Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Visual Control of Altitude in Flying Drosophila
Advertisements

Crossmodal Visual Input for Odor Tracking during Fly Flight
A Motion Direction Map in Macaque V2
Annual 10-Month Aerial Life Phase in the Common Swift Apus apus
Flying Drosophila Orient to Sky Polarization
Cursive Writing with Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements
Mark S. Blumberg, Cassandra M. Coleman, Ashlynn I. Gerth, Bob McMurray 
Aaron R. Seitz, Praveen K. Pilly, Christopher C. Pack  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e4 (December 2017)
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages e3 (November 2017)
Pattern and Component Motion Responses in Mouse Visual Cortical Areas
Sensory-Motor Integration: More Variability Reduces Individuality
Honeybee Vision: In Good Shape for Shape Recognition
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
Coding of the Reach Vector in Parietal Area 5d
Sexual Dimorphism in the Hoverfly Motion Vision Pathway
G. Lorimer Moseley, Timothy J. Parsons, Charles Spence  Current Biology 
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages R1156-R1158 (December 2015)
Mismatch Receptive Fields in Mouse Visual Cortex
There's more to magic than meets the eye
Michael L. Morgan, Gregory C. DeAngelis, Dora E. Angelaki  Neuron 
Annual 10-Month Aerial Life Phase in the Common Swift Apus apus
Learning Biases Underlie “Universals” in Avian Vocal Sequencing
Yukiyasu Kamitani, Frank Tong  Current Biology 
Young Children Do Not Integrate Visual and Haptic Form Information
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Honeybee Communication: A Signal for Danger
Lisa M. Fenk, Andreas Poehlmann, Andrew D. Straw  Current Biology 
Visual Control of Altitude in Flying Drosophila
Gal Aharon, Meshi Sadot, Yossi Yovel  Current Biology 
Publication metrics and success on the academic job market
Nicolas Catz, Peter W. Dicke, Peter Thier  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e4 (December 2017)
Jennifer L. Hoy, Iryna Yavorska, Michael Wehr, Cristopher M. Niell 
Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds
The Occipital Place Area Is Causally Involved in Representing Environmental Boundaries during Navigation  Joshua B. Julian, Jack Ryan, Roy H. Hamilton,
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
BOLD fMRI Correlation Reflects Frequency-Specific Neuronal Correlation
Medial Axis Shape Coding in Macaque Inferotemporal Cortex
Volume 24, Issue 21, Pages (November 2014)
Non-overlapping Neural Networks in Hydra vulgaris
Mosquitoes Use Vision to Associate Odor Plumes with Thermal Targets
Spatiotopic Visual Maps Revealed by Saccadic Adaptation in Humans
Attentive Tracking of Sound Sources
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
Pattern and Component Motion Responses in Mouse Visual Cortical Areas
Optic flow induces spatial filtering in fruit flies
Rapid Whisker Movements in Sleeping Newborn Rats
Mark S. Blumberg, Cassandra M. Coleman, Ashlynn I. Gerth, Bob McMurray 
Daniel E. Winkowski, Eric I. Knudsen  Neuron 
Steven K. Schwartz, William E. Wagner, Eileen A. Hebets 
Robust Selectivity to Two-Object Images in Human Visual Cortex
Masaya Hirashima, Daichi Nozaki  Current Biology 
Noa Raz, Ella Striem, Golan Pundak, Tanya Orlov, Ehud Zohary 
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (February 2017)
Dongjun He, Daniel Kersten, Fang Fang  Current Biology 
Path Integration: Combining Optic Flow with Compass Orientation
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Visually Mediated Motor Planning in the Escape Response of Drosophila
When Correlation Implies Causation in Multisensory Integration
Kristy A. Sundberg, Jude F. Mitchell, John H. Reynolds  Neuron 
Sung Jun Joo, Geoffrey M. Boynton, Scott O. Murray  Current Biology 
Goal-Driven Behavioral Adaptations in Gap-Climbing Drosophila
Cross-Modal Associative Mnemonic Signals in Crow Endbrain Neurons
A Visual Sense of Number
Gaby Maimon, Andrew D. Straw, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Nonvisual Motor Training Influences Biological Motion Perception
Li Zhaoping, Nathalie Guyader  Current Biology 
Head-Eye Coordination at a Microscopic Scale
Motion-Induced Blindness and Motion Streak Suppression
Presentation transcript:

Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds Partha S. Bhagavatula, Charles Claudianos, Michael R. Ibbotson, Mandyam V. Srinivasan  Current Biology  Volume 21, Issue 21, Pages 1794-1799 (November 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.09.009 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2011 21, 1794-1799DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.09.009) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Bird Flight through Tunnels in which the Walls Are Lined with Vertical or Horizontal Stripes Trajectories of budgerigars flying in a corridor in which both walls were lined with vertical stripes (A), the left wall was lined with horizontal stripes and the right wall with vertical stripes (B), and vice versa (C). The red arrow denotes the flight direction, which is from the bottom to the top in the images and the plots. The circles denote head position, and the lines denote body orientation. The dashed vertical line denotes the midline of the corridor. The histograms show the distributions of trajectory positions, the small arrowheads indicate the mean trajectory position, and the horizontal bars show the standard error of the mean (SEM) trajectory position. Data were analyzed from five birds, producing a total of 45–50 flights for each condition. P represents the results of t tests for a significant deviation of the mean trajectory position from the midline of the tunnel. The following abbreviations are used: LVRV, left vertical, right vertical; LVRH, left vertical, right horizontal; LHRV, left horizontal, right horizontal. Current Biology 2011 21, 1794-1799DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.09.009) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Bird Flight through Tunnels in which the Walls Are Blank or Lined with Vertical Stripes Trajectories of budgerigars flying in a corridor in which the left wall was blank and the right wall was lined with vertical stripes (A) and vice versa (B). Other details are as in Figure 1. In each case, the birds flew significantly closer to the blank wall (p < 0.0001, t test). Data were analyzed from five birds, producing a total of 51 flights for each condition. The following abbreviations are used: LBRV, left blank, right vertical; LVRB, left vertical, right blank. Current Biology 2011 21, 1794-1799DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.09.009) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Flight Speed Profiles Profiles of axial flight speed versus position for individual trajectories (left-hand panels) and mean axial flight speeds (right-hand panels) for the condition when both walls carry vertical stripes (LVRV, red) and when both walls carry horizontal stripes (LHRH, blue). The colored dotted lines in the left-hand panels and the correspondingly colored bars in the right-hand panels show the mean axial flight speed for each condition. In the right-hand panels, the error bars associated with each column depict the standard deviation (SD) (left) and the SEM (right). Data are shown for three different birds: Casper, One, and Two. The following abbreviations are used: LVRV, left vertical, right vertical; LHRH, left horizontal, right horizontal. Current Biology 2011 21, 1794-1799DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.09.009) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Axial Flight Speeds under Different Conditions (A) Mean axial flight speeds of birds flying in tunnels in which both walls were lined with vertical stripes (LVRV), horizontal stripes (LHRH), horizontal stripes on the left and vertical stripes on the right (LHRV), or vertical stripes on the left and horizontal stripes on the right (LVRH). The error bars on each column depict SD (left) and SEM (right). Data were analyzed from a total of eight birds. The number of flights analyzed for each condition is shown in each column. (B) Result of a Multcompare analysis (see Experimental Procedures) to test for statistical differences in flight speed among the four different conditions. The nonoverlapping error bars indicate that the mean axial speed in each condition is significantly different from that at each of the three other conditions, at the p < 0.05 level. The following abbreviations are used: LVRV, left vertical, right vertical; LHRH, left horizontal, right horizontal; LHRV, left horizontal, right horizontal; LVRH, left vertical, right horizontal. Current Biology 2011 21, 1794-1799DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.09.009) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions