Ecosystem Services from SAV in the Chesapeake Bay

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A detailed, systematic spatial assessment of coastal habitat, critical natural resources, and associated human uses in the tidal waters and near-shore.
Advertisements

1 Nicole Carlozo NOAA Coastal Management Fellow June 7, 2013 Integrating Water Quality and Coastal Resources into Marine Spatial Planning in the Chesapeake.
Marylands Approach to Success Stories Presented to the Region III States Meeting May 12, 2009 Presented by Jim George.
Harris Creek Case Study: Oyster Restoration and GIT Collaboration Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board August 2, 2012 Peyton Robertson Fisheries Goal.
SAV Habitat Requirements and Restoration Targets: Technical Synthesis III Lee Karrh SAV workgroup chair MD-DNR.
Dredging the Chesapeake Bay The 1999 Debate Heather Beall Intro to Coastal Management November 4, 2004.
1 Economic and Environmental Co-benefits of Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils: Retiring Agricultural Land in the Upper Mississippi River Basin.
Why Are Wetlands Important? By: Erin Janes & Danna Svejkosky MARS 689: Wetland Ecology Dr. Tom Linton Fall 2003.
What is “Coastal Blue Carbon”? A win-win-win for habitat conservation, coastal resilience, and climate mitigation Dr. Ariana Sutton-Grier NOAA Coastal.
Alachua County Wetland Protection Regulations Alachua County Board of County Commissioners October 22, 2013.
Ecosystem Services Studies in Minnesota Jan. 9, 2013 ES 281.
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Habitat Product Development: On-Screen Digitizing and Spatial Analysis of Core Sound Chelsea Vick, Patrina Bly, Michael JeffersonMentors:
Chesapeake Bay Program Presented by: Elizabeth Mills, Heather Plumridge, Elizabeth Repko Possibilities, Problems, and Promise.
Conclusions: Diversity and Ecosystem Function
Overview of Economic Valuation of Coral Reefs Lauretta Burke World Resources Institute (WRI) Mt. Irvine, Tobago March 21-22, 2006.
Ecosystem Services Analysis Tues, Jan ES 281.
 Biome Coral Reefs By: Hamad Al Dafaa. Map of the Coral Reefs.
CO 2 Valuing Virginia’s ECOSYSTEM Services
Millennium Assessment (MA) 2003 Typology of Ecosystem Goods and Services Regulating Benefits obtained from regulation of ecosystem processes climate regulation.
The Natural Capital Project  If we provide tools to help people understand what we get from nature,  And we test and use that understanding to inform.
OPTIMAL STRATEGIES FOR ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE Koel Ghosh, James S. Shortle, and Carl Hershner * Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology,
The Natural Capital Project  Help people understand what we get from nature  Use that understanding to inform decisions.
Why do Forest Ecosystems Matter? Results of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Jeffrey A. McNeely Chief Scientist IUCN-The World Conservation Union
6. Values and externalities Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
Planning for Prosperity and Security on our Coasts Amy Rosenthal | Science-Policy Specialist, The Natural Capital Project June 9, 2011.
Agriculture’s Role in Climate Change Mitigation July 18, 2007 (revised) Daniel A. Lashof, Ph.D. Science Director Climate Center Natural Resources Defense.
Submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) abundance and diversity in the tidal Potomac River and estuary By Nancy Rybicki, Jurate Landwehr, Edward Schenk, and.
An Overview of Barnegat Bay New Jersey Habitats of the Barnegat Bay Ecosystem OCC 2012.
Coastlines of the Gulf of Mexico Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi.
Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Galveston Bay Area Using InVEST Models Greg Guannel, Jorge Brenner, Joe Faries, Anne Guerry, Jennifer Proft, Jess Silver,
Oyster Reef and Estuarine Landscape Restoration Kenneth L. Heck, Jr. NGI Conference, May 2007.
Water Quality and the Chesapeake Bay David O’Brien NOAA Fisheries Service Gloucester Point, VA.
16.5 Conservation The timber industry has started to adopt sustainable practices. Global fisheries have adopted several sustainable practices. –rotation.
WWF Greater Mekong Programme InVEST Seminar – April 2012 Ecosystem Services in the Greater Mekong Subregion.
SAV Management Strategy 1 Title of Presentation Date Image or Graphic.
Maryland’s Coastal Resiliency Assessment Nicole Carlozo, MD DNR October 14, 2015 Good afternoon. I’m here today to provide some information on Maryland’s.
J. Patrick Megonigal Smithsonian Environmental Research Center State of research on climate mitigation benefits from conservation and restoration of blue.
Economic Valuation of Environment: Overview
TPS: What is an ocean? Oceanography – What does your book say? – Ocean- – -ography – Con – Pro.
Accounting For Maryland’s Ecosystem Services Renewable Energy Ecosystem Services Human Feedback Ecosystems People Heat Sink Elliott Campbell, PhD Integrated.
What “abiotic factors” make up an estuary?
Draft California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy PUBLIC MEETING Oakland, California June 27, 2012 Korie Schaeffer NMFS Habitat Conservation Division.
A Transformational Tool for Coastal Conservation
Tidal wetlands.
Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Galveston Bay Area Using InVEST Models Greg Guannel, Jorge Brenner, Joe Faries, Anne Guerry, Jennifer Proft, Jess Silver,
Socio-Economic Marine Research Data kkkk Stephen Hynes
Tidal Wetlands and Shorelines in the Chesapeake Bay
Nature’s Benefits: Getting more for restoration dollars
Virginia Institute of Marine Science
Land-based Pollution Threats to Coral Reefs
Approaches for Measuring Natural Capital
Wetlands Enviro 2 Go
Intro to Ecosystem Services
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Wetlands Enviro 2 Go
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
resources meet current needs resources will still be available
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Joint Nature Conservation Committee
The economic costs and benefits of the pNRP stream piping provisions Before the Hearing Stream 5 Panel Dave Grimmond.
Bay Grass Abundance 42% Bay Grass Abundance of Goal Achieved
Good riparian management Financial benefits for the public
VITAL HABITATS GOAL Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits,
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Wetlands.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Presentation transcript:

Ecosystem Services from SAV in the Chesapeake Bay Elliott Campbell, PhD Integrated Policy and Review Maryland Department of Natural Resources

What Are Ecosystem Services? “Benefits gained by people from the environment” As classified by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA 2005)

SAV Ecosystem Services What benefits do SAV provide compared to typical bay bottom? Higher rates of net primary production Stabilization of sediment and reduction of incoming wave energy Carbon sequestration Nitrogen sequestration High production of blue crabs and other fish species

Methodology: Eco-Price We measure what the ecosystem does Carbon is taken up Shoreline is protected Nutrients are taken up Habitat is provided We look at what we have paid for that service (Price Signals we term Eco-Prices) In a market Treatment and restoration costs Through mitigation fees Cost to regulate

Methodology Broke down each service by density of the SAV bed Used same density classes as the VIMS survey 0-10% (5% midpoint) 10-40% (25% midpoint) 40-70% (55% midpoint) 70-100% (85% midpoint) Assumed the ES is linearly related w/ % cover (for carbon and nitrogen)

SAV Density

Carbon Eco-Price: $24 per mt Carbon Key Ref.: Wyda et al. 2002, Moore 2004, Greiner et al. 2013, Duarte et al. 2013

Nitrogen Eco-Price: $18.33 per kg N Key Ref.: Kemp et al. 2005

Blue Crab Production Dockside value of $2.40 per kg (NOAA) Key Ref.: Ralph et al. 2002

Other Commercial Fish Production Dockside value of $5.00 per kg (NOAA) Key Ref.: Orth 1984, Sobocinski 2014

ES per Ha

Shoreline Stabilization Not all SAV provides shoreline stabilization Literature (Newell and Koch 2004, Koch et al. 2009) suggests importance of SAV density Height of SAV canopy SAV species Wave intensity Depth of water column Type of shoreline All factor in to the degree to which SAV protects The coast To be conservative we only included the highest Density class (4) within 500 m of the shore and Assumed these beds absorb 20% of incoming Erosive wave energy over 2/3 of year

ES per ha

SAV ES Totals for the Bay 2014 VIMS Survey Density and Acreage 1, 0-10% 1,249 ha $238,064 $ per year 2, 10-40% 3,190 $1,612,674 3, 40-70% 9,262 $9,561,798 4, 70-100% 20,806 $36,555,135 Subtotal $47,967,670 Cat 4 w/in 500 m 16,362 $18,939,334 CB total 34,507 $66,907,005 632 $120,357 1,017 $514,270 5,806 $5,994,585 11,116 $19,530,629 8,038 $9,304,142 MD 18,571 $35,463,983

2015 Survey Increase of 2570 ha, ~ $2.4 million per year Total ES Value $50,375,412 (w/o shoreline stabilization)

Questions Methane production in tidal fresh/oligohaline SAV? Rule of thumb for shoots/m2 to % cover? Better way to estimate fish production? Better model for coastal protection? Did not include replacement cost of SAV bed Email: elliott.campbell@maryland.gov