Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Andrew J. Pierce TOX 780 Single and Double-strand Break Repair TOX 780 Andrew Pierce Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics Toxicology University.
Advertisements

Mus81 and Yen1 Promote Reciprocal Exchange during Mitotic Recombination to Maintain Genome Integrity in Budding Yeast  Chu Kwen Ho, Gerard Mazón, Alicia.
Frequency of Nonallelic Homologous Recombination Is Correlated with Length of Homology: Evidence that Ectopic Synapsis Precedes Ectopic Crossing-Over 
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 Mismatch Repair Protein Localizes to Recombination Intermediates In Vivo  Elizabeth Evans, Neal Sugawara, James E Haber,
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)
The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Randy W. Hyppa, Gerald R. Smith  Cell 
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Reciprocal Crossovers and a Positional Preference for Strand Exchange in Recombination Events Resulting in Deletion or Duplication of Chromosome 17p11.2 
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Saving the Ends for Last: The Role of Pol μ in DNA End Joining
Volume 120, Issue 5, Pages (March 2005)
Mus81 and Yen1 Promote Reciprocal Exchange during Mitotic Recombination to Maintain Genome Integrity in Budding Yeast  Chu Kwen Ho, Gerard Mazón, Alicia.
Early Replication of Short Telomeres in Budding Yeast
RAD52 Facilitates Mitotic DNA Synthesis Following Replication Stress
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Chromosome-wide Rad51 Spreading and SUMO-H2A
When Genome Maintenance Goes Badly Awry
Mus81/Mms4 Endonuclease and Sgs1 Helicase Collaborate to Ensure Proper Recombination Intermediate Metabolism during Meiosis  Lea Jessop, Michael Lichten 
Sarah K. Deng, Yi Yin, Thomas D. Petes, Lorraine S. Symington 
Volume 125, Issue 7, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Neal Sugawara, Xuan Wang, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages (April 2012)
Hideo Tsubouchi, G.Shirleen Roeder  Developmental Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (November 2017)
Beth Elliott, Christine Richardson, Maria Jasin  Molecular Cell 
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
The Fuss about Mus81  James E Haber, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer  Cell 
A DNA Replication Mechanism for Generating Nonrecurrent Rearrangements Associated with Genomic Disorders  Jennifer A. Lee, Claudia M.B. Carvalho, James.
Intermediates of Yeast Meiotic Recombination Contain Heteroduplex DNA
Jörg Renkawitz, Claudio A. Lademann, Marian Kalocsay, Stefan Jentsch 
Reciprocal Crossovers and a Positional Preference for Strand Exchange in Recombination Events Resulting in Deletion or Duplication of Chromosome 17p11.2 
Chromosomal Rearrangements Occur in S
Early Decision Cell Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages 9-15 (April 2004)
The role of microhomology in genomic structural variation
Olga Tsaponina, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
Brh2 Promotes a Template-Switching Reaction Enabling Recombinational Bypass of Lesions during DNA Synthesis  Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular.
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
An AT-Rich Sequence in Human Common Fragile Site FRA16D Causes Fork Stalling and Chromosome Breakage in S. cerevisiae  Haihua Zhang, Catherine H. Freudenreich 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 18, Pages (September 2005)
Allyson M Holmes, James E Haber  Cell 
Telomere Dysfunction Increases Mutation Rate and Genomic Instability
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Homology Requirements and Competition between Gene Conversion and Break- Induced Replication during Double-Strand Break Repair  Anuja Mehta, Annette Beach,
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (April 2008)
Large-Scale Expansions of Friedreich's Ataxia GAA Repeats in Yeast
Scott J Diede, Daniel E Gottschling  Cell 
Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
XRCC3 Controls the Fidelity of Homologous Recombination
At Loose Ends: Resecting a Double-Strand Break
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Gene Amplification: Yeast Takes a Turn
Multiple Rad5 Activities Mediate Sister Chromatid Recombination to Bypass DNA Damage at Stalled Replication Forks  Eugen C. Minca, David Kowalski  Molecular.
Zhu Zhu, Woo-Hyun Chung, Eun Yong Shim, Sang Eun Lee, Grzegorz Ira 
Huan Chen, Michael Lisby, Lorraine S. Symington  Molecular Cell 
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Meiotic DNA Breaks at the S. pombe Recombination Hot Spot M26
Presentation transcript:

Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages 860-872 (December 2015) Translesion Polymerases Drive Microhomology-Mediated Break-Induced Replication Leading to Complex Chromosomal Rearrangements  Cynthia J. Sakofsky, Sandeep Ayyar, Angela K. Deem, Woo-Hyun Chung, Grzegorz Ira, Anna Malkova  Molecular Cell  Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages 860-872 (December 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.041 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2015 60, 860-872DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.041) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental System to Model BIR Collapse (A) DSB repair in a yeast strain disomic for chromosome III that has genetic markers at the ends of both copies of chromosome III used to identify DSB repair outcomes. (i) DSB is induced in a truncated copy of chromosome III (recipient chromosome) at MATa by a galactose inducible HO endonuclease. A full-length copy of chromosome III (donor) where MATα-inc is refractory to cutting by HO and contains a lys2::insA4 frameshift reporter inserted at one of two positions: MAT or 16 kb. (ii) Broken (recipient) chromosome invades intact homologous donor chromosome and initiates DNA repair synthesis that proceeds via a migrating bubble. (iii) DNA synthesis proceeds to the end of the chromosome, resulting in a completed BIR product. (iv–vii) BIR synthesis is interrupted, which leads to the resolution of BIR intermediates and the formation of one of the following half-crossover (HC) events: (iv) Ade-white Leu− HCs, (v) HCs that segregated with an intact sister chromatid of the broken donor similar to Deem et al. (2008), and (vi and vii) half-crossover initiated cascades (HCCs) where the broken chromosome is stabilized by ectopic recombination or de novo telomere formation as represented by purple lines (see also Figure S1). Dotted lines indicate nascent DNA. Abbreviations are as follows: GC, gene conversion; CL, chromosome loss. (B) Distribution of DSB repair events in strains containing lys2::insA4 reporters inserted at MAT. The classification of repair events was based on phenotypes described in (A). See Figure S2A and Experimental Procedures for details of phenotypic analysis. Molecular Cell 2015 60, 860-872DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.041) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Formation of Lys+ Frameshift Mutations in pif1Δ Require Polζ and Rev1 (A and B) The rate of Lys+ mutations for WT (PIF1) and derivative mutant strains was measured among Ade+ DSB repair outcomes 7 hr after the addition of galactose for strains with lys2::insA4 reporters at MAT (A) or at the 16 kb position (B). Median mutation rates are shown; bracketed numbers below show 95% CI for strains with ≥6 experiments or the median range for strains with 4 or 5 experiments. Data for WT and pif1Δ at 16 kb were similar to Saini et al. (2013). Asterisks (∗), crosses (†), and psi (Ψ) symbols indicate statistically significant differences from WT (PIF1), pif1Δ, and pif1Δ rev3Δ strains, respectively. See Table S2 for p values and for the description of statistical analysis. Molecular Cell 2015 60, 860-872DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.041) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Collapse of BIR Leads to MMBIR Mutations (A) Representative Lys+ mutant sequences obtained in WT (PIF1) and pif1Δ strains aligned to the original Lys− sequence. (i) A 1 bp deletion mutation, the main class of mutations associated with completed BIR in PIF1. (ii) MMBIR mutations in pif1Δ. Red letters indicate MMBIR mutations, orange letters indicate DNA sequences that served as a template for MMBIR, green letters indicate DNA sequences that were replaced by MMBIR, and blue letters indicate microhomology. “∗1” and “∗2” indicate the junctions of the first and second template switch during the formation of MMBIR mutations, respectively. (B) Lys+ mutation spectra associated with completed (PIF1) (i) and interrupted BIR (pif1Δ) (ii). Simple frameshifts include 1 bp deletions and 2 bp insertions that are sometimes also associated with 1 bp or 2 bp substitutions. (C) Microhomologies at the junctions of the first and second MMBIR template switching events that occurred in Ade+ Leu− pif1Δ strains with reporters at MAT and 16 kb positions. (D) Distribution of DSB repair events among Lys+ outcomes in WT (PIF1) and pif1Δ strains containing lys2:insA4 reporters at MAT. See Figure S2D and Experimental Procedures for details. (E) Chromosome III structure of representative MMBIR Ade+ Lys+ mutants obtained in pif1Δ-MAT strain. Upper panel: PFGE gel stained with ethidium bromide. Subsequent panels below show Southern blot analysis using LYS2-specific, ADE3-specific, and ADE1-specific probes as indicated. Red arrowheads indicate ADE3-containing chromosomes, while blue arrowheads indicate ADE1-containing chromosomes. The structure of chromosome III for each representative Lys+ mutant is shown below the gel, and only Lys+ copies of LYS2 are depicted. “P” denotes AM1003 derivative strain prior to induction of HO break. See Tables S4, S5, and S6 for a full list of MMBIR mutations. Molecular Cell 2015 60, 860-872DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.041) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Proposed Mechanism of Switching from Homology-Driven BIR to MMBIR (A) Initiation of BIR. (B) Processive BIR associated with homology- or homeology-mediated template switching (HOM-TS) (Anand et al., 2014; Smith et al., 2007; Stafa et al., 2014). (i) Dissociation of the 3′ end. (ii) Rad51-mediated invasion of the 3′ end into an area with significant homology or homeology. (iii) Second template switch back to original homologous chromosome. (C) Defective BIR synthesis leads to MMBIR that is followed by resolution resulting in HC events. (i) Interruption of BIR induced by the absence of Pif1. (ii and iii) Annealing at microhomology (blue rectangles) located in ssDNA behind the BIR bubble followed by DNA synthesis (red dotted lines) driven by Polζ/Rev1. In the absence of Polζ/Rev1, telomerase creates GT-rich mutations (as illustrated in Figure 5B). (iv) Strand dissociation and (v) annealing of 3′ end at microhomology (yellow rectangles) in original track of BIR. (D and E) Resolution of interrupted BIR intermediates leads to HC events with Lys+ mutations. Two events shown here are HC (Ade-white Leu−) (D) or CL (Ade-red Leu−) (E). Molecular Cell 2015 60, 860-872DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.041) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Pol ζ/Rev1 Complex Mediates Formation of MMBIR Mutations (A) Lys+ mutation spectra for Ade+ Leu− outcomes formed in various pif1Δ-MAT derivative strains. GT-rich class represents complex mutations where a telomere-like GT-rich sequence shown in red letters in (B) (i and ii) replaces a stretch of DNA shown in green letters. The asterisk (∗) denotes one rare outcome of ectopic MMBIR similar to rare ectopic template switching events observed in the absence of Polζ in Northam et al. (2014). (B) Representative Lys+ mutant sequences aligned to the original Lys− sequence. (i and ii) GT-rich mutations common in pif1Δ rev3Δ and pif1Δ rev1Δ. (iii and iv) Large deletions common in pif1Δ rev3Δ tlc1Δ and in pol32Δ. See legend to Figure 3B and Table S4. Molecular Cell 2015 60, 860-872DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.041) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions