KANSAS SB 123 Drug Possession Sentencing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March
Advertisements

Budget Recap Northside ISD as of 8/13/2010.
Algebra Recap Solve the following equations (i) 3x + 7 = x (ii) 3x + 1 = 5x – 13 (iii) 3(5x – 2) = 4(3x + 6) (iv) 3(2x + 1) = 2x + 11 (v) 2(x + 2)
“Justice Reinvestment through Policy Analysis in South Carolina” South Carolina State Senator Gerald Malloy 1.
Confidence Rating of Marine Eutrophication Assessments Ciarán Murray, DHI CONFIRM Workshop, Copenhagen 6 th March 2009.
1 Financial Mathematics Clicker review session, Midterm 01.
1 Financial Mathematics Clicker review session, Final.
1 Financial Mathematics Clicker review session, Midterm 01.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
Evaluation II Outcomes Cost benefit & effectiveness.
Punishment & Sentencing Amy Getsch Crime and Justice.
Commission on Criminal Justice and Sentencing Reform : System-wide Criminal Justice Spending June 3, 2015.
Economic and Social equality: oil and gas TACOSODE Theofrida Kapinga and Theophilus Mlaki.
Drug Offender Reform Act Smarter Sentencing + Smarter Treatment = Better Outcomes and Safer Neighborhoods.
1 The MDOC Five Year Plan to Control Prison Growth Phase III: Long Term Policy Options SUMMARY BRIEF SUMMARY BRIEF Preliminary MDOC Proposal Revising Michigan’s.
Finance Department Presentation to the City of Houston Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee First Quarter Review General Fund Five Year Scenario and FY2012.
ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph Wendy Naro-Ware October2012.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Tennessee Economy and State Budget Outlook FISCAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF January 20, 2010.
8.1.4 Can it still be factored? Factoring Completely I can factor out a common factor.
Review of Guidelines Worksheet Structure – Data Analysis.
How Do We Learn What We Know about Crime? Class 1.
Using Decision Support Information to Improve System Performance Peter F. Luongo, Ph.D. March 20, 2008.
Exhibit 8.1 Number of Medicare Beneficiaries, Fiscal Years (a) Copyright 2011 by the Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives.
Project New Attitudes – Pinellas County Sheriffs Office Simple Cost Benefit Analysis in the Program Evaluation Process – The Political Nature/Solution.
Secondary prevention of a Recurrent ACS; Results from the 2004 & 2006 ACSIS Survey Perl L, Behar S, Schwartz R, Mosseri M Meir Hospital and Sheba Tel Hashomer,
Slide 1 Examining Kansas SB 123: Mandatory Probation and Treatment Don Stemen, Loyola University Chicago The Honorable Richard Smith, Kansas Sentencing.
SB678 Chief Mack Jenkins, San Diego This was created over the last 5 years through important legislation 2009: SB678 AB1 Pass 2010: AB1 Seed Money 2011:
Reclassifying Nonviolent, Small Quantity Possession Potential Impact on Alaska’s Budget and Society.
Performance Measurement Tool (PMT) What Data Tells Us About Current RSAT Programming Presented by: Jimmy Steyee New Orleans, LA July 17, 2015.
基 督 再 來 (一). 經文: 1 你們心裡不要憂愁;你們信神,也當信我。 2 在我父的家裡有許多住處;若是沒有,我就早 已告訴你們了。我去原是為你們預備地去 。 3 我 若去為你們預備了地方,就必再來接你們到我那 裡去,我在 那裡,叫你們也在那裡, ] ( 約 14 : 1-3)
COLLEGE ADMISSION TEST SCORES Student IDReadingWritingMathTotal S S S S S
North Carolina vs. United States Drug Schedules.  In NC, drugs are classified by “schedule” according to: ▪ Dangeousness ▪ Risk of Addiction  The charge.
ΟΡΓΑΝΩΣΗ ΚΑΙ ΔΙΟΙΚΗΣΗ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΣΕΩΝ 3 Ο ΜΑΘΗΜΑ. ΟΙ ΜΕΓΑΛΕΣ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΣΕΙΣ Η δημιουργία μεγάλων επιχειρήσεων είναι ένα από τα χαρακτηριστικά του 20 ου αιώνα.
Prison Population and Prison Closures in Pennsylvania
Summit County Probation Services
Warm Up What two ways can a committee kill a bill?
Workshop on the Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM Reform
The Perfect Marriage! Ephesians 5:21-33.
Low-risk drinking limits Categories of patient drinking
ФОНД ЗА РАЗВОЈ РЕПУБЛИКЕ СРБИЈЕ
Algebra 7 pence a 3 2 If the price of an apple is given as
1.
Management. Management What is a risk? A risk is simply a probability that some adverse circumstance will actually occur.
Monetary Policy.
Risk Assessment Matrix
Terminology (Budget) Deficit – spending more money in a year than is taken in (National) Debt – the accumulation of yearly deficits plus interest (Budget)
Sentence Writing Strategy: Simple & Compound
Слайд-дәріс Қарағанды мемлекеттік техникалық университеті
.. -"""--..J '. / /I/I =---=-- -, _ --, _ = :;:.
II //II // \ Others Q.
Как да кандидатстваме по НИФ
ОПЕРАТИВНА ПРОГРАМА “ИНОВАЦИИ И КОНКУРЕНТОСПОСОБНОСТ“ „Подобряване на производствения капацитет в МСП“
'III \-\- I ', I ,, - -
I1I1 a 1·1,.,.,,I.,,I · I 1··n I J,-·
Eliza Kurcevic, Ganna Dovbakh, Eurasian harm reduction Association
Index Notation Sunday, 24 February 2019.
German Drug and Addiction Policy
Bay Restoration Fund (SB 240/HB446)
Solving Equations 3x+7 –7 13 –7 =.
WHO Global HIV/AIDS Staff Meeting
Major Sources of Savings Compared with Projected Spending, Net Cumulative Reduction of National Health Expenditures, 2010–2020 Dollars in billions Public.
Example Make x the subject of the formula
Эмийн гаж нөлөөг бүртгэн мэдээлэх, ач холбогдол
,, 'III \-\-
. '. '. I;.,, - - "!' - -·-·,Ii '.....,,......, -,
Algebra 7 pence a 3 2 If the price of an apple is given as
RISK MANAGEMENT.
U A B II III I IV 94.
Presentation transcript:

KANSAS SB 123 Drug Possession Sentencing Prison Reduction  Fiscal Year Total Sentences Level 4 Drug Sentences (%) SB 123 Sentences Direct Revocation Total 2004 * 13,049 2,245 18.8 360 * 2.8 * 85 41 126 2005 13,517 2,764 20.4 1,105 8.2 115 128 243 2006 13,456 3,016 22.4 1,359 10.1 133 154 287 2007 12,646 2,932 23.2 1,261 10.0 151 144 295 2008 13,710 2,875 21.0 1,319 9.6 168 150 318 2009 13,401 2,555 19.1 1,166 8.7 124 127 251 2010 13,810 2,566 18.6 1,062 7.7 135 259 2011 14,003 2,527 18.0 1,072 142 162 304 Total 8 Years 107,592 21,691 20.2 8,704 8.1 1,053 1,030 2,083 *SB 123 Effective 11/1/2003

Prison Admission Reduction Fiscal Year Direct Prison Admission Reduction SB 123 Revocation to Prison Admission Reduction Total Prison 2004 85 41 127 2005 115 128 244 2006 133 154 287 2007 151 144 295 2008 168 150 317 2009 124 252 2010 135 259 2011 142 162 304

Fiscal Year SB 123 Expenditure Money Collected Actual SB123 Cost Prison Cost Avoidance Estimated Money Saved 2004 $ 998,467.75 $ 15,948.04 $ 982,519.71 $ 2,525,000.00 $ (1,542,480.29) 2005 $ 5,106,505.20 $ 150,224.27 $ 4,956,280.93 $ 6,150,000.00 $ (1,193,719.07) 2006 $ 7,861,395.40 $ 213,588.86 $ 7,647,806.54 $ 8,325,000.00 $ (677,193.46) 2007 $ 8,642,249.50 $ 202,853.89 $ 8,439,395.61 $ 8,875,000.00 $ (435,604.39) 2008 $ 8,640,578.25 $ 229,649.20 $ 8,410,929.05 $ 9,875,000.00 $ (1,464,070.95) 2009 $ 7,677,082.00 $ 382,769.17 $ 7,294,312.83 $ 8,450,000.00 $ (1,155,687.17) 2010 $ 7,450,262.75 $ 405,707.81 $ 7,044,554.94 $ 8,650,000.00 $ (1,605,445.06) 2011 $ 7,058,160.50 $ 314,313.00 $ 6,743,847.50 $ 8,775,000.00 $ (2,031,152.50) Total $53,434,701.35 $ 1,915,054.24 $51,519,647.11 $ 61,625,000.00 $ (10,105,352.89)

SB 123 Level 4D LSI-R Risk Level (Score) SASSI Score Assessment Funded Treatment Mandatory Treatment Funded I (33 and above)   High Y Low N II (25 - 32) III (17 - 24) IV (0 - 16) High or Low