DMP Common Standards WG

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Extending the OPD to cover RDM Joy Davidson, DCC Adrian Cox, Equipment.data at University of Southampton Masud Khokhar, Lancaster University (test case)
Advertisements

DATA FOUNDATION TERMINOLOGY WG 4 th Plenary Update THE PLUM GOALS This model together with the derived terminology can be used Across communities and stakeholders.
RDA Data Foundation and Terminology (DFT) IG: Introduction Prepared for RDA 6 th Plenary Paris, Sept. 25, 2015 Gary Berg-Cross, Raphael Ritz Co-Chairs.
Public Health Reporting Initiative: Stage 2 Draft Roadmap.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Summary of Part C Questionnaire.
Modularization Also Known As: reuse, single sourcing, structured authoring What is it? Breaking down content into smaller chunks that can be reused in.
An adoption phase for RDA WGs?. Background WGs end after 18 months WGs (and some IGs) produce outputs, but adoption of these outputs often only takes.
CoRD Meeting 12 March 2003 STIPES (Lot 4) STIPES = Statistical Inquiries from Popular European Software.
Mandate and updated work plan of the UN Oslo Group on Energy Statistics Ville Vertanen 10th Meeting of the Oslo Group in Aguascalientes, Mexico.
Research Data Repository Interoperability WG David Wilcox, Thomas Jejkal Montreal, 09/20/17 CC BY-SA 4.0.
Designing a better future: Active, actionable DMPs
Materials Resource Registries Working Group Co-chairs: Laura M
INCOSE Usability Working Group
Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Rebecca Lawrence and Simon Hodson
Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Rebecca Lawrence and Simon Hodson
-
AR Doug Nebert, POC-elect GEO ADC Co-Chairs Meeting,
Data Type Registries #2 12 Month Status Larry Lannom, Tobias Weigel Date Location TBD? CC BY-SA 4.0.
Recent developments for machine-actionable DMPs
FAIR Metrics RDA 10 Luiz Bonino – - September 21, 2017.
Machine-actionable DMPs: a review of recent work
Exposing DMPs Working Group
T-TAP for climate data RDA P10 Montréal – September 2017
Planning and Management
RDA/TDWG Metadata Standards for Attribution of Physical and Digital Collections Stewardship Anne E Thessen, Matt Woodburn, Dimitris Koureas 21 Sept, 2017/Montreal,
Update RDA Secretariat 20 September 2017
Project Objectives, Workplan and Timescales
ESSnet Linked Open Statistics Update
Educator Effectiveness System Overview
From Observational Data to Information (OD2I IG )
6.2 data interoperability Rafael C Jimenez ELIXIR
Planning and Management
Tomasz Miksa, SBA Research, Wien, Austria
WG Research Data Collections Draft outputs of a RDA bottom-up effort P9 - April 2017 Co-chairs: Bridget Almas, Frederik Baumgardt, Tobias Weigel, Thomas.
Research Data Alliance (RDA) 9th WG/IG Collaboration Meeting: Repository Platforms for Research Data (RPRD) Interest Group 13nd June 2018 Co-Chairs:
Update RDA Strategy Discussion
Planning and Management
Agenda (AM) 9:30-10:15 Introduction to RDA
X-DIS/XBRL Phase 2 Kick-Off
Statistical Information Technology
Update RDA Strategy Discussion
European Innovation Partnership on Water
The Research Data Alliance
Organisations & The Research Data Alliance (RDA) - the Organisational Advisory Board CC BY-SA 4.0.
Exposing Data Management Plans WG Update
Bird of Feather Session
DMP Common Standards WG
Angus Whyte P-11 Berlin, 22 March 2018
The RDA Europe project CC BY-SA 4.0.
RDA Europe: the network of nodes
Exposing Data Management Plans
Regional engagement & European nodes
The Research Data Alliance
Title slide met vaste foto
Exposing Data Management Plans WG Update
Exposing Data Management Plans WG Update
WG PID Kernel Information RDA P11 Berlin – March 2018
Co-Chairs: Keith Jeffery, Rebecca Koskela, Alex Ball
Leveraging PIDs for object management in data infrastructures RDA UK Node Workshop, July Tobias Weigel (DKRZ)
The Research Data Alliance: a (data) window to the world
1st Call for Collaboration Projects
Planning and Management
The Research Data Alliance: a (data) window to the world
The Research Data Alliance: a (data) window to the world
The Research Data Alliance: a (data) window to the world
The Research Data Alliance: a (data) window to the world
Open Science: is the Research Data Alliance a help or a hindrance?
Planning and Management
Exposing Data Management Plans WG Update
Cultivating Semantics for Data in Agriculture and Nutrition
Presentation transcript:

DMP Common Standards WG Tomasz Miksa, Paul Walk, Peter Neish 15/01/2019 www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall

Challenge – why do we need this WG? Shortcomings of existing DMPs manually completed, vague, not updated, … Machine-actionable DMPs living documents automate data management collect information from systems trigger actions in systems facilitate validation This requires well-defined RDM workflows data management infrastructure common data model https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e13086 15/01/2019 www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall

DMP Common Standards - Outputs Common data model for machine-actionable DMPs to model information from standard DMPs NOT a template NOT a questionnaire modular design core set of elements domain specific extensions Reference implementations ready to use models JSON, XML, RDF, etc. Guidelines for adoption of the common data model requirements for supporting systems pilot studies 15/01/2019 www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall

www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall Example Current DMPs – model questionnaires <administrative_data> <question>Who will be the Principle Investigator?</question> <answer>The PI will be John Smith from our university.</answer> </administrative_data> Machine-actionable DMPs – model information "dc:creator":[ { "foaf:name":"John Smith", "@id":"orcid.org/0000-1111-2222-3333", "foaf:mbox":"mailto:jsmith@tuwien.ac.at", "madmp:institution":" AT-Vienna-University-of-Technology" } ], dc, foaf – reuse existing standards madmp – create own when needed AT Vienna – use controled vocabularies when possible or PIDs for instituion ORCID – use PIDs when possible 15/01/2019 www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall

Example Currently available – not very useful Machine-actionable DMP <administrative_data> <question>Who will be the Principle Investigator?</question> <answer>The PI will be John Smith from our university.</answer> </administrative_data> Machine-actionable DMP "dc:creator":[ { "foaf:name":"John Smith", "@id":"orcid.org/0000-1111-2222-3333", "foaf:mbox":"mailto:jsmith@tuwien.ac.at", "madmp:institution":"AT-Vienna-University-of-Technology" } ], Reuse existing standards, e.g. Dublin Core, PREMIS, etc. dc, foaf – reuse existing standards madmp – create own when needed AT Vienna – use controled vocabularies when possible or PIDs for instituion ORCID – use PIDs when possible 15/01/2019 www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall

Example Currently available – not very useful Machine-actionable DMP <administrative_data> <question>Who will be the Principle Investigator?</question> <answer>The PI will be John Smith from our university.</answer> </administrative_data> Machine-actionable DMP "dc:creator":[ { "foaf:name":"John Smith", "@id":"orcid.org/0000-1111-2222-3333", "foaf:mbox":"mailto:jsmith@tuwien.ac.at", "madmp:institution":"AT-Vienna-University-of-Technology" } ], Use PIDs whenever possible, e.g. ORCID dc, foaf – reuse existing standards madmp – create own when needed AT Vienna – use controled vocabularies when possible or PIDs for instituion ORCID – use PIDs when possible 15/01/2019 www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall

Example Currently available – not very useful Machine-actionable DMP <administrative_data> <question>Who will be the Principle Investigator?</question> <answer>The PI will be John Smith from our university.</answer> </administrative_data> Machine-actionable DMP "dc:creator":[ { "foaf:name":"John Smith", "@id":"orcid.org/0000-1111-2222-3333", "foaf:mbox":"mailto:jsmith@tuwien.ac.at", "madmp:institution":"AT-Vienna-University-of-Technology" } ], Use controlled vocabularies dc, foaf – reuse existing standards madmp – create own when needed AT Vienna – use controled vocabularies when possible or PIDs for instituion ORCID – use PIDs when possible 15/01/2019 www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall

Example Currently available – not very useful Machine-actionable DMP <administrative_data> <question>Who will be the Principle Investigator?</question> <answer>The PI will be John Smith from our university.</answer> </administrative_data> Machine-actionable DMP "dc:creator":[ { "foaf:name":"John Smith", "@id":"orcid.org/0000-1111-2222-3333", "foaf:mbox":"mailto:jsmith@tuwien.ac.at", "madmp:institution":"AT-Vienna-University-of-Technology" } ], Develop own concepts and vocabularies only when needed dc, foaf – reuse existing standards madmp – create own when needed AT Vienna – use controled vocabularies when possible or PIDs for instituion ORCID – use PIDs when possible 15/01/2019 www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall

www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall Join us now! We need inputs from all of you! researchers, infrastructure operators, funders, developers, managers, PhD students, ... Join our DMP Common Standards WG https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/dmp-common-standards-wg Mailing list dmp-common@rda-groups.org GitHub - issue tracker for discussion https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/IdeasOpenDiscussion Monthly calls 2 time slots – ‘friendly for each time zone’ RDA Europe Workshop in Vienna http://www.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/dp/rda17-workshop-vienna/ 15/01/2019 www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall

www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall Backup slides 15/01/2019 www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall

www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall Backup slides 15/01/2019 www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall

www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall The big picture 15/01/2019 www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall

www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall Next steps We will analyse existing systems analyse existing standards identify RDM workflows that best use maDMPs define architecture supporting maDMPs prototype run pilot studies 15/01/2019 www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall

Milestones and timeline Requirements and candidate solutions reviewed (M5) M2. Common model specification drafted (M10) M3. Common model refined (M15) M4. Dissemination and pilot studies (M18) Outputs delivered Kick-off Your 18 month timeline places your estimated WG finish date at the end of March 2019. This would put your 12-month community report out at P12 in Fall 2018 and your final Recommendations would be presented at P13 in Spring 2019. 10th Plenary 11th Plenary 12th Plenary 13th Plenary Fall 17 Spring 18 Fall 18 Spring 19 15/01/2019 www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall