Homologous Recombination Rescues Mismatch-Repair-Dependent Cytotoxicity of SN1- Type Methylating Agents in S. cerevisiae  Petr Cejka, Nina Mojas, Ludovic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Robust Network of Double-Strand Break Repair Pathways Governs Genome Integrity during C. elegans Development  Daphne B. Pontier, Marcel Tijsterman 
Advertisements

Franziska Fischer, Katja Baerenfaller, Josef Jiricny  Gastroenterology 
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 Mismatch Repair Protein Localizes to Recombination Intermediates In Vivo  Elizabeth Evans, Neal Sugawara, James E Haber,
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
PHAPI, CAS, and Hsp70 Promote Apoptosome Formation by Preventing Apaf-1 Aggregation and Enhancing Nucleotide Exchange on Apaf-1  Hyun-Eui Kim, Xuejun.
The INO80 Complex Removes H2A
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Erik D. Larson, W. Jason Cummings, David W. Bednarski, Nancy Maizels 
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (June 2002)
Replication-Independent Histone Deposition by the HIR Complex and Asf1
Volume 135, Issue 2, Pages e1 (August 2008)
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin: A Biochemical Implication for Chromosome Condensation  Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya Hirano  Cell 
Shelley Chu, Ira Herskowitz  Molecular Cell 
The Unstructured C-Terminal Tail of the Clamp Subunit Ddc1 Activates Mec1/ATR via Two Distinct Mechanisms  Vasundhara M. Navadgi-Patil, Peter M.
Selective Degradation of Ubiquitinated Sic1 by Purified 26S Proteasome Yields Active S Phase Cyclin-Cdk  Rati Verma, Hayes McDonald, John R Yates, Raymond.
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
The TFIIH Subunit Tfb3 Regulates Cullin Neddylation
PARP1 Represses PAP and Inhibits Polyadenylation during Heat Shock
Branden Wolner, Stephen van Komen, Patrick Sung, Craig L. Peterson 
Volume 125, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (April 2013)
Yutian Peng, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell 
Scott Gradia, Samir Acharya, Richard Fishel  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Positive or Negative Roles of Different Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Pho85-Cyclin Complexes Orchestrate Induction of Autophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 
Ana Losada, Tatsuya Hirano  Current Biology 
A Rad53 Kinase-Dependent Surveillance Mechanism that Regulates Histone Protein Levels in S. cerevisiae  Akash Gunjan, Alain Verreault  Cell  Volume 115,
The INO80 Complex Removes H2A
Ken-ichi Yoshioka, Yoshiko Yoshioka, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 16, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Replication-Independent Histone Deposition by the HIR Complex and Asf1
Richard W. Deibler, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
A Suppressor of Two Essential Checkpoint Genes Identifies a Novel Protein that Negatively Affects dNTP Pools  Xiaolan Zhao, Eric G.D Muller, Rodney Rothstein 
Marine Viruses Exploit Their Host's Two-Component Regulatory System in Response to Resource Limitation  Qinglu Zeng, Sallie W. Chisholm  Current Biology 
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 20, Pages (October 2008)
Dap1/PGRMC1 Binds and Regulates Cytochrome P450 Enzymes
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Histone H4 Lysine 91 Acetylation
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Irina Chernyakov, Felipe Santiago-Tirado, Anthony Bretscher 
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 112, Issue 3, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
Nitobe London, Steven Ceto, Jeffrey A. Ranish, Sue Biggins 
HURP Is Part of a Ran-Dependent Complex Involved in Spindle Formation
George Simos, Anke Sauer, Franco Fasiolo, Eduard C Hurt  Molecular Cell 
Michael J. Lee, Henrik G. Dohlman  Current Biology 
Adelina A. Davies, Andrea Neiss, Helle D. Ulrich  Cell 
Catherine Johnson, Vamsi K. Gali, Tatsuro S. Takahashi, Takashi Kubota 
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Enhancement of BLM-DNA2-Mediated Long-Range DNA End Resection by CtIP
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e6 (December 2017)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Kirk M Brown, Gregory M Gilmartin  Molecular Cell 
Minoru Funakoshi, Robert J. Tomko, Hideki Kobayashi, Mark Hochstrasser 
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Presentation transcript:

Homologous Recombination Rescues Mismatch-Repair-Dependent Cytotoxicity of SN1- Type Methylating Agents in S. cerevisiae  Petr Cejka, Nina Mojas, Ludovic Gillet, Primo Schär, Josef Jiricny  Current Biology  Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages 1395-1400 (August 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.032 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Substrate Specificity of the S. cerevisiae Mismatch Binding Factor Msh2p/Msh6p (A) Overexpression of scMsh2p/Msh6p in E. coli. Uninduced, total extract from BL21 codon plus cells; Induced, total extract from BL21 codon plus cells overexpressing scMsh2p/Msh6p; SP, Heparin and Mono Q, pooled fractions eluted from the respective FPLC chromatography columns. The figure shows aliquots from different purification steps separated on a denaturing 7.5% polyacrylamide gel stained with Coomassie Blue. (B–E) Binding of the scMsh2p/Msh6p heterodimer to different DNA substrates. Formation of specific (s) and nonspecific (ns) complexes. The heterodimer (1.7–67 nM) was incubated with 32P-labeled 6.6 nM G/T, MeG/T, G/C, or MeG/C DNA substrates. The lane with 16.4 nM protein concentration is indicated by an asterisk. The protein/DNA complexes were analyzed by a gel-shift assay as described in the Experimental Procedures and visualized by autoradiography. (E) Competition binding assay. The Msh6p/Msh2p heterodimer (16.4 nM) was incubated with 6.6 nM 32P-labeled G/T heteroduplex. The preformed complexes were then challenged with a 10-fold excess of unlabeled G/T, MeG/T, G/C, and MeG/C DNA substrates. The fraction of the labeled G/T substrate bound by Msh2p/Msh6p was quantitated by Typhoon 9600 PhosphoImager with ImageQuant software. Current Biology 2005 15, 1395-1400DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.032) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 MNNG-Induced Killing of S. cerevisiae Strains with Different Genetic Backgrounds (A) Comparison of MNNG sensitivities of the MMR-deficient (mlh1 or msh2) and/or recombination-deficient (rad52) strains as measured by the spot test. Mid-log phase cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of MNNG, harvested and spotted on YPD plates at proper serial dilutions as described in the Experimental Procedures. (Wild-type genes are labeled with capitals, deletion mutants with lowercase letters) Sensitivity to ultraviolet (UV) light was used as a control. The upper panel shows a representative experiment, and the lower panel shows a graphic representation of data pooled from 3–5 independent experiments. Error bars show standard error of the mean. (B) Effect of methylguanine methyltransferase (mgt1) deficiency on the sensitivity of MMR- and/or recombination-deficient strains to MNNG. Sensitivity to UV light was used as a control. The upper panel shows a representative experiment, and the lower panel shows a graphic representation of data pooled from 3–5 independent experiments. Error bars show standard error of the mean. Current Biology 2005 15, 1395-1400DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.032) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 MNNG Sensitivities of Recombination- (rad52), Methylguanine Methyltransferase- (mgt1), and/or Exonuclease 1 (exo1)-Deficient S. cerevisiae Mid-log phase cells of the indicated strains were treated with the indicated concentrations of MNNG and spotted at proper serial dilutions on YPD plates as described in the Experimental Procedures. The upper panel shows a representative experiment, and the lower panel shows a graphic representation of data pooled from 3–5 independent experiments. Error bars show standard error of the mean. Current Biology 2005 15, 1395-1400DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.032) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Model of MMR-Induced Killing upon Treatment with Methylating Agents See text for details. Current Biology 2005 15, 1395-1400DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.032) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions