Black Hole - Stellar Mass

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
18 July Monte Carlo Markov Chain Parameter Estimation in Semi-Analytic Models Bruno Henriques Peter Thomas Sussex Survey Science Centre.
Advertisements

COEVOLUTION OF SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES AND THEIR HOST GALAXIES...OR: CHICKEN, EGG OR BOTH? Jari Kotilainen Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, Finland.
The Role of Dissipation in Galaxy Mergers Sadegh Khochfar University of Oxford.
Formation of Globular Clusters in  CDM Cosmology Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan)
On the nature of AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models Nikos Fanidakis and C.M. Baugh, R.G. Bower, S. Cole, C. Done, C. S. Frenk Leicester, March.
AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models Nikos Fanidakis and C.M. Baugh, R.G. Bower, S. Cole, C. Done, C. S. Frenk Accretion and ejection in AGN, Como,
Desika Narayanan EVLA Conference The Formation and Evolution of SMGs: A (mostly) Panchromatic View Desika Narayanan Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Why Environment Matters more massive halos. However, it is usually assumed in, for example, semianalytic modelling that the merger history of a dark matter.
The relation among black holes, their host galaxies and AGN activity INAF ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI ASTROFISICA NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ASTROPHYSICS Galaxies.
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation Section 4: Semi-Analytic Models of Galaxy Formation Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael.
THE MODERATELY LARGE SCALE STRUCTURE OF QUASARS
AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models Nikos Fanidakis and C.M. Baugh, R.G. Bower, S. Cole, C. Done, C. S. Frenk Physics of Galactic Nuclei, Ringberg.
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation (Section 3: Galaxy Data vs. Simulations) Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael Solway.
Claudia Lagos U. 8 Abril 2008 Seminario de Astrofísica “Semi-analytic galaxies (SAG) model: results on BH and galaxy population” Claudia Lagos (PUC, Chile)
Cosmological evolution of Black Hole Spins Nikos Fanidakis and C. Baugh, S. Cole, C. Frenk NEB-XIII, Thessaloniki, June 4-6, 2008.
AGN downsizing は階層的銀河形成論で 説明できるか? Motohiro Enoki Tomoaki Ishiyama (Tsukuba Univ.) Masakazu A. R. Kobayashi (Ehime Univ.) Masahiro Nagashima (Nagasaki Univ.)
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
THE ROLE OF BLACK HOLES IN GALAXY EVOLUTION Tiziana Di Matteo Carnegie Mellon University Volker Springel, Lars Hernquist, Phil Hopkins, Brant Robertson,
Gravitational Waves from Massive Black-Hole Binaries Stuart Wyithe (U. Melb) NGC 6420.
The Black-Hole – Halo Mass Relation and High Redshift Quasars Stuart Wyithe Avi Loeb (The University of Melbourne) (Harvard University) Fan et al. (2001)
The Building Up of the Black Hole Mass- Stellar Mass Relation Alessandra Lamastra collaborators: Nicola Menci 1, Roberto Maiolino 1, Fabrizio Fiore 1,
Scaling relations of spheroids over cosmic time: Tommaso Treu (UCSB)
The coordinated growth of stars, haloes and large-scale structure since z=1 Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
June 9th 2010Desika Narayanan Penn State - First GQGRBs CO in High-Redshift Galaxies (with applications to the M*-M BH relation) Desika Narayanan Harvard-Smithsonian.
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs Lan Wang Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann (MPA) Cheng Li (MPA/SHAO, USTC) Gabriella.
AMUSE-Virgo AGN MUlti-wavelength Survey in Early type galaxies Black Hole Accretion in the Nearby Universe: Evidence for Down-Sizing Elena Gallo | MIT.
Quasars at the Cosmic Dawn Yuexing Li Penn State University Main Collaborators: Lars Hernquist (Harvard) Volker Springel (Heidelberg) Tiziana DiMatteo.
Coeval Evolution of Galaxies and Supermassive Black Holes : Cosmological Simulations J. A. de Freitas Pacheco Charline Filloux Fabrice Durier Matias Montesino.
AGN feedback in action: constraints on the scaling relations between BH and galaxy at high redshift Andrea Merloni (EXC, MPE) A. Bongiorno (MPE), COSMOS.
An alternative track of Black hole – galaxy co-evolution An alternative track of Black hole – galaxy co-evolution Smita Mathur The Ohio State University.
Black hole accretion history of active galactic nuclei 曹新伍 中国科学院上海天文台.
Semi-analytical model of galaxy formation Xi Kang Purple Mountain Observatory, CAS.
The dependence on redshift of quasar black hole masses from the SLOAN survey R. Decarli Università dell’Insubria, Como, Italy A. Treves Università dell’Insubria,
Evolution of Accretion Disks around Massive Black Holes: Constraints from the Demography of Active Galactic Nuclei Qingjuan Yu UC Berkeley April 21, 2006.
The non-causal origin of black hole–galaxy scaling relations (and its consequences) Knud Jahnke Andrea Macciò Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Heidelberg.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
A synthesis model for AGN evolution: unveiling SMBH growth with (past and future) X- ray surveys Ringberg Meeting, 2/2008 Andrea Merloni Max-Planck Institut.
The GOOD NICMOS Survey (GNS): Observing Massive Galaxies at z > 2 Christopher J. Conselice (University of Nottingham) with Asa Bluck, Ruth Gruethbacher,
“Black hole spin and radioloudness in a ΛCDM universe” Claudia Lagos (PUC, Chile) Nelson Padilla (PUC, Chile) Sofía Cora (UNLP, Argentina) SOCHIAS 2008.
Star Formation and Accretion: Systems experience periods of activity on the first passage of the galaxies, where tidal tails and morphological disturbances.
Tools for computing the AGN feedback: radio-loudness and the kinetic luminosity function Gabriele Melini Fabio La Franca Fabrizio Fiore Active Galactic.
Evolution of massive binary black holes Qingjuan Yu Princeton University July 21, 2002.
Arman Khalatyan AIP 2006 GROUP meeting at AIP. Outline What is AGN? –Scales The model –Multiphase ISM in SPH SFR –BH model Self regulated accretion ?!
T. J. Cox Phil Hopkins Lars Hernquist + many others (the Hernquist Mafia) Feedback from AGN during Galaxy Mergers.
Maracalagonis, 24/05/ Semi-Analytic Modeling of Galaxy Formation PhD student: Elena Ricciardelli Supervisor: prof. Alberto Franceschini.
Towards Realistic Modeling of Massive Star Clusters Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan) graduate student Hui Li.
On the Origin of Galaxy Morphology in a Hierarchical Universe
Miroslav Micic, Steinn Sigurdsson, Tom Abel, Kelly Holley-Bockelmann
The Origin and Structure of Elliptical Galaxies
Spheroid and Black Hole formation at high z
Dipartimento di Astronomia Università di Bologna
The interaction-driven model for the starburst galaxies and AGNs
Growth of SMBH studied through X-ray surveys
Outline Part II. Structure Formation: Dark Matter
The formation and dynamical state of the brightest cluster galaxies
Speaker: Bingxiao Xu Peking University
Clustering of galaxies around AGN in the HSC Wide survey
Clustering properties and environment of AGN
Lecture 10: Black Holes and How They Shine
Why are Massive Black Holes Small in Disk Galaxies ?
‘3D’ Data Sets are ABSOLUTELY Crucial to Answer the Important Questions of Galaxy Formation and Evolution Galaxy dynamical masses, gas masses Spatially.
- = + = Quasars, Mergers, and the Formation of Elliptical Galaxies
Black Hole Growth in the Local Universe
QSO2 and their host galaxies
Outline Part II. Structure Formation: Dark Matter
On the
The Formation and Evolution of SMGs: A (mostly) Panchromatic View
Galactic Astronomy 銀河物理学特論 I Lecture 3-3: Stellar mass function of galaxies Seminar: Perez-Gonzalez et al. 2008, ApJ, 675, 234 Lecture: 2012/01/16.
Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Heidelberg
Presentation transcript:

Black Hole - Stellar Mass The Building Up of the Black Hole - Stellar Mass Relation Alessandra Lamastra collaborators: Nicola Menci1, Roberto Maiolino1, Fabrizio Fiore1, Andrea Merloni2 1 INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma 2 Max-Planck-Institut fur Extraterrestriche Physik

SMBH & galaxies co-evolution Supermassive Black Holes (SMBH, MBH=106-109 M) are a ubiquitous constituent of spheroids in nearby galaxies (Kormendy & Richstone 1995) Tight link between the growth of SMBH (AGN phase) and the formation of the host galaxy In the local Universe the black hole mass strongly correlates with the properties of the spheroidal component of the host galaxy (Magorrian et al. 1998, Ho 1999, Gebhardt et al. 2000, Ferrarese & Merritt 2000, Graham et al. 2001) Which is the physical nature of the SMBH-galaxy connection? MBH-M* MBH-σ* MBH-Lbulge Which are the relative time scales for star formation and for SMBH growth? How and when the AGN emission affects the galaxy properties? Haring & Rix 2004 Tremaine et al. 2002 Marconi & Hunt 2003

The Evolution of the MBH-M* relation stellar mass assembly BH growth Haring & Rix 2004

The MBH-M* relation at high redshift (1+z) Peng et al. 2006 McLure et al. 2006 Maiolino et al. 2009 Merloni et al. 2010 Decarli et al. 2010 Alexander et al. 2008

+ + Detailed predictions based on semi-analytic model (Menci et al. 04,05,06,08) + + gas cooling, star formation SN feedback,… DM merging trees SMBH growth, AGN, AGN feedback DM merging trees: Monte Carlo realizations Dynamical processes involving galaxies within DM haloes Cooling, Disc properies, Star formation and SNae feedback Starbursts triggered by merging and fly-by events Growth of SMBH from BH merging + accretion of galactic gas destabilized by galaxy encounters (merging and fly-by events) Feedback from the AGN associated to the active, accretion phase Rate of encounters Fraction of galactic gas accreted by the BH Stellar content of the host galaxies duty cycle Physical, non parametric Model.Computed from galactic and orbital quantities

Properties of DM merging trees The evolution of Dark Matter Haloes Springel et al. 2005 Galaxy formation and evolution are driven by the collapse and growth of dark matter (DM) haloes, which originate by gravitational instability of overdense regions in the primordial DM density field The primordial DM density field is taken to be a random, Gaussian density field with Cold Dark Matter (CDM) power spectrum within the “concordance cosmology” (Spergel et al. 2007). Properties of DM merging trees Initial (z≈4-6) merging events involve small clumps with comparable size High merging rate Last major merging at z≈3 for M≈3X1012 M Phase 1 At later times, merging rate declines Accretion of much smaller clumps Phase 2

z>2 z<2 Star formation Menci et al. 2005, 2006 Two channels of star formation may convert the cold gas into stars: Quiescient star formation Cf. with Kennicutt law Starburst driven by (major+minor) merging and fly-by events (time scale 10-50 Myr, SFR up to 1000 M/yr) Blue galaxies Red galaxies Supernovae feedback: Frequent galaxy interactions Rapid cooling (high gas density) Starbursts with large fraction of gas converted into stars Drop of interaction rate Decline of cooling rate Quiescent and declining star formation z>2 z<2

Accretion onto SMBH and AGN emission (Menci et al. 2006,2008) The BH accretion is triggered by galaxy interactions (merging and fly-by events) Black hole accretion rate Fraction of accreted gas Larger fraction of accreted gas for massive haloes high z (m’/m≈1) Interaction rate Higher interaction rate at high z AGN feedback: associated to the active, accretion phase Hydrodynamic N-body simulations (e.g. Di Matteo et al. 2005, Hopkins et al. 2006, Springel et al. 2005) Galaxy mergers as triggers for BH accretion Role of the AGN feedback

Testing the model MBH-σ relation Local stellar mass function data points: 2dF survey (Cole et al. 2001) 2MASS survey (Bell et al. 2003) Tully-Fisher relation shaded region: Mathewson et al 1992 Willik et al. 1996 Giovanelli et al. 1997 Bimodal color distribution u-r color MBH-σ relation AGN luminosity function B-band luminosity function data points: z=0.1 Balnton et al 2000 Madgwick et al. 2002 Zucca et al. 1997 data points: La Franca et al. 2005

The predicted MBH-M* relation z=0.1 z=4 local relation local relation data points: Evolutionary paths followed by BH with MBH(z=0)>1010 M data points: high-z QSO Haring & Rix 2004 Maiolino et al. 07 Marconi & Hunt 2003 Riechers et al. 08, 09 Walter et al. 04 Barth et al. 03 Dietrich & Hamann 04 Shields et al. 07 Riechers et al. 09 Lamastra et al. 2010 MNRAS

Selecting massive BHs at high z Contour plots: fraction of objects with a given Γ(z) Star formation from 0.01 (lightest) to 0.1 (darkest) BH accretion Γ >1 when we select MBH >109 M at z≥4 Galaxies formed in biased, high density regions undergo major merging events at high redshifts. At z ≲ 2.5 interaction-driven AGN feeding drops while quiescent star formation still builds up stellar mass bringing Γ→1 Lamastra et al. 2010 MNRAS

Selecting intermediate-mass objects at z=1-2 Contour plots: fraction of objects with a given Γ(z) from 0.01 (lightest) to 0.1 (darkest) Galaxies formed in less biased regions of the primordial density field: lower interaction rate at z≳4 The excess Γ>1 is less pronounced Observations by Merloni et al. 2010: log LX/erg s-1>44.5 Lamastra et al. 2010 MNRAS

Selecting gas-rich, star forming galaxies at z=2-3 Contour plots: fraction of objects with a given Γ(z) from 0.01 (lightest) to 0.1 (darkest) local relation datapoints: Alexander et al. 2008 Adopted selection critera consistent with those adopted by Alexander et al. 08 Gas Fraction ≥ 0.7 (see Tacconi et al. 06, 08; Swinbank et al. 08) SFR ≥ 100M/yr Γ(z)<1 for galaxies which retained a large gas fraction at z=2-3 (galaxies originated from merging histories characterized by less prominent high-z interactions) Lamastra et al. 2010 MNRAS

Mass dependence of Γ(z) Lamastra et al. 2010 MNRAS Downsizing in the assembly of BH masses Massive local galaxies have formed preferentially through path passing above the local MBH-M* relation 5% of the final mass 50% of the final mass 90% of the final mass Marconi et al. 2004

Summary Interaction-driven fueling of AGNs within Cosmological galaxy formation models yields: Γ(z)>1 for massive galaxies at high redshift (i.e., when merging histories characteristic of biased, high-density regions of the primordial density field are selected) Γ≃2 for luminous (Lbol≥1044.5 erg/s) QSO at z=1-2 Γ≃4 for massive (MBH≥109 M) in QSOs at z≳4 Γ(z)<1 for galaxies which retained a large gas fraction at z=2-3 (i.e., which did not convert the whole gas content into stars at high redshifts) Γ≃(0.3-1) for SMG-like galaxies hosting active AGNs (LX≥1043 erg/s, large SFR and gas fraction ). These evolve to local galaxies with masses MBH < 109 M At any given z, Γ(z) is predicted to increase with BH mass Corresponds to a ‘’downsizing’’ in the assembly of BH masses Measuring Γ(z) for an unbiased sample of AGN can provide crucial constraints on interaction-driven fueling scenarios for the growth of SMBHs in a cosmological context

In the absence of AGN feedback a sizeble fraction of large-mass NO AGN feedb AGN feedb In the absence of AGN feedback a sizeble fraction of large-mass galaxies has blue colors

The low redshift descendants of SMGs are predicted to have BH with MBH=108-109 M, in agreement with the independent finding of Alexander et al. 2008 based on the larger number density of SMGs compared to that of local galaxies hosting BH with MBH>109M