July 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/192 July 2000 One Global Standard for Wireless LANs? ETSI/IEEE/MMAC Convergence July 2000 Lucent Technologies Harold.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /227 Submission July 2000 Vic Hayes, Lucent TechnologiesSlide 1 Regulatory and “one 5 GHz standard” ad-hocs Wednesday report Vic Hayes,
Advertisements

Wireless Fundamentals Chapter 6 Introducing Wireless Regulation Bodies, Standards, and Certifications.
Wireless Local Area Networks By Edmund Gean August 2, 2000.
Doc.: IEEE f Submission IEEE f March 2010 Tim Harrington, Zebra Enterprise SolutionsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P
Doc.: IEEE wng Submission July 11-16, 2004 J.W Lim Slide 1 WirelssLAN Spectrum Issue in Rep. of Korea Jaewoo LIM 1, Jongtaek Oh, Taejin.
© HiperLAN2 Global Forum H2GF COMMENTS ON ALLOCATION FOR WIRELESS ACCESS SYSTEMS OPERATING IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE 5150 MHz TO 5875 MHz Peter.
Doc.: IEEE /0474 r1 Submission September 2003 Kei Obara, SiemensSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Technical Education Click here to move on Index H.323 Related Standards Lesson 4.
Doc.: IEEE /128r0 Submission Marc de Courville, MotorolaSlide 1 An OFDM based solution anticipating the convergence between next G of.
Doc.: IEEE /242-r1 Submission July 2000 Vic Hayes, Lucent TechnologiesSlide 1 Regulatory and “one 5 GHz standard” ad-hocs Thursday report Vic.
Doc.: IEEE /214r1 Submission July 2000 Grant B. Carlson, Eastman Kodak Co. Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /371 Submission November 2000 James Chen, AtherosSlide 1 A Framework for Evaluating 5GHz PARs.
Doc.: IEEE /503r0 Submission September 2004 McCorkle & Welborn, FreescaleSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /0059r0 & /0xxxr0 Submission May 2007 Rich Kennedy, OakTree WirelessSlide 1 RR-TAG Liaison Report July 2007 IEEE
Doc.: IEEE /360r0 Submission September 2002 Stan Bottoms, ConsultantSlide 1 Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission June 1999 Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Consolidating Standards to Enable Economies of Scale Tom Siep Member Group.
Doc.: IEEE a Submission November, 2003 CRL-UWB ConsortiumSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
IEEE Std Proposed Revision Purpose, Scope & 5 Criteria.
Doc.: IEEE /0778r0 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR July MHz PHY Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Wi-Fi Technology.
Wireless Technologies
Comments on HT PAR & 5 Criteria
RR-TAG Liaison Report May 2007 IEEE
Worldwide 5GHz Requirements
May 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: MBAN Closing Report for Montreal May 2007 Date.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
IEEE WG Closing Report – July 2006
Werner Mohr, Siemens Networks, Munich, Germany
On the Objectives and Scope of the WS Coexistence PAR
Submission Title: [MAC requirements for the BAN]
September 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [European 60GHz Indoor System Projects]
160 MHz PHY Transmission Date: Authors: March 2010
January 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Sub-GHz proposal for ] Date Submitted:
September 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Regulatory activity above 275 GHz in.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
5GSG Hilton Head, South Carolina
[VHT SG Approach Proposal]
IEEE WG Closing Report – July 2006
RR-TAG Liaison Report IEEE
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed European Regulations] Date Submitted:
Submission Title: [Proposal on PAR and 5C draft for BAN]
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
January 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Sub-GHz proposal for ] Date Submitted:
<month year> Denver, March 2006
March 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Conformance PAR Background Date Submitted:
Submission Title: [Reasonable Compromise Proposal]
Submission Title: [Reasonable Compromise Proposal]
Thoughts on VHT Date: Authors: May 2007 April 2007
900 MHz ISM Band Date: Authors: January 2010 Month Year
Submission Title: [MAC requirements for the BAN]
78th Session of the IEEE WG
IEEE Comments on aq PAR and 5C
IEEE Comments on aq PAR and 5C
March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [IEEE f Key User and Technical Requirements]
Reinhard Scholl, GTSC-7 Chairman
120 MHz PHY Transmission Date: Authors: January 2010
February 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Initiative to enable to operate.
RR-TAG Liaison Report Mar07 IEEE
RR-TAG Liaison Report IEEE
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Regulatory Update in Europe for Gigabit Application.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
WLAN Overlay with 60 GHz Channels
RR-TAG Liaison Report IEEE
Shared Infrastructure
Liaison Report from Date: Authors: September 2011
Interest for HDR extension to a
Submission Title: [TG3a Compromise Direction]
Liaison Report from Date: Authors: September 2011
Presentation transcript:

July 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/192 July 2000 One Global Standard for Wireless LANs? ETSI/IEEE/MMAC Convergence July 2000 Lucent Technologies Harold Teunissen, Jan Kruys hteunissen@lucent.com Harold Teunissen & Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies

Main Goals Addresses To present the different views on Wireless LANs July 2000 Main Goals To present the different views on Wireless LANs To establish working group to study IEEE/ETSI/MMAC WLAN convergence Addresses Global standardization for Wireless LANs Harold Teunissen & Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies

Summary User view Integrator’s view Commercial view Regulatory view July 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/192 July 2000 Summary User view Integrator’s view Commercial view Regulatory view Technical view Convergence approach How to proceed Harold Teunissen & Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies

July 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/192 July 2000 User View “Wireless LANs are great and 5 GHz stuff is promising but...“ Three products? IEEE, ETSI, MMAC With similar services? Will I need two cards? “Please keep it simple!” Harold Teunissen & Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies

Integrator’s view I want one device for Wireless LAN functions July 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/192 July 2000 Integrator’s view I want one device for Wireless LAN functions Integration is costly maintenance and support of multiple devices is costly I want smooth migration from 2.4 to 5 GHz These standards guys should get their act together and cooperate with their peers worldwide they did it with the PHY, why not with the MAC too?? Harold Teunissen & Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies

Commercial view One standard is preferable No installed base yet July 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/192 July 2000 Commercial view One standard is preferable No installed base yet no loss of investment by users/customers level playing field Slugging it out in the market makes no sense the resulting confusion will delay acceptance by the public as well by integrators Convergence is a now or never opportunity Harold Teunissen & Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies

July 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/192 July 2000 Regulatory view The World Radio Conference of 2003 will decide on 5 GHz spectrum for WLANs Currently the US, Europe and Japan have different perspectives on the need for such spectrum One standard, supported by the three major WLAN standards bodies will significantly improve the spectrum case and improve the prospects for WRC 2003 - as well as in the ITU-R preparation processes Harold Teunissen & Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies

History 802.11 HIPERLAN/2 MMAC considers both approaches July 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/192 July 2000 History 802.11 medium data rates, “wireless Ethernet” different PHY solutions HIPERLAN/2 high data rates “wireless ATM with QoS” single PHY MMAC considers both approaches Harold Teunissen & Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies

Major technical differences July 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/192 July 2000 Major technical differences Harold Teunissen & Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies

Essential Requirements July 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/192 July 2000 Essential Requirements Global usability Broad range of data rates Robustness in contention mode Good QoS in centralized mode Support direct mode with QoS QoS and Security that ties in with the IETF Harold Teunissen & Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies

July 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/192 July 2000 Convergence approach The aim should be a single implementation that supports both best effort and other QoS modes Take the best of each standard but assure backward compatibility with current installed base Address inter-working with other networks - e.g. IMT 2000 Assure compliance with regional radio regulations and support global spectrum effort Common Technical and Conformance Test Specifications as basis for ISO standard Harold Teunissen & Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies

July 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/192 July 2000 How to proceed Set up a small study group to analyze and propose a converged model define a common set of requirements main proponents of each standard: ETSI/IEEE/MMAC Report at the next meeting (September 2000) Direction Technical Approach Documentation structure We have done it with the PHY - we can do it again! Harold Teunissen & Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies Jan Kruys, Lucent Technologies