Takako Takeda, Dmitri K. Klimov  Biophysical Journal 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Advertisements

Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
(Un)Folding Mechanisms of the FBP28 WW Domain in Explicit Solvent Revealed by Multiple Rare Event Simulation Methods  Jarek Juraszek, Peter G. Bolhuis 
Ining Jou, Murugappan Muthukumar  Biophysical Journal 
Young Min Rhee, Vijay S. Pande  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages (October 2015)
Folding Pathways of Prion and Doppel
Pedro R. Magalhães, Miguel Machuqueiro, António M. Baptista 
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Anti-Aggregation Effect of Ibuprofen
Surface Characterization of Insulin Protofilaments and Fibril Polymorphs Using Tip- Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (TERS)  Dmitry Kurouski, Tanja Deckert-Gaudig,
Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Calculations to Assess the Possibility of Water Existence in Protein Nonpolar Cavities  Masataka Oikawa, Yoshiteru Yonetani 
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Elucidating the Locking Mechanism of Peptides onto Growing Amyloid Fibrils through Transition Path Sampling  Marieke Schor, Jocelyne Vreede, Peter G.
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
David C. Latshaw, Carol K. Hall  Biophysical Journal 
Structural and Dynamic Properties of the Human Prion Protein
Volume 96, Issue 10, Pages (May 2009)
Meng Qin, Jian Zhang, Wei Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Mechanism and Energetics of Charybdotoxin Unbinding from a Potassium Channel from Molecular Dynamics Simulations  Po-chia Chen, Serdar Kuyucak  Biophysical.
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2003)
Molecular Modeling of the Misfolded Insulin Subunit and Amyloid Fibril
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Influence of Protein Scaffold on Side-Chain Transfer Free Energies
Christian Kappel, Ulrich Zachariae, Nicole Dölker, Helmut Grubmüller 
Heleen Meuzelaar, Jocelyne Vreede, Sander Woutersen 
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Tianjun Sun, Peter L. Davies, Virginia K. Walker  Biophysical Journal 
Xiao-Han Li, Elizabeth Rhoades  Biophysical Journal 
G. Fiorin, A. Pastore, P. Carloni, M. Parrinello  Biophysical Journal 
Conformational Recognition of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein
Sukanya Sasmal, James Lincoff, Teresa Head-Gordon  Biophysical Journal 
Binding Dynamics of Isolated Nucleoporin Repeat Regions to Importin-β
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Resveratrol Inhibits the Formation of Multiple-Layered β-Sheet Oligomers of the Human Islet Amyloid Polypeptide Segment 22–27  Ping Jiang, Weifeng Li,
Calcium Enhances Binding of Aβ Monomer to DMPC Lipid Bilayer
Till Siebenmorgen, Martin Zacharias  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 8, Pages (October 2012)
Comparative Studies of Microtubule Mechanics with Two Competing Models Suggest Functional Roles of Alternative Tubulin Lateral Interactions  Zhanghan.
Volume 107, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Histone Acetylation Regulates Chromatin Accessibility: Role of H4K16 in Inter- nucleosome Interaction  Ruihan Zhang, Jochen Erler, Jörg Langowski  Biophysical.
Molecular Interactions of Alzheimer's Biomarker FDDNP with Aβ Peptide
Yuliang Zhang, Yuri L. Lyubchenko  Biophysical Journal 
Sequence and Crowding Effects in the Aggregation of a 10-Residue Fragment Derived from Islet Amyloid Polypeptide  Eva Rivera, John Straub, D. Thirumalai 
Volume 106, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Yuguang Mu, Lars Nordenskiöld, James P. Tam  Biophysical Journal 
Cholesterol Modulates the Dimer Interface of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor via Cholesterol Occupancy Sites  Xavier Prasanna, Amitabha Chattopadhyay, Durba.
Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations Provide Insight into Substrate Recognition by Small Heat Shock Proteins  Sunita Patel, Elizabeth Vierling,
Structural Flexibility of CaV1. 2 and CaV2
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 2009)
Paolo A. Lobo, Lynn Kimlicka, Ching-Chieh Tung, Filip Van Petegem 
Dmitri K. Klimov, D. Thirumalai  Structure 
Volume 112, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Dynamics of Nuclear Receptor Helix-12 Switch of Transcription Activation by Modeling Time-Resolved Fluorescence Anisotropy Decays  Mariana R.B. Batista,
Volume 103, Issue 10, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Flow-Induced β-Hairpin Folding of the Glycoprotein Ibα β-Switch
Ining Jou, Murugappan Muthukumar  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 108, Issue 9, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 111, Issue 11, Pages (December 2016)
Tianjun Sun, Peter L. Davies, Virginia K. Walker  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Characterization of Structure, Dynamics, and Detergent Interactions of the Anti-HIV Chemokine Variant 5P12-RANTES  Maciej Wiktor, Oliver Hartley, Stephan.
A Critical Residue Selectively Recruits Nucleotides for T7 RNA Polymerase Transcription Fidelity Control  Baogen Duan, Shaogui Wu, Lin-Tai Da, Jin Yu 
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Christian Kappel, Ulrich Zachariae, Nicole Dölker, Helmut Grubmüller 
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Seongwon Kim, Takako Takeda, Dmitri K. Klimov  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

Probing Energetics of Aβ Fibril Elongation by Molecular Dynamics Simulations  Takako Takeda, Dmitri K. Klimov  Biophysical Journal  Volume 96, Issue 11, Pages 4428-4437 (June 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.015 Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 (a) Cartoon representation of the Aβ10–40 hexamer. Four Aβ peptides in backbone representation (in gray, online) form a fibril fragment. Two incoming peptides with side chains shown (in color, online) are bound to the fibril edge. The fibril protofilament consists of four laminated, in-registry β-sheets formed by the β1 and β2 strands in an Aβ sequence. The N-termini (in red, online) of incoming peptides form parallel off-registry β-sheets with the fibril N- and C-termini (i.e., the locked state; see Methods for details). The C-termini (in orange, online) of incoming peptides form few interactions with the fibril. The stagger of inner β2 sheets with respect to β1 results in the appearance of two distinct fibril edges—concave and convex. On the concave edge, indented β2 sheets form a groove. The fibril structure is derived from nuclear magnetic resonance measurements (13) and visualized using Chimera (61). (b) The sequence of Aβ10–40 monomer and the allocation of the β1 and β2 fibril β-strands (also referred to as N- and C-termini) and the turn. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 4428-4437DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.015) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The free energy of incoming peptide F(Nphb;λ) as a function of the number of peptide-fibril pHBs, Nphb. The data for the wild-type (λ = 0) and the mutant, in which Phe19 side-chain interactions are partially deleted (λ = 0.3), are in shaded and solid representation, respectively. The docked and locked states are indicated. The energetic perturbation caused by partial deletion of Phe19 interactions stabilizes the locked state by ∼35% (as measured by δF). The free energy level FL,min + 1.0RT used in defining the mutant locked state is marked by the dashed line. The free energy of the docked state is set to zero. The inset shows the linear dependence of the change in free energy gap between docked and locked states δF(λ) on small λ. The straight line represents linear fit. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 4428-4437DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.015) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 (a) The thermal contact map 〈C(i, j)〉 displays the probabilities of forming side-chain contacts between amino acids i from the Aβ fibril and j from incoming peptide. 〈C(i, j)〉 is color-coded according to the scale on the right. The map 〈C(i, j)〉 indicates that the contacts between Aβ C-termini are rare. (b and c) The distributions of contacts, 〈Cp(j)〉 and 〈Cf(i)〉, formed by the side chains in incoming and fibril peptides, respectively. Both plots show the preference for the N-terminus to form peptide-fibril interactions. The N- and C-terminal residues in this figure and in Figs. 4 and 5 are in boxes. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 4428-4437DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.015) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 (a) The thermal pHB map 〈Nphb(i, j)〉 displays the probabilities of forming parallel HBs between amino acids i from the Aβ fibril and j from incoming peptide. 〈Nphb(i, j)〉 is color-coded according to the scale on the right. The plot shows that the elements of parallel β-sheets occur between the Aβ N- and C-termini, but very rarely between the two C-termini. (b and c) The distributions of HBs, 〈Nhbp(j)〉 and 〈Nhbf(i)〉, formed by the residues in incoming and fibril peptides, respectively. With some variations, all regions of incoming peptide form HBs with the fibril. In contrast, most peptide-fibril HBs are formed by the N-terminus of the fibril peptide. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 4428-4437DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.015) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 (a) Distribution of slopes ∂(δF(j))/∂λ along the sequence of incoming Aβ peptide. The slope ∂(δF(j))/∂λ characterizes the change in the binding free energy landscape arising in response to partial deletion of the interactions formed by the side chain j. The distribution of slopes suggests that almost all side-chain interactions in the N-terminus reduce the stability of the locked state. (b) The fractions of random contacts cr(j) = 〈Cr(j)〉/〈Cp(j)〉 (in shading) and pHBs nphb(j) = 〈Nphbp(j)〉/〈Nhbp(j)〉 (in solid representation) are plotted for residues j in incoming peptide. (〈Cr(j)〉 and 〈Nphbp(j)〉 are the thermal numbers of random side-chain contacts and pHB at j.) The plot indicates that cr(j) and nphb(j) are anticorrelated. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 4428-4437DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.015) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The experimental free energies of fibrillation ΔGfib obtained for Aβ1–40 peptide and its Val18X mutants as a function of Kyte-Doolittle hydrophobic score of the amino acid X. The amino acids next to the datapoints indicate the substitutions X. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 4428-4437DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.015) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions