Crystal Structure of RumA, an Iron-Sulfur Cluster Containing E

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2002)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
The crystal structure of bovine bile salt activated lipase: insights into the bile salt activation mechanism  Xiaoqiang Wang, Chi-sun Wang, Jordan Tang,
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Crystal Structure of the Soluble Form of Equinatoxin II, a Pore-Forming Toxin from the Sea Anemone Actinia equina  Alekos Athanasiadis, Gregor Anderluh,
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Intramolecular interactions of the regulatory domains of the Bcr–Abl kinase reveal a novel control mechanism  Hyun-Joo Nam, Wayne G Haser, Thomas M Roberts,
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Structure of Bacteriophage T4 RNase H, a 5′ to 3′ RNA–DNA and DNA–DNA Exonuclease with Sequence Similarity to the RAD2 Family of Eukaryotic Proteins 
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Crystal Structure of the Human High-Affinity IgE Receptor
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Recognition of a TG Mismatch
The 2.2 Å Crystal Structure of Hsp33
Crystal Structure of a DinB Lesion Bypass DNA Polymerase Catalytic Fragment Reveals a Classic Polymerase Catalytic Domain  Bo-Lu Zhou, Janice D. Pata,
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (November 2002)
Danny N.P Doan, Terje Dokland  Structure 
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Edith Schlagenhauf, Robert Etges, Peter Metcalf  Structure 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 1999)
NSF N-Terminal Domain Crystal Structure
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
The structure of ribosomal protein S7 at 1
Crystal Structure of the Flagellar σ/Anti-σ Complex σ28/FlgM Reveals an Intact σ Factor in an Inactive Conformation  Margareta K. Sorenson, Soumya S.
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Luc Bousset, Hassan Belrhali, Joël Janin, Ronald Melki, Solange Morera 
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Presentation transcript:

Crystal Structure of RumA, an Iron-Sulfur Cluster Containing E Crystal Structure of RumA, an Iron-Sulfur Cluster Containing E. coli Ribosomal RNA 5- Methyluridine Methyltransferase  Tom T Lee, Sanjay Agarwalla, Robert M Stroud  Structure  Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 397-407 (March 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2004.02.009

Figure 1 The Catalytic Mechanism of RNA m5U MTases Adapted from Kealey et al. (1994). Structure 2004 12, 397-407DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.02.009)

Figure 2 Overall Structure of RumA The model includes residues 15–431. The N-terminal, central, and C-terminal domains are colored in red, green, and blue, respectively. The α helices and β strands are each numbered sequentially. (A) Ribbon diagram of RumA. The catalytic cysteine (389), the [Fe4S4] cluster, and the side chains of its coordinating cysteines are shown in ball-and-stick model (magenta for Fe, yellow for S, and silver for C). The locations of the conserved MTase motifs are colored in gold and indicated in roman numerals. The potential SAM binding region is also marked. (B) Planar representation showing the topology of the same model. Classic numbering of the secondary structure elements in the MTase domain is also shown in parentheses. (C) Sequence alignment of three E. coli m5U MTases. The secondary structure elements of RumA assigned using DSSP (Kabsch and Sander, 1983) are labeled on top of the sequences and correspond with the secondary structure elements shown in (A) and (B). The four [Fe4S4]-coordinating cysteines are highlighted in yellow. The conserved motifs and the catalytic cysteine (*) are also marked. The graph was prepared with ESPript (Gouet et al., 1999). Structure 2004 12, 397-407DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.02.009)

Figure 3 Thermal Ellipsoid Representation of the Anisotropic Temperature Factors The anisotropic U factors resulting from TLS refinement with the three domains as the TLS groups show marked libration. The ellipsoids were plotted at the 50% probability level and colored according to Biso with a range of 10 (dark blue) to 80 (dark red). The most noticeable motion is the libration of the N-terminal domain. The figure was prepared using RASTEP (Merritt, 1999). Structure 2004 12, 397-407DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.02.009)

Figure 4 Stereo View of the Sigma-Weighted 2Fo − Fc Omit Electron Density around the [Fe4S4] Cluster The map contoured at 1 σ was calculated after the simulated annealing procedure in CNS omitting the coordinates of the cluster. The covalent bonding between the cluster and all four cysteine side chains is revealed by continuous electron density. Structure 2004 12, 397-407DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.02.009)

Figure 5 Sequence Alignment of the Catalytic Domains of Three 5-Methylpyrimidine MTase Families Sequence alignment within each family was performed by CLUSTALW. The secondary structural elements that are colored and labeled on top of each family are those of RumA (RNA m5U MTases, blue), Fmu (RNA m5C MTases, magenta), and M. HhaI (DNA m5C MTases, green). The conserved motifs are marked below the respective sequences with the same color as the secondary structural elements. Alignment between families is adjusted to reflect the 3-D structural conservation. The plot was generated by ESPript using the default color setting (white letters highlighted in red for complete conservation, and red letters for residues with similarity scores greater than 0.7), except that the conserved residues discussed in the text are colored blue. The conserved cysteines in motifs IV (m5C MTases) and VI (RNA MTases) are indicated by red triangles and red stars, respectively. The segment marked with a rectangular bar shows large differences among the three families. RumA, Fmu, and M. HhaI contain 6, 31, and 22 residues in this segment. (The segment starts with motif IV and ends at the first structurally alignable residue.) Sequences of RNA m5U MTases include the ruma and trma (RUMT) subfamilies, which are specified in their names. The two-letter species abbreviations are: Ec, Escherichia coli; Ss, Synechocystis sp.; Tm, Thermotoga maritima; Bs, Bacillus subtilis; Os, Oryza sativa; St (in RNA m5U MTases), Salmonella typhimurium; Hi, Haemophilus influenzae; Pa, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Xf, Xylella fastidiosa; Hh, Haemophilus haemolyticus; Ha, Haemophilus aegyptius; St (in DNA m5C MTases), Streptococcus thermophilus; Hp, Helicobacter pylori; Fn, Fusobacterium nucleatum. Structure 2004 12, 397-407DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.02.009)

Figure 6 Stereo View of Motifs IV and VI of Superposed RumA, Fmu, and M. HhaI The structures were aligned using the LSQKAB program in the CCP4 package (CCP4, 1994; Kabsch, 1976) using the Cα atoms of equivalent residues, as identified by the DALI server. Motifs IV and VI and their flanking strands and helices are shown in ribbons. The ribbon and the carbon atoms are colored in silver (RumA), green (Fmu), and blue (M. HhaI). The rest of the atoms are colored by atom type (red for O, blue for N, and orange for S). The catalytic cysteines in RumA (Cys389) and Fmu (Cys375) are from motif VI, whereas the catalytic cysteine in M. HhaI (Cys81) is from motif IV. They are in close proximity despite the differences of the nucleotide substrates. The segments marked by rectangular bars in Figure 5 show striking divergence in length and orientation. The second conserved cysteine in Fmu (Cys325) is also shown. The side chains of motif IV following strand 4 in RumA (DPAR) are also shown. Structure 2004 12, 397-407DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.02.009)

Figure 7 Electrostatic Potential Surface of RumA The molecular surface was calculated with MSMS (Sanner et al., 1996) using a probe radius of 1.35 Å. An electrostatic potential map was computed with GRASP (Nicholls et al., 1991) using the Poisson-Boltzmann method. The cluster was assigned +2 charge, and the four coordinating cysteines were each assigned −1 charge. The surface of the front side (left) shows three highly charged areas (enclosed and labeled A, B, and C), whereas the backside (right) lacks any continuous stretch of positively charged surface. The color ramp and the scale are shown at the bottom, with blue for positive (+15 kBT), white for neutral (0 kBT), and red for negative (−15 kBT), where kB is the Boltzmann's constant and T is the temperature. Structure 2004 12, 397-407DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.02.009)