Are syllables used in processing Spanish?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Identifying the beast in my breast: More evidence for the influence of inter-word lexical priming on eye movements during reading Kevin Paterson University.
Advertisements

Accessing spoken words: the importance of word onsets
Marslen-Wilson Big Question: “What processes take place during the period that the sensory information is accumulating for the listener” during spoken.
Figure 2. L2 Cognates vs. L2 Non-cognates in both language groups at the anterior electrode site Fz (finding A). Figure 3. L2 Cognates vs. L2 Non-cognates.
Evaluating the Effect of Neighborhood Size on Chinese Word Naming and Lexical Decision Meng-Feng Li 1, Jei-Tun WU 1*, Wei-Chun Lin 1 and Fu-Ling Yang 1.
INTRALINGUAL HOMOGRAPHS: words with two distinct meanings in one of the bilingual's languages  Fr. voler means both ‘to steal’ and ‘to fly’ (i.e., it.
Modality-specific interaction between phonology and semantics Gail Moroschan & Chris Westbury Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton,
Facilitation in Recognizing Pairs of Words: Evidence of a Dependence between Retrieval Operations By David E. Meyer & Roger W. Schvaneveldt Presented by.
Is there evidence for the processing of different memory systems by different areas of the brain? Jeff Karpicke, Jessica Roland, Johnie Sanders. Department.
Spoken Word Recognition 1 Language Use and Understanding.
Does Prior Knowledge Affect Distraction? The Effects of Aging and Music Expertise on Reading with Distraction Elizabeth R. Graham, 1,2 Gabrielle Osborne,
Design of icons for use by Chinese in Mainland China Interacting with computers 9(1998) Yee-Yin Choong, Gavriel Salvendy Report: Yang Kun, Ou.
Chinese: A window on analytic processing. Laurie Beth Feldman State University at Albany, SUNY & Haskins Laboratories NIH HD
Segmenting Nonsense Sanders, Newport & Neville (2002) Ricardo TaboneLIN 7912.
Introduction Complex words may be either (a) stored as full forms in the mental lexicon, or (b) undergo decomposition into their constituent morphemes.
 Previous studies have found facilitatory combinability effect in transparent characters, which have semantic radicals with clear meaning. Our results.
Phonetic Similarity Effects in Masked Priming Marja-Liisa Mailend 1, Edwin Maas 1, & Kenneth I. Forster 2 1 Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing.
Haptic Signals for Communication under Workload In a primarily visual task, haptic signals can be more resistant to large cognitive workloads than visual.
PS: Introduction to Psycholinguistics Winter Term 2005/06 Instructor: Daniel Wiechmann Office hours: Mon 2-3 pm Phone:
Does sentence constraint influence word recognition in bilinguals? Evidence from Event-Related Potentials and RTs Pascal E. A. Brenders, Janet G. van Hell,
The processing of morpheme-like units in monomorphemic words.
Newly-Learned Stimuli: The Effects on Lateralized Lexical Decision Travellia Tjokro & Christine Chiarello University of California, Riverside Introduction.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Representing language.
Suzanne E. Welcome 1, Laura K. Halderman 1, Janelle Julagay 1, Christiana Leonard 2, & Christine Chiarello 1 1 University of California, Riverside 2 University.
Knowledge information that is gained and retained what someone has acquired and learned organized in some way into our memory.
Cross-Language Neighborhood Effects in Bilinguals: An Electrophysiological Investigation Krysta Chauncey 1, Katherine J. Midgley 1,2, Jonathan Grainger.
Exp. 3: priming effect of semantic radical transparency 64 real-word targets; 64 foil trails; 128 psudo-word targets Procedures: same as Exp. 1 Results:
Experimental study of morphological priming: evidence from Russian verbal inflection Tatiana Svistunova Elizaveta Gazeeva Tatiana Chernigovskaya St. Petersburg.
1 by Catherine-Marie Longtin, Juan Segui, and Pierre A. Halle´ Laboratoire de Psychologie Expe´rimentale, CNRS, Universite´ Rene´ Descartes, Boulogne-
Visual Word Form Recognition: An MEG study using Masked Priming Heejeong Ko 1, Michael Wagner 1, Linnaea Stockall 1, Sid Kouider 2, Alec Marantz 1 1 Department.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Difference in reaction times between true memories and false memories in a recognition task Marta Forai.
Lexicon Organization: How are words stored? Atomist view  Words are stored in their full inflected form  talk –> talk  talked –> talked  toothbrush.
Semantic Memory Knowledge memory Main questions How do we gain knowledge? How is our knowledge represented and organised in the mind-brain? What happens.
Right hemisphere sensitivity to word & sentence level context: Evidence From Event-Related Brain Potentials. Coulson, S. Federmeier, K.D., Van Petten,
Understanding Action Verbs- Embodied Verbal Semantics Approach Pavan Kumar Srungaram M.Phil Cognitive Science (09CCHL02) Supervisor: Prof. Bapi.
Access Into Memory: Does Associative Memory Come First? Erin Buchanan, Ph.D., University of Mississippi Abstract Two experiments measuring the reaction.
Sequence of Events in Spatial Cueing Paradigm +. +  time.
Assumptions in cognitive psychology Mental processes mental structures mental representations.
THE EFFECTS OF ALCOHOL ON AUTOMATIC AND CONTROLLED PROCESSING IN MISPERCEIVING A WEAPON J. Scott Saults, Bruce D. Bartholow, & Sarah A. Lust University.
Ling 580E Lexical Ambiguity Forster & Hector 2002.
Stem Homograph Inhibition and Stem Allomorphy: Representing and Processing Inflected Forms in a Multilevel Lexical System, 1999 & Morphological Parsing.
Automatic affective processing: Priming effects on the perception of affective valence in visual stimuli Schumann, Griego, James, Kunkemöller, Kabisch,
Phonological Priming and Lexical Access in Spoken Word Recognition Christine P. Malone Minnesota State University Moorhead.
COGNITIVE MORPHOLOGY Laura Westmaas November 24, 2009.
Tip of the tongue state sematics. What do these words mean? ● Fecundity.
Orienting Attention to Semantic Categories T Cristescu, JT Devlin, AC Nobre Dept. Experimental Psychology and FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford,
Older adults generally perform worse than younger adults on tests of episodic long-term memory, but show preserved performance on tests of semantic memory.
Tonal Violations Interact with Lexical Processing: Evidence from Cross-modal Priming Meagan E. Curtis 1 and Jamshed J. Bharucha 2 1 Dept. of Psych. & Brain.
Models of Production and Comprehension [1] Ling4-437.
Innovative Approaches to Displaying Words -- The effect of segmentation on word identification Yu-Chi Tai, Shun-nan Yang, John R. Hayes, & James Sheedy.
VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION. What is Word Recognition? Features, letters & word interactions Interactive Activation Model Lexical and Sublexical Approach.
Type of Work: Language Materials Development Duration: 06-Jul-2015 to 14-Aug-2015 Compensation: Paid Attractive compensation Internship Location: Princeton,
Visual Word Recognition by Trilinguals Orthographic, phonologic and semantic similarity effects between languages Jean-Marc LAVAUR, Xavier APARICIO,
Semantic Priming Effects in a Bilingual Gujarati Speaker
The Effect of Language Modality
New Data: Irrelevant Objects & Orientations Disrupt the
Introduction Intro Problem Materials Hypothesis Procedure Results
Phonological Priming and Lexical Access in Spoken Word Recognition
Yu-Chi Tai, Shun-nan Yang, John Hayes , James Sheedy
Psycholinguistics: the study of language processing
Influence of native-language phonology
Visual Stress and Cognition: An investigation of the impacts of visual stress on lexical decision making Joshua Gietzen, Yu-Chi Tai, PhD, John R. Hayes,
Verb Activation through Priming at the Syntax-Semantics Interface
Evidence of Inhibitory Processing During Visual Search
Influence of native-language phonology
Phonological Priming and Lexical Access in Spoken Word Recognition
Noriko Hoshino Department of Psychology
Nursing Introduction.
Memory and Priming: Meyer and Schvaneveldt’s Lexical Decision Task
How precise are verbal working memory representations
Presentation transcript:

Are syllables used in processing Spanish? Dominguez, Alberto, Manuel de Vega, and Fernando Cuetos. 1997. Lexical inhibition from syllabic units in Spanish visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 12.401-422.

Introduction Seeing a word influences the recognition of a subsequent word if: The word is semantically related (nurse-doctor) The word is morphologically related (sing-singing) The word is orthographically related (burn-burps)

Introduction Seeing a word influences the recognition of a subsequent word if: The word is semantically related (nurse-doctor) The word is morphologically related (sing-singing) The word is orthographically related (burn-burps) The influence can either speed or slow recognition

Research Question Is the syllable used in word processing? If so it should influence word recognition

Hypothesis Seeing a word with the same syllable structure will influence the speed at which a subsequent word is recognized. Seeing a word with a different syllable structure will not influence the reaction time.

Method Lexical Decision Task Subjects see real words and nonce words on the screen. They press one key if the word is real and another if it is not real

Method Lexical Decision Task Subjects see real words and nonce words on the screen. They press one key if the word is real and another if it is not real Time to recognize word is measured

Method Lexical Decision Task Subjects see real words and nonce words on the screen. They press one key if the word is real and another if it is not real Time to recognize word is measured The word that is similar or not is presented first-The prime The word that appears after, whose RT is measured, is the target

Materials Prime Target Relationship nor.ma nor.te orthographic, syllabic no.ria nor.te orthographic, not syllabic sa.via nor.te not orthographic, not syllabic man.do nor.te not orthographic, syllabic

Results If orthographic overlap causes slowed RTs to target then Nor.ma should prime nor.te as much as no.ria primes nor.te Prime Target Relationship RT in ms nor.ma nor.te orthographic, syllabic 930 no.ria nor.te orthographic, not syllabic 887 930 is statistically larger than 887 so priming is different

Results If syllabic overlap causes slowed RTs to target then Man.do should prime nor.te but sa.via should not prime nor.te Prime Target Relationship RT in ms sa.via nor.te not orthographic, not syllabic 872 man.do nor.te not orthographic, syllabic 871 872 and 871 are not statistically different so there is no difference in priming

Results If syllabic overlap only causes slowed RTs to target when there is orthographic overlap too then Nor.ma should prime nor.te but no.ria shouldn't prime nor.te Prime Target Relationship RT in ms nor.ma nor.te orthographic, syllabic 930 no.ria nor.te orthographic, not syllabic 887 930 and 887 are statistically different so there is a difference in priming

Conclusions Words with the same syllable structure do not exhibit a priming relationship Syllable structure alone isn't relevant to processing Words with the same syllable structure that also overlap orthographically do exhibit a priming relationship Syllable structure is relevant to processing when coupled with orthographic similarity