PRESENTATION GUIDE Dear School District Administrator, This PowerPoint presentation is intended to help initiate and facilitate community engagement in budget planning during the Local Control and Accountability Plan development process. The information included in this presentation is an example of what would be helpful to share with stakeholders. Feel free to add or omit information to tailor this presentation to the specific context of your district. We provide further guiding information throughout the presentation indicated by this symbol: This presentation is a companion to the Best Practices for Engaging Stakeholders in the Budget document. Sincerely,

DISTRICT’S NAME BUDGET OVERVIEW District’s Logo Date SUPPORTING OUR STUDENTS & FAMILIES DISTRICT’S NAME BUDGET OVERVIEW District’s Logo Date

OVERVIEW OF PRESENTATION About LCFF and LCAP How the Local Control Funding Formula Works Local Control & Accountability Plans LCAP Timeline The Big Picture Overview of our District Our District’s Student Achievement Our District’s Plans for Success Budget Development District Fiscal Trends – General Fund Revenue New Revenue Increase in District Financial Commitments New Investments Being Considered Proposed Supplemental & Concentration Reflections & Feedback

ABOUT LCFF AND LCAP

HOW THE LOCAL CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA (LCFF) WORKS In 2013, California dramatically reformed the way it funds our public schools. LCFF established a funding system that provides school districts with base funding and additional funds based on how many low-income students, English learners, and foster youth they serve. BASE GRANTS SUPPLEMENTAL GRANTS CONCENTRATION GRANTS Every student generates a base grant, which funds basic educational costs, such as teacher salaries, retirement costs, instructional materials, etc. Every student who is low-income, learning English, or in foster care generates 20% more funding above the base grant. These funds must be spent on increasing and improving services for these high-need student groups in order to improve their achievement. In districts where at least 55% of students are high-need, those high-need students above the 55% enrollment threshold generate an extra 50% of the base grant. These funds must also be spent to increase or improve services for high-need students in order to improve their achievement.

THE LOCAL CONTROL & ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN (LCAPS) All school districts must adopt a Local Control & Accountability Plan (LCAP), a 3-year plan for how districts will use state funds to serve all students. Each district’s LCAP must include the following: Goals Actions Related expenditures LCAPs must include services that target each major student subgroup, including: Racial/ethnic subgroups Low-income students English learners Students with disabilities Foster youth Homeless youth LCAPs must address the 8 State Priorities*: Basic Services Implementation of standards Parental engagement Student achievement Student engagement School climate Access to courses Other student outcomes * For county offices of education there are 2 additional priorities: (9) Instruction for Expelled Youth and (10) Foster Youth Services

THE TIMEFRAME TO DEVELOP THE LCAP Late Summer-Fall 2015 Winter 2016 Spring 2016 Spring 2016 July 1, 2016 October 8, 2016 District engages the community to solicit input on the LCAP. District and community assess student needs. Suggested District creates first draft of plan, incorporating community input. Suggested District presents proposed plan to parent advisory committees for feedback and input. Suggested District responds in writing to feedback from parent advisory committees and incorporates feedback into plan. Suggested School board adopts plan by July 1st in a public hearing. Required by Statute County office of education must approve district LCAPs by October 8th. Required by Statute

THE BIG PICTURE

OVERVIEW OF OUR DISTRICT # of Schools # of Students # of Staff # of Students by Race/Ethnicity # of Students by Subgroup Elementary: Middle: High School: Alternative: Charter: TK-5: 6-8: 9-12: Support Staff: Teachers: Administrators: Latino: African American/ Black: Asian: White: Other: Low-Income: English Learners: Foster Youth: Homeless Youth: % Unduplicated or High Need:

OUR DISTRICT’S STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

OUR DISTRICT’S STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

OUR DISTRICT’S SCHOOL CLIMATE

Answer the following questions for your stakeholders: OUR DISTRICT’S PLANS FOR SUCCESS Answer the following questions for your stakeholders: Which LCAP goals are the district prioritizing to improve student achievement? How will our LCFF investments support meeting our district’s goals for improved student achievement? How does the LCAP reflect the district’s commitment to closing opportunity and achievement gaps?

BUDGET DEVELOPMENT

DISTRICT FISCAL TRENDS – GENERAL FUND REVENUE Total General Fund Revenue, 2013-2017 in Millions 2016-17 General Fund Revenue in Millions Increase in Revenue from 2015-16 to 2016-17 = $16.8 million

Expenditures in Millions PROJECTED GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 2016-2017 Expenditures in Millions

Revenue Sources in Millions BREAKDOWN OF SOURCES FOR $16.8 MILLION IN NEW REVENUE Revenue Sources in Millions

2016-17 INCREASE IN DISTRICT FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS COST (In Millions) Increase in Revenue $ 16.8 Salary Increases (required step-and-column) $ 0.5 Salary Increases (negotiated raises) $ 2.0 Increase in Health Care Benefits $ 1.0 Increase in Pensions (burden shifted from the state to the district) $ 1.5 K-3 Class Size Reduction (required under LCFF) Total Financial Commitments $ 6.0 Revenue Increase Remaining $ 10.8

2016-17 NEW INVESTMENTS BEING CONSIDERED Remaining New Revenue for 2016-17 = $10.8 Million Priority Goal LCFF-Base (In Millions) LCFF-Suppl. & Conc. (In Millions) Expanding summer school to 3 additional school sites (add names of school sites) Improving Math and English Language Arts achievement $ 1.1 New tutoring program at 4 school sites (add names of school sites) $ 0.2 Expanding restorative justice to 5 more schools (name schools) Decreasing suspensions Use the “Goal” column in this and the following tables to show how district investments will address the needs identified by the data displayed earlier in the presentation. CONTINUED

2016-17 NEW INVESTMENTS BEING CONSIDERED Remaining New Revenue for 2016-17 = $10.8 Million Priority Goal LCFF-Base (In Millions) LCFF-Suppl. & Conc. (In Millions) Expanding dual-language learners program; adding 8 new positions Improving English learner academic achievement $ 0.8 Additional need-based school-site allocations Increasing support for high-need students $ 0.7 10 additional counselors Increasing access to college-prep coursework $ 1.0 Districtwide teacher professional development Improving academic achievement $ 6.8 Total $ 7.8 $ 3.0

OTHER POTENTIAL NEW INVESTMENTS Potential Investments Goal Cost (In Millions) Career technical course pathways Preparation for career $ 4.0 3-5 New social workers Socio-emotional supports $ 0.3-0.5 Transportation for extracurricular activities Student engagement/ graduation rates $ 0.2 Professional development in culturally-relevant pedagogy Student engagement/school climate $ 2.0 4 new parent liaisons Parent engagement $ 0.4

2016-17 PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTAL & CONCENTRATION SPENDING (IN MILLIONS) ACTION OR SERVICE GOAL CHANGE TO ACTION OR SERVICE IN 2016-17 CONTINUED INVESTMENT FROM 2015-16 PROPOSED NEW INVESTMENT 2016-17 DISTRICTWIDE/SCHOOLWIDE/ TARGETED 2 foster youth liaisons Ensuring continuity of educational support for foster youth Continued $ 0.2 Targeted Professional development for all teachers on the new ELD Standards Improving English learner academic achievement $ 5.0 Districtwide 4 Restorative justice trainers to train 80 teachers at 10 school sites (name schools) Decreasing suspensions 2 additional trainers to serve 5 more school sites (name schools) $ 0.2 Schoolwide CONTINUED

2016-17 PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTAL & CONCENTRATION SPENDING (IN MILLIONS) ACTION OR SERVICE GOAL CHANGE TO ACTION OR SERVICE IN 2016-17 CONTINUED INVESTMENT FROM 2015-16 PROPOSED NEW INVESTMENT 2016-17 DISTRICTWIDE/SCHOOLWIDE/ TARGETED Dual-language learners program Improving English learner academic achievement Adding 8 new positions to program $ 10.4 $ 0.8 Targeted Allocations to highest-need school sites Increasing support for high-need students Increased site funding $ 44.5 $ 0.7 Schoolwide Summer school for credit recovery/ academically at-risk students at 5 school sites (name schools) Improving graduation rates 3 additional school sites (name schools) $ 0.7 $ 1.1 CONTINUED

2016-17 PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTAL & CONCENTRATION SPENDING (IN MILLIONS) ACTION OR SERVICE GOAL CHANGE TO ACTION OR SERVICE IN 2016-17 CONTINUED INVESTMENT FROM 2015-16 PROPOSED NEW INVESTMENT 2016-17 DISTRICTWIDE/SCHOOLWIDE/TARGETED Tutoring services at 4 school sites Improving Math and English Language Arts achievement Launching program at 4 school sites (name schools) $ 0.2 Schoolwide TOTALS $ 61.0 $ 3.0 GRAND TOTAL $64 MILLION

REFLECTIONS & FEEDBACK

REFLECTIONS & FEEDBACK Questions for discussion: What questions do you have about the information we presented? Is there anything we need to clarify? In what ways do these spending priorities resonate with you? In what ways do they not resonate with you? Which investments might we increase or add, and why? Which investments might we decrease or eliminate, and why? In what ways is this spending plan helping to close opportunity and achievement gaps within our district?

THANK YOU!