S4 Online Inspiral Search

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

S3/S4 BBH report Thomas Cokelaer LSC Meeting, Boston, 3-4 June 2006.

Advertisements

A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.

For the Collaboration GWDAW 2005 Status of inspiral search in C6 and C7 Virgo data Frédérique MARION.

11/12/2003LIGO Document G Z1 Data reduction for S3 I Leonor (UOregon), P Charlton (CIT), S Anderson (CIT), K Bayer (MIT), M Foster (PSU), S Grunewald.

LIGO-G v2 Recovering Burst Injections in LIGO S5 Data Alex Cole Data Analysis Meeting May 6, 2014.

GWDAW /12/16 - G Z1 Report on the First Search for BBH Inspiral Signals on the S2 LIGO Data Eirini Messaritaki University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

GEO02 February GEO Binary Inspiral Search Analysis.

LIGO-G E ITR 2003 DMT Sub-Project John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Argonne, May 10, 2004.

Detector Characterization in GEO 600 by Alicia M. Sintes-Olives on behalf of the GEO-DC team Universitat de les Illes Balears

Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis

Patrick R Brady University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

G Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration Grid Patrick Brady University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee LIGO Scientific Collaboration.

G Z LSC Meeting 3/22/ ASIS Closeout Bruce Allen, UWM.

Data Characterization in Gravitational Waves Soma Mukherjee Max Planck Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik Golm, Germany. Talk at University of Texas, Brownsville.

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M ITR 2003 DMT Sub-Project John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.

Adapting matched filtering searches for compact binary inspirals in LSC detector data. Chad Hanna – For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.

LIGO Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration -- UWM 1 LSC Data Analysis Alan G. Wiseman (LSC Software Coordinator) LIGO Scientific Collaboration.

Data Quality Vetoes in LIGO S5 Searches for Gravitational Wave Transients Laura Cadonati (MIT) For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.

Status of Standalone Inspiral Code Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee LIGO Scientific Collaboration Inspiral Working Group LIGO-G Z.

The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.

Glitch Group S5 Activities Laura Cadonati for the Glitch Working Group LSC meeting, Hanford March 21, 2006 G Z.

Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS

LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)

Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW 11 Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW Dec 2006 Leone.

LIGO-G E LIGO Scientific Collaboration Data Grid Status Albert Lazzarini Caltech LIGO Laboratory Trillium Steering Committee Meeting 20 May 2004.

A Waveform Consistency Test for Binary Inspirals using LIGO data LSC Inspiral Analysis Working Group LIGO-G Z LSC Meeting Andres C. Rodriguez.

15 Dec 2005GWDAW 10 LIGO-G Z1 Overview of LIGO Scientific Collaboration Inspiral Searches Alexander Dietz Louisiana State University for the LIGO.

Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.

S5 BNS Inspiral Update Duncan Brown Caltech LIGO-G Z.

1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.

1 Planning notes from August 2005 Burst Group Face-to-Face Meeting LHO, August 18, 2005 Peter Shawhan, scribe LIGO-G Z.

May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.

LIGO-G W Use of Condor by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.

First Year S5 Low Mass Compact Binary Coalescences Drew Keppel 1 representing the LIGO/VIRGO Compact Binary Coalescence Group 1 California Institute of.

LIGO-G E PAC9 Meeting LIGO Laboratory at Caltech 1 The LIGO I Science Run Data & Computing Group Operations Plan 9 th Meeting of the.

LIGO-G Z1 Using Condor for Large Scale Data Analysis within the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Duncan Brown California Institute of Technology.

LIGO: The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory Sarah Caudill Louisiana State University Physics Graduate Student LIGO Hanford LIGO Livingston.

S5 First Epoch BNS Inspiral Results Drew Keppel 1 representing the Inspiral Group 1 California Institute of Technology Nov LSC Meeting MIT, 4 November.

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.

November, 2009 STAC - Data Analysis Report 1 Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi Università di Urbino and INFN Firenze for the Virgo Collaboration.

1 InspiralMon Duncan Brown California Institute of Technology LIGO-G Z.

LIGO-G Z Introduction to QScan Shourov K. Chatterji SciMon Camp LIGO Livingston Observatory 2006 August 18.

SEARCH FOR INSPIRALING BINARIES S. V. Dhurandhar IUCAA Pune, India.

LSC Meeting, June 3, 2006 LIGO-G Z 1 Status of inspiral search reviews Alan Weinstein (LIGO Laboratory / Caltech) For the LSC Internal review.

LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.

24 th Pacific Coast Gravity Meeting, Santa Barbara LIGO DCC Number: G Z 1 Search for gravitational waves from inspiraling high-mass (non-spinning)

1 8 th E. Amaldi Conference, New York City, June, 2009 Anand Sengupta California Institute of Technology on behalf of the LSC and Virgo Collaborations.

Search for gravitational waves from binary inspirals in S3 and S4 LIGO data. Thomas Cokelaer on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.

Search for compact binary systems in LIGO data Thomas Cokelaer On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. LIGO-G Z.

GEO600 Data Analysis Status

Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi

SC03 failed results delayed FDS: parameter space searches

Brennan Hughey MIT Kavli Institute Postdoc Symposium

S3 Spinning Binary Black Hole Search: Status Report

Bounding the strength of gravitational radiation from Sco-X1

S5 First Epoch BNS & BBH Inspiral Update

Inspiral Analysis Group Results

LIGO Scientific Collaboration meeting

Bounding the strength of gravitational radiation from Sco-X1

On Behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and VIRGO

S3 Glitch Updates Laura Cadonati

S2/S3 calibration Gabriela González, Louisiana State University Plus

S2 Inspiral Hardware Injections

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Towards the first coherent multi-ifo search for NS binaries in LIGO

OK Alexander Dietz Louisiana State University

ورود اطلاعات بصورت غيربرخط

M Ashley - LSC Meeting – LIGO Hanford, 12 Nov 2003

A Waveform Consistency Test for Binary Inspirals using LIGO data

Presentation transcript:

S4 Online Inspiral Search Duncan Brown California Institute of Technology

Goals for Online Running in S4 Produce online “level 0” triggers for detector characterization and astrophysical follow up Use same codes as for offline analysis Test the Condor based online analysis system (onasys) Make resulting triggers easily available for follow up

Analysis being run online Running on DARM_ERR with  =  = 1 50 Hz low frequency cutoff 2PN stationary phase templates Template bank from 0.9 to 5.0 Msun at 97% match No 2 veto applied online (will be applied after coincidence)

Results Gaby and Alex have been following up top 10 loudest http://www.phys.lsu.edu/faculty/gonzalez/S4BNStriggers/H1/ http://www.lsc-group.phys.uwm.edu/cgi- bin/enote.pl?nb=iags4detchar&action=view&page=3 InspiralMon displaying results in control room Several hardware injections have been followed up The rest will follow shortly Triggers are ready for coincidence analysis Although re-run will re-run with correctly calibrated data

What’s Next? Publish trigger files into LDR for replication to CIT and other tier 2 centers (UWM, LSC, etc.) Onasysd at non-observatory site running coincidence and veto follow up (S3/4/… pipeline) Onasysd running in European tier 2 center for GEO More automation of detector characterization Keep things running between now and S5