Clinical outcome after SVR: ANRS CO22 HEPATHER

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bruix J, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 24, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/28/09.
Advertisements

Liver fibrosis regression after anti HCV therapy and the rate of death, liver-related death, liver- related complications, and hospital.
FT in prognostic of HBV FibroTest: predictive value in HBV.
Multicenter Study of Down-staging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) to within Milan Criteria before Liver Transplantation Neil Mehta, MD; Jennifer Guy,
SMV 150 mg QD + SOF 400 mg QD Randomisation 1 : years HCV genotype 1 Naïve or pre-treated with IFN-based regimen No cirrhosis HCV RNA ≥
SOLAR-2 LDV/SOF + RBV Randomisation of the 7 groups 1 : 1 Open-label SOLAR-2 Study: LDV/SOF + RBV in decompensated and post-liver transplant with genotype.
SOLAR-1 LDV/SOF + RBV Randomisation* of the 7 groups 1 : 1 Open-label SOLAR-1 Study: LDV/SOF + RBV in advanced liver disease  Design W12W24 ≥ 18 years.
SOF/VEL 400/100 mg qd N = 75 W24 SOF/VEL > 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 to 6 Naïve or treatment-experienced No prior treatment with NS5A or.
No randomization N = 59 W12W24 Arm B : compensated cirrhosis N = 31 N = 29 Arm C : compensated cirrhosis Arm A : No cirrhosis AGATE-II Study: OBV/PTV/r.
SMV + DCV + SOF Open label Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 or 4 Treatment-naïve or pre-treated with PEG-IFN ± RBV Portal hypertension or liver decompensation.
Open-label W24 ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection All genotypes HCV RNA ≥ 10,000 IU/ml Liver transplantation months earlier Child Pugh ≤ 7 and MELD.
Trends in Treatment of Recurrent Hepatitis C After Liver Transplantation Kate Forgan-Smith KA Stuart 1,4, C Tallis 1,4 GA Macdonald 1,3,4, J Fawcett 2,3.
 Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), by ITT OBV/PTV/r + SOF + RBV OBV/PTV/r + SOF Not randomised Open-label QUARTZ-II Study: OBV/PTV/r + SOF for HCV.
Date of download: 9/17/2016 From: The Changing Burden of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States: Model-Based Predictions Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(3):
No cirrhosis or compensated cirrhosis * No HBV or HIV coinfection
Genotype 1 HCV infection Stable immunosuppressive therapy
Matching methods for estimating causal effects Danilo Fusco Rome, October 15, 2012.
ARV-trial.com RUBY-II Study: ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir for HCV genotype 1a or 4 with severe renal impairment Design Open label W12.
Design Randomisation 1 : 1 Double-blind W8 W12
Design Single arm Open label W12 ≥ 18 years, HCV genotype 1 to 6
No HBV or HIV co-infection
National Hepatitis C Database
TOPAZ-II Study: OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV for genotype 1
ARV-trial.com SURVEYOR-II study – Part 3: glecaprevir/pibrentasvir + RBV in genotype 3 with treatment experience and/or cirrhosis Design Randomisation.
C-ISLE study: EBR/GZR + SOF + RBV in genotype 3 and cirrhosis
Effectiveness of Sofosbuvir in terms of sustained virological response at 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) BETWEEN treatment naïve AND treatment.
Design No randomisation Open-label W12 W years HCV genotype 1
Design Randomisation 1 : 1 Open-label W16 W24 > 18 years
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
> 18 years Chronic HCV infection Compensated cirrhosis **
ARV-trial.com C-CREST study, Part B: uprifosbuvir (MK-3682)/GZR/ruzasvir (MK-8408) fixed-dose combination + RBV for genotypes 1, 2 and 3 - Phase II Randomisation.
Compensated cirrhosis No HBV or HIV co-infection
Design Randomisation 2 : 1 Double-blind W12 ≥ 18 years, HCV genotype 3
GEODE-II Study: OBV/PTV/r + DSV + low dose RBV in genotype 1a
GARNET Study: OBV/PTV/r + DSV 8 weeks in genotype 1b
AL study: AL ODV + SMV in naïve patients, phase II
Creatinine clearance ≥ 50 ml/min No HBV or HIV co-infection
Design Randomisation* 1 : 1 Open-label W12
Failure to achieve SVR on No HBV or HIV co-infection
ARV-trial.com RUBY-I Study, cohort 2: ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir + RBV for HCV genotype 1 with renal impairment Design Open label W12.
QUARTZ II-III : OBV/PTV/r + SOF RBV in genotype 2 or 3
Eradication of HCV induced by DAAs
Sofosbuvir and Ledipasvir Combination with and without Ribavirin in Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Infection; Preliminary Report of an Experience from.
LDV/SOF in kidney transplant recipients
C-BREEZE-2 Study: ruzasvir + uprifosbuvir for 12 weeks in genotype 1-6
Clinical outcome after SVR: Veterans Affairs
The Aging Liver in the Aging HIV and HCV Patients
ARV-trial.com SURVEYOR-II study – Part 3: glecaprevir/pibrentasvir ± RBV in genotype 3 with treatment experience and/or cirrhosis Design Randomisation.
Design W12 Randomisation * Open-label
Risk of de novo Hepatocellular Carcinoma after HCV Treatment with Direct-Acting Antivirals Liver Cancer - DOI: / Fig. 1. Flowchart of included.
ARV-trial.com IMPACT Study: SMV + DCV + SOF in HCV genotype 1 with decompensated liver disease Design Open label ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype.
Volume 153, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
LEPTON Study: SOF/VEL + GS-9857 genotype 1 or 3 Phase II
EXPEDITION-V Study: GLE/PIB in patients with renal impairment
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
MAGELLAN-3 Study: GLE/PIB + SOF + RBV in patients who failed GLE/PIB
2018 Postgraduate Research Symposium: Exploring opportunities
COMMIT Study: SMV + DCV in genotype 1b
No HBV or HIV co-infection
SOF/VEL in liver transplantation with genotype 1-4 infection
REAL-WORLD SAFETY, EFFECTIVENESS, AND PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEPATITIS C VIRUS INFECTION TREATED WITH GLECAPREVIR/PIBRENTASVIR:
No HBV or HIV co-infection
Melissa Herrin, Jan Tate ScD, MPH & Amy Justice, MD, PhD
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
SOF/VEL ± RBV in genotype 3 with compensated cirrhosis
Incidence of HCC after HCV treatment with DAAs: ERCHIVES
ENDURANCE-4 Study: glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in genotype 4, 5 or 6
Survival benefits of DAA in patients with decompensated cirrhosis
Sequencing cohorts Open-label Design W8 W12 ≥ 18 years
Design W12 Open-label Liver transplant recipients
Presentation transcript:

Clinical outcome after SVR: ANRS CO22 HEPATHER Design Observational prospective cohort (France) 12 502 HCV-infected patients Exclusion criteria: HBV co-infection, history of decompensated cirrhosis, HCC or liver transplant, treatment with IFN-RBV ± 1st generation PI, no follow-up Survival time since enrolment or start of DAA (censoring date: July 1st, 2017, or death, or HCC, or decompensated cirrhosis) Cox proportional hazards models with Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) to quantify the impact of DAA (as a time dependent-covariate) on clinical outcomes IPTW scores were obtained from a logistic model linking treatment with baseline covariates that confounded the treatment-outcome relationship Study population 6 460 patients received DAA 8 462 patient-years of follow up, occurrence of 90 deaths, 164 HCC and 77 decompensation 2 835 patients did not receive DAA 10 040 patient-years of follow up, occurrence of 78 deaths, 57 HCC and 35 decompensation ANRS CO22 HEPATHER Carrat F, AASLD 2017, Abs. LB-28

Clinical outcome after SVR: ANRS CO22 HEPATHER Baseline characteristics Median (IQR) age: 56 (50-65) years Male: 54% Cirrhosis: 38% Treatment experienced: 54% Genotype 1: 66% 2: 7% 3: 11% 4: 12% Diabetes: 12% BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2: 13% Hypertension: 29% Association of baseline characteristics and DAA treatment during follow-up (multivariate analysis) More likely to start DAA if Age > 50 years Genotype 3 (vs genotype 1) Fibrosis F3-F4 (vs F0-F1) Less likely to start DAA if Female Genotype 2 (vs genotype 1) Treatment naive ANRS CO22 HEPATHER Carrat F, AASLD 2017, Abs. LB-28

Clinical outcome after SVR: ANRS CO22 HEPATHER All-cause-deaths Weighted survival (IPTW) 1.00 0.98 DAA - DAA + Deaths DAA - : 78 vs DAA + : 90 0.96 0.94 HRIPWfixed for DAA+ 0.65 (0.45;0.95), p=0.0258 0.92 0.90 5 10 15 20 25 30 Months Hepatocellular carcinoma Weighted survival (IPTW) Decompensated cirrhosis Weighted survival (IPTW) 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.96 0.96 HRIPWfixed for DAA+ 0.90 (0.58;1.41), p=0.6533 0.94 0.94 HRIPWfixed for DAA+ 1.19 (0.85;1.66), p=0.3178 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 10 15 20 25 30 Months Months HCC = DAA - : 57 vs DAA + : 164 Decompensation = DAA - : 35 vs DAA + : 77 ANRS CO22 HEPATHER Carrat F, AASLD 2017, Abs. LB-28

Clinical outcome after SVR: ANRS CO22 HEPATHER HRcrude (DAA+ vs DAA-) HRIPWfixed (DAA+ vs DAA-) 2,43 Liver related deaths (n = 58) 0,68 1,23 Non liver related deaths (n = 81) 0,75 1,53 All cause deaths (n = 168)* 0,65 0,1 1 10 * 29 deaths were not yet adjudicated ANRS CO22 HEPATHER Carrat F, AASLD 2017, Abs. LB-28

Clinical outcome after SVR: ANRS CO22 HEPATHER Conclusions DAA was associated with a decreased risk of death The decrease in deaths was more pronounced for liver-related deaths than for non liver-related deaths and no increased risk of HCC and decompensation ANRS CO22 HEPATHER Carrat F, AASLD 2017, Abs. LB-28