Shogo Ito, Young Hun Song, Takato Imaizumi  Molecular Plant 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Photoperiod & Circadian Rhythms Eva Farre. Photoperiod Light qualityVernalization Autonomous Gibberellin Signaling (SD) Floral Transition PAF complex.
Advertisements

Light regulation of growth
Javed A. Khan, Ben M. Dunn, Liang Tong  Structure 
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
A Fence-like Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Trimeric C-type lectin domains in host defence
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Ankan Banerjee, Elena Herman, Tilman Kottke, Lars-Oliver Essen 
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Amanda Ooi, Fouad Lemtiri-Chlieh, Aloysius Wong, Christoph Gehring 
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Crystal Structure of Tetrameric Arabidopsis MYC2 Reveals the Mechanism of Enhanced Interaction with DNA  Teng-fei Lian, Yong-ping Xu, Lan-fen Li, Xiao-Dong.
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Structure of CheA, a Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinase
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Protein Turnover: A CHIP Programmed for Proteolysis
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
Yusuke Nakasone, Kazunori Zikihara, Satoru Tokutomi, Masahide Terazima 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
The Structure of Chorismate Synthase Reveals a Novel Flavin Binding Site Fundamental to a Unique Chemical Reaction  John Maclean, Sohail Ali  Structure 
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Structure and Regulation of the CDK5-p25nck5a Complex
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
What Does It Take to Bind CAR?
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
Mechanisms Contributing to T Cell Receptor Signaling and Assembly Revealed by the Solution Structure of an Ectodomain Fragment of the CD3ϵγ Heterodimer 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Tertiary Structure of Destrin and Structural Similarity between Two Actin-Regulating Protein Families  H Hatanaka, K Ogura, K Moriyama, S Ichikawa, I.
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Complexity in the Wiring and Regulation of Plant Circadian Networks
SUR-8, a Conserved Ras-Binding Protein with Leucine-Rich Repeats, Positively Regulates Ras-Mediated Signaling in C. elegans  Derek S Sieburth, Qun Sun,
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Crystal Structure of the Human Neuropilin-1 b1 Domain
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 1-11 (July 1997)
Plant Phototropic Growth
Yang Cang-Jin , Zhang Chi , Lu Yang-Ning , Jin Jia-Qi , Wang Xue-Lu  
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
Presentation transcript:

LOV Domain-Containing F-Box Proteins: Light-Dependent Protein Degradation Modules in Arabidopsis  Shogo Ito, Young Hun Song, Takato Imaizumi  Molecular Plant  Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 573-582 (May 2012) DOI: 10.1093/mp/sss013 Copyright © 2012 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Domain Structures of ZTL/FKF1/LKP2 and Related Proteins, Amino Acid Sequence Alignments of LOV Domains, and Photochemical Properties of Phototropin and FKF1 LOV Domains. (A) Schematic illustration of functional domains of ZTL/FKF1/LKP2 family proteins, phototropin proteins, and PAS/LOV proteins. LOV domain bound to an FMN molecule functions as a blue-light-sensing domain. The ZTL/FKF1/LKP2 family proteins possess one LOV domain at the N-terminus region followed by an F-box domain and six Kelch repeats in the C-terminal region. The phototropins contain two FMN-binding LOV domains in their N-terminal region (LOV1 and LOV2) and a serine/threonine kinase domain at the C-terminus. The PAS/LOV proteins (PLP or also called LLP) contain two LOV domains; however, the cysteine residue essential for the cysteinyl adduct formation within the first LOV domain is not always conserved in some plant species, including Arabidopsis (Kasahara et al., 2010), indicating that there is no light-induced photocycle of the LOV domain. The LOV2 domains of PLP proteins usually contain the conserved cysteine and show the blue-light-induced photocycle in vitro. (B) Sequence alignment of several LOV domains. The alignment includes Arabidopsis thaliana ZTL, LKP2, FKF1, phot1-LOV1, phot1-LOV2, phot2-LOV1, and phot2-LOV2. Identical and similar amino acids are marked on top of the alignment by asterisks (*) and (: or .), respectively. The conserved cysteines for FMN binding are highlighted in orange. The characteristic loop regions of ZTL/FKF1/LKP2 LOV are gray-shaded. The predicted secondary structure elements are shown on top of the alignment. Arrows and boxes indicate β-strands and α-helices, respectively. (C) Schematic representation of LOV-domain photochemistry. In darkness, the FMN chromophore is non-covalently bound in the LOV domain (L450). Light triggers the production of a reactive triplet-state flavin (L660) that leads to formation of a covalent bond between the FMN and a conserved cysteine residue in the LOV domain (S390). The photoreaction process of the phot-LOV protein (right blue arrow circuit) is fully reversible in the dark. In contrast, the FKF1–LOV protein (a black dotted arrow) shows a slow dark reversion rate. The dark reversion rate (half-lives; t1/2) of each protein is shown. Molecular Plant 2012 5, 573-582DOI: (10.1093/mp/sss013) Copyright © 2012 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Tentative Structure Changes of FKF1 Triggered by Blue-Light Absorption. (A) Proposed structural changes of phot1. Two phot1 molecules dimerize through their LOV1 domains. The LOV2 domain is important for light-dependent function. Once phot1 absorbs blue light, the Jα-helix located adjacent to the LOV2 domain detaches from the LOV2 domain. This structural change is thought to activate the C-terminal kinase. The kinase phosphorylates N-terminal regions as well as substrate proteins to send phosphorylation signals. (B) FKF1 also forms at least a homodimer with anti-parallel configuration in vitro. In the dark, FKF1 may be incorporated in the SCFFKF1 complex (which consists of FKF1 F-box protein, ASK, Cullin, and Rbx). After blue-light exposure, FKF1 interacts with GI through the LOV domain. Light may cause a similar structural change to phot1 to enable FKF1 to bind to GI. GI also binds to CDF1, a substrate of FKF1 for ubiquitination-dependent protein degradation. FKF1 binds to CDF1 through the Kelch repeat domain and is involved in protein degradation. Molecular Plant 2012 5, 573-582DOI: (10.1093/mp/sss013) Copyright © 2012 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Light-Mediated Proteolysis Controlled by ZTL, FKF1, and LKP2 in the Regulation of Flowering Time and the Circadian Clock. (A) The function of FKF1 in the control of flowering time. GI forms protein complexes with CDFs on the CO promoter. In the afternoon, FKF1 is recruited to the CO promoter region through blue-light-dependent interaction with GI. FKF1 degrades CDFs, facilitating expression of CO. Since CDF2 is stabilized further in the ztl fkf1 lkp2 triple mutants than in the fkf1 mutants, the ZTL–GI and LKP2–GI complexes may also contribute to the degradation of some CDF proteins. CO and GI bind to the FT promoter and activate FT transcription, which induces flowering. FKF1 may also bind to the FT promoter; however, the function of this interaction is unknown. (B) The function of ZTL in regulation of the circadian clock. Under blue light, ZTL interacts with GI. ZTL also forms a protein complex with HSP90. The interaction of ZTL with GI and HSP90 stabilizes ZTL protein. The ZTL–GI complex formation may sequester ZTL from interaction with TOC1 or PRR5. This enables TOC1 and PRR5 proteins to accumulate in the late afternoon. The FKF1–GI and LKP2–GI complex may also have a similar role (left side). In the dark, ZTL (FKF1 and LKP2) interact with TOC1 and PRR5 proteins and degrade them through a proteasome pathway (right side). Molecular Plant 2012 5, 573-582DOI: (10.1093/mp/sss013) Copyright © 2012 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions