Cell-Autonomous Requirement of the USP/EcR-B Ecdysone Receptor for Mushroom Body Neuronal Remodeling in Drosophila  Tzumin Lee, Simone Marticke, Carl.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rein et al., 2002 Current Biology The mushroom bodies (MBs) in the adult Drosophila brain.
Advertisements

Rein et al., 2002 Current Biology The mushroom bodies (MBs) in the adult Drosophila brain.
Genetic Specification of Axonal Arbors
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Caroline Medioni, Mirana Ramialison, Anne Ephrussi, Florence Besse 
A Map of Olfactory Representation in the Drosophila Mushroom Body
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages e4 (August 2018)
Identification of E2/E3 Ubiquitinating Enzymes and Caspase Activity Regulating Drosophila Sensory Neuron Dendrite Pruning  Chay T. Kuo, Sijun Zhu, Susan.
Jean-Maurice Dura Institut de Génétique Humaine
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw 
Luyuan Pan, Yong Q. Zhang, Elvin Woodruff, Kendal Broadie 
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (May 2005)
The Conserved Immunoglobulin Superfamily Member SAX-3/Robo Directs Multiple Aspects of Axon Guidance in C. elegans  Jennifer A Zallen, B.Alexander Yi,
Volume 91, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
Flies without Centrioles
Distinct Protein Domains and Expression Patterns Confer Divergent Axon Guidance Functions for Drosophila Robo Receptors  Bettina Spitzweck, Marko Brankatschk,
Sightless has homology to transmembrane acyltransferases and is required to generate active Hedgehog protein  Jeffrey D. Lee, Jessica E. Treisman  Current.
Regulating Axon Branch Stability
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
Muscles in the Drosophila second thoracic segment are patterned independently of autonomous homeotic gene function  Sudipto Roy, L.S. Shashidhara, K VijayRaghavan 
Hierarchical Deployment of Factors Regulating Temporal Fate in a Diverse Neuronal Lineage of the Drosophila Central Brain  Chih-Fei Kao, Hung-Hsiang Yu,
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Apical/Basal Spindle Orientation Is Required for Neuroblast Homeostasis and Neuronal Differentiation in Drosophila  Clemens Cabernard, Chris Q. Doe  Developmental.
The Molecular Basis of Sugar Sensing in Drosophila Larvae
BTB/POZ-Zinc Finger Protein Abrupt Suppresses Dendritic Branching in a Neuronal Subtype-Specific and Dosage-Dependent Manner  Wenjun Li, Fay Wang, Laurent.
Giovanni Marchetti, Gaia Tavosanis  Current Biology 
Dendrites of Distinct Classes of Drosophila Sensory Neurons Show Different Capacities for Homotypic Repulsion  Wesley B. Grueber, Bing Ye, Adrian W. Moore,
Taste Representations in the Drosophila Brain
Elizabeth E. Caygill, Andrea H. Brand  Cell Reports 
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Allan M Wong, Jing W Wang, Richard Axel  Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
From Lineage to Wiring Specificity
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages (September 2004)
Control of Dendritic Field Formation in Drosophila
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Jillian L. Brechbiel, Elizabeth R. Gavis  Current Biology 
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Benjamin J. Matthews, Wesley B. Grueber  Current Biology 
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Aljoscha Nern, Yan Zhu, S. Lawrence Zipursky  Neuron 
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 128, Issue 2, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (May 2003)
Paracrine Signaling through the JAK/STAT Pathway Activates Invasive Behavior of Ovarian Epithelial Cells in Drosophila  Debra L. Silver, Denise J. Montell 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
F. Christian Bennett, Kieran F. Harvey  Current Biology 
Extremes of Lineage Plasticity in the Drosophila Brain
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Maria E. Gallegos, Cornelia I. Bargmann  Neuron 
Control of Dendritic Field Formation in Drosophila
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Giovanni Marchetti, Gaia Tavosanis  Current Biology 
Caroline Medioni, Mirana Ramialison, Anne Ephrussi, Florence Besse 
Allison L. Blum, Wanhe Li, Mike Cressy, Josh Dubnau  Current Biology 
Regulating Axon Branch Stability
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages (December 2004)
Different Levels of the Homeodomain Protein Cut Regulate Distinct Dendrite Branching Patterns of Drosophila Multidendritic Neurons  Wesley B Grueber,
E93 Directs Steroid-Triggered Programmed Cell Death in Drosophila
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Cell-Autonomous Requirement of the USP/EcR-B Ecdysone Receptor for Mushroom Body Neuronal Remodeling in Drosophila  Tzumin Lee, Simone Marticke, Carl Sung, Steven Robinow, Liqun Luo  Neuron  Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 807-818 (December 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00155-0

Figure 1 Remodeling of MB γ Neurons In all figures, the unit of the scale bar is μm; the left brain hemispheres are shown; midline is toward right and dorsal is up. br, brain; vnc,ventral nerve cord; seg, supraesophageal ganglion; sub, subesophageal ganglion; ol, optic lobe. (A and C) Schematic drawing of Drosophila brains at late larval (A) and adult (C) stages, not to scale. One MB neuroblast clone (one quarter of the entire MB) in each brain lobe is outlined, and one representative γ neuron is drawn at the left brain hemisphere. At the larval stage, every MB γ axon bifurcates into the dorsal and medial lobes. In adults all γ neurons project axons medially toward the midline without dorsal branching. (B) Schematic drawing of a single γ (black) and α′/β′ (gray) neurons in late larval, 18-hr APF, and adult stages, showing that axonal and dendritic reorganization occurs in γ but not in α′/β′ neurons (Lee et al. 1999). (D–F) Composite confocal images of single-cell/two-cell clones of MB γ neurons at late larval (D), 18-hr APF (E), and adult (F) stages. These MARCM clones were generated in newly hatched larvae; tissues were processed for immunofluorescence (see Experimental Procedures) at the indicated stages. Note that the larval dendrites undergo extensive pruning at the early pupal stage (arrowheads in [D] and [E]) and the larva-specific axonal branches (arrows in [D]) were completely pruned (star in E) before being replaced by the processes without dorsal branching (arrow in [F]). Genotype: hs-FLP/Y;FRTG13,UAS-mCD8GFP,GAL4–201Y/FRTG13,tubP-GAL80. Neuron 2000 28, 807-818DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00155-0)

Figure 2 Identification of the l(X)48 and l(X)101 Mutants Defective in the Pruning of Larval-Specific Axons and Dendrites (A) Summary of the genetic crosses for the MARCM-based genetic screen. The asterisk represents a mutagenized chromosome. (B and C) Composite confocal images of multiple single-cell/two-cell MARCM clones of γ neurons at the adult stage. They are homozygous for the l(X)48 (B) and l(X)101 (C) mutations, respectively. Note that the larval type of bifurcated axons (horizontal and vertical arrows represent dorsal and medial lobes, respectively, in this and all subsequent images) persisted into the adult stage. Genotypes: (B) FRT19A,l(X)48/FRT19A,hs-FLP,tubP-GAL80; UAS-mCD8GFP/+;GAL4-OK107/+; and (C) FRT19A,l(X)101/FRT19A,hs-FLP,tubP-GAL80; UAS-mCD8GFP/+;GAL4-OK107/+. (D and E) Composite confocal images of the MARCM neuroblast clones (Lee et al. 1999) composed of MB γ neurons labeled with GAL4–201Y. The l(X)48 homozygous mutant clone (D) and the wild-type clone (E) were both generated in newly hatched larvae and examined at 18-hr APF. In contrast to the pruning of both larval dendrites and the larval-specific axonal branches in wild type (E), the l(X)48 mutant MB clone retained a prominent calyx composed of MB dendrites (arrowhead in [D], compared with the arrowhead in [E]) and two axonal lobes (arrows in [D]). The broken lines indicate the brain midline. Genotypes: (D) FRT19A,l(X)48/FRT19A,hs-FLP,tubP-GAL80;UAS-mCD8GFP,GAL4–201Y/+; and (E) hs-FLP/X;FRTG13,UAS-mCD8GFP,GAL4–201Y/FRTG13,tubP-GAL80. Neuron 2000 28, 807-818DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00155-0)

Figure 3 Lack of Axonal and Dendritic Pruning in usp3 Mutant MB γ Neurons Composite confocal images of single-cell/two-cell MARCM clones of usp3 mutant γ neurons generated in newly hatched larvae and examined in late larva (A), 18-hr APF (B), and adult (C) stages, respectively. Note the persistence of bifurcated axons in pupae and adults (arrows in [B] and [C]), and the lack of obvious pruning of larval dendrites in pupae (arrowhead in [B]). Genotype: FRT19A,usp3/FRT19A,hs-FLP,tubP-GAL80; UAS-mCD8GFP,GAL4–201Y/+;+/TM3. Neuron 2000 28, 807-818DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00155-0)

Figure 4 Molecular Nature of usp Mutant Alleles Sequence alignment of the DNA binding domain of USP, its human homolog hRXR, and two other Drosophila nuclear hormone receptors investigated in this study, EcR and E75. The amino acid changes of usp5 identified in this study, as well as two previously identified usp alleles are shown. All three alleles result in changes of invariant arginines that contact phosphates in target DNA. The consensus sequence is derived from sequence analysis of the C4-type zinc fingers (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/cgi-bin/Pfam/getacc?PF00105). Neuron 2000 28, 807-818DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00155-0)

Figure 5 Expression of EcR-B1 in MB γ Neurons A single-section confocal image of the MB cell body region in a wandering third instar larval brain. The brain was immunostained for both the mCD8GFP expression ([A], green) and the EcR-B1 expression ([B], red). Merging (A) and (B) revealed that all γ neurons marked by the mCD8GFP are positive for EcR-B1 (A + B). Note that EcR-B1 expression is not present in the GFP-negative α′/β′ cell bodies (arrows) that are located superficial to the GFP-positive γ neurons. The calyx composed of dendrites is outlined by white dots and the brain margin is labeled by gray dots. Genotype: UAS-mCD8GFP/GAL4–201Y. Neuron 2000 28, 807-818DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00155-0)

Figure 6 Rescue of the MB γ Neuron Pruning in the EcR-B1/EcR-B Mutants Composite confocal images of the paired MBs in the EcRW53st/EcR31 mutant “pupal” brains in the absence of any EcR transgenes (A) and in the presence of UAS-EcR-A (B), UAS-EcR-B1 (C), and UAS-EcR-B2 (D). GAL4–201Y was used to restrict the expression of mCD8GFP to all γ neurons. (A) In the EcRW53st/EcR31 mutant background, the MB γ neurons still retained the larval calyces (the MB dendritic field indicated by arrowheads) and two axonal lobes (arrows) even at 24-hr APF, indicating a lack of pruning of larval-specific processes. Genotype: EcRW53St,UAS-mCD8GFP,GAL4–201Y/EcR31. (B) The larval-specific axonal lobes (arrows) still persisted after expressing EcR-A specifically in EcRW53st/EcR31 mutant MB γ neurons (100% penetrance, n = 38 brain lobes). In contrast, the calyces (arrowhead) became less prominent, indicating some degree of pruning of larval dendrites. Genotype: EcRW53St,UAS-mCD8GFP,GAL4–201Y/EcR31; UAS-EcR-A/+. (C and D) After expressing EcR-B1 (C) or EcR-B2 (D) specifically in EcRW53st/EcR31 mutant γ neurons, pruning of larval-specific axonal branches was rescued and re-extension of new processes was observed (arrows) (n = 30 and 24 brain lobes for EcR-B1 and EcR-B2, respectively). In addition, the larval calyces (arrowheads) were barely detectable. Genotypes: (C) EcRW53St,UAS-mCD8GFP,GAL4–201Y/EcR31;UAS-EcR-B1/+; and (D) EcRW53St, UAS-mCD8GFP,GAL4–201Y/EcR31;UAS-EcR-B2/+. Neuron 2000 28, 807-818DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00155-0)

Figure 7 Normal MB γ Neuron Pruning in BR-C, E75, and E74 Mutants (A–D) Composite confocal images of single-cell/two-cell MARCM clones of γ neurons examined around 18-hr APF. (A–C) In mosaic brains, γ neurons homozygous for npr13 (A), E75e213 (B), or E74P[neo] (C) lost most larval dendrites (arrowheads), and their axonal termini (arrows) were far away from the midlines (broken lines) and without bifurcation, indicating normal pruning of larva-specific processes. (D) The E74DL-1 mutant γ neuron was weakly and unevenly labeled. This is an example of the strongest labeling. The weak labeling prevented a detailed analysis of the dendritic elaboration (arrowhead) and the axon projection (question mark). Genotypes: (A) FRT19A, npr13/FRT19A,hs-FLP,tubP-GAL80;UAS-mCD8GFP/+;GAL4-OK107/+; (B) hs-FLP,UAS-mCD8GFP/X;FRT2A,E75e213/FRT2A,tubP-GAL80; GAL4-OK107/+; (C) hs-FLP,UAS-mCD8GFP/X;FRT2A,E74P[neo]/FRT2A,tubP-GAL80;GAL4-OK107/+; and (D) hs-FLP,UAS-mCD8GFP/X; FRT2A,E74DL-1/FRT2A,tubP-GAL80;GAL4-OK107/+. Consistent results were seen for at least 10 samples for each genotype. (E) Composite confocal images of MARCM-labeled adult γ neurons homozygous for E74DL-1. Note their axons (arrow) only projected medially toward the midline. Genotype: hs-FLP,UAS-mCD8GFP/X;FRT2A,E74DL-1/FRT2A,tubP-GAL80;GAL4-OK107/+. Consistent results were seen for at least 10 samples of this genotype. (F) A summary illustrating that the well-characterized BR-C, E74, E75 primary response genes for ecdysone are not individually essential for MB neuronal remodeling, and that the USP/EcR-B heterodimer probably mediates the ecdysone-dependent MB neuronal remodeling through other target genes. Neuron 2000 28, 807-818DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00155-0)