ON THE EDGES OF FLOW: STUDENT ENGAGEMENT IN PROBLEM SOLVING

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CMEF 2014 BOOTSTRAPPING THINKING: THE ROLE OF ENGAGING MATHEMATICAL TASKS - Peter Liljedahl.
Advertisements

building thinking classrooms
CMM 2015 PÓLYA, CARDS, and CSÍKSZENTMIHÁLYI: THE PHENOMENON OF FLOW - Peter Liljedahl.
TLC 2014 WHAT COULD LEARNING LOOK LIKE? YOUR TURN TO SHUFFLE - Peter Liljedahl & Kathryn Ricketts.
CtC 2014 MOTIVATING STUDENTS - Peter Liljedahl. CtC 2014 ENGAGEENTERTAINCURIOSITYINTERESTMOTIVATE.
Oliver 2015 THINGS I (WE) TRIED tasks hints and extensions how we give the problem how we answer questions how we level room organization how groups are.
Milano 2016 POLITECNICO di MILANO PhD COURSE session II.
Flow: a framework for discussing teaching
building thinking classrooms
FLOW AND THE THINKING CLASSROOM
Flow: a framework for discussing teaching
POLITECNICO di MILANO PhD COURSE session II
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
ENGAGING STUDENTS: UNDERSTANDING FLOW
building thinking classrooms
Building Thinking Classrooms: A Story of Teacher Professional Development - Peter Liljedahl.
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
Student Problem Solving Behaviour in a Thinking Classroom
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
BUILDING THINKING CLASSROOMS
FLOW IN THE CLASSROOM: LOOKING AT TEACHER MOVES AND STUDENTS' AUTONOMOUS ACTIONS - Peter Liljedahl.
BUILDING THINKING CLASSROOMS
BUILDING THINKING CLASSROOMS THE NARRATIVE BEHIND THE NARRATIVE (part I) - Peter Liljedahl.
LEARNING or STUDENTING?
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
Reflecting on Practice: Using Inquiry to Build Thinking Classrooms
building thinking classrooms
BUILDING THINKING CLASSROOMS
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
FLOW.
CLASSROOM PRACTICES FOR SUPPORTING PROBLEM SOLVING
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
Building Thinking Classrooms: A Story of Teacher Professional Development - Peter Liljedahl.
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
ENGAGING STUDENTS: UNDERSTANDING FLOW
building thinking classrooms
BUILDING THINKING CLASSROOMS
ENGAGING STUDENTS: UNDERSTANDING FLOW
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
NOW YOU TRY ONE HOMEWORK TAKING NOTES CONTEXTS.
CONTEXT OF RESEARCH NOW YOU TRY ONE HOMEWORK TAKING NOTES REVIEW
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms – part II
building thinking classrooms
BUILDING THINKING CLASSROOMS
building thinking classrooms
Presentation transcript:

ON THE EDGES OF FLOW: STUDENT ENGAGEMENT IN PROBLEM SOLVING - Peter Liljedahl

Liljedahl, P. (under review) Liljedahl, P. (under review). On the edges of flow: Student problem solving behavior. In S. Carreira, N. Amado, & K. Jones (eds.), Broadening the scope of research on mathematical problem solving: A focus on technology, creativity and affect. New York, NY: Springer.

MIHALY CSÍKSZENTMIHÁLYI THE OPTIMAL EXPERIENCE MIHALY CSÍKSZENTMIHÁLYI

OPTIMAL EXPERIENCE There are clear goals every step of the way. There is immediate feedback on one’s actions. There is a balance between challenges and skills. Attention is focused on one’s actions. Distractions are excluded from consciousness. There is no worry of failure. Self-consciousness disappears. The sense of time becomes distorted. The activity becomes satisfying in its own right. - Csíkszentmihályi (1990) OPTIMAL EXPERIENCE

OPTIMAL EXPERIENCE - internal There are clear goals every step of the way. There is immediate feedback on one’s actions. There is a balance between challenges and skills. Attention is focused on one’s actions. Distractions are excluded from consciousness. There is no worry of failure. Self-consciousness disappears. The sense of time becomes distorted. The activity becomes satisfying in its own right. - Csíkszentmihályi (1990) OPTIMAL EXPERIENCE - internal

OPTIMAL EXPERIENCE - external There are clear goals every step of the way. There is immediate feedback on one’s actions. There is a balance between challenges and skills. Attention is focused on one’s actions. Distractions are excluded from consciousness. There is no worry of failure. Self-consciousness disappears. The sense of time becomes distorted. The activity becomes satisfying in its own right. - Csíkszentmihályi (1990) OPTIMAL EXPERIENCE - external

OPTIMAL EXPERIENCE FLOW There are clear goals every step of the way. There is immediate feedback on one’s actions. There is a balance between challenges and skills. FRUSTRATION FLOW BOREDOM OPTIMAL EXPERIENCE

FLOW EXPERIENCE FLOW There are clear goals every step of the way. There is immediate feedback on one’s actions. There is a balance between challenges and skills. FRUSTRATION FLOW BOREDOM FLOW EXPERIENCE

FLOW EXPERIENCE FLOW = ENGAGEMENT There are clear goals every step of the way. There is immediate feedback on one’s actions. There is a balance between challenges and skills. FRUSTRATION FLOW = ENGAGEMENT BOREDOM FLOW EXPERIENCE

FRUSTRATION FLOW BOREDOM FLOW EXPERIENCE

FRUSTRATION FLOW BOREDOM FLOW EXPERIENCE

FRUSTRATION FLOW BOREDOM FLOW EXPERIENCE

FRUSTRATION FLOW BOREDOM MOMENTS OF IMBALANCE

METHODOLOGY – TEACHING STYLE Liljedahl, P. (2016). Building thinking classrooms: Conditions for problem solving. In P. Felmer, J. Kilpatrick, & E. Pekhonen (eds.), Posing and Solving Mathematical Problems: Advances and New Perspectives. (pp. 361-386). New York, NY: Springer. Liljedahl, P. (2014). The affordances of using visibly random groups in a mathematics classroom. In Y. Li, E. Silver, & S. Li (eds.), Transforming Mathematics Instruction: Multiple Approaches and Practices. (pp. 127-144). New York, NY: Springer. METHODOLOGY – TEACHING STYLE

FRUSTRATION FLOW BOREDOM CHALLENGE TOO LOW

FRUSTRATION FLOW TOLERANCE BOREDOM CHALLENGE TOO LOW

FRUSTRATION FLOW TOLERANCE BOREDOM CHALLENGE TOO LOW

FRUSTRATION FLOW TOLERANCE BOREDOM CHALLENGE TOO HIGH

FRUSTRATION FLOW PERSEVERANCE TOLERANCE BOREDOM CHALLENGE TOO HIGH

FRUSTRATION FLOW PERSEVERANCE TOLERANCE BOREDOM CHALLENGE TOO HIGH

FRUSTRATION FLOW PERSEVERANCE TOLERANCE BOREDOM MODIFIED FLOW

THANK YOU! liljedahl@sfu.ca www.peterliljedahl.com/presentations @pgliljedahl