Calibration and Validation of Microwave Humidity Sounder onboard FY-3D Satellite Yang Guo, Songyan Gu NSMC/CMA Mar. 2018.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stratospheric Measurements: Microwave Sounders I. Current Methods – MSU4/AMSU9 Diurnal Adjustment Merging II. Problems and Limitations III. Other AMSU.
Advertisements

Evaluating Calibration of MODIS Thermal Emissive Bands Using Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer Measurements Yonghong Li a, Aisheng Wu a, Xiaoxiong.
Characterization of ATMS Bias Using GPSRO Observations Lin Lin 1,2, Fuzhong Weng 2 and Xiaolei Zou 3 1 Earth Resources Technology, Inc.
1 Analysis of Airborne Microwave Polarimetric Radiometer Measurements in the Presence of Dynamic Platform Attitude Errors Jean Yves Kabore Central Florida.
GOES-13 First Sounder Infrared radiances Data from SSEC Data Center T. Schmit ASPB.
GOES-13 First Infrared radiances Data from SSEC Data Center T. Schmit ASPB.
EECS 823 MACHARIA.  Four-frequency, linearly-polarized, passive microwave radiometric system which measures atmospheric, ocean and terrain microwave.
A STUDY OF THE NOAA NEAR-NADIR MICROWAVE HUMIDITY SOUNDER BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURES OVER ANTARCTICA Tsan Mo, Yong Han, and Fuzhong Weng NOAA/NESDIS Center.
Yimin Ji - Page 1 October 5, 2010 Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission Precipitation Processing System (PPS) Yimin Ji NASA/GSFC,
Aquarius Algorithm Workshop March 2007 College of Engineering Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic & Space Sciences Chris Ruf Space Physics Research.
Development of AMSU-A Fundamental CDR’s Huan Meng 1, Wenze Yang 2, Ralph Ferraro 1 1 NOAA/NESDIS/STAR/CoRP/Satellite Climate Studies Branch 2 NOAA Corporate.
NASA, CGMS-41, July 2013 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Calibration/validation of Operational Instruments at NASA Langley Research.
Status of calibration and data evaluation of AMSR on board ADEOS-II Keiji Imaoka a, Yasuhiro Fujimoto a, Misako Kachi.
Slide 1 VAISALA Award Lecture Characterising the FY-3A Microwave Temperature Sounder Using the ECMWF Model Qifeng Lu, William Bell, Peter Bauer, Niels.
Implementation and Processing outline Processing Framework of VIIRS instrument monitoring System Processing Framework of VIIRS EV data Monitoring SD/SDSM.
The Inter-Calibration of AMSR-E with WindSat, F13 SSM/I, and F17 SSM/IS Frank J. Wentz Remote Sensing Systems 1 Presented to the AMSR-E Science Team June.
Obs-sim[ECMWF] obs-sim[AIRS] Dashed curve = ECMWF curve shifted to AIRS curve at nadir This is our best estimate of scan bias Motivation: AIRS-retrieval.
Bias analysis and correction for MetOp/AVHRR IR channel using AVHRR-IASI inter-comparison Tiejun Chang and Xiangqian Wu GSICS Joint Research and data Working.
Intercalibration of AMSR2 and PMW radiometers Takashi Maeda(JAXA/EORC), Arata Okuyama (JMA), Kazufumi Kobayashi (RESTEC), Mieko Seki (RESTEC), Keiji Imaoka.
GSICS MW products and a path forward.?
GSICS Microwave Sub Group Meeting
GSICS Web Meeting, 17 November 2011
Paper under review for JGR-Atmospheres …
Pre-launch Characteristics and Calibration
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
RENISH THOMAS (GPM) Global-Precipitation- Mapper
In-orbit Microwave Reference Records
Wang Ling, Hu Xiuqing, Chen Lin
CoSMIR Performance during OLYMPEX
Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer
An Overview of MODIS Reflective Solar Bands Calibration and Performance Jack Xiong NASA / GSFC GRWG Web Meeting on Reference Instruments and Their Traceability.
NOAA Report on Satellite Data Calibration and Validation – Satellite Anomalies Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group 2 session, agenda item 3 Author: Weng.
Calibration Activities of GCOM-W/AMSR2
AIRS (Atmospheric Infrared Sounder) Instrument Characteristics
An Update on the Activities of the Precipitation Measurement Missions (i.e. TRMM/GPM) XCAL Team PMM XCAL Team Wesley Berg, Rachael Kroodsma, Faisal Alquaeid,
Characterizing DCC as invariant calibration target
The Moon as Possible Calibration Reference for Microwave Radiometers
Manik Bali Jonathan Mittaz
On-orbit Performance : DAY-1 Results
NOAA GSICS Processing and Research Center
Imke Hans1, Martin Burgdorf1, Viju O
Hanlie XU, Xiuqing HU, Chunqiang Wu, Tianhang Yang, Na Xu
GSICS MW products and a path forward.?
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
Draft plan about lunar calibration for FY-3 MWHS
GRWG MW-SubGroup Candidate GSICS products – Window Channels
AIRS/GEO Infrared Intercalibration
MW Products and Deliverables
TanSat/CAPI Calibration and validation
Assessing passband errors
Fangfang Yu1 and Xiangqian Wu2
Early calibration results of FY-4A/GIIRS during in-orbit testing
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
Consistent calibration of VIRR onboard FY-3A to FY-3C
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
Na Xu, Xiuqing Hu, Lin Chen, Min Min
FY-3 Microwave Sensor Status and Calibration
Use of GSICS to Improve Operational Radiometric Calibration
ROSHYDROMET Agency Report
Proposed best practices for Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (A Discussion)
AIRS (Atmospheric Infrared Sounder) Level 1B data
Lu Zhang, Peng Zhang , Xiuqing Hu, Lin Chen
FY-3D/HIRAS On-orbit performance and validation
Na XU Xiuqing HU Lin CHEN Ling SUN NSMC CMA
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
FY-3 MWRI -Calibration and Time Series Record
Proposed best practices for Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (A Discussion)
Introduction of FY historical dataset reprocessing
Discussion Way Forward for Multispectral IR
How good is IASI-A as an in-orbit reference in GSICS in LWIR and IR
Presentation transcript:

Calibration and Validation of Microwave Humidity Sounder onboard FY-3D Satellite Yang Guo, Songyan Gu NSMC/CMA Mar. 2018

outline FY3D MWHS Introduction Calibration process On-orbit instrument performance Inter-satellite Validation Summary

MWHS Introduction number of channel up to 15from 5, frequency points from 2 to 4. Old Chs. New Chs. FY-3A/B/ MWHS FY-3C/D MWHTS Channel Frequency(GHz) 1 89.0 2 118.750.08 3 118.750.2 4 118.750.3 5 118.750.8 6 118.751.1 7 118.752.5 8 118.753.0 9 118.755.0 150(V) 10 150.0 150(H) 183.31±1 11 12 183.31±1.8 183.31±3 13 14 183.31±4.5 183.31±7 15

Atmospheric Transmission at Microwave Wavelengths 118GHz 89GHz 183GHz 150GHz

MWHS Introduction MWHS instrument MWHS scan sequence 0º(Nadir) 90º 180±2º Hot Targets 270º 53.35º 287±2º Cold Space 306.65º earth scene accelerate MWHS instrument MWHS scan sequence nonlinearity Radiometer transfer function

Calibration process Calibration flow chart Quality control flow chart No lunar intrusion If a lunar intrusion

Band correction: Planck’s Law: Calibration flow chart Triangular function No lunar intrusion If a lunar intrusion n The variation of Nedt with number of N included in the average of the Space view and internal target counts. Band correction: Planck’s Law:

Data_QA_Scan_Flag: ABCDE A_Flag: 0—preprocess success! Calibration flow chart Data_QA_Scan_Flag: ABCDE A_Flag: 0—preprocess success! 1—preprocess Failure! QC_Flag: 0—all channels cal success! 1—Part of the channel cal success! 2—all channels cal Failure! moonAffect: 0—no lunar contamination! 1—lunar contamination! Geoqc: 00,01,02—Geolocation success! 11,12,13—Geolocation Failure! No lunar intrusion If a lunar intrusion Use to compute Then use to compute antenna brightness temperature. Compute scene TBs by antenna correction

FY-3D MWHSII Global Brightness Temperature(Ascending)

FY-3D MWHSII Global Brightness Temperature(Descending)

Instrument temperature and Warm Target temperature Long-term trends of the internal warm target PRTs averaged temperatures and the instrument temperature

MWHS Warm Target View Count AGC adjustment AGC adjustment Long-term trends of Warm Target view counts

MWHS Noise Equivalent Delta Temperature

Center Frequency(GHz) Inter-satellite Validation of Observation FY-3D MWHS VS. Soumi/NPP ATMS Corresponding channels between FY-3D MWHS and Soumi/NPP ATMS Data : 2017.12.21-2017.12.30 Key match-up conditions Difference of observing times < 20 minutes Difference of satellite zenith angles < 5° Distance < 3 km Uniformity check : STD (3×3 pixels BT) < 1 K Center Frequency(GHz) MWHS Channel ATMS Channel 89.0/88.2 1 -- 118.750.08 2 118.750.2 3 118.750.3 4 118.750.8 5 118.751.1 6 118.752.5 7 118.753.0 8 118.755.0 9 150.0/165.5 10 183.31±1 11 22 183.31±1.8 12 21 183.31±3 13 20 183.31±4.5 14 19 183.31±7 15 18

Inter-satellite Validation of Observation Ch.11 Ch.12 Ch.13 Ch.14 Ch.15 Brightness Temperature of MWHS versus that of ATMS

SUMMARY FY-3D MWHS(II) on-orbit calibration system has been working well, and the basic calibration data are stable. The Noise Equivalent Delta Temperature of FY-3D MWHS(II) is well characterized and meets the specification. Assessments of FY-3D MWHS(II) performance will using NWP O-B and site calibration test data.

Thank you!