Testing some CAL specs Level 3 CAL requirement 5.5.5: <3 cm xyz position resolution per layer (“CAL MIP centroid”) Level 3 CAL requirement 5.5.6: <15ocos2q.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bill Atwood, Dec GLAST 1 GLAST Energy or Humpty-Dumpty’s Revenge A Statement of the Problem Divide and Conquer strategy Easiest: Leakage (Depth)
Advertisements

Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Understanding SVAC CalMip Variables Monica Pepe Stefano Germani INFN Perugia Instrument Analysis Meeting December.
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
GLAST LAT Project I&T Meeting – Jan 20,2004 E. do Couto e Silva 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: EM1 Data Analysis and Calibration Summary Report Eduardo.
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb28,2006 Preliminary Studies on the dependence of Arrival Time distributions in the LAT using CAL Low Energy Trigger.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop 6 – 06/02/27 F. Piron & E. Nuss (LPTA) 1 Trending CAL performance and mapping crystals Gamma-ray Large Area.
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectCalibration and Analysis group meeting, April, 3, 2006 CAL on-orbit calibration with protons. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU.
Page 1 Calculating the Beam Position at the Ecal for DESY Run (Independent of Tracking) Hakan Yilmaz.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop 5 – 05/08/29 F. Piron & E. Nuss (IN2P3/LPTA – Montpellier) 1 Comprehensive review of CAL calibrations Gamma-ray.
1 May 27, 2005 Comparison tower A data and Montecarlo OVERVIEW Comparison of MC (EM- v 4r060302p18 ) and tower A data using the “baseline” run (Run )
GLAST LAT Project Software vrvs meeting X. Chen 1 GLAST LAT Project Software vrvs meeting X. Chen 1 Analyses of Muon Calibration Data Xin Chen.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectCAL Recon rewriting meeting, May, 11, 2005 In what cases we need external position estimation ? Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU.
1 ACD studies: 1. Light Yield Determination for top ACD Tiles 2. Looking for holes (screws) in the ACD data Instrument Analysis Workshop VI Luis C. Reyes.
GLAST LAT Project IA meeting, 21 April 2006 David Smith Bordeaux 1 Muons from Flight SoftWare (= “FSW”) See my WorkShopSix presentation to understand.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop #4, 14 July 2005 David Smith CAL calib at SLAC SVAC1 Stability of the CAL Calibrations Online script “suites”
CalRecon Moments Analysis Studies I Tracy Usher1/17 A Brief History of Glast Release GR (Friday, July 15) –Effectively, the first DC-2 2M all-gamma.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
LCG Meeting, May 14th 2003 V. Daniel Elvira1 G4 (OSCAR_1_4_0) Validation of CMS HCal V. Daniel Elvira Fermilab.
GLAST LAT ProjectIntegration and Test CDR Peer Review, March 28, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 8 - Page 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I & T Peer.
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
Outrigger Timing Calibration & Reconstruction Milagro – 11/17/03 Shoup – 1 Purpose: To incorporate outrigger hits in event angle fitting Additionally incorporated.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Meeting August 6, 2004 David Smith w. Benoît Lott Muons in photodiodes1 MIPs in your Photodiodes David’s Instr. Ana.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectInstrument Analysis meeting, February, 27, 2006 CAL features and idiosyncrasies. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU Gamma-ray Large.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
1 NaI calibrationneutron observation NaI calibration and neutron observation during the charge exchange experiment 1.Improving the NaI energy resolution.
Progress on F  with the KLOE experiment (untagged) Federico Nguyen Università Roma TRE February 27 th 2006.
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
CALICE, CERN June 29, 2004J. Zálešák, APDs for tileHCAL1 APDs for tileHCAL MiniCal studies with APDs in e-test beam J. Zálešák, Prague with different preamplifiers.
LAV efficiency studies with photons T. Spadaro* *Frascati National Laboratory of INFN.
Comparison of MC and data Abelardo Moralejo Padova.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
ICARUS T600: low energy electrons
An update on ECAL simulations
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Background Rejection Prep Work
EZDC spectra reconstruction and calibration
Solving pedestal problem
Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS
GLAST LAT tracker signal simulation and trigger timing study
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
“minimum-ionisation” peak
PCAL Cosmic Ray Tests Progress Report C. Smith μ U V W MODULE 2
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
DC1 Energy Evaluation.
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Calorimeter calibrations with Flight Software.
TKR to CAL for 16 Towers The usual TKR extrapolation to CAL study, for the 16 tower data. Check calibrations, look for problems, etc. Today -- “work in.
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Imaging crystals with TKR
Correlation of HO signal with DT
Mini Tower Preliminary Results
Tower A: A First Look Finding the Data: Login: THIS ONE! user: glast
Michele Faucci Giannelli
CR Photon Working Group
Eduardo do Couto e Silva Feb 28, 2006
Current status Minjung Kim
Shaped Digital Readout Noise in CAL
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Overview of Beam Test Benoit, Ronaldo and Eduardo Nov 8 , 2005 thanks to Steve and Bill for helping to consolidate all the information.
Presentation transcript:

Testing some CAL specs Level 3 CAL requirement 5.5.5: <3 cm xyz position resolution per layer (“CAL MIP centroid”) Level 3 CAL requirement 5.5.6: <15ocos2q for cosmic muons (“m PSF”) Non-spec things Want LAC settings to be at 1 or 2 MeV (zero suppression), without overly hot channels nor overly inefficient channels. Tools used: my usual TKR extrapolation to CAL, as well as CALMip.

You are here

This talk

The Method [Review my IA Workshop #4 presentation if you like (14 July 2005).] Extrapolate TKR track to CAL, predict which crystals get hit. Look at energy deposits, positions. Use Tkr1EndPos, Dir. Stay a few cm away from crystal ends. Require: TkrNumTracks == 1 Tkr1KalThetaMs < 0.03 Tkr1NumHits > 15 <2 MeV in adjacent crystals Extrapolation of track must traverse top & bottom of crystal. Energy corrected for cosq.

Yellow: 4M Surface Muons (v5r0703p5) The data sample Red: six B30 runs (135005404 to 14) Blue: ~22 (twenty-two) B2 runs (135005345 to 89), re-processed with the “muon track” hypothesis Yellow: 4M Surface Muons (v5r0703p5)

CAL level 3 req’t 5.5.5: <3cm xyz position resolution per layer This is an even layer… …so the x-direction is the longitudinal meas’t (light ratio from the two crystal ends)… …whereas the y-direction is just the transverse crystal profile. Z-direction like y. millimeters

CAL position vs extrapolated TKR position Here, odd layers, all 1536 crystals. (Even layers similar.)

All rms’s << 30 mm: req’t met dX, odd layers dY, evens rmsX, odd layers rmsY, evens

CAL level 3 req’t 5.5.6: <15ocos2q for cosmic muons Use all B2 “muon TKR hypothesis” MeritTuple files (runs 135005345 to 89) TCut OneTrack = “TkrNumTracks==1 && CalMipNum==1” TCut AteLayers = “CalELayer0>8 && …&& CalELayer7>8 ” Let cosx = -CalDir•VtxDir (angle between CALMIP and TKR tracks) (using Montpellier MIP finder.) Make 9 bins of 10 degrees each, histogram x, find 68% point.

Nine 10o zenith angle intervals Psf req 7.0 15 6.5 14 5.5 12 5.0 10 4.0 8 3.0 5 2.5 2.7 1.5 1.0 req’t met: Gets marginal beyond 70 degrees off axis.

A typical crystal: tower 9 Layer 7 Column 5 0.79/11.4 = 7%, for sigma of landau s ~ rms ~ fwhm/2.36 = .45/2.36 = 0.19 0.19/11.4 = 1.7% Spike contains ~230/9431 = 2.5%, which is roughly the inter-crystal gap (thickness of the carbon fiber wall…)

Energy deposit vs crystal index Most uniform ever! (MC width < true width is an old problem)

Un-zoom y-axis of energy deposit vs crystal 2 of the 3 channels with LAC DAC = 127, (nearly) reproduced by MC. 11.2 MeV by design and in MC, but 11.3 MeV in data, both B2 and B30. (B30 used for calibration.) (This slide: full statistics. Preceding slide: earlier work, not updated.)

Energy deposit histograms Here, all B2 runs, with “muon” track hypothesis. B30 looks same, MC looks real similar.

LAC = Log Accept (for zero suppresion) Each crystal end has a discriminator, to decide whether there’s a signal worth reading out. The discriminator threshold is set using the “LAC DAC”. if it’s too low, event size becomes unnecessarily large, leading to acquisition deadtime issues. If it’s too high, you can miss teeny energy deposits that help with background rejection. We’re aiming for the 1 or 2 MeV range. Here, look at the end of the analysis chain to check that the settings come out okay

Single diode pedestal-subtracted ADC counts (from the CalTuple) Peak at 381 dc <=> 12 MeV (>11.2 MeV cuz no cosq correction) LAC threshold. LAC_MeV = 12 * LAC_adc/MPV

Observed LAC thresholds for all channels Find the LAC turn on, in ADC counts, crystal-by-crystal. Tuning in progress -- presently what I find is (maybe) 2x too high.

IA, CERN testbeams and DC2 In IA we’ve looked at mostly muons, at the micro micro level Beginning Wednesday, we hope to look at gammas at the macro macro level (like, the Universe, man!) How to transition? Real gamma rays coming this summer… simulated CERN gamma rays on disk… opportunity to learn how the DC2 “photon lists” get filled.

Conclusions < 30 cm MIP centroid requirement 5.5.5 is satisfied. <15ocos2q PSF for m‘s requirement 5.5.6 is satisfied. LAC settings (zero suppression) are 1 or 2 MeV. A few warm and cool channels are being taken care of.