Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(+++) Normal breast ATM (++) IDC ATM Lymph node metastasis negative positive P-value A B X200 C Vector ATM - WT.
Advertisements

B Supplementary Fig S1. (A) ZR75- and MCF7-PELP1 knockdown cells were generated as described in methods section. Pooled colonies were analyzed for PELP1.
A conditional feedback loop regulates Ras activity through EphA2
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages e4 (March 2014)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
ASF1a Promotes Non-homologous End Joining Repair by Facilitating Phosphorylation of MDC1 by ATM at Double-Strand Breaks  Kyung Yong Lee, Jun-Sub Im, Etsuko.
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 129, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 138, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Shobhan Gaddameedhi, Christopher P. Selby, Michael G
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
SMARCAD1 Phosphorylation and Ubiquitination Are Required for Resection during DNA Double-Strand Break Repair  Sharmistha Chakraborty, Raj K. Pandita,
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Increased Steady-State Levels of CUGBP1 in Myotonic Dystrophy 1 Are Due to PKC- Mediated Hyperphosphorylation  N. Muge Kuyumcu-Martinez, Guey-Shin Wang,
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
The VEGF-C/Flt-4 axis promotes invasion and metastasis of cancer cells
Richard C. Centore, Stephanie A. Yazinski, Alice Tse, Lee Zou 
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (July 2009)
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
Activation of the Innate Signaling Molecule MAVS by Bunyavirus Infection Upregulates the Adaptor Protein SARM1, Leading to Neuronal Death  Piyali Mukherjee,
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Inhibition of KLF4 by Statins Reverses Adriamycin-Induced Metastasis and Cancer Stemness in Osteosarcoma Cells  Yangling Li, Miao Xian, Bo Yang, Meidan.
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Modeling the Therapeutic Efficacy of p53 Restoration in Tumors
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (May 2014)
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Ramiro E. Verdun, Laure Crabbe, Candy Haggblom, Jan Karlseder 
Septins Regulate Actin Organization and Cell-Cycle Arrest through Nuclear Accumulation of NCK Mediated by SOCS7  Brandon E. Kremer, Laura A. Adang, Ian.
Hus1 Acts Upstream of Chk1 in a Mammalian DNA Damage Response Pathway
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
Cell-Nonautonomous Regulation of C. elegans Germ Cell Death by kri-1
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Shrimp miR-34 from Shrimp Stress Response to Virus Infection Suppresses Tumorigenesis of Breast Cancer  Yalei Cui, Xiaoyuan Yang, Xiaobo Zhang  Molecular.
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
New Histone Incorporation Marks Sites of UV Repair in Human Cells
RLE-1, an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase, Regulates C
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
Negative Regulation of Tumor Suppressor p53 by MicroRNA miR-504
SYCE2 potentiates the steady-state DNA repair activity without affecting the cell cycle checkpoint. SYCE2 potentiates the steady-state DNA repair activity.
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 145-157 (August 2006) BRIT1 regulates early DNA damage response, chromosomal integrity, and cancer  Rekha Rai, Hui Dai, Asha S. Multani, Kaiyi Li, Koei Chin, Joe Gray, John P. Lahad, Jiyong Liang, Gordon B. Mills, Funda Meric- Bernstam, Shiaw-Yih Lin  Cancer Cell  Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 145-157 (August 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.07.002 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 BRIT1 forms IRIF immediately after IR and is required for NBS1, 53BP1, MDC1, and p-ATM IRIF formation A: U2OS cells were analyzed for IRIF formation at the indicated times after irradiation (10 Gy). B: U2OS cells were transfected with control (luciferase) or BRIT1 siRNA#1 twice as described; 48 hr after the second transfection, cells were treated or not treated with 10 Gy of ionizing radiation, and 1 hr later they were fixed and stained with antibodies to BRIT1 and 53BP1. Cells were then washed and stained with rhodamine- or FITC-conjugated antibodies; nuclei were visualized by DAPI staining. The 53BP1 foci were abolished in cells in which BRIT1 was completely knocked down; the cells with incomplete knockdown of BRIT1 did show 53BP1 foci (bottom panel). C: U2OS cells were transfected and treated as described in B except that the antibodies used were to BRIT1 and MDC1 (top) or BRIT1 and p-ATM (bottom). D: U2OS cells were transfected and treated as described for B except that the antibodies used were to BRIT1 and NBS1. Scale bars, 20 μm. Cancer Cell 2006 10, 145-157DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2006.07.002) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 BRIT1 is required for UV-induced formation of ATR, RPA, and p-Rad17 foci U2OS cells were transfected with control (luciferase) or BRIT1 siRNA twice; at 48 hr after the second transfection, cells were treated or not treated with 50 J/m2 of UV radiation. One hour after irradiation, cells were fixed and costained with antibodies to BRIT1 and ATR (A), RPA34 (B), p-RPA34 (C, left panel), and p-Rad17 (C, right panel). Cells were then washed and stained with rhodamine- or FITC-conjugated antibodies. Nuclei were visualized by DAPI staining. Scale bars, 20 μm. Cancer Cell 2006 10, 145-157DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2006.07.002) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 BRIT1 is required for the association of MDC1, 53BP1, p-NBS1, RPA, and p-Rad17 with chromatin and for the UV-induced phosphorylation of RPA and Rad17 A: U2OS cells were transfected twice with luciferase or with two different BRIT1 siRNAs; at 48 hr after the second transfection, cells were treated or not treated with 10 Gy of ionizing radiation. Two hours after irradiation, chromatin-enriched sediments were subjected to Western blot analysis and probed with antibodies against BRIT1, MDC1, 53BP1, p-NBS1, NBS1, and ORC2. B: U2OS cells were transfected as described for A and treated with 50 J/m2 UV radiation; 2 hr later, chromatin-enriched fractions were subjected to Western blotting and probed with antibodies against BRIT1, RPA70, p-RPA34, RPA34, p-Rad17, Rad17, and ORC2. C: U2OS cells were treated as described above except that cells were exposed to 30 J/m2 of UV; 8 hr after irradiation, whole-cell lysates were collected and subjected to Western blot analysis and probed with antibodies against BRIT1, p-RPA34, RPA34, p-Rad17, and actin. Cancer Cell 2006 10, 145-157DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2006.07.002) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 BRIT1 deficiency leads to chromosomal aberrations HMEC cells were mock transfected or transfected with luciferase or one of three different BRIT1 siRNAs twice; 72 hr later, cells were analyzed by metaphase spreads. The top panels show examples of abnormal chromosomes, and the bottom panel summarizes percentages of cells containing chromosomal aberrations. Cancer Cell 2006 10, 145-157DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2006.07.002) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 BRIT1 deficiencies in human cancer A: Array-based CGH was used to test 87 specimens of human serous ovarian cancer with bacterial artificial chromosome probes. Log base two logarithmic ratios of test to reference intensity were calculated for the probes across the region containing BRIT1. More than half of the samples arrayed showed a reduction in copy number, whereas approximately 30% showed a loss of at least one copy of the region across chromosome 8 encompassing BRIT1. B: The losses of BRIT1 gene copy in the ovarian cancer CGH database were compared with the gain or loss of at least one copy number change using different probes to other chromosome regions. The specimens that exhibited more BRIT1 gene loss correlated with the overall copy changes of various genes. C: Comparing BRIT1 RNA transcript levels in benign ovarian tissue specimens and ovarian tumor specimens demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in BRIT1 RNA levels in the tumors as compared with the mean of RNA levels of the benign specimens. D: CGH of 54 breast cancer cell lines showed that a striking majority showed large decreases in copy number, with loss of at least one copy, for the region on chromosome 8 containing BRIT1. E: Expression of BRIT1 RNA in human normal (untransformed) breast cell lines or breast cancer cell lines were analyzed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. F: Left: total cell lysates were obtained from the cultured cell lines, subjected to Western blot analysis, and probed with antibodies against BRIT1 or actin. Right: the indicated cell lines were treated with 10 Gy of ionizing radiation. One hour after irradiation, cells were fixed and costained with antibodies to BRIT1 or phospho-ATM antibody. Scale bar, 20 μm. Note: the phospho-ATM foci appeared in a very small fraction of BT20 or MCF7 cells that showed detectable BRIT1 expression. G: Prostate cancer specimens were analyzed by immunohistochemical staining and probed with BRIT1-specific antibody. The brownish color indicates BRIT1 expression in the regions of normal tissue, benign prostate hypertrophy (BPH), or prostate cancer from the same patient specimen. Scale bar, 50 μm. H: BRIT1 RNA transcript levels were tested for correlation with time to metastasis of breast cancer in a database maintained by Stanford University. Normal to high BRIT1 levels were associated with longer time to develop metastasis and an overall reduction in the incidence of metastasis. Cancer Cell 2006 10, 145-157DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2006.07.002) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The deleted BRIT1 gene identified from a breast cancer patient fails to activate foci formation for MDC1, p-RPA, and p-ATM A: Exon 10 deletion of the BRIT1 gene (BR7) was identified in a breast patient sample by sequence analysis (coding exons shown in gray). The premature termination (indicated by red x, bottom schematic) results in a protein lacking two C terminus BRCT domains. B: U2OS cells were transfected with FLAG-V, FLAG-BRIT1, or FLAG-BR7 constructs. Four hours after the transfection, cells were mock transfected or transfected with control luciferase or BRIT1 siRNA#1. Forty-eight hours after the siRNA transfection, cells were treated with IR (10 Gy). One hour after irradiation, cells were fixed and stained with the MDC1 antibody. Cells were then washed and subsequently stained with rhodamine-antibody. Nuclei were visualized by DAPI staining (left). Scale bars, 20 μm. The lysates from the cells analyzed above were subjected to Western blot analysis and probed with BRIT1 antibody (right) to confirm the expression of the exogenous FLAG-BRIT1 and FLAG-BR7 protein. C: MCF7 cells were transfected with FLAG-V, FLAG-BRIT1, or FLAG-BR7 constructs. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were treated with either UV (50 J/m2) or IR (10 Gy). One hour after irradiation, cells were fixed and stained with the p-RPA and p-ATM antibodies, respectively. Cells were then washed and subsequently stained with rhodamine- or FITC-conjugated antibodies. Nuclei were visualized by DAPI staining. The lysates from the cells analyzed above were subjected to Western blot analysis and probed with BRIT1 antibody (right) to confirm the expression of the exogenous FLAG-BRIT1 and FLAG-BR7 protein. Cancer Cell 2006 10, 145-157DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2006.07.002) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 A model of BRIT1 functions in checkpoint signaling, chromosomal integrity, and cancer suppression In addition to regulating BRCA1 and Chk1 expression, BRIT1 is also required for the function of DNA damage sensors or mediators in both the ATM and ATR pathways; BRIT1 is also required for the maintenance of chromosomal integrity and, potentially, for tumor suppression. Cancer Cell 2006 10, 145-157DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2006.07.002) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions