Ebba Dellwik, Duncan Heathfield, Barry Gardiner

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Population Modeling Methods and Projects: Implications for Data Use Greg Yetman CIESIN, Columbia University GEO Meningitis.
Advertisements

Introduction to modelling extremes
Phoenics User Conference on CFD May 2004 Vipac Engineers & Scientists Ltd COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS Simulation of Turbulent Flows and Pollutant Dispersion.
Wind Flow Over Forested Hills: Mean Flow and Turbulence Characteristics CEsA - Centre for Wind Energy and Atmospheric Flows, Portugal J. Lopes da Costa,
Modeling to Revise Coastal Inundation and Flooding Estimates in Georgia and Northeast Florida Association of State Flood Plain Managers Conference May.
Wind Resource Assessment
Application of the FEWS Stream Flow (SF) Model to the Limpopo Basin, Mozambique Final Report Tanya Hoogerwerf.
PRESENTS: FORECASTING FOR OPERATIONS AND DESIGN February 16 th 2011 – Aberdeen.
Discovering the true wind resource: including hi-res terrain effects for a new and global wind atlas. Jake Badger, Hans Jørgensen, Mark Kelly, Ferhat Bingöl,
Software Demonstration Please left click to advance through the show
OpenFOAM for Air Quality Ernst Meijer and Ivo Kalkman First Dutch OpenFOAM Seminar Delft, 4 november 2010.
Maximum Covariance Analysis Canonical Correlation Analysis.
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Geographic Information Science Geography 625 Intermediate Geographic Information Science Instructor: Changshan Wu Department.
ADMS ADMS 3.3 Modelling Summary of Model Features.
Statistics, data, and deterministic models NRCSE.
Esri International User Conference | San Diego, CA Technical Workshops | Lidar Solutions in ArcGIS Clayton Crawford July 2011.
fluidyn – PANAIR Fluidyn-PANAIR
Validated adjustment of remote sensing bias in complex terrain using CFD Michael Harris, Ian Locker, Neil Douglas, Romain Girault, Claude Abiven, Oisin.
© Vattenfall AB Vattenfall Perspective on Wind in Forest Jens Madsen Principal R&D Engineer, Ph.D Vattenfall Research & Development AB.
A Decision Support Demonstrator for Abiotic Damage to Trees, using a WWW Interface Ari Talkkari Roger Dunham.
Improving WAsP predictions in (too) complex terrain
Troubleshooting, Parametrization, and Design Professor Christiani 11/17/2014.
Accounting for tree growth in resource assessment: A case study using the VENTOS code on Kyle wind farm Presenter: Oisin BRADY (VENTEC) Contributors: Anabel.
Real-Time Estimation of Volcanic Ash/SO2 Cloud Height from Combined UV/IR Satellite Observations and Numerical Modeling Gilberto A. Vicente NOAA National.
Going to Extremes: A parametric study on Peak-Over-Threshold and other methods Wiebke Langreder Jørgen Højstrup Suzlon Energy A/S.
Graphical Expert System for Analyzing Nuclear Facility Vulnerability David Sulfredge Oak Ridge National Laboratory December 3, 2002 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL.
3D VIEWS OF TREES AND FOREST SAMPLE PLOTS Christopher Legg The spatial distribution of trees in forest sample plots can be analysed statistically and using.
1/26 APPLICATION OF THE URBAN VERSION OF MM5 FOR HOUSTON University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Sylvain Dupont Collaborators: Steve Burian, Jason.
AWS Truewind Methodology Timeline of AWS Truewind participation Key points Wind resource modeling Estimation of plant output Validation and adjustment.
Use of Dynamical Adaptation in Research Impact Studies Second Workshop on Statistical and Dynamical Adaptation May 2003, Vienna, Austria Martina.
Wsws wpwp dw wpwp wsws NARR ONLY Variations in x (size parameter)
Desarrollo de un método ensemble para la predicción del viento a escala local usando elementos finitos MINECO PROGRAMA.
CONFIDENTIAL1 Hidden Decision Trees to Design Predictive Scores – Application to Fraud Detection Vincent Granville, Ph.D. AnalyticBridge October 27, 2009.
Advanced interpretation and verification of very high resolution models National Meteorological Administration Rodica Dumitrache, Aurelia LUPASCU,
Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Systems: Optimization Using Genetic Algorithms J. Y. Grandidier, Valorem, 180 Rue du Marechal Leclerc, F B ´ Begles,
Experience of Modelling Forested Complex Terrain Peter Stuart, Ian Hunter & Nicola Atkinson 30 th October 2009.
Penny Coombes Sarah Wharton Gary Davies Simon White River Bee, Desing FLOOD ALLEVIATION FEASIBILITY.
Wildfire Risk Assessment: Western Travis County, Texas Integrating GIS and Fire Modeling Jennifer Perry CE 394K GIS.
Performance of wind energy conversion systems. For the efficient planning and successful implementation of any wind power project, an understanding on.
DEVELOPMENT OF A CELL BASED MODEL FOR STREAM FLOW PREDICTION IN UNGAUGED BASINS USING GIS DATA P B Hunukumbura & S B Weerakoon Department of Civil Engineering,
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
Best Practices for Managing and Serving Lidar and Elevation Data Cody Benkelman.
Lidar and GIS: Applications and Examples
Institute for Energy and Transport
Yelena Kropivnitskaya, Kristy F. Tiampo,
What’s new in FUSION? Bob McGaughey
Torkil Veyhe, Hans Georg Beyer, Barður Niclasen
Oil Spill Model Systems
ECOSYSTEM MODEL EVALUATION TEMPLATE
Change in Flood Risk across Canada under Changing Climate
What is in our head…. Spatial Modeling Performance in Complex Terrain Scott Eichelberger, Vaisala.
City of Austin Detention Ponds
The Calibration Process
European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition 2009, Marseille, France
WindNinja Model Domain/Objective
David Gustafsson, Kristina Isberg, Jörgen Rosberg
Torkil Veyhe, Hans Georg Beyer, Barður Niclasen
Data management: 10 minute data, 8760 hours Data Q/C, error checking
Dynamic Controllers for Wind Turbines
WindEurope Summit th September, Hamburg
Tree List Generator (TLG) v1.0
Adam Butler, Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland
Validation of mesoscale generalisation procedure for the WRF model
Update on Great Lakes Coastal Methodology
High Resolution Velocity Analysis for Resource Plays
Introduction to the WASP Interface
Mahnameh TAHERI, Ardeshir MAHDAVI
ENM 310 Design of Experiments and Regression Analysis Chapter 3
Wind Energy Potential in Europe: 2020 – 2030
Spatial Analysis with Raster Datasets-1
Presentation transcript:

Ebba Dellwik, Duncan Heathfield, Barry Gardiner WAsP-ForestGALES: a merged tool for improved forest wind damage prediction Ebba Dellwik, Duncan Heathfield, Barry Gardiner Most of you know Barry, WORLD INABOX

Starting point Currently, the ForestGALES model does not include a spatially varying wind field. We insert WAsP wind field predictions into ForestGALES and propose an automated way of doing this. A simple flow model (such as WAsP) is better than no flow model.

Risø national laboratory and the orgin of WAsP

Risø national laboratory and the origin of WAsP In 2017, WAsP is still the most widely used siting tool for wind turbines.

Key model properties WAsP: Surface parametrization Elevation map Roughness map for large area. Displacement height map (optional) Wind input Observations fit to a Weibull distribution Output Prediction based on a linearized model (IBZ) for terrain elevation and a parametrized non-linear roughness change model. Gridded wind field “resource grid” ForestGALES: Stand parametrization Compartments where the forest properties are constant, added by user. Some of the forest parameters are recalculated to {z0,d} using Raupach (1994, 1995). Wind input DAMS score based on Wind Zone and local elevation or Weibull distribution from data. Output Wind risk assessment Wind Zone local elevation -> Weibull parameters (Weibull A) from which probability of strong winds is calculated.

Example case: Aberfoyle in Southern Scotland Intention: Predict a map of time until first damage for a small area of Aberfoyle forest and discuss how the map would have looked without the coupling.

Recipe for “TOMBERONT”: Raw ingredients Map of DAMS windiness zones for UK (Source: Forest Research) Ordnance Survey explorer elevation contour data for tile NS, NT (Source: OS) Aerodynamic roughness data for a 50km square area around Aberfoyle (Source: GWA Map Server for Online WAsP) Forest stand data (polygons and properties) for Aberfoyle area (Source: Juan Suarez) Method Make a WasP *.tab file representing DAMS windiness score, and make a WasP *.lib wind atlas file from the DAMS tab file Make a WAsP-optimised elevation vector map Use ForestGales to get roughness lengths from forest map Blend forest-derived roughness map with background roughness map Construct WAsP workspace with small resource grid, and run Get Weibull A and K for sector with maximum speed for each node Use ForestGales to get predicted return period for each node

Work flow: trial coupling at Aberfoyle WAsP: Surface parametrization Elevation map Roughness map Displacement height map Wind data input Weibull distribution of observed wind fields. Output Gridded wind field “resource grid” with Weibull parameters for each grid point ForestGALES: Stand parametrization Compartments where the forest properties are constant added by user. Some of the forest parameters are recalculated to {z0,d} using Raupach (1994, 1995). Wind DAMS score based on Wind Zone and local elevation. Output Wind risk assessment

Making the WAsP roughness map Forest area where we have use stand data subcompartments. Prediction area (small pink area)

Addition of Corinne roughness Square is huge area, add first picture,

Comparison of roughness values from stand data and Corinne map Z0 forest = 1.2m Corinne Stand data Juan Suarez, Raupach (1994)

Final roughness map LARGE area Example zoom in

Preparing for fast simulations Low res High res 20 km

WAsP output

Forest risk map, ForestGALES Increasing risk Recurrence interval, return period. 200 years (or more) event to turn the forest over.

Other possible recipes Using WAsP CFD, WAsP Engineering instead of WASP IBZ (the traditional linear orography model + nonlinear roughness change model) Using a global extreme wind climate from WAsP Engineering Using Gumbel distribution instead of Weibull Add the displacement height to the elevation map in WAsP Use airborne lidar data to estimate roughness + displacement height values

Lidar scan of Aberfoyle

Orography

Max. Tree height was set to 35m

Max PAI = 6

Roughness (h/10), could be adjusted to different forest height fraction. 60m resolution 300m resolution

Conclusions It seems possible to integrate ForestGALES with WAsP. The integrated models provide more detailed spatial information on wind risk. There are several possible ways of improvement. Next step: Automated beta-version testing by expert users after September. Anybody interested ?

Thank you for listening. Contact: ebde@dtu Thank you for listening! Contact: ebde@dtu.dk Read more about wasp: www.wasp.dk 200 years 100 years 50 years 0 years

Scan density (first reflections) Empty square corresponds to half-empty .las file.