Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3-Dimensional structure of membrane-bound coagulation factor VIII: modeling of the factor VIII heterodimer within a 3-dimensional density map derived by.
Advertisements

David Craig, Mu Gao, Klaus Schulten, Viola Vogel  Structure 
High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule
YidC and Oxa1 Form Dimeric Insertion Pores on the Translating Ribosome
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Moses Prabu-Jeyabalan, Ellen Nalivaika, Celia A. Schiffer  Structure 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Rhomboid Protease Dynamics and Lipid Interactions
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
The Binding of Antibiotics in OmpF Porin
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Chen-Chou Wu, William J. Rice, David L. Stokes  Structure 
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Near-Atomic Resolution for One State of F-Actin
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
How Does a Voltage Sensor Interact with a Lipid Bilayer
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Structural Insights into the Inhibition of Wnt Signaling by Cancer Antigen 5T4/Wnt- Activated Inhibitory Factor 1  Yuguang Zhao, Tomas Malinauskas, Karl.
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages (October 2010)
Regulation of the Protein-Conducting Channel by a Bound Ribosome
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Binding Dynamics of Isolated Nucleoporin Repeat Regions to Importin-β
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Computational Modeling Reveals that Signaling Lipids Modulate the Orientation of K- Ras4A at the Membrane Reflecting Protein Topology  Zhen-Lu Li, Matthias.
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Functional Plasticity in the Substrate Binding Site of β-Secretase
Volume 102, Issue 9, Pages (May 2012)
The Structure of Chorismate Synthase Reveals a Novel Flavin Binding Site Fundamental to a Unique Chemical Reaction  John Maclean, Sohail Ali  Structure 
Marcos Sotomayor, Klaus Schulten  Biophysical Journal 
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
David Craig, Mu Gao, Klaus Schulten, Viola Vogel  Structure 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Ying Huang, Michael P. Myers, Rui-Ming Xu  Structure 
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Matthieu Chavent, Elena Seiradake, E. Yvonne Jones, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Y. Zenmei Ohkubo, Emad Tajkhorshid  Structure 
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Unfolding Barriers in Bacteriorhodopsin Probed from the Cytoplasmic and the Extracellular Side by AFM  Max Kessler, Hermann E. Gaub  Structure  Volume.
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Presentation transcript:

Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 92-104 (January 2016) Structural Basis of Pullulanase Membrane Binding and Secretion Revealed by X-Ray Crystallography, Molecular Dynamics and Biochemical Analysis  Alexandra East, Ariel E. Mechaly, Gerard H.M. Huysmans, Cédric Bernarde, Diana Tello-Manigne, Nathalie Nadeau, Anthony P. Pugsley, Alejandro Buschiazzo, Pedro M. Alzari, Peter J. Bond, Olivera Francetic  Structure  Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 92-104 (January 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2015.10.023 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2016 24, 92-104DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.10.023) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Klebsiella oxytoca PulA Structure and Domain Organization (A) Surface representation of the three-dimensional structure of a PulA protomer (subunit A) colored by structural domains. PulA domain architecture was defined according to the CAZy database (Cantarel et al., 2009). (B) PulA domain mobility represented by the crystal B-factor variation of every Cα atom along the primary sequence. Structure 2016 24, 92-104DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.10.023) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Conformational Variability in the PulA Crystallographic Dimer (A) Ribbon and transparent surface representation of the PulA crystal structure; subunits A and B are colored blue and red, respectively. The two monomers within the unit assemble into a highly asymmetric dimer. Views from the side (top panel) and above (bottom panel) are shown. (B) Monomer superposition highlights the observed conformational differences. Dimer asymmetry comes from the significant difference between the relative orientations of the N1 domains (shown in ribbon form) and rigid cores (including the N2, N3, A, and C domains) of each monomer. Structure 2016 24, 92-104DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.10.023) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Molecular Dynamics Simulations of lipoPulA Anchored in the POPE Model Membrane (A and B) The lipoPulA conformation in the beginning (A) and at the end (B) of a representative 100-ns simulation. The N-terminal 19-residue tether is shown in red, and the fatty-acyl tail as spheres. PulA domains are shown in different colors: N1 is in orange, N2 in yellow, N3 in green, A in cyan, and C in purple. The POPE membrane atoms are shown in light blue (carbon), red (oxygen), and dark blue (nitrogen). (C) The distance between the center of mass of different PulA domains and the membrane during the simulation. The colors of graph lines represent movements of individual lipoPulA domains relative to the membrane center of mass as indicated on the right. (D) Main-chain H bonds (left) and atomic contacts (right) of the tether and domains N1, N2, and N3 with the POPE membrane during a representative simulation. The graph color code is indicated on the right. Structure 2016 24, 92-104DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.10.023) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Interactions of lipoPulA with the POPE Membrane Revealed by MD Simulations (A) Tether contacts with the POPE at 0 ns (purple) and 100 ns (orange) of MD simulations. (B) PulA IM retention signal with fatty-acylated residue C1 shown in red, D2 in magenta, N3 in cyan, and G4 in green. The POPE molecules making polar contacts (black dashed lines) with these residues are shown, with carbon atoms in light blue, oxygen atoms in red, nitrogen in dark blue, hydrogen in white, and phosphorus in orange. (C) A zoom-out view of the PulA tether with the fatty-acylated C1 and residues D2 to Q19 shown in red. The POPE molecules in direct contact with the IM retention signal are shown as light-blue sticks. (D) PulA tether (cyan) with S5 to S10 residues shown in green. Pro-Asp dipeptides are shown as sticks, in pale cyan in tether, or in gray in domains N1 and N2. (E) Residues in domains N1 (yellow), N2 (green), and N3 (orange) in contact with the POPE membrane, shown as sticks. Structure 2016 24, 92-104DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.10.023) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 MD Simulations of the Nonacylated PulA (A) Snapshot of PulANA simulations at 0 ns. In the cartoon model of PulANA nonpolar residues are shown in white, basic residues in blue, acidic in red, and polar in green. The polar residues of the POPE bilayer are shown in ice blue and nonpolar tails in white. (B) PulANA position on the POPE membrane after 100 ns. Color coding as in (A). (C) The center of mass of each protein domain approaches the center of mass of the bilayer over the course of the simulation. The partial density of the system components across the simulation box averaged over the first 20 ns (top right) and the final 20 ns (bottom right) shows the protein approaching the membrane and each other. (D) Final structure of all residues with hydrogen-forming side chains (color coded) and POPE molecules (headgroups, ice blue; tails, white) within 10 Å of protein. (E) View of the final frame of the simulation of PulA from below, showing the tether, N1, N2, and N3 protein domains in white ribbon, and showing all residues with side chains capable of forming hydrogen bonds (arginine, histidine, lysine, serine, threonine, asparagine, glutamine, tryptophan, and tyrosine) found within 3.5 Å of the lipid in a colored representation: Arg, red; His, orange; Lys, yellow; Ser, green; Thr, cyan; Asp, mauve; Glu, purple. Structure 2016 24, 92-104DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.10.023) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 PulANA Binding to Liposomes In Vitro (A) Purified PulANA co-sedimentation assay in the presence or absence of liposomes. Total (T), soluble (S), and pellet (P) fractions of PulANA treated as described in the Experimental Procedures and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie brilliant blue staining. (B) Summary of PulANA binding to E. coli lipids or pure phospholipids as indicated. The bar graphs show mean values of the fraction of lipid-associated PulANA from at least three independent experiments; error bars indicate SD. Structure 2016 24, 92-104DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.10.023) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 PulA Domain Dynamics during MD Simulation (A) The structural drift of the carbon backbone of different lipoPulA (top) and PulANA (bottom) domains during the course of representative simulations (note the different y axis scales). Each graph represents domain fluctuations as indicated in the legend on the right. (B) All PulANA domains except N1 and the tether were superimposed. Domain N1 (shown) pivots around the rest of the protein (not shown) during the simulations (see Figure 2B). Subunit A (red) was used as the initial structure, and the N1 domain moved to occupy a similar position to subunit B (yellow) by the end of the simulation (cyan). (C) PulA domain mobility represented by the B-factor variation of every Cα atom over the last 80 ns of each simulation. Structure 2016 24, 92-104DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.10.023) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Effects of Mutations in Domains N1, N2, and N3 and the Tether on PulA Secretion and Stability (A) Cartoon representation of PulA X-ray structure with N-terminal residue D20 in blue spheres. Region A is highlighted in blue, region B in green, and region C in purple. TEV insertions at positions 234 and 284 are indicated by red spheres. Cyan spheres indicate Ca2+ atoms. (B) Top: PulA immunodetection in cell (C) and supernatant (S) fractions from 0.05 OD600nm of PAP7460 bacteria containing pCHAP8185 plasmid producing PulA or PulA variants and the Pul secretion system (high copy). Bottom: Cell and supernatant fractions of 0.5 OD600nm of PAP5207 bacteria containing pCHAP8185 derivatives (low copy). The images have been processed to remove irrelevant lanes as indicated by a space. Structure 2016 24, 92-104DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.10.023) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 The Ins Subdomain Is Essential for PulA Secretion in Physiological Conditions (A) A snapshot of the Ins domain showing the three short helices forming a triangular structure, with the sulfur atoms forming a disulfide bridge between Cys491 and Cys506 shown in yellow. Two other α helices are also present in the Ins domain. (B) A snapshot of lipoPulA MD simulation with the Ins subdomain highlighted. (C) Secretion of PulANAΔIns and controls in strain PAP7460 (high copy) and PAP5207 (low copy). The images have been processed to remove irrelevant lanes as indicated by a space. C, cell; S, supernatant. Structure 2016 24, 92-104DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.10.023) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions