and Magnus G. Jacobsen Department of Chemical Engineering.
Implementation of Coordinator MPC on a Large-Scale Gas Plant
1 Plantwide control: Towards a systematic procedure Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology (NTNU)
1 Part 3: Regulatory («stabilizing») control Inventory (level) control structure –Location of throughput manipulator –Consistency and radiating rule Structure.
1 PLANTWIDE CONTROL Identifying and switching between active constraints regions Sigurd Skogestad and Magnus G. Jacobsen Department of Chemical Engineering.
1 Self-optimizing control Theory. 2 Outline Skogestad procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step S1: Define operational objective (cost) and.
LOGO Plantwide Control Structure Design of Tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) Process Thitima Tapaneeyapong and Montree Wongsri Department of Chemical Engineering.
1 Outline About Trondheim and myself Control structure design (plantwide control) A procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step 1: Degrees of.
T&S Chapter 5, SS&L Chapter 20 Terry A. Ring University of Utah
Multi-Variable Control
Plantwide process control Introduction
Heat Exchangers and Condensers
Sequence Valves.
Part 3: Regulatory («stabilizing») control
Self-optimizing control Theory
Part 3: Regulatory («stabilizing») control
Plant-wide Control- Part3
Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering
Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering
Example regulatory control: Distillation
PLANTWIDE CONTROL Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering
Plantwide control: Towards a systematic procedure
PLANTWIDE CONTROL Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering
Outline Skogestad procedure for control structure design I Top Down
Outline Control structure design (plantwide control)
Perspectives and future directions in control structure selection
Plantwide control: Towards a systematic procedure
Example : Optimal blending of gasoline
Process Operability Class Materials Copyright © Thomas Marlin 2013
Distillation Column – External Balance
Example regulatory control: Distillation
Part 3: Regulatory («stabilizing») control
Plant-wide Control- Part2
Plantwide control: Towards a systematic procedure
Example regulatory control: Distillation
Example regulatory control: Distillation
Example “stabilizing” control: Distillation
Part 3: Regulatory («stabilizing») control
PWC Basics: A Simple Chemical Process
Presentation transcript:

Step 2. Degree of freedom (DOF) analysis Nm : no. of dynamic (control) DOFs (valves) Nss = Nm- N0 : steady-state DOFs N0 : liquid levels with no steady-state effect (N0y)+ purely dynamic control DOFs (N0m) Cost J depends normally only on steady-state DOFs

Distillation column with given feed Nm = 5, N0y = 2, Nss = 5 - 2 = 3 (2 with given pressure)

Heat-integrated distillation process

Step 4. Where set production rate? Very important! Determines structure of remaining inventory (level) control system Set production rate at (dynamic) bottleneck Link between Top-down and Bottom-up parts

Production rate set at inlet : Inventory control in direction of flow

Production rate set at outlet: Inventory control opposite flow

Production rate set inside process

Definition of bottleneck A unit (or more precisely, an extensive variable E within this unit) is a bottleneck (with respect to the flow F) if - With the flow F as a degree of freedom, the variable E is optimally at its maximum constraint (i.e., E= Emax at the optimum) - The flow F is increased by increasing this constraint (i.e., dF/dEmax > 0 at the optimum). A variable E is a dynamic( control) bottleneck if in addition - The optimal value of E is unconstrained when F is fixed at a sufficiently low value Otherwise E is a steady-state (design) bottleneck.

Heat integrated distillation process: Given feedrate with production rate set at inlet

Heat integrated distillation process: Reconfiguration required when reach bottleneck (max. cooling in column 2)

Heat integrated distillation process: Given feedrate with production rate adjusted at bottleneck (column 2) SET