Leland Jacobs Seth Krivohlavek Shirley J. Mills

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Critical Review of the Cognitive Abilities Test

Advertisements

Assessment in Early Childhood Education Fifth Edition Sue C. Wortham

Wortham: Chapter 2 Assessing young children Why are infants and Preschoolers measured differently than older children and adults? How does the demand for.

L2 program design Content, structure, evaluation.

Teacher Evaluation Model

© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Validity and Reliability Chapter Eight.

Evaluation of the Iowa Algebra Aptitude Test Terri Martin Doug Glasshoff Mini-project 1 June 17, 2002.

General Information --- What is the purpose of the test? For what population is the designed? Is this population relevant to the people who will take your.

Using Multiple Choice Tests for Assessment Purposes: Designing Multiple Choice Tests to Reflect and Foster Learning Outcomes Terri Flateby, Ph.D.

Issues of Technical Adequacy in Measuring Student Growth for Educator Effectiveness Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. Director, Assessment & Standards Development.

Metropolitan Achievement Test, Seventh Edition (MAT 7)

Lecture 7 Psyc 300A. Measurement Operational definitions should accurately reflect underlying variables and constructs When scores are influenced by other.

Chapter 5 Instrument Selection, Administration, Scoring, and Communicating Results.

Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation

Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A

Understanding Validity for Teachers

Chapter 14 Understanding and Using Standardized Tests Viewing recommendations for Windows: Use the Arial TrueType font and set your screen area to at least.

 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.

Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

ASSESSMENT 19 September 2015Laila N. Boisselle 1.

TerraNova Evaluation of a Standardized Test Mini-Project 1 Teresa Frields and Mitzi Hoback.

Evaluation of Nelson-Denny Reading Test Mini Project I By Becky Brandl.

Miller Function & Participation Scales (M-FUN)

Invention Convention Seth Krivohlavek Angie Deck.

Diagnostics Mathematics Assessments: Main Ideas  Now typically assess the knowledge and skill on the subsets of the 10 standards specified by the National.

General Information Iowa Writing Assessment The Riverside Publishing Company, 1994 $39.00: 25 test booklets, 25 response sheets 40 minutes to plan, write.

Session 7 Standardized Assessment. Standardized Tests Assess students’ under uniform conditions: a) Structured directions for administration b) Procedures.

Chapter 8 Validity and Reliability. Validity How well can you defend the measure? –Face V –Content V –Criterion-related V –Construct V.

Session 4 Reliability and Validity. Validity What does the instrument measure and How well does it measure what it is supposed to measure? Is there enough.

Designs and Reliability Assessing Student Learning Section 4.2.

8th Grade Criterion-Referenced Math Test By Becky Brandl, Shirley Mills and Deb Romanek.

Selection, Administration, Scoring, and Communicating Assessment Results Chapter 5.

SOCW 671: #5 Measurement Levels, Reliability, Validity, & Classic Measurement Theory.

Mini-Project #2 Quality Criteria Review of an Assessment Rhonda Martin.

Chapter 3 Selection of Assessment Tools. Council of Exceptional Children’s Professional Standards All special educators should possess a common core of.

Validity & Reliability. OBJECTIVES Define validity and reliability Understand the purpose for needing valid and reliable measures Know the most utilized.

Delwyn L. Harnisch, University of Nebraska – Lincoln Leslie Lukin, Lincoln Public Schools.

Career Counseling: A Holistic Approach

Lesson Thirteen Standardized Test. Contents Components of a Standardized test Reasons for the Name “Standardized” Reasons for Using a Standardized Test.

Terra Nova By Tammy Stegman, Robyn Ourada, Sandy Perry, & Kim Cotton.

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 47 Critiquing Assessments.

Reduced STAAR test blueprints

Professor Jim Tognolini

Principles of Language Assessment

Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.

CHAPTER 3: Practical Measurement Concepts

Introduction to Evaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.

Assessment and Evaluation

Test Design & Construction

Reliability & Validity

Week 3 Class Discussion.

بسمه تعالی تحليل سوالهاي آزمون Dr Mirjalili.

Washback and Alternative Assessment

Assessment Directors WebEx March 29, :00-3:00 pm ET

CHAPTER 12: Assessing Reading Achievement

Study Questions To what extent do English language learners have opportunity to learn the subject content specified in state academic standards and.

ابزار گرد آوری داده ها 1- پرسشنامه 2- مشاهده 3- مصاحبه

Student Assessment and Evaluation

Evaluating MAT 7- Metropolitan Achievement Test

The first test of validity

Critically Evaluating an Assessment Task

Understanding and Using Standardized Tests

Student Assessment and Evaluation

Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.

First Hour - How can one measure intelligence?

Qualities of a good data gathering procedures

Doug Glasshoff Greg Gaden Darin Kelberlau

Chapter 3: How Standardized Test….

Presentation transcript:

Leland Jacobs Seth Krivohlavek Shirley J. Mills EVALUATION OF THE MAT8 Leland Jacobs Seth Krivohlavek Shirley J. Mills

GENERAL INFORMATION Metropolitan Achievement Test 8th Edition Harcourt Assessment Company, 2000 K-12 Cost: K-3 $122.50 per 25 students 4-12 $93.00 per 25 students Time: Un-timed with stipulations Range from 90 min. to 275 min. (Full Battery)

PURPOSE AND NATURE OF TEST Foundation Skills Critical Thinking Processes Reflects Classroom Curriculum Based on Studies of Syllabi, Standards, Assessments, and Current Research

TECHNICAL EVALUATION Norms and Standards A Variety of Score Reporting Methods Standardization Sample of 80,000 Students of 151 School Districts Standard Setting Procedures Involved Cross Section of U.S. Cultures

TECHNICAL EVALUATION Reliability Internal Consistency based on Kuder-Richardson Procedure KR-20 Coefficient Results range from .77 to .97

TECHNICAL EVALUATION Validity Content Validity Criterion Validity Construct Validity

REVIEW SUMMARIES Ronald K. Hambleton 1. Negative about Technical Information 2. Bias Reporting Carmen J. Finley 1. Positive about Updating of Content 2. Highly Recommended

CRITIQUE OF INSTRUMENT Outstanding Battery of K-12 Achievement User Friendly Manual Weakness: No Test Effort to Correlate Nebraska Standards to Test Highly Recommended