Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (April 1998)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The RNA World of the Nucleolus: Two Major Families of Small RNAs Defined by Different Box Elements with Related Functions  Andrey G Balakin, Laurie Smith,
Advertisements

Crystal Structure of a Flp Recombinase–Holliday Junction Complex
The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
The Orientation of Mycobacteriophage Bxb1 Integration Is Solely Dependent on the Central Dinucleotide of attP and attB  Pallavi Ghosh, Amy I Kim, Graham.
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Generation and Interconversion of Multiple Distinct Nucleosomal States as a Mechanism for Catalyzing Chromatin Fluidity  Geeta J. Narlikar, Michael L.
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1997)
Erik D. Larson, W. Jason Cummings, David W. Bednarski, Nancy Maizels 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Silencing in Yeast rDNA Chromatin
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Daan C. Swarts, John van der Oost, Martin Jinek  Molecular Cell 
RAG1/2-Mediated Resolution of Transposition Intermediates
The Three Chemical Steps of Tn10/IS10 Transposition Involve Repeated Utilization of a Single Active Site  Silvia Bolland, Nancy Kleckner  Cell  Volume.
Ben B. Hopkins, Tanya T. Paull  Cell 
The Transmembrane Kinase Ire1p Is a Site-Specific Endonuclease That Initiates mRNA Splicing in the Unfolded Protein Response  Carmela Sidrauski, Peter.
Gracjan Michlewski, Sonia Guil, Colin A. Semple, Javier F. Cáceres 
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Structural Alterations and Conformational Dynamics in Holliday Junctions Induced by Binding of a Site-Specific Recombinase  Jehee Lee, Yuri Voziyanov,
Poly(A) Signal-Dependent Transcription Termination Occurs through a Conformational Change Mechanism that Does Not Require Cleavage at the Poly(A) Site 
Zbigniew Dominski, Xiao-cui Yang, William F. Marzluff  Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (July 2005)
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Polynucleotide Ligase Activity of Eukaryotic Topoisomerase I
Site-specific recombination in plane view
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
ResT, a Telomere Resolvase Encoded by the Lyme Disease Spirochete
VDJ Recombination Cell Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
DNA Topoisomerase I and PC4 Can Interact with Human TFIIIC to Promote Both Accurate Termination and Transcription Reinitiation by RNA Polymerase III 
Replisome Assembly Reveals the Basis for Asymmetric Function in Leading and Lagging Strand Replication  Alexander Yuzhakov, Jennifer Turner, Mike O'Donnell 
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
Meiosis-Specific DNA Double-Strand Breaks Are Catalyzed by Spo11, a Member of a Widely Conserved Protein Family  Scott Keeney, Craig N Giroux, Nancy Kleckner 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Helena Celesnik, Atilio Deana, Joel G. Belasco  Molecular Cell 
Mechanism of 5′-Directed Excision in Human Mismatch Repair
Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 
Chromatin Constrains the Initiation and Elongation of DNA Replication
Functional Link between the Mammalian Exosome and mRNA Decapping
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
Direct Visualization of Uridylate Deletion In Vitro Suggests a Mechanism for Kinetoplastid RNA Editing  Scott D Seiwert, Stefan Heidmann, Kenneth Stuart 
Simone E. Nunes-Düby, Marco A. Azaro, Arthur Landy  Current Biology 
Mu Transpositional Recombination: Donor DNA Cleavage and Strand Transfer in trans by the Mu Transposase  Harri Savilahti, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell  Volume.
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Hairpin Opening and Overhang Processing by an Artemis/DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Complex in Nonhomologous End Joining and V(D)J Recombination  Yunmei.
Exon Identity Established through Differential Antagonism between Exonic Splicing Silencer-Bound hnRNP A1 and Enhancer-Bound SR Proteins  Jun Zhu, Akila.
Functional Recognition of the 5′ Splice Site by U4/U6
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Template Switching by RNA Polymerase II In Vivo
Modification of the Properties of Elongating RNA Polymerase by Persistent Association with Nascent Antiterminator RNA  Ranjan Sen, Rodney A King, Robert.
Site-Specific Ribonuclease Activity of Eukaryotic DNA Topoisomerase I
Beyond Homing: Competition between Intron Endonucleases Confers a Selective Advantage on Flanking Genetic Markers  Heidi Goodrich-Blair, David A Shub 
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Angela K Kennedy, David B Haniford, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell 
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Requires Changes in DNA Topology
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
The V(D)J Recombinase Efficiently Cleaves and Transposes Signal Joints
Kirk M Brown, Gregory M Gilmartin  Molecular Cell 
A Minimal RNA Polymerase III Transcription System from Human Cells Reveals Positive and Negative Regulatory Roles for CK2  Ping Hu, Si Wu, Nouria Hernandez 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Assembly of a Double Hexameric Helicase
Meiotic DNA Breaks at the S. pombe Recombination Hot Spot M26
Presentation transcript:

Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages 729-739 (April 1998) Unveiling Two Distinct Ribonuclease Activities and a Topoisomerase Activity in a Site- Specific DNA Recombinase  Chong-jun Xu, Ian Grainge, Jehee Lee, Rasika M Harshey, Makkuni Jayaram  Molecular Cell  Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages 729-739 (April 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80072-6

Figure 1 The General Mechanism for DNA Recombination by the Integrase Family Recombinases The reaction proceeds in two steps that are chemically identical. Each step involves the breakage of two DNA chains using active site tyrosines from recombinase monomers as the nucleophiles, followed by chain joining across partners using 5′-hydroxyl groups as the nucleophiles. The strand exchange region (thin gray lines) on each DNA partner is flanked by two Flp binding elements (parallel arrows) in inverted orientation. The phosphodiesters involved in recombination are indicated by (P). Molecular Cell 1998 1, 729-739DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80072-6)

Figure 2 Strand Cleavage and Strand Joining by Flp in DNA Half-Sites and DNA-RNA Hybrid Half-Sites (A) Recombination within a DNA half-site (S) requires the concerted action of two Flp monomers, a shared active site being assembled at the dimer interface (Chen et al. 1992b; Lee and Jayaram 1995). Attack by Tyr-343 of one Flp monomer on the labile phosphodiester releases the trinucleotide (5′HOTTT3′). Phosphoryl transfer from the 3′-O-phosphotyrosine bond to the 5′-hydroxyl group of the bottom strand results in the formation of the hairpin recombinant R. The parallel lines including the C-G pair in bold letters represent the Flp binding element (5′GAAGTTCCTATAC3′/3′CTTCAAGGATATG5′). (B) Reactions were carried out using half-sites in which the top strand (the one that is cleaved by Flp) is labeled at the 5′ end (asterisk). A ribonucleotide position within the labeled strand is indicated by the 2′-OH, or by the T-to-U substitution. The molecular markers (M) are deoxyoligonucleotides containing 5′-phosphate and 3′-hydroxyl ends. They range in size from 32 to 14 nt, with a difference of 2 nt between two successive rungs of the ladder. (C) reactions were done with the indicated substrates and Flp(Y343F) in the absence or presence of tyramine (100 mM). In (B) and (C), the substrate and recombinant bands are indicated by (S) and (R), respectively. The cleavage products from the Flp or/and Flp(Y343F) reactions are denoted by (CP1), (CP2), and (CP3). In (A), (B), and (C), the phosphodiester position that normally participates in the recombination reaction is shown as (p). Molecular Cell 1998 1, 729-739DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80072-6)

Figure 3 Characterization of the Cleavage Products from Half-Sites Labeled with 32P on the Top Strand at the 5′ Ends (A) Complete extension of the radioactive strand in the 5′ end–labeled substrate ([S]; the asterisk indicates the label) by Klenow polymerase would give rise to the product EP. If the strand were to be cleaved to expose a 3′-hydroxyl group, extension of the cleavage product would also yield EP. (B) The indicated substrate (containing a 2′-OH at the C position on the top strand) was reacted with Flp as described under Figure 2 to obtain 70%–80% of conversion into CP1. Production of R was inhibited almost completely by phosphorylating the 5′ end of the bottom strand using unlabeled ATP and polynucleotide kinase. DNA was recovered from the reactions, aliquoted into equal samples, and subjected to various treatments as indicated below the respective lanes. (PK) stands for polynucleotide kinase. (C) The reactions for obtaining CP2 were done with Flp and a half-site containing 2′-OH groups at the U positions on the top strand. The yield of CP2 was approximately 30%–40% of the input substrate. In (B) and (C), the bands corresponding to the substrate and the extension product are designated as (S) and (EP), respectively. The arrow indicates the dephosphorylation product derived from CP1 or CP2. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 729-739DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80072-6)

Figure 4 Characterization of the Cleavage Products Obtained with Half-Sites Labeled near the 3′ End The two substrates were labeled (asterisk) by the Klenow polymerase reaction using [α-32P]-TTP in the absence of the other three dNTPs. After the cleavage reactions with Flp or Flp(Y343F), the recovered DNA was either directly fractionated by electrophoresis (lanes 3 and 5) or treated with polynucleotide kinase in the presence of unlabeled ATP (lanes 7 and 9) prior to fractionation. Molecular size markers (deoxyoligonucleotides) were run in lanes 1 and 10. Those in lane 1 contained 32P (asterisk) in the 3′-proximal phosphodiester bond, and a free 5′-hydroxyl group. They were obtained by alkaline hydrolysis of hybrid oligonucleotides containing ribonucleotide placements at desired positions. The markers in lane 10 contained 32P (asterisk) at the 5′ ends and hydroxyl groups at the 3′ ends. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 729-739DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80072-6)

Figure 5 Topoisomerase Activity of Flp Reactions were done with plasmid substrates containing the normal 8-bp (pSP-8) or the artificial 20-bp (pSP-20) spacer between two Flp binding elements in a head-to-head orientation. After phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation, the DNA was fractionated in 0.8% agarose gels and subsequently stained with ethidium bromide for viewing under UV light. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 729-739DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80072-6)

Figure 6 Possible Mechanistic Paths for the Formation of CP1/CP1′ and CP2/CP2′ (A) Two possible mechanisms can, in principle, account for the formation of CP1/CP1′ from the substrate containing the ribo-C immediately 5′ to the scissile phosphodiester. In one scheme, the phosphodiester bond is cleaved by Tyr-343 of Flp or by the tyrosine mimic added in solution to form a 3′-O-phosphotyrosine bond. The 2′-hydroxyl group then attacks the phosphotyrosine bond to yield a 2′,3′-cyclic phosphate that is hydrolyzed to the 3′-phosphate product. In the other, Tyr-343 or the tyrosine mimic facilitates the direct attack of the 2′-hydroxyl group on the phosphodiester bond to yield the 2′,3′-cyclic product. (B) The CP2/CP2′ product pair is formed as a result of the attack of the 2′-hydroxyl group from U on the phosphodiester bond that is immediately downstream of the one involved in the reaction shown in (A). The resultant formation of 2′,3′-cyclic phosphate, followed by its hydrolysis, is akin to the pancreatic RNase mechanism. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 729-739DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80072-6)