External quality control for embryology laboratories Jose Antonio Castilla, Rafael Ruiz de Assín, Maria Carmen Gonzalvo, Ana Clavero, Juan Pablo Ramírez, Francisco Vergara, Luis Martínez Reproductive BioMedicine Online Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 68-74 (January 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.09.033 Copyright © 2009 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Success rates in evaluation of materials. Sensitivity could not be calculated in 2007 as only non-toxic materials were sent. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2010 20, 68-74DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.09.033) Copyright © 2009 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Mean percentage decrease in sperm motility and acceptance or rejection of materials (2003–2007). Bars=SD. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2010 20, 68-74DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.09.033) Copyright © 2009 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Percentage of embryos (day 2 and day 3) and zygotes with a high degree of agreement. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2010 20, 68-74DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.09.033) Copyright © 2009 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 4 Clinical decision: percentage of zygotes (2003–2006) and day-2 and day-3 embryos (2003–2007) with a high degree of agreement. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2010 20, 68-74DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.09.033) Copyright © 2009 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions