Where We Began – Summer 2013 Campus Strategic Plan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GenChem ABOR Learner-Centered Education 2009 General Chemistry Redesign Department of Chemistry University of Arizona.
Advertisements

Supplemental Instruction in Precalculus
I nteractive G uided N on-Traditional I ndividualized T echnology – Based E ducation.
College Algebra Course Redesign Southeast Missouri State University.
Learning and Teaching Conference 2012 Skill integration for students through in-class feedback and continuous assessment. Konstantinos Dimopoulos City.
Academic Warning B Status Standing Workshop What is Academic Warning? How did I get here? How do I get off Academic Warning? The Center For Educational.
Freshman Intensive Studies "A Unique Freshman Experience for Motivated Students!" Information Session Information Session
A mathematics support program for first year engineering students 1 School of Mathematics and Physics The University of Queensland 23 June 2014.
Welcome to the MiraCosta College Adult High School Orientation.
END OF COURSE TESTING WHAT YOU CAN EXPECT Freshman Parent Information Session
Redesign of Beginning and Intermediate Algebra using ALEKS Lessons Learned Cheryl J. McAllister Laurie W. Overmann Southeast Missouri State University.
What is a transcript? What are credits? How do I check my grades? Where can I get help with classes? How should I prepare for final exams? What does success.
Tammy Muhs General Education Program Mathematics Coordinator University of Central Florida NCAT Redesign Scholar Course Redesign: A Way To Improve Student.
What is Academic Warning? How did I get here? How do I get off Academic Warning? The Center For Educational and Retention Counseling Presents Academic.
Implementing Active Learning Strategies in a Large Class Setting Travis White, Pharm.D., Assistant Professor Kristy Lucas, Pharm.D., Professor Pharmacy.
A STEP to Grow in Science-Engineering-Mathematics Undergraduate Degrees Kandethody Ramachandran a (PI), Catherine Bénéteau a, Scott Campbell b, Gordon.
A Supplemental Instruction Model for Precalculus Gabriela Schwab El Paso Community College Helmut Knaust Emil Schwab The University of Texas at El Paso.
Redesign of Beginning and Intermediate Algebra Lessons Learned Cheryl J. McAllister Laurie W. Overmann Pradeep Singh Southeast Missouri State University.
Operation STEM Cleveland State University February 22, 2014.
Hybrid Courses: Some Random Thoughts on Expectations and Outcomes Martha Goshaw Seminole State College of Florida November 12, 2009.
Modes of Integration: 1) Enhancing with projects and assignments within a science course 2) Adding online support for math topics 3) Adding a credit of.
The Redesigned Elements of Statistics Course University of West Florida March 2008.
Professionally Speaking : Qualitative Research and the Professions. Using action research to gauge the quality of feedback given to student teachers while.
Student Preferences For Learning College Algebra in a Web Enhanced Environment Dr. Laura J. Pyzdrowski, Pre-Collegiate Mathematics Coordinator Institute.
Dean of Students Office Academic Success Center Overview of Services.
Interactivity and Intervention An Overview of Calculus Redesign at Missouri S&T.
Annual Enrollment: 2200 Sections: 71 Section Size: 30 (24 at centers) Fully Implemented in Fall 2009 SMART Math Jackson State Community.
Annual Enrollment: 2200 Sections: 71 Section Size: 30 (24 at centers) Fully Implemented in Fall 2009 SMART Math Jackson State Community.
Last Updated 9/15/2008.  Fall 2007 and Spring 2008.
WHAT DOES SUCCESS MEAN TO ME? Think of three things that would make you feel successful on the last day of high school? What actions are needed to make.
REMEDIAL MATH Everything you need to know about placing into NSC’s Foundational Math Program.
Freshman Intensive Studies "A Unique Freshman Experience for Motivated Students!" Information Session Information Session Winter
Supplemental Instruction (SI) Spring 2016 Faculty Orientation January 13, :30-12:00 B-8.
Learning Objectives By the end of this session you… MUST: have pretended to enjoy it. SHOULD: have stayed awake. COULD: even have got a couple of ideas.
Florida State University
Stacey K. Vargas VMI Department of Physics and Astronomy
Statement of Teaching Philosophy and Practice
February 7-9, 2017 Lakeway, Texas
Phase Gate 4 CREATING A PRE-ALGEBRA COURSE Samantha Haas –DoCI – STEM.
FOUNDATIONAL STUDIES Foundational Studies
Marla M. Bell Associate Dean of Student Success
Online Course Design: Is the Conversation Over?
Effects of Inquiry Based Learning on an Undergraduate Precalculus Class Jessica Wilson.
Bridge to success in Math Program
Welcome to Milton Future class of 2020.
Academic Success Center
Pathways to Learning in Undergraduate Statistics
Riverside City College Overview
Presenter: Kimberly Kinder
A Journey Towards Specifications Grading
Fall 2014 Undergraduate National Webinar
Computing in the Classroom and best practices to improve gender diversity equity: Professional development for adjunct faculty Professor Younge’s Experience.
Developmental Mathematics
Provost’s Hybrid Pilot
A Unique Modular Approach
Starfish Faculty Training How to Raise Flags and Kudos
Achieving mile high success through virtual tutoring and instruction
“Backwards Revision”: Using Revision to Introduce Important Concepts
Saddleback College Finding your way off of Academic/Progress Probation
County College of Morris – Educational Opportunity Fund Program
The University of Idaho Mathematics Redesign
MML R2R LSU Precalculus Redesign October 2003 – May 2006 Phoebe Rouse
Scholastic Aptitude Test
Community/Habilitation Assistant Specialist
GT Parent Meeting October 16, 2017.
Impact of AB 705 and Guided Pathways on Part-Time Faculty
Split-Block Class Schedule at Yorktown High School
Small School Master Scheduling with Big School Aspirations
ACADEMIC SUCCESS CENTER
Riverside City College Overview
Presentation transcript:

Sometimes a Step Forward Requires a Step Sideways Barbara Wilkins, Paul N. Runnion

Where We Began – Summer 2013 Campus Strategic Plan Redesign high-volume courses through integration of new technology and modified teaching methods to enhance student learning Four-year target: Increase calculus success by 7% One of three funded strategic plan initiatives on campus

Historic Success Rates From Winter 2004 to Spring 2015: Calculus I: 68.35% pass rate Calculus II: 79.50% pass rate Calculus III: 74.05% pass rate

Does Calc I Success Predict Calc II Success? Calc II Grade A B C D F WD HR A in Calc I 75.25% 17.61% 4.81% 0.39% 0.78% 0.54% 0.62% B in Calc I 30.77% 38.28% 21.25% 3.29% 2.10% 2.18% 2.13% C in Calc I 5.77% 22.52% 36.84% 12.11% 9.53% 6.05% 7.18% Calc II Grade A B C D F WD HR A in Calc I 75.25% 17.61% 4.81% 0.39% 0.78% 0.54% 0.62% B in Calc I C in Calc I Calc II Grade A B C D F WD HR A in Calc I 75.25% 17.61% 4.81% 0.39% 0.78% 0.54% 0.62% B in Calc I 30.77% 38.28% 21.25% 3.29% 2.10% 2.18% 2.13% C in Calc I Calc II Grade A B C D F WD HR A in Calc I B in Calc I C in Calc I Grade in Calc I Calc II Pass Rate A 97.67% B 90.31% C 65.13% Grade in Calc I Calc II Pass Rate A 97.67% B 90.31% C Grade in Calc I Calc II Pass Rate A 97.67% B C Grade in Calc I Calc II Pass Rate A B C Since Spring 2004, students who pass Calc I have passed Calc II on the first try 82.65% of the time.

What About Unsuccessful Calc I Students? Second Attempt A B C D F WD HR First Attempt: D 2.70% 27.36% 42.00% 17.53% 8.09% 1.93% 0.39% First Attempt: F 0.62% 10.91% 24.90% 22.22% 32.92% 8.23% 0.20% First Attempt: WD 1.27% 8.90% 28.81% 14.83% 30.09% 13.98% 2.12% First Attempt: HR 1.23% 8.59% 34.36% 18.40% 24.54% 9.20% 3.68% Second Attempt A B C D F WD HR First Attempt: D 2.70% 27.36% 42.00% 17.53% 8.09% 1.93% 0.39% First Attempt: F 0.62% 10.91% 24.90% 22.22% 32.92% 8.23% 0.20% First Attempt: WD First Attempt: HR Second Attempt A B C D F WD HR First Attempt: D 2.70% 27.36% 42.00% 17.53% 8.09% 1.93% 0.39% First Attempt: F 0.62% 10.91% 24.90% 22.22% 32.92% 8.23% 0.20% First Attempt: WD 1.27% 8.90% 28.81% 14.83% 30.09% 13.98% 2.12% First Attempt: HR Second Attempt A B C D F WD HR First Attempt: D 2.70% 27.36% 42.00% 17.53% 8.09% 1.93% 0.39% First Attempt: F First Attempt: WD First Attempt: HR Second Attempt A B C D F WD HR First Attempt: D First Attempt: F First Attempt: WD First Attempt: HR First Attempt Pass Rate on Second Attempt D 72.06% F 36.42% WD 38.98% HR 44.17% First Attempt Pass Rate on Second Attempt D 72.06% F 36.42% WD 38.98% HR First Attempt Pass Rate on Second Attempt D 72.06% F WD HR First Attempt Pass Rate on Second Attempt D F WD HR First Attempt Pass Rate on Second Attempt D 72.06% F 36.42% WD HR

Can Underperforming Calc I Students Be Identified Early? Fall 2013 A, B, C after E2 D after E2 F after E2 Total Total Students 364 49 55 468 Passed (A, B, C) Failed (D, F) Withdrew Fall 2013 A, B, C after E2 D after E2 F after E2 Total Total Students 364 49 55 468 Passed (A, B, C) 299 4 303 Failed (D, F) 63 33 31 127 Withdrew Fall 2013 A, B, C after E2 D after E2 F after E2 Total Total Students 364 49 55 468 Passed (A, B, C) 299 4 303 Failed (D, F) 63 33 31 127 Withdrew 2 12 24 38 Fall 2013 A, B, C after E2 D after E2 F after E2 Total Total Students 364 49 55 468 Passed (A, B, C) 299 4 303 Failed (D, F) Withdrew Fall 2014 A, B, C after E2 D after E2 F after E2 Total Total Students 342 35 51 428 Passed (A, B, C) 292 3 2 297 Failed (D, F) 48 32 36 116 Withdrew 13 15 Fall 2014 A, B, C after E2 D after E2 F after E2 Total Total Students 342 35 51 428 Passed (A, B, C) 292 3 2 297 Failed (D, F) 48 32 36 116 Withdrew Fall 2014 A, B, C after E2 D after E2 F after E2 Total Total Students 342 35 51 428 Passed (A, B, C) 292 3 2 297 Failed (D, F) Withdrew Fall 2014 A, B, C after E2 D after E2 F after E2 Total Total Students 342 35 51 428 Passed (A, B, C) Failed (D, F) Withdrew

Success for Calculus 4 credit hour course (3 lecture, 1 lab) Same as Math 1214 Course Description: This course focuses on the use of college algebra and trigonometry skills within the context of calculus, providing students with the opportunity to improve their preparedness for future calculus coursework.

Success for Calculus Only offered pass/fail Begins at the end of Week 8 Meets at the same times as Calculus I lectures Fall 2015: 4 sections Spring 2016: 3 sections Blended course

Success for Calculus Calculus I students with a grade below 65% after Exam 2 who have participated in Calc I are strongly encouraged (but not required) to take the success course. Replaces Calculus I on schedule and transcript. Students are only allowed to take Success for Calculus one time, regardless of outcome. Successful completion is not prerequisite to retaking Calculus I

Student Success Activities Goal-Setting (collaboration with the Student Success Center) Diet and Exercise Activity Test Anxiety (collaboration with Counseling, Disability Support, and Student Wellness)

Feedback from Students Goal-Setting Activity: “During my Student Success Center session, my mentor suggested that I write a very specific goal for an upcoming test. He particularly wanted me to set a realistic letter grade to aim for and how to achieve it. This made me nervous because I’m afraid of setting expectations for myself; I’m afraid of disappointing myself.”

Feedback from Students Test Anxiety Workshop: “I learned to face my anxiety and to address the problem rather than worry about it approaching and bringing me down each time. This presentation helped me and I am grateful. This semester, I realized what this school is all about.”

Feedback from Students Test Anxiety Workshop: “I learned three things that contribute to my test anxiety: expectations, negativity, and lack of preparation. These three variables all relate to reasons to why I get so nervous about taking tests. By taking the time to reflect on them, I can find reasons as to why I feel that way and how I can eliminate them and better prepare myself for tests.”

Feedback from Students Test Anxiety Workshop: “Our visit with Stephanie Martensen gave me a much better idea of what it means to really let stress and anxiety get the best of you. It opened my eyes and made me realize how often I balance on the edge of letting anxiety get the best of me. I now also have ideas for how to remain on the right side of stress and still be able to do well in my classes.”

Feedback from Students Test Anxiety Workshop: “I think that the presentation was very beneficial because it not only allowed me to get a better understanding of what test anxiety is and how it affects you, but also because it helped me realize some of my own negative attitudes and how I can help deal with them.”

Feedback from Students Diet and Exercise Activity: “One of the main things I want to focus on is being able to manage my time well enough to work out more. When I am able to get a quick run or even walk in, I am able to reduce stress.”

Feedback from Students Diet and Exercise Activity: “Downloading the app to track my calories, and the pedometer together made me make decisions ‘just because.’ I got out of class early and instead of waiting for the E-Bus to take me to Miner Village, I walked. I would have never have done that before. Maybe I would have thought it (because I have before) but I’ve always pushed it out of my mind. I actually did it. I chose NOT to grab seconds. Thank you.”

Feedback from Students Diet and Exercise Activity: “I'm trying to work on basically EVERYTHING. I need to excersize more, eat better, and get out more. I have been working on it already, but I am still lacking. The progress I have made however has managed to help rid myself of my near constant stomach pains.”

Lessons Learned We need more than one day per week of face-to-face contact with these students Will change beginning Fall 2016 High-stakes exams were counterproductive Will incorporate more frequent, shorter assessments in addition to exams Need to structure the course around the calculus topics, not the algebra/trig topics

Success for Calculus – Fall 2015 Calc I Before Midterm: 563 students Includes students from Math 1208 Stayed in Calc I: 423 students (75.1%) 80.4% of students staying in Calc I passed Switched to Success: 140 students (24.9%) S: 81 (57.9%) U: 55 (39.3%) WD: 4 (2.8%)

Some Preliminary Results Fall 2015 Success Cohort: 140 students (81 S, 55 U, 4 WD) Spring 2016 Status In Math 1214: 91 (62 S, 29 U) In Math 1208: 4 (3 S, 1 U) In Math 1212: 6 (3 S, 3 U) In Math 1140/1160: 1 (1 S) In Stat 1115: 1 (1 U) Enrolled, no math: 22 (9 S, 12 U, 1 WD) On Co-Op: 1 (1 U) Study Abroad: 1 (1 U) Not Enrolled: 13 (3 S, 7 U, 3 WD)

Some Preliminary Results – Exam 1 Cohort FS15 Count FS15 Exam 1 Average SP16 Count SP16 Exam 1 Average Whole Class 524 65.84% 458 72.26% FS15 Success (S) 82 55.96% FS15 Success (S) Retaking in SP16 62 56.32% 76.61% FS15 Success (U) 55 51.09% FS15 Success (U) Retaking in SP16 29 51.75% 67.86% FS15 1214 (D) Retaking in SP16 19 62.94% 74.63% FS15 1214 (F) Retaking in SP16 10 59.36% 69.45% Cohort FS15 Count FS15 Exam 1 Average SP16 Count SP16 Exam 1 Average Whole Class 524 65.84% 458 72.26% FS15 Success (S) 82 55.96% FS15 Success (S) Retaking in SP16 62 56.32% 76.61% FS15 Success (U) 55 51.09% FS15 Success (U) Retaking in SP16 29 51.75% 67.86% FS15 1214 (D) Retaking in SP16 19 62.94% 74.63% FS15 1214 (F) Retaking in SP16 10 59.36% 69.45% Cohort FS15 Count FS15 Exam 1 Average SP16 Count SP16 Exam 1 Average Whole Class 528 65.64% 458 72.26% FS15 Success (S) 81 55.74% FS15 Success (S) Retaking in SP16 62 56.32% 76.61% FS15 Success (U) 55 51.09% FS15 Success (U) Retaking in SP16 29 51.75% 67.86% FS15 1214 (D) Retaking in SP16 19 62.94% 74.63% FS15 1214 (F) Retaking in SP16 10 59.36% 69.45% Cohort FS15 Count FS15 Exam 1 Average SP16 Count SP16 Exam 1 Average Whole Class 524 65.84% 458 72.26% FS15 Success (S) 82 55.96% FS15 Success (S) Retaking in SP16 62 56.32% 76.61% FS15 Success (U) 55 51.09% FS15 Success (U) Retaking in SP16 29 51.75% 67.86% FS15 1214 (D) Retaking in SP16 19 62.94% 74.63% FS15 1214 (F) Retaking in SP16 10 59.36% 69.45% Cohort FS15 Count FS15 Exam 1 Average SP16 Count SP16 Exam 1 Average Whole Class 524 65.84% 458 72.26% FS15 Success (S) 82 55.96% FS15 Success (S) Retaking in SP16 62 56.32% 76.61% FS15 Success (U) 55 51.09% FS15 Success (U) Retaking in SP16 29 51.75% 67.86% FS15 1214 (D) Retaking in SP16 19 62.94% 74.63% FS15 1214 (F) Retaking in SP16 10 59.36% 69.45% Cohort FS15 Count FS15 Exam 1 Average SP16 Count SP16 Exam 1 Average Whole Class 524 65.84% 458 72.26% FS15 Success (S) 82 55.96% FS15 Success (S) Retaking in SP16 62 56.32% 76.61% FS15 Success (U) 55 51.09% FS15 Success (U) Retaking in SP16 29 51.75% 67.86% FS15 1214 (D) Retaking in SP16 19 62.94% 74.63% FS15 1214 (F) Retaking in SP16 10 59.36% 69.45% Cohort FS15 Count FS15 Exam 1 Average SP16 Count SP16 Exam 1 Average Whole Class 524 65.84% 458 72.26% FS15 Success (S) 82 55.96% FS15 Success (S) Retaking in SP16 62 56.32% 76.61% FS15 Success (U) 55 51.09% FS15 Success (U) Retaking in SP16 29 51.75% 67.86% FS15 1214 (D) Retaking in SP16 19 62.94% 74.63% FS15 1214 (F) Retaking in SP16 10 59.36% 69.45% Cohort FS15 Count FS15 Exam 1 Average SP16 Count SP16 Exam 1 Average Whole Class 524 65.84% 458 72.26% FS15 Success (S) 82 55.96% FS15 Success (S) Retaking in SP16 62 56.32% 76.61% FS15 Success (U) 55 51.09% FS15 Success (U) Retaking in SP16 29 51.75% 67.86% FS15 1214 (D) Retaking in SP16 19 62.94% 74.63% FS15 1214 (F) Retaking in SP16 10 59.36% 69.45%

Some Preliminary Results – Exam 2 Cohort FS15 Count FS15 Exam 2 Average SP16 Count SP16 Exam 2 Average Whole Class 518 65.69% 449 69.07% FS15 Success (S) 80 48.90% FS15 Success (S) Retaking in SP16 60 49.51% 77.21% FS15 Success (U) 53 42.25% FS15 Success (U) Retaking in SP16 28 44.46% 29 59.13% FS15 1214 (D) Retaking in SP16 19 63.31% 72.47% FS15 1214 (F) Retaking in SP16 11 52.90% 66.81% Cohort FS15 Count FS15 Exam 2 Average SP16 Count SP16 Exam 2 Average Whole Class 518 65.69% 449 69.07% FS15 Success (S) 80 48.90% FS15 Success (S) Retaking in SP16 60 49.51% 77.21% FS15 Success (U) 53 42.25% FS15 Success (U) Retaking in SP16 28 44.46% 29 59.13% FS15 1214 (D) Retaking in SP16 19 63.31% 72.47% FS15 1214 (F) Retaking in SP16 11 52.90% 66.81% Cohort FS15 Count FS15 Exam 2 Average SP16 Count SP16 Exam 2 Average Whole Class 518 65.69% 449 69.07% FS15 Success (S) 80 48.90% FS15 Success (S) Retaking in SP16 60 49.51% 77.21% FS15 Success (U) 53 42.25% FS15 Success (U) Retaking in SP16 28 44.46% 29 59.13% FS15 1214 (D) Retaking in SP16 19 63.31% 72.47% FS15 1214 (F) Retaking in SP16 11 52.90% 66.81% Cohort FS15 Count FS15 Exam 2 Average SP16 Count SP16 Exam 2 Average Whole Class 518 65.69% 449 69.07% FS15 Success (S) 80 48.90% FS15 Success (S) Retaking in SP16 60 49.51% 77.21% FS15 Success (U) 53 42.25% FS15 Success (U) Retaking in SP16 28 44.46% 29 59.13% FS15 1214 (D) Retaking in SP16 19 63.31% 72.47% FS15 1214 (F) Retaking in SP16 11 52.90% 66.81% Cohort FS15 Count FS15 Exam 2 Average SP16 Count SP16 Exam 2 Average Whole Class 518 65.69% 449 69.07% FS15 Success (S) 80 48.90% FS15 Success (S) Retaking in SP16 60 49.51% 77.21% FS15 Success (U) 53 42.25% FS15 Success (U) Retaking in SP16 28 44.46% 29 59.13% FS15 1214 (D) Retaking in SP16 19 63.31% 72.47% FS15 1214 (F) Retaking in SP16 11 52.90% 66.81% Cohort FS15 Count FS15 Exam 2 Average SP16 Count SP16 Exam 2 Average Whole Class 518 65.69% 449 69.07% FS15 Success (S) 80 48.90% FS15 Success (S) Retaking in SP16 60 49.51% 77.21% FS15 Success (U) 53 42.25% FS15 Success (U) Retaking in SP16 28 44.46% 29 59.13% FS15 1214 (D) Retaking in SP16 19 63.31% 72.47% FS15 1214 (F) Retaking in SP16 11 52.90% 66.81% Cohort FS15 Count FS15 Exam 2 Average SP16 Count SP16 Exam 2 Average Whole Class 518 65.69% 449 69.07% FS15 Success (S) 80 48.90% FS15 Success (S) Retaking in SP16 60 49.51% 77.21% FS15 Success (U) 53 42.25% FS15 Success (U) Retaking in SP16 28 44.46% 29 59.13% FS15 1214 (D) Retaking in SP16 19 63.31% 72.47% FS15 1214 (F) Retaking in SP16 11 52.90% 66.81% Cohort FS15 Count FS15 Exam 2 Average SP16 Count SP16 Exam 2 Average Whole Class 518 65.69% 449 69.07% FS15 Success (S) 80 48.90% FS15 Success (S) Retaking in SP16 60 49.51% 77.21% FS15 Success (U) 53 42.25% FS15 Success (U) Retaking in SP16 28 44.46% 29 59.13% FS15 1214 (D) Retaking in SP16 19 63.31% 72.47% FS15 1214 (F) Retaking in SP16 11 52.90% 66.81%

How Often do Students Repeat Courses? Attempts including HR/WD 1103 1120 1140 1160 1208 1214 1215 1221 2222 3304 1212 1 1085 1971 3393 5048 6922 7809 6464 6324 521 2 127 541 59 623 1109 805 1024 728 45 3 20 71 5 117 231 180 142 4 12 10 44 35 52 37 14 7 9 8 6 11 12+ Attempts including HR/WD 1103 1120 1140 1160 1208 1214 1215 1221 2222 3304 1212 1 1085 1971 3393 5048 6922 7809 6464 6324 521 2 127 541 59 623 1109 805 1024 728 45 3 20 71 5 117 231 180 142 4 12 10 44 35 52 37 14 7 9 8 6 11 12+ Attempts including HR/WD 1103 1120 1140 1160 1208 1214 1215 1221 2222 3304 1212 1 1085 1971 3393 5048 6922 7809 6464 6324 521 2 127 541 59 623 1109 805 1024 728 45 3 20 71 5 117 231 180 142 4 12 10 44 35 52 37 14 7 9 8 6 11 12+ Attempts including HR/WD 1103 1120 1140 1160 1208 1214 1215 1221 2222 3304 1212 1 1085 1971 3393 5048 6922 7809 6464 6324 521 2 127 541 59 623 1109 805 1024 728 45 3 20 71 5 117 231 180 142 4 12 10 44 35 52 37 14 7 9 8 6 11 12+ Attempts including HR/WD 1103 1120 1140 1160 1208 1214 1215 1221 2222 3304 1212 1 1085 1971 3393 5048 6922 7809 6464 6324 521 2 127 541 59 623 1109 805 1024 728 45 3 20 71 5 117 231 180 142 4 12 10 44 35 52 37 14 7 9 8 6 11 12+ Attempts including HR/WD 1103 1120 1140 1160 1208 1214 1215 1221 2222 3304 1212 1 1085 1971 3393 5048 6922 7809 6464 6324 521 2 127 541 59 623 1109 805 1024 728 45 3 20 71 5 117 231 180 142 4 12 10 44 35 52 37 14 7 9 8 6 00 11 12+ Attempts including HR/WD 1103 1120 1140 1160 1208 1214 1215 1221 2222 3304 1212 1 1085 1971 3393 5048 6922 7809 6464 6324 521 2 127 541 59 623 1109 805 1024 728 45 3 20 71 5 117 231 180 142 4 12 10 44 35 52 37 14 7 9 8 6 11 12+ Attempts including HR/WD 1103 1120 1140 1160 1208 1214 1215 1221 2222 3304 1212 1 1085 1971 3393 5048 6922 7809 6464 6324 521 2 127 541 59 623 1109 805 1024 728 45 3 20 71 5 117 231 180 142 4 12 10 44 35 52 37 14 7 9 8 6 11 12+ Attempts including HR/WD 1103 1120 1140 1160 1208 1214 1215 1221 2222 3304 1212 1 1085 1971 3393 5048 6922 7809 6464 6324 521 2 127 541 59 623 1109 805 1024 728 45 3 20 71 5 117 231 180 142 4 12 10 44 35 52 37 14 7 9 8 6 11 12+ Attempts including HR/WD 1103 1120 1140 1160 1208 1214 1215 1221 2222 3304 1212 1 1085 1971 3393 5048 6922 7809 6464 6324 521 2 127 541 59 623 1109 805 1024 728 45 3 20 71 5 117 231 180 142 4 12 10 44 35 52 37 14 7 9 8 6 11 12+ Attempts including HR/WD 1103 1120 1140 1160 1208 1214 1215 1221 2222 3304 1212 1 1085 1971 3393 5048 6922 7809 6464 6324 521 2 127 541 59 623 1109 805 1024 728 45 3 20 71 5 117 231 180 142 4 12 10 44 35 52 37 14 7 9 8 6 11 12+ Attempts including HR/WD 1103 1120 1140 1160 1208 1214 1215 1221 2222 3304 1212 1 1085 1971 3393 5048 6922 7809 6464 6324 521 2 127 541 59 623 1109 805 1024 728 45 3 20 71 5 117 231 180 142 4 12 10 44 35 52 37 14 7 9 8 6 11 12+ Attempts including HR/WD 1103 1120 1140 1160 1208 1214 1215 1221 2222 3304 1212 1 1085 1971 3393 5048 6922 7809 6464 6324 521 2 127 541 59 623 1109 805 1024 728 45 3 20 71 5 117 231 180 142 4 12 10 44 35 52 37 14 7 9 8 6 11 12+

Redesign Team Paul Runnion Stephanie Fitch Robert Roe Barbara Wilkins

Any Questions? Barbara Wilkins bwilkins@mst.edu Paul N. Runnion Instructional Designer Educational Technology Missouri University of Science and Technology bwilkins@mst.edu Paul N. Runnion Assistant Teaching Professor Department of Mathematics and Statistics Missouri University of Science and Technology prunnion@mst.edu