ARRAY The MILO Study Study Design Schema

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AGO-Austria Phase-III Studie: HECTOR
Advertisements

“Taking Care of Tomorrows Patient Better than Today”… the Future is Now Set A1 – Title Slide David O’Malley, M.D.
ASCO G.U Lawrence H. Einhorn.
Zeroing in on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Integrating Targeted Therapies into Practice.
Bevacizumab taxan Första linjens behandling vid metastaserande Her2- bröstcancer.
What are clinical trials? Phases of Clinical Trials Clinical trials of new medicines are done in phases: Phase I Phase II Phase III.
Introduction  Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STS) are a group of highly chemotherapy resistant tumors  Doxorubicin is the only APPROVED 1 st line chemotherapy.
Presented by Martin H. Cohen, M.D. at the 27 July 2004 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
Drug Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer
GCIG Meeting 29th May 2009 The Implications of Primary Chemotherapy for Clinical Trials Iain McNeish Professor of Gynaecological Oncology Barts and the.
EN.8 - A PHASE III STUDY OF STANDARD THERAPY VERSUS RIDAFOROLIMUS IN WOMEN WITH RECURRENT OR METASTATIC ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WHO HAVE PREVIOUS HAD CHEMOTHERAPY.
1 March 2003 ODAC: DOXIL ®, Ovarian Cancer ODAC Discussion on Accelerated Approval March 12-13, 2003 DOXIL ® (doxorubicin HCl liposome injection) Treatment.
Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology.
, START UP MEETING FOR STAGE 2. Response Rates in Phase 3 Trials Chemotherapy Response rates % Liposomal doxorubicin Gemcitabine 5-9 Gemcitabine.
Randomized Comparison of Adjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Exemestane plus Ovarian Function Suppression vs Tamoxifen plus Ovarian Function Suppression in Premenopausal.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
Phase III Trial of Induction Gemcitabine (G) or Paclitaxel (T) Plus Carboplatin (C) Followed by Elective T Consolidation in Ovarian Cancer (OC), Stages.
WHAT WILL THE KEY ISSUES IN END- POINT ASSESSMENT BE, IN FUTURE OVARIAN CANCER TRIALS INVOLVING NOVEL TARGETED AGENTS? first line treatment maintenance/consolidation.
E2100 A Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel versus Paclitaxel plus Bevacizumab as First- Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
GCIG Rare Tumor Working Group Chicago, IL, June 3, 2010 Chair: Isabelle Ray-Coquard Co-Chair: David M. Gershenson.
OCEANS: A Randomized, Double- Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy with or without Bevacizumab (BEV) in Patients with Platinum-
CALYPSO Trial: Carboplatin & Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) versus Carboplatin & Paclitaxel in Relapsed, Platinum- Sensitive Ovarian Cancer Pujade-Lauraine.
Agency Review of sNDA SE-006 DOXIL for Ovarian Cancer Division of Oncology Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation 1 Center for Drug Evaluation.
GCIG trials for rare ovarian histologies Edward L. Trimble, MD, MPH National Cancer Institute, USA.
INTERGROUP STUDY 0148 BMS CA Effect of TAXOL® (paclitaxel) and Doxorubicin Dose on Disease Free and Overall Survival of Patients with Node Positive.
Early Treatment of Relapsed Ovarian Cancer Based on CA125 Level Alone Versus Delayed Treatment Based on Conventional Clinical Indicators Results of the.
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel- Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab- Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
Relapsed/Refractory Ovarian Cancer: Decision Points in Diagnosis and New Treatment Strategies Friday, March 24, 2006 Palm Springs Convention Center Primrose.
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab-Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
HE-4 TRIAL Prospective phase II trial on the prognostic and predictive value of HE-4 regression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, Fallopian.
Results Increased median PFS 2.8 months No apparent increased survival. HR=0.985 CR+PR=46% Gemzar vs 36% control Independently Assessed Increased toxicity,
GCIG Rare Tumor Working Group Prague, CZ, October, 2010 Chair: Isabelle Ray-Coquard Co-Chair: David M. Gershenson.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 GOG0213: Bevacizumab Retreatment of Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian.
1SOLO 2 - June
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab-Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
Randomized Phase III Study Of Gemcitabine
MITO 27 Randomized Phase II study on Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (a MITO.
MITO 27 Randomized Phase II study on Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (a MITO.
SABR Update Breast SSG June 2017.
Supplemental Figure 1: FOXM1 mRNA level analysis in 48 ovarian tissues
A cura di Filippo de Marinis
Claudia Marchetti Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
Nicoletta Colombo, Martin Gore 
Volume 144, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
BIBF 1120 (Nintedanib) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer:
A Single-Arm Phase IIIb Study of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab with a Taxane as First-Line Therapy for Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.
Emerging treatment strategies in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: Focus on trabectedin  Andrés Poveda, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Ignacio Romero,
PHASE I/II STUDY OF PEGYLATED LIPOSOMAL DOXORUCIN (PLD) AND GEMCITABINE (GEM) IN RECURRENT PLATIN RESISTANT OVARIAN CANCER (OC). A Study of the VWOG.
Farletuzumab in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer with low CA125
MITO 29 Randomized Phase II study on Decitabine plus Carboplatin versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Maintenance Lapatinib After Chemotherapy in HER1/2-Positive Metastatic Bladder Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
S1207: Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial adding 1 year of everolimus to adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with high-risk, HR+, HER2-
Swain SM et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
Intervista a Lucio Crinò
Bevacizumab in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: OCEANS.
Managing gBRCA-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
Nab-paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer
PARP Inhibitors.
IMagyn050 YO39523/GOG-3015/ENGOT-ov39 Recruitment Update
Randomized phase III trial on Trabectedin (ET 743) vs clinician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancers.
CoPrincipal Investigators
Randomized Phase 2b Study of Pralatrexate Versus Erlotinib in Patients With Stage IIIB/IV Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) After Failure of Prior Platinum-Based.
Limited access safety lead-in of the MEK inhibitor trametinib in combination with GSK , an AKT inhibitor, in patients with recurrent or persistent.
The latest clinical evidence on PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy
MITO 29 Randomized Phase II study on Decitabine plus Carboplatin versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
(A) Progression-free survival in the hormone receptor-negative cohort patients treated with PARPi versus those treated with mono chemotherapy (controls).
MITO 27 Randomized Phase II study on Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (a MITO.
Presentation transcript:

ARRAY-162-311 The MILO Study Study Design Schema Patients with recurrent or persistent low‑grade serous carcinomas of the ovary, fallopian tube or primary peritoneum Must have received prior platinum-containing therapy, but no more than 3 prior chemotherapies; unlimited prior hormonal therapy N = 360 Binimetinib 45 mg BID N = 240 Randomization 2:1 Physician’s Choice Chemo (paclitaxel, topotecan or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) N = 120 Stratification Platinum-free interval Prior systemic treatment CROSSOVER Binimetinib 45 mg BID Primary endpoint: Progression-free Survival by Blinded Independent Central Review Secondary endpoints: Overall Survival, ORR, DOR, DCR, Safety, PK, QOL MILO: MEK Inhibitor in Low Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer 1 confidential

Study terminated 1 april 2016 Study interupted 1 april 2016 after planned futility analysis Final enrollment 341 randomized of 360 planned Data base will be definitvely closed 29 June 2016 Confidential

Centri MITO – final enrollment figures