Envisioning Consumer Participation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Cochrane Library. What is The Cochrane Library? The Cochrane Library offers high-quality evidence for health care decision making
Advertisements

Definitions Patient Experience Patient experience at NUH results from a range of activities that all impact upon patient care, access, safety and outcomes.
Engaging Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Research
Disability Research to Practice Program NIDRR RERC Project Directors Meeting April 3 & 4, 2006.
Diabetes Programme Progress Report Dr Charles Gostling, Joint Diabetes Clinical Director October 2013.
Involving Consumers in Systematic Reviews Catherine McIlwain The Cochrane Collaboration Consumer Co-ordinator.
Engaging Stakeholders in the Effective Health Care Program Information and tools for researchers and investigators.
Evidence-based Health Care and Consumer Involvement in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunities Godwin N. Aja, MCH, CHES Department of Health.
Consumer Input: Top Tips for Managing Editors Catherine McIlwain The Cochrane Collaboration Consumer Co-ordinator.
The power of information: Putting all of us in control of the health and care information we need Giles Wilmore, Director of Patient & Public Voice and.
Knowledge into Action: supporting education and learning Host: Derek Boyle Senior Knowledge Manager, NHS Education for Scotland
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
+ Welcome to PAHO/WHO Sustainable Development and Health Toolkit for the UN Global Conference RIO + 20 Welcome to PAHO/WHO Sustainable Development and.
The Engagement Cycle : engaging with patients and public throughout the commissioning process In collaboration with NHS Institute and DH.
THE SOUND OF SILENCE: AN EVALUATION OF CDC’S PODCAST INITIATIVE Quynh-Chau, M., Myers, Bradford A. (2013). The Sound of Silence: an evaluation of CDC's.
Patient and Public Involvement: Supporting a future of better research Isabelle Abbey-Vital, Research Involvement Officer.
National Dental Practice-Based Research Network
Surf smart training.
Strategic Plan AHLA Hospitals and Health Systems Practice Group
Knowledge for Healthcare: Driver Diagrams October 2016
The Value of HIA for EH Professionals
THE HEALTHCARE SUPPORT WORKER
Ontario Early Years Child and Family Centres Planning Guidelines
Lou Diamond, MB, ChB, FACP Moderator
The guiding principles of prudent healthcare
ITCILO/ACTRAV COURSE A Capacity Building for Organizing and Managing Trade Unions 13 to 24 May 2013 Community of Practice.
Improving Health Literacy Today….not Tomorrow”
Person Centred Care in NHS Wales
Gender statistics in Information and Communication Technology for Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality Dorothy Okello, Annual.
GENDER STATISTICS IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION
Accessible Information Standard Review
Business Planning Process
From ambition to reality
Achieving World-Class Cancer Outcomes: Taking the strategy forward May 2016 “People affected by cancer – those living with it and those supporting relatives.
Creating a blended outreach service model for a province-wide health care information service Yongtao Lin, MLIS Jeanette Blanchard, MI Jorden Habib, MLIS.
Consumer Communication Solutions
Everyday Lives: Values in Action Using IM4Q Data to Improve Statewide
Kate Yorke, Project Manager – MECC
Integrated Care European Partnership for Supervisory Organisations
Communications Strategy
Helpful Hints for action to prevent elder abuse
Citizen, consumer, and patient roles in using publicly reported primary healthcare performance information Lessons from citizen-patient dialogues in three.
RESNA 2018 Annual Conference
Jason Gerson, PhD Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
Engaging Patients and Families as Partners
Carers and place-based commissioning
Public engagement strategy
The patient and carer perspective
Inclusive Communication Hub
Member Update January 2019.
Role & Relevance of Cochrane UK to trainees
CHADD improves the lives of people affected by ADHD
Stephen Bennett Sarah Holmes Pearl Barker Mark Wilkinson
VCSQI Patient (Person) and Family Engagement (PFE) Survey
Collaborating With Community
Harrow CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
National Cancer Center
Clinical Research Network North East and North Cumbria
The Role of Healthcare Payers in Digital Health Literacy
Module 5: Formulating Research Questions
Michelle Summers and Matthew Gray 12 October 2017
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Stakeholder Engagement Board
Making Aberdeenshire More Active
It’s OK to ask questions
Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Alliance
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Getting Knowledge into Action for Healthcare Quality
Levels of involvement Consultation Collaboration User control
Workbook for Progressing Strategic Priorities at Local Level
Presentation transcript:

Envisioning Consumer Participation The Cochrane Collaboration reviews medical research. These reviews synthesize all that information available about a specific health topic and experts assess the quality of that research. Most research is driven by pharmaceutical interests. Impact of any medical condition affects the quality of life of that individual. CCNet was formed in 1983 to support consumer interests within the Collaboration. Catherine McIlwain Tel  +44 1865 310138  cmcilwain@cochrane.org

Consumers and Cochrane The Cochrane Consumer Network (CCNet) encourages consumers throughout the world to give their perspectives and have their say on priorities for health care. Consumers is a broad term that includes all users or receivers of health care, patients, a members of the public, caregivers and family members. Our Vision: Enhanced accessibility and relevance of Cochrane reviews through consumer and community participation.

Coming Together Consumers Review Groups Cochrane Evidence CCNet works with Consumers to advance Cochrane’s ability to improve this information by answering questions that are important to consumers. Consumers and health practitioners can then work together to make the best possible decisions about health care. CCNet actively forges connections between projects of consumer interest and shares opportunities for involvement with its members. CCNet Aims: To enable and support consumer participation in The Cochrane Collaboration; and continue to develop the use and usefulness of consumer participation in Cochrane groups, in particular Review Groups

What’s In It For Me? Statistics: beginning of 2011 1102 consumers affiliated with Cochrane 760 are members of Ccnet 549 consumers participate or have thought about participating in reviews 228 Ccnet members have expressed an interest in participating.

Consumer Contributions The authors of Cochrane reviews may choose a treatment for a review because of their own interests and experiences as a clinician or a healthcare researcher; however, these are not always the questions of most concern to healthcare consumers, their families and their carers. The purpose of consumer input during the review process is to: Ensure that review questions are relevant to people who require health care and are offered treatment by their healthcare providers;   Consumers offer a unique perspective.

A Community of Consumers CCNet Listserv consumers@lists.cochrane.org Facebook (multi-lingual) Add “CCNet Cochrane Collaboration” Consumer Discussion Boards Five key areas are targeted by CCNet activities: Consumer involvement in the Cochrane review process Training resources for consumers to participate in reviews Communication tools that engage consumers Global network providing accessible evidence Consumer support utilizing evidence-based health care information Together we can use consumer input to: Prioritize topics for new reviews. 

Meet Consumer Needs Should I or shouldn’t I? Will it really help? How can I know for sure? It is not always easy for researchers and providers to understand how the questions for Cochrane reviews need to be stated in order to be useful for consumers. The purpose of consumer input during the review process is to: Identify the end results of treatments that are important to consumers (it may be different than those identified by providers);  

Expand Health Literacy Cochrane Journal Club www.cochranejournalclub.com Online Podcasts and Webinars www.cochrane.org/multimedia/ Cochrane Consumer Learning consumers.cochrane.org/resources The Consumer Network supports consumers with training and guidance to empower them to provide a consumer perspective in Cochrane reviews. Consumer input during the review process will: Improve public access to reviews by ensuring that the language is sensitive to consumers and can be understood by a wide audience;  

Patient Needs and Experiences  CCNet promotes healthcare user input into and acceptance of evidence-based practice. Consumer experience offers valuable input during the review process to ensure that reviews: Weigh the benefits of treatment against the potential harms – from a consumer perspective; Consumer insights = better research

Stay Informed CCNet Newsletters www.cochrane.org/news/newsletters Consumer Blog consumers.cochrane.org/blog Tweet #CochranConsumer CCNet - Working for you: Ensuring CCNet involvement on CRG projects for consumers New ways to access information Requirements for plain language summaries Simplifying participation with clear checklists Lobbying for changes within Cochrane to support consumer involvement; and usage of reviews Developing guidelines for reviewers Identifying reviews that are important to consumers Working to build partnerships: Consumers Union, IAPO, Cochrane Library promotion

Moving Forward What does Cochrane do well to involve consumers? What prevents consumer participation in the review process? Are there other ways for consumers to get involved? What are your thoughts?