Evaluation of a Wearable Body Monitoring Device During Treadmill Walking and Jogging in Patients With Fibromyalgia Syndrome Diego Munguía-Izquierdo, PhD, Alfredo Santalla, PhD, Alejandro Legaz-Arrese, PhD Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages 115-122 (January 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.021 Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Bland and Altman plots of the differences between tests 1 and 2 for (A) 50m·min–1, 0% grade walking EE; (B) 83.3m·min–1, 0% grade walking EE; (C) 116.7m·min–1, 0% grade walking EE; and (D) 116.7m·min–1, 2.5% grade walking EE. The means of the differences (solid lines) and limits of agreement (dashed lines) within±2 SDs are shown. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012 93, 115-122DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.021) Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Bland and Altman plots of the differences between SWA estimate and IC measurement for (A) 50m·min–1, 0% grade walking EE; (B) 83.3m·min–1, 0% grade walking EE; (C) 116.7m·min–1, 0% grade walking EE; and (D) 116.7m·min–1, 2.5% grade walking EE. The means of the differences (solid lines) and limits of agreement (dashed lines) within±2 SDs are shown. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012 93, 115-122DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.021) Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions