Faculty Development Dr Samira Rahat Afroze.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IASCE Conference Athlone October 7 th & 8 th 2004 Responsive Evaluation. Working with Stakeholders: A review of the Open Training College Quality Assurance.
Advertisements

PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Open University Centre Quality Assurance of UCE at the University of Tartu Ülle Kesli Open University Office
Dr.Mohamed E. Osman & Prof.Thuwayba A. Al Barwani With Dr.Abdo M. Al Mekhlafi Dr. Khalid Al Saadi Ms.Laila Alhashar Ms.Fathiya Al Maawali Ms.Zuhor Al lawati.
Unit 2: Managing the development of self and others Life Science and Chemical Science Professionals Higher Apprenticeships Unit 2 Managing the development.
Embedding Information Literacy into Staff Development at an acute NHS Trust Sharon Hadley Kim Hacker
LOGO Internal Quality Assurance Model: Evidence from Vietnamese Higher Education Tang Thi Thuy, Department of International and Comparative Education,
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
“Review of Student Evaluation of Teaching at WCPPE” Catherine O’Brien PCUTL Presentation Group Project Jan 2012.
Important Information Have you got a username and password for the school SRF account? If your school has not registered before then you can do this if.
Accreditation in the higher education
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
The Role of Libraries Special Committee Robert Morris University
Model Name Transition Project Learning Network Workshop 3 IYF Transition Project.
Developing a Sustainable Procurement Policy and Strategy EAUC – EAF Programme.
July 2007 National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Role of Action Planning in The Developmental.
Program Evaluation DR. MAJED WADI. Objectives  Design necessary parameters used for program evaluation  Accept different views of program evaluation.
Pharmacy School Self Study Prof. Abdalla Elkhawad UMST.
The International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) – Guidelines.
PUBLIC ACCREDITATION AGENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION “Key aspects of quality assessment for teaching and learning in HE” Niko Hyka Innovation and information.
Encompass – Learning Partnership SCHOOL BUSINESS MANAGER Course - Level 4 Diploma CLIVE HAINES and SUZANNE BEAN Welcome – Face to Face Session One.
Schools as Organisations
Interpersonal and Communication Skills
Presenters: Drs. Thomas Koballa, Jr. & Tracy Linderholm
Overview Module 2: Problem/Project Identification
Outline of Quality assurance and accreditation
Evaluating the Quality and Impact of Community Benefit Programs
Higher Education and Training Awards Council
Workshops curriculum building Zenica
Assessment of the initial situation
PowerPoint to accompany:
PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN MEDICAL EDUCATION
Capacity building in the Maths4Stats project
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Arancha Oviedo EQAVET Secretariat
Intercept 5 Community Supervision
Five Microskills of Effective Feedback Focus on SBIRT Maureen Strohm, MD, MSEd with thanks to Julie G Nyquist, Ph.D.
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Community Participation in Research
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Project Cycle Management
Psych 638: Training needs assessment
Training - Bharat Thapa NASC.
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
Designing and Implementing Local Faculty Development Programs
School Self-Evaluation 
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Virtual learning Environments and Staff development
European TRAINING FOUNDATION
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
Reproductive Health and Safety Education: Making It Stick in NC
school self-evaluation and improvement toolkit
PROCESSES AND INDICATORS FOR MEASURING THE IMPACT OF EQUALITY BODIES
What should a decision-maker know?
Research & scholarship
Current Practice and Plans for the Future
Patient Centered Interprofessional Development Workshop ​
February 21-22, 2018.
Virtual learning Environments and Staff development
Good practices in mother-tongue first multilingual education
Competencies for beginning teachers
ETBI Annual Conference for Principals and Deputy Principals
Allied Health Statistics
Week 2 Evaluation Framework
London Youth Introduction to the Quality Mark.
The National Approach to Professional Learning
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

Faculty Development Dr Samira Rahat Afroze

By the end of this presentation Define faculty and faculty development Identify your own faculty in your context Develop principles for faculty development with 6 Key questions Need assessment Programme planning How will you evaluate it?

Faculty Purpose? Whom to include? Whom not to include? “if you are involved in teaching you must develop the skills, attitudes and practices of a competent teacher” (GMC, 2013)

Faculty Development Essential reading

What does faculty development do Improves knowledge and practice Develops strengths and skills Updates skills Manages change Has planned activity Aids personal development of faculty members Fosters better institutional environment Provides two-way communication

The intent of these activities is to assist faculty members in their roles as teachers educators leaders administrators researchers

6 key questions Who are your ‘faculty’? —What development do they need? —Why is this important? Why now? —How will development opportunities be provided? —Where…—and when will faculty access the development opportunities?

What will motivate your target audience to sign up?   Who will you need to report back to?   Any other points? 

Faculty development Skilled clinical teachers Improved student learning Competent, caring practitioners Improved patient & community outcome

Training cycle Analysis Evaluation Design Implementation Development

Need assessment 2nd Key : What do they need? 3 phases Pre-assessment 3. Post-assessment

— Define the target group of learners Pre-assessment — Set objectives — Define the target group of learners — Establish what is already known about them — Decide what is unknown and how important it is to know — Determine methods for collecting data How can we collect data? Direct: —Surveys —Interviews —Focus groups —Observations —Performance appraisals —Tests / assessments Indirect: —‘Extant data’ (existing organisational data collected for another purpose) —Document review (‘Grey’ literature: policies, regulations, reports, best practice guidelines etc.)

Assessment — Collect data Post-assessment — Analyse data — Identify and prioritise problems — Identify and evaluate potential solutions

Why is this important? Why now? Enhancing forces Restraining forces

Social Technological Economic Environmental Political Legal Ethical —External : STEEPLE analysis —Institutional : fund, curriculum, staff, student —Individual : SWOT analysis Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Treats

Programme planning How will development opportunities be provided? A good faculty development programme will provide a mix of formal development opportunities to cater for different needs and preferences.

Workshops / seminars / short courses —Fellowships / other longitudinal programmes —Accredited courses —Communities of practice —Mentorship / role-modelling —Printed materials —Online learning —PBSGL (Practice-Based Small Group Learning) —Assessment of performance with feedback

Training cycle Analysis Evaluation Design Implementation Development

Organisations or their products (e.g. courses) are accredited —Individuals are certificated or credentialed

It is important to check: —Who has provided the accreditation? —How is it monitored and quality assured and by whom? —Internally? —Externally? —Frequency of monitoring / review? —How widely is the resulting certification accepted? —Locally? —Nationally? —Internationally?

Evaluating the Programme 5 simple steps Identify stakeholders Determine the focus of the evaluation Identify key evaluation questions Select methods for gathering credible evidence Determine how the data will be reported and to whom

Gather creditable evidence Use of lessons learned Application

Training cycle Analysis Evaluation Design Implementation Development

“A medical school’s most important asset is its faculty” Whitcomb, 2003