ICAO Aviation English Language Test Endorsement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E-OCVM (Version 2) Explained Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Alistair Jackson EUROCONTROL Episode 3 Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009.
Advertisements

Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM)
IS&T Project Management: Project Management 101 June, 2006.
System Office Performance Management
EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGY PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Ref: Youth Peer Education toolkit: Standard of Peer Education Programmes, 2005.
Creating a Shared Vision Model. What is a Shared Vision Model? A “Shared Vision” model is a collective view of a water resources system developed by managers.
RI Educator Evaluation System Design ACEES Meeting October 25, 2010.
Name Position Organisation Date. What is data integration? Dataset A Dataset B Integrated dataset Education data + EMPLOYMENT data = understanding education.
Member Development and Support Tools and Resources for Building Strong Programs.
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fourth Edition
1. Outline Purpose: o Review the work underway to establish an ICAO aviation English test endorsement process Topics: o Project purpose and structure.
The techniques involved in systems analysis Explanation of a feasibility study:Explanation of a feasibility study: –economic, –legal, –technical, –time.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
COG/TNG contribution to LPR Implementation Language Proficiency: a safety issue St. Petersburg May 24th 2011.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference, September 2014 Digging into “Data Use” Using the DaSy Framework.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Local Points of Contact Webinar
Welcome to Scottish Improvement Skills
Roles and Responsibilities
Software Quality Control and Quality Assurance: Introduction
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Working in Groups in Canvas
Public School Monitoring Roadmap
Enhancing employers’ involvement in Social Protection policy debates
Data & Technology Updates April, 2016
BUMP IT UP STRATEGY in NSW Public Schools
44th Meeting of the Standing Committee Bonn, Germany, October 2015 Report on activities of the Strategic Plan Working Group Ines Verleye,
TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
ITS Integrator User Certification Program
FORMAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGIES
Training for New District Test Coordinators
MEGAN HOOPES-MYERS BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY EDTECH
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Five Required Elements
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference, September 2014
Get Ready for the Alberta Health Care Aide Directory Pilot
Collaborative Leadership
Improve IEP Project IEP Form Improvement Project
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Global Grants Breakout
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Wednesday, December 1st Today’s Facilitators: Kim Glow & Cindy Dollman
Energy Statistics Compilers Manual
PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE RENEWAL PROCESS
2003 Annual NSDL PI Survey A Collaborative Formative Evaluation
Developing a shelter strategy
Iowa Statewide Assessment of Student Progress
Adrian Enright EUROCONTROL
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Subject Name: SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Subject Code:10IS51
Integrating Human Rights and Gender Equality in Evaluation –Towards UNEG Guidance Update title Presentation by UNEG HR/GE Task Force.
Leuven Policy implementation.
Language Proficiency: a safety issue
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Practice Standards, Program Guides, and CES Operations Manual
MEGAN HOOPES-MYERS BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY EDTECH
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Draft Charter Community of Practice for Direct Access Entities
Presentation transcript:

ICAO Aviation English Language Test Endorsement Jean-Marc Guillemette Project Manager ICAO Aviation English Language Test Endorsement

Outline Purpose: Topics: Review the work underway to establish an ICAO aviation English test endorsement process Topics: Project purpose and structure Test endorsement process Current activities Next steps

Purpose of Test Endorsement Ensure that the design, development and administration of aviation English language tests reflect, the principles and practices of effective language test construction and administration the constraints and framework established by the ICAO language provisions Support the application of globally harmonized language testing criteria See the document “About ICAO’s Aviation English Language Test Endorsement Service” for additional detail on the process and its implementation. The first two questions in that document provide additional detail for this slide.

Participation Initial workgroup with representatives from ILTA, IFALPA, IFATCA, ICAEA developed the endorsement process. Expanded the group in January to increase test service provider representation: ILTA, IFALPA, IFATCA, ICAEA Representatives from China, Latin America, Eastern Europe, Eurocontrol Participatory approach based on extensive use of communication technology. The diagram in this slide illustrates using a cyclical approach to work through discussions and decision making. While the diagram implies completing steps only once, the workgroup consistently followed an iterative cycle of discussion, review and decision making throughout the project. This was therefore a participatory approach based on equal contributions and collaboration. The workgroup worked mostly at a distance using various computer-based tools. For example, a webinar platform, document sharing services and VOIP communication (e.g. Skype). Thanks to everyone’s flexibility and willingness to work through some technological problems, the workgroup was able to complete the project nearly entirely at distance.

Project Overview Activities Sept-Dec 2010 Jan-Apr 2011 May-Jun 2011 Post start-up Develop a test endorsement process Develop test evaluation criteria Pilot the endorsement process Implement / manage process This slide is intended as broad project timeline to provide the audience with a sense of how the project evolved over time. The project currently remains essentially on time, with some slippage conducting the pilot. More about the pilot on slides 10 and 11 of this presentation. The step to “Implement / manage process” consists of setting up a more permanent test endorsement service within ICAO to ensure ongoing improvement of what we now have. ICAO intends to continue working closely with professional associations and other stakeholders to keep the endorsement process as practical, effective and efficient as possible.

Endorsement: Main Parts Evaluate original tests (created by TSP) - test construction / ICAO constraints & framework (formative process) Test Endorsement Review and confirm endorsed tests continue meeting set criteria (3 years) Test re-endorsement There are three main parts to the endorsement process: - to evaluate original tests from Test Service Providers (i.e. tests created by TSP submitting it for endorsement; - to review and re-endorsed tests every three years; and to provide up-to-date information on tests endorsed to States and members of the public. Test endorsement and re-endorsement remain team efforts in which language testing and operational experts will together determine whether or not a test can be endorsed. Working in cooperation with associations like IFALPA, ICAO will set up and manage a pool of test evaluators with appropriate expertise. The first part is the most demanding for all concerned, in terms of time and effort. Test Service Providers will be required to provide detailed information on test design, development and use to be considered for endorsement. Confirm test administration data – assist States with language proficiency oversight Test Administration

Endorsement: TSP Perspective This diagram shows what TSP will do to complete the endorsement process. Create an account for identification and security purposes Complete an online pre-assessment questionnaire to help confirm their test is ready for evaluation and endorsement. TSP complete the questionnaire online and receive feedback immediately after highlighting possible test problems. TSP can then decide to stop-and-fix or continue as desired. Once ready to continue, TSP pay a non-refundable endorsement fee. Once payment is confirmed, TSP receive additional instruction to prepare and submit more detailed test documentation to be reviewed by an evaluation team. TSP with an endorsed test will receive a certificate confirming ICAO has reviewed and confirmed the test is in good standing. Endorsed tests will be identified in the public area of the endorsement website.

Test Endorsement Website ICAO is creating a dedicated website to act as the main communication channel between all those involved in the endorsement process. The site will reflect the parts of the process previously identified. The website is therefore essentially divided in 4 parts: For the system administrator (system caretaker) For TSP: with the tools and information needed to submit tests for endorsement For evaluators to learn about and become test evaluators, and track evaluation assignments To display a list of endorsed tests to the public. Parts of the website for the administrator, TSP and test evaluators will be secure and require login. The public area will be open to all.

Test Endorsement Website This image shows the home page of the test endorsement website. As indicated, it is primarily intended as a communication channel between those involved in the process and is not intended for broader public use. It currently remains a simple tool to be refined over time as ICAO learns from the experience of offering the service.

Test Endorsement Pilot Just starting Includes 3 existing tests from different TSP Working with the project workgroup as evaluators Opportunity to confirm: The endorsement process works as intended and is feasible over time Test evaluation criteria is reliable Where and how to improve all aspects of the process How best to manage implementation over time

Next Steps Complete the pilot: review / improve the endorsement process, criteria and tools Set up more ‘permanent’ process Ensure full integration of test endorsement and other processes within ICAO Build a capacity to continually work with users to improve the system Operate regular test endorsement service 2nd bullet refers to setting up a more permanent test endorsement service as indicated in slide 5, above. 3rd bullet refers to other endorsement services being considered by ICAO. For example, to endorse training programs (technical, not language) or other types of tests. While there are currently no set plans to develop these services, there is growing interest in applying the experience of this project in others.

Thank you! Jean-Marc Guillemette Workplace Learning Architect Project Manager ICAO Aviation English Language Test Endorsement