Expert Group on Reporting Nature Directives , Brussels

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Arctic Observing Viewer a web mapping application for AON data collection sites
Advertisements

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world Oil Spill Response Planning Coastal and Marine Environmental Sensitivity Mapping Simon Ross.
IWC Database Overview of technology and application 13 th July 2010.
Update on INSPIRE: INSPIRE maintenance and implementation and INSPIRE related EEA activities on biodiversity CDDA/European protected areas technical meeting.
Co-funded by the European Community eContentplus programme Data flow in Natura 2000: the past and the future Current and future data management Diederik.
Introduction to the Workshop on Target 1 of the 2020 Biodiversity Strategy Stefan Leiner, DG ENV European Commission Nature Directors Meeting Denmark,
Managing the Natura 2000 network: state of play, challenges and opportunities.
Workshop 1.4: ESPON Database ESPON Internal Seminar November 2011 Kraków,Poland ESPON M4D Project - LIG (Grenoble Computer Science Lab) Partner Jérôme.
Agenda item 2.1 Progress on Target 1 of the 2020 Biodiversity Strategy CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature 12 th meeting - 29/03/12.
Presentation of the Air Quality e-reporting User Interface (AQUI 1.0) Wim Mol Presentation AQUI 1.0 Dublin, Ireland October 2013 European Environment.
European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity EIONET NRC Meeting on Biodiversity October 2011, Copenhagen Progress.
Natura 2000 System Alberto Telletxea Bilbomática under EEA Contractor.
THE NEW REPORTING SYSTEM Photo: Kristina Eriksson Mats Eriksson N2K Group.
Agenda item 2.2 Progress on Target 1 Developments since CGBN of March 2012 CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature 13 th meeting – 06/09/12.
HaBiDeS+ the new EU tool for reporting derogations under the EU Birds and Habitats Directives, and the Bern Convention Expert Group on Birds and Habitats.
Agenda FDSN WG2+3 SEED issues –Order of FIR filter coeff (bl 54) –QC flag indicating M for merged data –Est. delay and corr. Applied fields bl 57 –Minor.
Agenda item 4 Natura 2000: key facts and figures Data as of January 2011 CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature 10 th meeting – 08/04/11.
Art. 17 reporting process Using the IT tool Art. 17 reporting process Using the IT tool Miruna Bădescu Sheila Cryan Søren Roug Rania Spyropoulou 17 October.
Tools to Assist with Assessing the Affected Environment.
Validation of Metadata XML files SeaDataNet Training, June 2008 Presented by with contributions from Karen Vickers (BODC) Presented by Michèle Fichaut.
“The EUNIS habitat classification, governance and future developments”
Designation boundaries
Streamlining of Industrial Emissions Reporting
WISE and the future of WFD reporting
For info only! Expected date of reporting of RBMP as reported informally by SCG Legal deadline 22/03/ MS by deadline 1 MS partly by deadline (BE)
WP4 Revision of the Dataflow - Standard Data Form -
Point 5 Revising the Natura 2000 Standard Data Form
Results of Questionnaire 24 Nov 2011
Cambridge CDDA/European Protected Areas Technical Meeting
of EU-level green and blue infrastructure
Natura 2000 dataflow & Standard data forms
WP4 Revision of the Dataflow - Standard Data Form -
WP 1 - Review of the Art.17 reporting format & guidelines
Progress on Natura 2000 filtered database
Review of Decision 2010/477/EU and MSFD Annex III
Public access to Natura 2000 geo-database
Update on Reporting Information point 10
Review of Decision 2010/477/EU and MSFD Annex III
Review plan of the nature reporting – update 7
Favourable Reference Values
Work on the coherence of data-flows / improving data-quality
Results Questionnaire
CDDA & INSPIRE work of EEA - preliminary lessons learnt
Reporting Tool.
Questionnaire on progress in preparing reports under Nature Directives
WP 4 - Revision of Natura 2000 dataflow
Natura 2000 dataflow (1) QA/QCs for Natura 2000 dataflow is now up and running (completeness & consistency of the tabular data) Individual QA/QCs now uploaded.
Action Points 16th meeting of the Working Group on
Summary and action points 1-2 March 2017 Brussels
State of progress with transition to new Standard Data Form
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
Reporting tools updates & prefilling
MSFD Article 11 reporting Monitoring programmes
Point 5 Revising the Natura 2000 Standard Data Form
Natura 2000: points of information
Mandate of the EEA To provide the Community and Member States with:
Update on the status of RBMP reporting
WP4 Revision of the Natura 2000 Dataflow - Standard Data Form -
Natura 2000 dataflow Current issues
On-going work on Art 17 & Art 12 - agenda item 6
HELCOM Baltic Sea Protected Areas
Expert Group on Reporting , Brussels
“Access to Natura 2000 Data” -
WP4 Revision of the Dataflow - Standard Data Form -
Progress with transition to new SDF
Work on improving the quality and
Towards a prioritised action framework for financing Natura 2000
CDDA alignment with INSPIRE
WISE Working Group D September 2009, Brussels Jon Maidens.
Feasibility study on data harvesting using INSPIRE infrastructure
Presentation transcript:

Expert Group on Reporting Nature Directives 22.3.2012, Brussels Natura 2000 dataflow Sabine Roscher

Natura 2000 SDF Software http://bd.eionet.europa.eu/activities/Natura_2000/reference_portal …

Enhancements Natura 2000 SDF Software v. 2 New version has been uploaded on 19. March 2012 Some bug fixes and several enhancements: Import Tool works properly for Access 2003 or higher. Export also possible if the data is not fully compliant with the schema or if not all mandatory field are filled in Alphabetical order for the species list Birds Editor Import single site from Access Database or xml

Enhancements Natura 2000 SDF software v. 2.0 Print each SDF by means of html files. Control system for the edition process: Users are notified which sites have been updated and when. Show how many sites are in the SDF Manager and how many are filtered. Enable the use of a remote MySQL database. Icons for mandatory fields

Overview time plan transition to new SDF End of Phase 1 of the transition period: all Member States have provided their Natura 2000 databases in the new format End September 2012 End of Phase 2 of the transition period: all Member States have updated their SDFs to the state of knowledge / best available information End of 2015

Natura 2000 User-Manual updated 13. March 2012 overview changes: An explanatory note explaining the changes occurring in the database .. as compared to the previous database delivery. A single dataset containing separate shapefiles for the SCI and SPA layers is acceptable, under the condition that C-category sites ...are not provided twice. In order to minimise the risk of potential coordinate transformation errors in further data processing, countries are encouraged to deliver their GIS data in an ETRS89 (or WGS84) based coordinate reference system, where feasible. The consistency of data from different regions (e.g. no overlap), particularly in the case of Member States with federal structure, must be ensured.

Natura 2000 viewer covers all MS – incl. Austria (asap) Shift-problem in spatial data improved

Assessment of the sufficiency of the SCI network for species and habitat types: Database end of 2010 Sufficiency assessment based on end of 2010 DB Terrestrial species & habitat types (27 MS) Marine species & habitat types (22 MS) Code Sufficient designation of sites 5694 83,6% 89 35,3% SUF Minor Insufficiency: Natura 2000 site SDF(s) to be completed 328 4,8% 23 9,1% IN MIN Moderate insufficency: additional site(s) must be designated 453 6,6% 82 32,5% IN MOD Major Insufficiency: no sites so far 16 0,2% 7 2,8% IN MAJ Scientific Reserve: further inventories required 243 3,6% 32 12,7% SR Scientific Reserve to the Reference List (occurence uncertain) / Others 81 1,2% 19 7,5% SR ref List / Others Total 6815 100% 252  

Sufficiency of the European Natura 2000 network – terrestrial part (assessments for species and habitat type) SR: Scientific reserve, further inventories required IN MAJ: Major insufficiency IN MOD: Moderate insufficiency IN MIN: Minor insufficiency SUF: Sufficient designation of sites

Sufficiency of the European Natura 2000 network – terrestrial part (assessments for species and habitat type) SR: Scientific reserve, further inventories required IN MAJ: Major insufficiency IN MOD: Moderate insufficiency IN MIN: Minor insufficiency SUF: Sufficient designation of sites

Sufficiency of the European Natura 2000 network – marine part (assessments for species and habitat type) SR: Scientific reserve, further inventories required IN MAJ: Major insufficiency IN MOD: Moderate insufficiency IN MIN: Minor insufficiency SUF: Sufficient designation of sites

Evolution compared to previous year (Database 2009) (terrestrial and marine species & habitat types)