Virtis Opis User Group Meeting, August 6, 2013

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Agenda – Day 1 8:00 am – 8:15 am Introductions and House Keeping

Advertisements

LOAD RATING TRAINING Hand Calculations Tim Keller, PE Amjad Waheed, PE

ODOT Structure Project Manager Training

T1. DESIGN OF STEEL BEAMS Steel framed building

July Training Outline Part 1 Cost-per –SF and Detailed Estimate Pay Item Detailed Estimate Segments Bridge Level Data Segment Level Data Supports.

3D Analysis with AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating

MDOT Load Rating Local Agency Workshop Training Bradley M. Wagner, PE Load Rating Program Manager.

Solutions for Prestressed Reinforced Concrete Structures

Ying Tung, PhD Candidate

Modeling of Composite Steel Floors Using GT STRUDL

Bridge Engineering (6) Superstructure – Concrete Bridges

Gravity Force Resisting Systems

VOBUG Conference August 3 rd, 2010 Nashville, Tennessee Robert LeFevre, P.E. Adam Price, P.E. Tennessee Department of Transportation Structures Division.

Apollo Bridge Architect: Ing. Miroslav Maťaščík - Alfa 04 a.s., Bratislava Design: Dopravoprojekt a.s., Bratislava Apollo Bridge Architect: Ing. Miroslav.

Brenden K. Schaefer, P.E. Principal Bridge Engineer Wyoming Department of Transportation 2011 Virtis / Opis User Group Meeting August 2, 2011 Helena, MT.

Rating of Local Bridges for SHVs Using Virtis Software Virtis/Opis User Group Meeting August 3-4, 2010 Moises C. Dimaculangan, P.E. Minnesota Department.

VDOT LRFD Software Andy Zickler VDOT Structure and Bridge Division Central Office September 8, 2006.

Micheal J. Watters, P.E. Principal Bridge Engineer Wyoming Department of Transportation Virtis / Opis Users Group Meeting August 3, 2010.

AASHTOWare Bridge Update

Bridge Projects PCEF Meeting Dover, DE Aug 25, 2009 Troy M. Jenkins, P.E. Chief Engineer Northeast Prestressed Products, LLC.

Bridge Engineering (7) Superstructure – Reinforced Concrete Bridges

PennDOT Research Program Got Research? Repair Methods for Prestressed Girder Bridges.

Virtis/Opis Technical Update Virtis Opis Bridgeware User Group 2011 Conference Helena, Montana 1.

Virtis-Opis Update Virtis-Opis User Group Training Meeting Helena – August 2011.

PGSuper2AASHTOWare Bridge Data Translator

Shear Capacity of Composite Steel Girder at Simple Support Virtis/Opis User Group Conference Nashville, TN, August 3-4, 2010 George Huang, PhD, PE California.

Todd Thompson, PE – SD DOT AASHTOWare Bridge Task Force, Chair Presented to the RADBUG Traverse City, MI August 12, 2014.

EXAMPLE 9.3 – Part III PCI Bridge Design Manual

RM Product Update October 2009 Alexander Mabrich, PE, Msc Senior Engineering Consultant.

EXAMPLE 9.2– Part VI PCI Bridge Design Manual

Office of Highway Safety Bridge Load Rating Dan Walsh.

EXAMPLE 9.2 – Part II PCI Bridge Design Manual

CIA Biennial Conference Melbourne October 2005 High Performance Concrete in Bridge Decks Opportunities for Innovation.

2013 Design Rating User Group Presentation Virginia Beach, Virginia August 8, 2013.

DEPERTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING 1/23/ Continuous Beam TOPIC 1/23/20143.

NCHRP VOBUG Nashville– 2010 NCHRP Evaluation of Load Rating by LRFR Mark Mlynarski, P.E. – Michael Baker Jr., Inc. Wagdy Wassef, Ph.D. P.E.-

LRFR vs. LFR Virtis Opis User Group Meeting, August 2, 2011

1 Differences Between BRASS and AASHTO Standard Spec Engines Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2011 Helena, Montana.

Optimising Precast Bridge Girders for Sustainability With the use of High Performance Concrete Doug Jenkins - Interactive Design Services Leigh McCarthy.

LRFD Now! Andy Zickler VDOT Structure and Bridge Division Central Office April 10, 2006

1 AASHTOWare Bridge Technical Update AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/Design User Group Training Meeting Traverse City – August 2014.

Bridge Design to AS 5100 Sydney May 25th 2005 Using High Strength Concrete with AS 5100 opportunities and restrictions.

Superload Move April 06, 2013 Prasad Nallapaneni & Jonathan Mallard Structure and Bridge, VDOT.

“Get in, do it right, get out, and stay out.”

Comparative Study of Codes for the Design of Composite Decks and Plate Girders for Bridges and Buildings By Venkata S. Vemana For CIVL 511 – April

Bridge Design Implementation Jeff Olsen, PE – MT DOT AASHTOWare Bridge Task Force

C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center

A Load Rating of a 3 Span Continuous Deck-to- Through Truss Bridge in Br|R AASHTOWare BrDR 2013 User Group Meeting A Load Rating of a 3 Span Continuous.

Day 20 PRECAST AND PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE Pre Cast concrete comprise units that are made under controlled conditions, with necessary preparations for.

1 Virtis/Opis Technical Update Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2010 Nashville, Tennessee.

Bridge Girder Alternatives for Extremely Aggressive Environments Project Manager: Will Potter, P.E. - FDOT Research Team: Jeff R. Brown, PhD, Assoc. Professor.

Overview of the “Recommended LRFD Seismic Design Specifications for Highway Bridges” Ian M. Friedland, P.E. Bridge Technology Engineer Federal Highway.

Prestressed Concrete I. *Unfavorable effects induced from the presence of cracking in reinforced concrete: To expose the reinforcement to corrosion;

1 Differences Between BRASS and AASHTO LRFD/LRFR Engines Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2011 Helena, Montana.

TEACHING PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DESIGN

1 PennDOT Truss Gusset Plate Analysis and Ratings Spreadsheet Overview Karim Naji Assistant Structural Engineer FHWA PA Division

TOTAL BRIDGE REPLACEMENT OF M-13 OVER CHEBOYGANING CREEK

Investigation of the Effects of End Region Deterioration in Precast, Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders Royce Floyd, Cameron Murray, Darion Mayhorn DONALD.

Offsite manufactured Bridges

Structural Considerations for Bridges

786 Design of Two Way floor system for Flat Plate Slab

SDDOT –Load Rating & Permitting

Bridge modelling with CSI software.

Chapter-2 Parts of Steel Bridges.

ABCD What’s New In Bridges

A BRIDGE WITH VEHICLE LOADS

Load Rating of Precast Box Culverts

Historical Life Cycle Costs of Steel & Concrete Girder Bridges

AASHTOWare Bridge Task Force

Presentation transcript:

Virtis Opis User Group Meeting, August 6, 2013 Effect of 2013 Interim Revisions to the MBE on Legal, SHV and Permit Vehicles August 6, 2013 Bryan J. Silvis, P.E. Structure and Bridge Division Engineering Services Section

VDOT Load Rating Background Original purpose was to run a test suite to track changes in release versions. When investigating changes in ratings for legal routine, legal SHV and permit (unlimited crossing) vehicles, became aware of more general effect of the changes to the MBE. All tables shown are taken from the AASHTO 2013 Interim Revisions to the Manual for Bridge Evaluation, Second Edition.

Sample Set 8 Bridge Types (3 structures selected for each type): Type 1 - Simple span concrete slabs Type 2 - Continuous concrete slabs Type 3 - Simple span concrete T-beams Type 4 - Simple span rolled beams Type 5 - Continuous rolled beams Type 6 - Simple span plate girders Type 7 - Continuous plate girders Type 8 - Simple span prestressed AASHTO I-beams

Legal - Routine

Legal - Routine

Legal - SHV

Legal - SHV

Permit – Unlimited Crossings BP-115:

Previous MBE - Permit

2013 Interim - Permit

Summary 2013 Changes (very general): Legal (Routine): Modest increase in rating for lower ADTT’s to substantial increase for higher ADTT’s Legal (SHV): Slight decrease in rating for lower ADTT’s to modest increase for higher ADTT’s Permit (Unlimited Crossing): General increase in ratings. Rating increase percentage increases with ADTT. Percentage increase where entire vehicle fits on structure is larger than where only a portion of the vehicle can.

Questions?? Contact: bryan.silvis@vdot.virginia.gov 804-371-2737