Lionel Costenaro, J. Günter Grossmann, Christine Ebel, Anthony Maxwell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 92, Issue 8, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Natalie K. Garcia, Miklos Guttman, Jamie L. Ebner, Kelly K. Lee 
A Naturally Occurring Repeat Protein with High Internal Sequence Identity Defines a New Class of TPR-like Proteins  Jacob D. Marold, Jennifer M. Kavran,
Maxim V. Petoukhov, Dmitri I. Svergun  Biophysical Journal 
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages (July 1995)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
The Mechanism of the Translocation Step in DNA Replication by DNA Polymerase I: A Computer Simulation Analysis  Andrei A. Golosov, Joshua J. Warren, Lorena.
Cortical Mechanisms of Smooth Eye Movements Revealed by Dynamic Covariations of Neural and Behavioral Responses  David Schoppik, Katherine I. Nagel, Stephen.
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Anna Hagmann, Moritz Hunkeler, Edward Stuttfeld, Timm Maier  Structure 
XLF Regulates Filament Architecture of the XRCC4·Ligase IV Complex
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
The Exomer Cargo Adaptor Features a Flexible Hinge Domain
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
A Gating Mechanism of the Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Deciphering the “Fuzzy” Interaction of FG Nucleoporins and Transport Factors Using Small-Angle Neutron Scattering  Samuel Sparks, Deniz B. Temel, Michael.
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Crystal Structure of the N-Terminal Domain of the Secretin GspD from ETEC Determined with the Assistance of a Nanobody  Konstantin V. Korotkov, Els Pardon,
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Molecular Structures of Transcribing RNA Polymerase I
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Jochen Zimmer, Declan A. Doyle, J. Günter Grossmann 
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
XLF Regulates Filament Architecture of the XRCC4·Ligase IV Complex
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Modular Structure of the Full-Length DNA Gyrase B Subunit Revealed by Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering  Lionel Costenaro, J. Günter Grossmann, Christine Ebel, Anthony Maxwell  Structure  Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 329-339 (March 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2007.01.013 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Sequence Alignment of GyrB and Topo II Sequences Identical residues are written in white in black boxes; similar residues are boxed in. GyrB consists of three domains: an ATPase domain (GyrB43, shown only from residue I370) in blue, a Toprim domain in red, and a Tail domain in pink and green. The domain extents are shown above the sequences with a bold line where crystallographic structures are known (PDB ID codes 1ei1 for GyrB43 and 1bgw for topo II) and with a dotted line otherwise. Secondary structures are indicated below the alignment. Tail-2 secondary structures, predicted by PSI-pred, PHDsec, and PROFsec, are shown for a reliability index above 5. Red stars under the sequences indicate the Toprim residues that are part of the cleavage-religation active site of gyrase. Structure 2007 15, 329-339DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.01.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Crystallographic Structures of GyrB43, PDB ID Code 1ei1, in Ribbon and Space-Filling Representations The amino-terminal loop extending out from one GyrB43 monomer caps the ATP- or ADPNP-binding pocket of the other monomer. The length of the axes is 10 Å. Structure 2007 15, 329-339DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.01.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Analytical Ultracentrifugation of GyrB (A) Modeling of the sedimentation velocity profiles of GyrB at 0.5 mg/ml. The symbols represent the experimental profiles as a function of time and distance from the axis of rotation, after the start of the sedimentation. The curves represent the theoretical fits, and the residuals are their differences with the corresponding experimental profiles. Concentrations are in units of fringe displacement in the interference optical system. For clarity, only every second profile and every tenth experimental point used in the analysis are shown. (B) Sedimentation coefficient distribution c(s) calculated for GyrB. The distribution is normalized to the main peak values. Structure 2007 15, 329-339DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.01.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering of GyrB in Solution at 0.5 mg/ml Experimental data (in black) are shown as a function of the momentum transfer q (>0.04 Å−1) in comparison to a typical monomeric model reconstructed by Gasbor (in red) and the domain model (blue dashed line; see text). The inset shows the corresponding pair distribution functions p(r), which represent the distribution of interatomic distances. The maximal dimension of monomeric GyrB in solution is 132 Å (black curve). Structure 2007 15, 329-339DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.01.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Monomeric GyrB Models Built from SAXS Data (A–C) Typical models: numbers 3, 4, and 1, respectively (see Table 1). (D) Filtered model representing the common structural features of the nine independent consensus models. The surfaces were built with a sphere radius of 5 Å for each residue. The views are, respectively, from front, side, and bottom; the length of the axes is 10 Å. Structure 2007 15, 329-339DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.01.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Solution Structure of a Monomer of GyrB and Its Domain Organization The monomeric filtered model (Figure 5D) is represented as a transparent surface. The four subdomain structures were fitted into it, forming the three GyrB domains: ATPase, Toprim, and Tail, which includes the subdomains Tail-1 and Tail-2. The connecting ends of each subdomain are colored as the following subdomain and are in space-filling representation, except for the Toprim-Tail connection, which comes from the continuous structure of topo II. In addition, the corresponding ends of the Tail-1 and Tail-2 subdomains are numbered. Red stars indicate the Toprim residues that are part of the cleavage-religation active site of DNA gyrase. The views are, respectively, from the front, side, and bottom; the length of the axes is 10 Å. Structure 2007 15, 329-339DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.01.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Schematic Mechanism of Supercoiling by DNA Gyrase Step 1: Free states of the components in solution. Step 2: Wrapping of the DNA around the holoenzyme presents the T segment over the G segment, with a positive crossover. Step 3: Upon ATP binding, GyrB dimerizes, captures the T segment, and the G segment is transiently cleaved. Step 4: Hydrolysis of one ATP allows GyrB to rotate, the GyrA opening to widen, and the transport of the T segment through the cleaved G segment. Step 5: Religation of the G segment introduces two negative supercoils into DNA. Release of the T segment and hydrolysis of the second ATP resets the enzyme. The right column shows the side views for steps 2–4. Stars indicate the active-site residues for DNA cleavage and the circle indicates the ATP-binding pocket. Color coding of the domains: GyrA59, orange; GyrA-CTD, cyan; GyrB43, blue; Toprim, red; Tail, green; G segment, black; T segment, purple. Structure 2007 15, 329-339DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.01.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions