Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials  Cholesterol.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protecting the heart and the kidney: Implications from the SHARP trial Dr. Christina Reith University of Oxford United Kingdom.
Advertisements

Lancet : doi: /S (08)60104-X Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from.
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Ungroup once.
Who should have statins 18 th March Nonfatal MI CHD death Any major coronary event CABG PTCA Unspecified Any coronary revascularisation.
HPS: Heart Protection Study Purpose To determine whether simvastatin reduces mortality and vascular events in patients with and without coronary disease,
C. Baigent, et al. on behalf of the SHARP Investigators Lancet 2011;Epub 9 June.
Antithrombotic Trialists’ (ATT) Collaboration. Lancet 2009;373:
4S: Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration. Lancet 2010;epub 9 Nov.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Baseline characteristics of participants presenting with or without peripheral artery disease (PAD) Heart Protection Study Group J Vasc Surg 2007;45:
Number of participants with diabetes by trial Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaborators Lancet 2008;371:
Baseline characteristics and eligibility criteria of participating trials Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators Lancet 2005;366:
Adjuvant bisphosphonate treatment in early breast cancer: meta-analyses of individual patient data from randomised trials The Lancet Volume 386, Issue.
Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in early breast cancer: patient-level meta- analysis of the randomised trials The Lancet Volume 386, Issue 10001,
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from participants in 26 randomised trials Lancet 2010;
Volume 376, Issue 9753, Pages (November 2010)
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Ungroup once.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(13): doi: /archinte Figure Legend:
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials  Cholesterol.
Predicted 5-year benefits of LDL cholesterol reductions with statin treatment at different levels of risk. (A) Major vascular events, and (B) vascular.
2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol treatment guidelines
The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
Volume 376, Issue 9734, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 388, Issue 10059, Pages (November 2016)
SEARCH Collaborative Group. Lancet 2010;epub 9 Nov
Long-term effects of hormone replacement therapy
Volume 378, Issue 9804, Pages (November 2011)
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Volume 388, Issue 10059, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 366, Issue 9503, Pages (December 2005)
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior diabetes
Volume 376, Issue 9734, Pages (July 2010)
The results of the SHARP trial
Volume 377, Issue 9784, Pages (June 2011)
National Lipid Association Recommendations for Patient-Centered Management of Dyslipidemia: Part 1—Full Report  Terry A. Jacobson, MD, Matthew K. Ito,
Long-term effects of hormone replacement therapy
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Aspirin in the prevention of cancer – Author's reply
Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta- analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials 
The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised.
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Volume 386, Issue 10001, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 379, Issue 9822, Pages (March 2012)
2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol treatment guidelines
Adrian Martineau  The Lancet Respiratory Medicine 
Volume 386, Issue 10001, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 375, Issue 9725, Pages (May 2010)
MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
Volume 376, Issue 9753, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 371, Issue 9627, Pages (May 2008)
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials  Cholesterol.
Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials 
Volume 382, Issue 9894, Pages (August 2013)
C-reactive protein concentration and the vascular benefits of statin therapy: an analysis of 20 536 patients in the Heart Protection Study  Heart Protection.
Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group Lancet 2011;377:469-76
Volume 375, Issue 9719, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 379, Issue 9822, Pages (March 2012)
Cause of death Treatment-arm events, % (n=45 054)
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Volume 373, Issue 9672, Pages (April 2009)
Drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for the treatment of coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized.
Impact of renal function on the effects of LDL cholesterol lowering with statin-based regimens: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from 28.
Effects on 11-year mortality and morbidity of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin for about 5 years in 20 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised.
The results of the SHARP trial
Presentation transcript:

Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials  Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration  The Lancet  Volume 376, Issue 9753, Pages 1670-1681 (November 2010) DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Effects on any major vascular event in each study In the left panel, unweighted rate ratios (RRs) for each trial of the comparison of first event rates between randomly allocated treatment groups are plotted along with 99% CIs. Trials are ordered according to the absolute reduction in LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) at 1 year within each type of trial comparison (more vs less statin and statin vs control). In the right panel, rate ratios are weighted per 1·0 mmol/L LDL cholesterol difference at 1 year. Subtotals and totals with 95% CIs are shown by open diamonds. The Lancet 2010 376, 1670-1681DOI: (10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Effects on each type of major vascular event In the left panel, unweighted rate ratios (RRs) are plotted for each comparison of first event rates between randomly allocated treatment groups. In the right panel, RRs are weighted per 1·0 mmol/L LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) difference at 1 year. RRs are shown with horizontal lines denoting 99% CIs or with open diamonds denoting 95% CIs. MI=myocardial infarction. CHD=coronary heart disease. CABG=coronary artery bypass graft. PTCA=percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. The Lancet 2010 376, 1670-1681DOI: (10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Effects on major vascular events per 1·0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol, by baseline prognostic factors Rate ratios (RRs) are plotted for each comparison of first event rates between treatment groups, and are weighted per 1·0 mmol/L LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) difference at 1 year. Missing data are not plotted. RRs are shown with horizontal lines denoting 99% CIs or with open diamonds showing 95% CIs. CHD=coronary heart disease. GFR=glomerular filtration rate. The Lancet 2010 376, 1670-1681DOI: (10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Effects on major vascular events per 1·0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol, by baseline LDL cholesterol concentration on the less intensive or control regimen Rate ratios (RRs) are plotted for each comparison of first event rates between treatment groups, and are weighted per 1·0 mmol/L LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) difference at 1 year. Analyses were done with trial-specific and subgroup-specific LDL weights for each baseline LDL cholesterol category. Missing data are not plotted. RRs are shown with horizontal lines denoting 99% CIs or with open diamonds showing 95% CIs. The Lancet 2010 376, 1670-1681DOI: (10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Effects on cause-specific mortality per 1·0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol Rate ratios (RRs) are plotted for each comparison of first event rates between treatment groups and are weighted per 1·0 mmol/L LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) difference at 1 year. RRs are shown with horizontal lines denoting 99% CIs or with open diamonds showing 95% CIs. CHD=coronary heart disease. The Lancet 2010 376, 1670-1681DOI: (10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Effects on site-specific cancer incidence per 1·0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol Rate ratios (RRs) are plotted for each comparison of first event rates between treatment groups and are weighted per 1·0 mmol/L LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) difference at 1 year. RRs are shown with horizontal lines denoting 99% CIs or with open diamonds showing 95% CIs. Analyses are of first cancers, subdivided by site: gastrointestinal (International Classification of Disease codes version 9 140–159); genitourinary (179–189); respiratory (160–163,165); female breast (174); haematological (200–208); melanoma (172); other/unknown site (other cancers with codes 140–172, 174–209, plus deaths with codes 173, 210–239). The Lancet 2010 376, 1670-1681DOI: (10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions