Thinking Like A Researcher

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 3 Introduction to Quantitative Research
Advertisements

Chapter 3 Introduction to Quantitative Research
Chapter 3 Thinking Like a Researcher McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2-1 Chapter 2 Thinking Like A Researcher.
Research Basics PE 357. What is Research? Can be diverse General definition is “finding answers to questions in an organized and logical and systematic.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Business Research Methods, 10eCopyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 3 Thinking Like a Researcher.
Research Methods in MIS
Chapter Two SCIENTIFIC METHODS IN BUSINESS
Specifying a Purpose, Research Questions or Hypothesis
Developing Ideas for Research and Evaluating Theories of Behavior
The Scientific Method n See the problem n Look for the relevant variables n Construct a hypothesis, if possible n Create a research design n Collect data.
Accounting Theory: Roles and Approaches
McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. THINKING LIKE A RESEARCHER Chapter 3.
Purpose, Objectives, Questions, Hypotheses
Thinking Like a Researcher
Business Research Process 1
Conceptual Foundations
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Business Research Methods, 10eCopyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 3 Thinking Like a Researcher.
Theoretical Framework & Hypothesis Development
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK and Hypothesis Development
Terminologies for Research Methodology Business Research Methods.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Developing and Evaluating Theories of Behavior.
RESEARCH PROCESS STEP 4 : 5. RESEARCH STEP 4 THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK.
METODE PENELITIAN AKUNTANSI. Tugas Tugas Telaah Tugas Riset.
LECTURE 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Research framework and Hypotheses development.
Donald Cooper Pamela Schindler Business Research Methods Lecture II.
1 The Theoretical Framework. A theoretical framework is similar to the frame of the house. Just as the foundation supports a house, a theoretical framework.
Business Research Methods
Thinking Like a Researcher
Research Methods in Psychology Chapter 2. The Research ProcessPsychological MeasurementEthical Issues in Human and Animal ResearchBecoming a Critical.
Chapter 2 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2001Irwin/McGraw-Hill Donald Cooper Pamela Schindler Business Research Methods.
SCIENTIFIC THINKING Presented by: Dr. Salem M. Al-Ghamdi Associate Professor of Management King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals.
Fall 2009 Dr. Bobby Franklin.  “... [the] systematic, controlled empirical and critical investigation of natural phenomena guided by theory and hypotheses.
McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. THINKING LIKE A RESEARCHER Chapter 3.
Building Blocks of Scientific Research Chapter 5 References:  Business Research (Duane Davis)  Business Research Methods (Cooper/Schindler) Resource.
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 7. HYPOTHESIS Background Once variables identified Establish the relationship through logical reasoning. Proposition. Proposition.
THE RESEARCH PROCESS - THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK & HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. Part One INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS RESEARCH.
ACCOUNTING THEORY AND STANDARDS
2-1 Research. Research What is research? It is any attempt undertaken in order to investigate some problem. In research, a problem is a question or a.
The Scientific Method. Scientifically Solving a Problem Observe Define a Problem Review the Literature Observe some More Develop a Theoretical Framework.
Chapter 1: The What and the Why of Statistics
Nursing Research Week Two Research Problem Definition: a perplexing or troubling condition. Sources – Clinical experience – Nursing literature – Social.
2-1 Chapter 2 Thinking Like A Researcher. 2-2 Learning Objectives The need for sound reasoning to enhance business research results The terminology used.
Research Methods in Psychology
Terminologies for Research Methodology
Selection Of THE Research Problem
Writing a sound proposal
Research and Scientific Method
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 7
Thinking Like a Researcher Language of Research
Business Research Methods William G. Zikmund
Part One INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS RESEARCH
Part One INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS RESEARCH
Lecture 02.
Intro to Research Methods
CHAPTER 2 Research Methods in Industrial/Organizational Psychology
THEORY IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
WELCOME HEIDI VAN DER WESTHUIZEN Cell:
Chapter Three Research Design.
© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Developing and Evaluating Theories of Behavior
中央大學.資訊管理系 范錚強 mailto: upd
中央大學.資訊管理系 范錚強 mailto: upd
中央大學.資訊管理系 范錚強 mailto: upd
Thinking Like a Researcher
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 6
Thinking Like a Researcher
LEARNING OUTCOMES After studying this chapter, you should
Presentation transcript:

Thinking Like A Researcher Chapter 2 Thinking Like A Researcher

Learning Objectives The need for sound reasoning to enhance business research results The terminology used by professional researchers employing scientific thinking What you need to formulate a solid research hypothesis

The Scientific Method Direct observation Clearly defined variables Clearly defined methods Empirically testable Elimination of alternatives Statistical justification Self-correcting process Good business research is based on sound reasoning because reasoning is essential for producing scientific results. This slide introduces the scientific method and its essential tenets. The scientific method guides our approach to problem-solving. An important term in the list is empirical. Empirical testing denotes observations and propositions based on sensory experiences and/or derived from such experience by methods of inductive logic, including mathematics and statistics. Researchers using this approach attempt to describe, explain, and make predictions by relying on information gained through observation. The scientific method is described as a puzzle-solving activity.

Researchers Encounter problems State problems Propose hypotheses Deduce outcomes Formulate rival hypotheses Devise and conduct empirical tests Draw conclusions The steps followed by business researchers to approach a problem are presented in the slide.

Synovate Curiosity is necessary to be a good business researcher This ad from Synovate reinforces the notion that researchers must be curious. Students can see the Synovate website at www.synovate.com.

Sound Reasoning Types of Discourse Exposition Argument Deduction Exposition consists of statements that describe without attempting to explain. Argument allows us to explain, interpret, defend, challenge, and explore meaning. There are two types of argument: deduction and induction. Deduction is a form of reasoning in which the conclusion must necessarily follow from the premises given. The next slide provides an example of a deductive argument. Induction is a form of reasoning that draws a conclusion from one or more particular facts or pieces of evidence. Slide 2-8 illustrates an inductive argument. Deduction Induction

Deductive Reasoning Inner-city household interviewing is especially difficult and expensive This survey involves substantial inner-city household interviewing   This slide provides an example of a deductive argument. The interviewing in this survey will be especially difficult and expensive © 2002 McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Inductive Reasoning Why didn’t sales increase during our promotional event? Regional retailers did not have sufficient stock to fill customer requests during the promotional period A strike by employees prevented stock from arriving in time for promotion to be effective A hurricane closed retail outlets in the region for 10 days during the promotion This slide provides an example of an inductive argument.

Exhibit 2-1 Why Didn’t Sales Increase? Deduction Induction and deduction can be used together in research reasoning. Induction occurs when we observe a fact and ask, “Why is this?” In answer to this question, we advance a tentative explanation or hypothesis. The hypothesis is plausible if it explains the event or condition (fact) that prompted the question. Deduction is the process by which we test whether the hypothesis is capable of explaining the fact. Exhibit 2-1 illustrates this process.

Exhibit 2-2 Tracy’s Performance

Language of Research Terms used in research Concepts Constructs Conceptual schemes Models Operational definitions Terms used in research Several terms are used by researchers to converse about applied and theoretical business problems. A concept is a bundle of meanings or characteristics associated with certain concrete, unambiguous events, objects, conditions, or situations. The importance of conceptualization is discussed in the following slide. A construct is a definition specifically invented to represent an abstract phenomena for a given research project. Exhibit 2-3, a depiction of job redesign constructs, is provided in Slide 2-13. A conceptual scheme is the interrelationship between concepts and constructs. An operational definition defines a variable in terms of specific measurement and testing criteria. An example of an operational definition is provided in Slide 2-14. A variable is used as a synonym for the construct being studied. Slides 2-15 through 2-20 expand on different types of variables. A proposition is a statement about observable phenomena that may be judged as true or false. (Slide 2-21) A hypothesis is a proposition formulated for empirical testing. (Slides 2-22 through 2-25) A theory is a set of systematically interrelated concepts, definitions, and propositions that are advanced to explain or predict phenomena. Slide 2-26 shows an example of a theory. A model is a representation of a system constructed to study some aspect of that system. Slide 2-27 shows an example of a model. Theory Variables Propositions/ Hypotheses

Clear conceptualization Language of Research Clear conceptualization of concepts Success of Research Shared understanding of concepts We must attempt to measure concepts in a clear manner that others can understand. If concepts are not clearly conceptualized and measured, we will receive confusing answers.

Exhibit 2-3 Job Redesign Constructs and Concepts Exhibit 2-3 illustrates some of the concepts and constructs relevant to job redesign. The concepts at the bottom of the exhibit (format accuracy, manuscript errors, and keyboarding speed) are the most concrete and easily measured. Keyboarding speed is one just concept in the group that defines a construct that the human resource analyst calls Presentation Quality. It is not directly observable like keyboarding speed. It is a term used to communicate (a label) the combination of meanings presented by the three concepts. Concepts at the next level are vocabulary, syntax, and spelling. As they are related, the analyst groups them into a construct she calls language skill. Language skills is placed at a higher level of abstraction in the exhibit because two of the concepts that comprise it, vocabulary and syntax, are more difficult to observe and measure. The construct of job interest is not yet measured nor are its components specified. Researchers often refer to such constructs as hypothetical constructs because they are inferred only from the data—they are presumed to exist but no measure tests whether such constructs actually exist. If research shows the concepts and constructs in this example to be interrelated, and if the connections can be supported, then the analyst has the beginning of a conceptual scheme. One exercise you can try is to have students attempt to identify the concepts/constructs in the hypothetical construct…job interest, and discuss which elements are truly measurable…and how. 3-13

Operational Definitions How can we define the variable “class level of students”? Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior < 30 credit hours 30-50 credit hours 60-89 credit hours > 90 credit hours Operational definitions are definitions stated in terms of specific criteria for testing or measurement. The specifications must be so clear that any competent person using them would classify the objects in the same way. If a study of college students required classifying students by class level, a definition of each category would be necessary. Students could be grouped by class level based on self-report, number of years in school, or number of credit hours completed. Credit hours is the most precise measure.

What Is A Variable? Variable Event Act Characteristic Trait In practice, the term variable is used as a synonym for the property being studied. In this context, a variable is a symbol of an event, act, characteristic, trait, or attribute that can be measured and to which we assign categorical values. The different types of variables are presented on the following slides.

Religious affiliation Types of Variables Dichotomous Male/Female Employed/ Unemployed Discrete Ethnic background Educational level Religious affiliation For the purposes of data entry and analysis, we assign numerical values to a variable based on that variable’s properties. Dichotomous variables have only two values that reflect the absence or presence of a property. Variables also take on values representing added categories such as demographic variables. All such variables are said to be discrete since only certain values are possible. Continuous variables take on values within a given range or, in some cases, an infinite set. Continuous Income Temperature Age

Exhibit 2-4 Independent and Dependent Variables Independent Variable (IV) Predictor Presumed cause Stimulus Predicted from… Antecedent Manipulated Dependent Variable (DV) Criterion Presumed effect Response Predicted to…. Consequence Measured outcome Exhibit 2-4 presents the commonly used synonyms for independent and dependent variables. An independent variable is the variable manipulated by the researcher to cause an effect on the dependent variable. The dependent variable is the variable expected to be affected by the manipulation of an independent variable.

Moderating Variables (MV) The switch to commission from a salary compensation system (IV) will lead to increased sales productivity (DV) per worker, especially among younger workers (MV). The loss of mining jobs (IV) leads to acceptance of higher-risk behaviors to earn a family-supporting income (DV) – particularly among those with a limited education (MV). Moderating variables are variables that are believed to have a significant contributory or contingent effect on the originally stated IV-DV relationship. Whether a variable is treated as an independent or as a moderating variable depends on the hypothesis. Examples of moderating variables are shown in the slide.

Extraneous Variables (EV) With new customers (EV-control), a switch to commission from a salary compensation system (IV) will lead to increased sales productivity (DV) per worker, especially among younger workers (MV). Among residents with less than a high school education (EV-control), the loss of jobs (IV) leads to high-risk behaviors (DV), especially due to the proximity of the firing range (MV). Extraneous variables are variables that could conceivably affect a given relationship. Some can be treated as independent or moderating variables or assumed or excluded from the study. If an extraneous variable might confound the study, the extraneous variable may be introduced as a control variable to help interpret the relationship between variables. Examples are given in the slide.

Intervening Variables (IVV) The switch to a commission compensation system (IV) will lead to higher sales productivity (DV) by increasing overall compensation (IVV). A promotion campaign (IV) will increase savings activity (DV), especially when free prizes are offered (MV), but chiefly among smaller savers (EV-control). The results come from enhancing the motivation to save (IVV). An intervening variable is a factor that affects the observed phenomenon but cannot be measured or manipulated. It is a conceptual mechanism through which the IV and MV might affect the DV.

Propositions and Hypotheses Brand Manager Jones (case) has a higher-than-average achievement motivation (variable). Brand managers in Company Z (cases) have a higher-than-average achievement motivation (variable). Generalization A proposition is a statement about observable phenomena that may be judged as true or false. A hypothesis is a proposition formulated for empirical testing. A case is the entity or thing the hypothesis talks about. When the hypothesis is based on more than one case, it would be a generalization. Examples are provided in the slide.

Hypothesis Formats Descriptive In Detroit, our potato chip market share stands at 13.7%. American cities are experiencing budget difficulties. Research Question What is the market share for our potato chips in Detroit? Are American cities experiencing budget difficulties? A descriptive hypothesis is a statement about the existence, size, form, or distribution of a variable. Researchers often use a research question rather than a descriptive hypothesis. Examples are provided in the slide. Either format is acceptable, but the descriptive hypothesis has three advantages over the research question. Descriptive hypotheses encourage researchers to crystallize their thinking about the likely relationships. Descriptive hypotheses encourage researchers to think about the implications of a supported or rejected finding. Descriptive hypotheses are useful for testing statistical significance.

Relational Hypotheses Correlational Young women (under 35) purchase fewer units of our product than women who are older than 35. The number of suits sold varies directly with the level of the business cycle. Causal An increase in family income leads to an increase in the percentage of income saved. Loyalty to a grocery store increases the probability of purchasing that store’s private brand products. A relational hypothesis is a statement about the relationship between two variables with respect to some case. Relational hypotheses may be correlational or explanatory (causal). A correlational hypothesis is a statement indicating that variables occur together in some specified manner without implying that one causes the other. A causal hypothesis is a statement that describes a relationship between two variables in which one variable leads to a specified effect on the other variable.

The Role of Hypotheses Guide the direction of the study Identify relevant facts Suggest most appropriate research design Provide framework for organizing resulting conclusions This slide presents the functions served by hypotheses.

Characteristics of Strong Hypotheses Adequate A Strong Hypothesis Is Testable The conditions for developing a strong hypothesis are more fully developed in Exhibit 2-5. Better than rivals

Exhibit 2-6 Theory of the Product Life Cycle What is the difference between theories and hypotheses? Theories tend to be complex, abstract, and involve multiple variables. Hypotheses tend to be simple, limited-variable statements involving concrete instances. A theory is a set of systematically interrelated concepts, definitions, and propositions that are advanced to explain or predict phenomena. To the degree that our theories are sound and fit the situation, we are successful in our explanations and predictions. The product life cycle, shown in Exhibit 2-6, is an example of a theory.

Exhibit 2-7 A Distribution Network Model A model is a representation of a system constructed to study some aspect of that system or the system as a whole. Models versus Theories a model’s role is to represent or describe A theory’s role is to explain. Models in business research may be descriptive, predictive, and normative. Descriptive models are used for complex systems because they allow for the visualization of numerous variables and relationships. Predictive models forecast future events and facilitate business planning. Normative models are used for control, because they indicate necessary actions. Exhibit 2-7, shown in the slide, is a distribution network model called a maximum flow model used in management science. In this example, a European manufacturer of automobiles needs an increased flow of shipping to its Los Angeles distribution center to meet demand. However the primary distribution channel is saturated and alternatives must be sought. Models allow researchers to specify hypotheses that characterize present or future conditions: the effect of advertising on consumer awareness or intention to purchase, brand switching behavior, an employee training program, or other aspects of business.

Exhibit 2-8 The Role of Reasoning Business models are developed through the use of inductive and deductive reasoning. As illustrated in Exhibit 2-8, a business model may originate from empirical observations about market behavior based on researched facts and relationships among variables. Inductive reasoning allows the modeler to draw conclusions from the facts or evidence in planning the dynamics of the model. The modeler may also use existing theory, managerial experience or judgment, or facts.

Live and Learn Source: Cooper R. D. & Schindler, S. P. (2006). Business Research Methods 9e. McGraw.Hill