State Accountability Results September 18, 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Advertisements

Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
Accountability data overview August Topics  Changes to 2014 accountability reporting  Overview of accountability measures  Progress & Performance.
Dec. 14, 2010 APS BOE Workshop Graduation Requirements High School Presented By: Division of Instruction PACESetters!
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
FotherGile School District Mission, Vision and Graduation Proposal.
School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.
2014 School Performance Framework Overview for CSC.
Academic Progress Plan Results. Two Topics to be Covered ASD DCAS results relative to other Delaware school districts SY Performance.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Understanding the SPP September 26, > Purpose The PA School Performance Profile is designed to:  Provide a building.
We are a Title I school What does this mean?. We are Title I because… Our school has a high number of students who are eligible for Free and Reduced Price.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
MI-SAAS: Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System Overview of Key Features School Year.
Accountability 2.0 Overview Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.4.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Accountability Scorecards Okemos Board of Education September 2013.
WHITE HOUSE CONVENING November 2-4, 2015 University of North Florida MEASUREMENT, MOBILIZATION, MOVING FORWARD STRENGTHENING SCHOOL COUNSELING AND COLLEGE.
Every Student Succeeds Act Jan. 14, 2016 David W. Volkman Executive Deputy Secretary.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
1 Educational Accountability Act of 2009 (SB09-163) Colorado Department of Education February 6, 2012.
Communication Webinar:
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
Omni Houston Hotel at Westside
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Overview of the new State Accountability System
Kansas K-12 Education House of Representatives - Vision 2020 Committee
Mark Baxter Texas Education Agency
WIFI ACCESS COW-GUEST-WIRELESS No Login Needed
2016 Accountability Reporting
Accountability Update
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
School & District Performance Frameworks
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
Mississippi Succeeds Madison County Business League & Foundation
ECHOLS COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL April 12, 2016 Middle School Teachers
Participation in State Assessments State and Federal Policy
Using Local Flexibility in School Accreditation and SB-163 Updates
KASB Professor’s Meeting
Campus Improvement Plans
Briefing on Development of Performance Frameworks
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Starting Community Conversations
Understanding Your School and District Performance Frameworks
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Strengthening Secondary Indicators under Perkins V
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
English Learner Accountability Component
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Presentation transcript:

State Accountability Results September 18, 2018 Every Student Shapes a Successful Future State Accountability Results September 18, 2018 Presented by: DJ Loerzel, Director of Accountability and Research

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future State Accountability Why is this topic on the board agenda? To provide an overview of the District (DPF) and School (SPF) Performance Frameworks What are we asking the board to do with this information? For informational purposes How is this linked to the Strategic Plan vision, mission, goals & core beliefs? State Accountability is essential to APS’ mission and vision to serve our students effectively

State Accountability Process Every Student Shapes a Successful Future State Accountability Process Background Point Distribution Key Performance Indicators Accreditation Plan Types Additional Descriptors District Performance

Accountability Background Every Student Shapes a Successful Future Accountability Background The District (DPF) and Schools (SPF) Performance Frameworks seek to: hold districts/schools accountable for performance on the same, single set of indicators and measures inform a differentiated approach to state support based on performance and need, by specifically identifying the lowest performing schools and districts These goals are part of the Colorado Department of Education’s (CDE) Statewide System of Accountability and Support and the goals outlined in the Education Accountability Act of 2009 (SB 09- 163)

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future DPF/SPF Structures Frameworks include three measures of student success: Academic Achievement Academic Longitudinal Growth Postsecondary and Workforce Readiness Points are earned for overall student and disaggregated groups: Previously Identified on a READ Plan English Language Learners Free/Reduced Lunch Eligible Minority Students Students with Disabilities

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future Point Distributions District/High School Achievement – 30% Growth – 40% PWR – 30% ES/MS Achievement – 40% Growth – 60%

Key Performance Indicators Every Student Shapes a Successful Future Key Performance Indicators The performance frameworks measure attainment on the key performance indicators identified in SB 09-163 as the measures of educational success: Academic Achievement 33.3% ELA, 33.3% Math, 33.3% Science Academic Longitudinal Growth (Colorado Growth Model) 40% ELA, 40% Math, & 20% English Language Proficiency Postsecondary and Workforce Readiness 22.2% Dropout, 22.2% SAT (Read/Math), 11.1% Matriculation, 44.4% Graduation

Accountability Impact Every Student Shapes a Successful Future Accountability Impact These State-identified metrics are combined to produce an overall evaluation of a school’s or district’s performance The Performance Framework results in Accreditation at the district level, and Plan Types for school level implementation

Accreditation and School Plan Types Every Student Shapes a Successful Future Accreditation and School Plan Types The plan type is based on the total percent of framework points earned out of points eligible:

Additional Descriptors Every Student Shapes a Successful Future Additional Descriptors Low Participation Notated on the ratings for schools and districts with test participation rates below 95 percent Informational only: Important to note because low participation can impact how well the results reflect the school/district Decreased due to Participation Indicates the plan type or rating was lowered one level because assessment participation rates fell below 95 percent in two or more subject areas (Parent refusals are excluded)

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future District Performance Longitudinal DPF: Longitudinal School Performance Frameworks: **Note: Accountability data for the 2015 school year is not available due to the one year CDE Accountability pause**

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future District Performance 77% of APS schools earned a Performance (27 schools) or Improvement rating (16 schools) While the number of schools on the Accountability Clock remained flat, APS decreased the number of schools on Turnaround Plans (2)

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future Questions?