higher education Funding Formulas & performance funding

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Selection Overview By Tim Washington September 14 th, 2011.
Advertisements

Overview of Performance Funding Model for Ohio’s Community Colleges
1 Changes in the State Share of Instruction FY 2008 and Beyond Presented by: The Office of Administrative Services.
Louisiana Public Postsecondary Education Budget & Performance Funding Formula Overview August 19, 2011.
Louisiana Public Postsecondary Education Governance Commission Budget, Formula Funding, & Efficiencies September 28, 2011.
IBHE Board Meeting December 6, 2011 Performance Funding Principles.
ERM in the Rating Evaluation CAMAR Fall Meeting November 29, 2007 Thomas M. Mount, ACAS, MAAA Andrew Colannino, Vice President A.M.Best Company.
Performance Based Funding Formula. SSI History SSI Overview University Formula Performance Changes OTC Funding Formula 2.
Outcomes-Based Funding: Design Principles and State Examples Outcomes-Based Funding: The Indiana Experience Teresa Lubbers, Indiana Commissioner for Higher.
Strategic Planning …demystified Definition What it is: –Management tool –Choosing a desired future –Consciously responding to dynamic environment –Process,
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
Expanded Version of COSO a presentation by Steve Wadleigh Expanded Version of COSO a presentation by Steve Wadleigh Standards for Internal Control in the.
Introduction to Hospitality, 6e
Manoa Budget Committee Update Kathy CutshawFebruary 18, 2015.
Chapter © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or.
Illinois Higher Education FY15 Performance Funding Recommendations IBHE Board Presentation February 4, 2014 Dr. Alan Phillips.
Analysis of States’ Use of Student Enrollments and Performance Criteria in Higher Education Funding May 2012 R EPORT FOR THE N EVADA L EGISLATURE ’ S C.
IBHE Presentation 1 Performance Funding Discussion Topics Performance Funding Steering Committee Meeting September 28, 2011.
Managing Risk. Objectives  To Describe Risk Management concepts and techniques  To calculate and analyze a project using Probability of completion 
Management by Objectives
1 How and Why to Share Governance at a College A Faculty Council of Community Colleges Presentation By Tina Good, FCCC President.
Joint Budget Hearing Texas Public Community Colleges Presentation to: Governor’s Office of Budget, Planning and Policy Legislative Budget Board Texas Association.
National Center for Higher Education Management Systems 3035 Center Green Drive, Suite 150 Boulder, Colorado A Brief History of Outcomes-based Funding.
Outcomes-Based Funding: Design Principles and State Examples Outcomes-Based Funding: Implementation in Massachusetts Richard Freeland, Commissioner Massachusetts.
From Cyclical to Continuous Improvement: Assessment Feedback and Program Metrics Derek J. Herrmann, Coordinator of University Assessment Services Kristen.
Out of the Box Ideas Ginny Donohue, Executive Director On Point for College, Inc.
FY15 Academic Affairs Budget Planning & Discussion UC Raccoon Mountain Room March 17, 2014.
WACTC 2014 Allocation and Accountability Recommendations - Briefing SBCTC October 2014.
National Center for Higher Education Management Systems 3035 Center Green Drive, Suite 150 Boulder, Colorado A Starting Point for Developing a Performance.
Strategic Planning for the Department of Health and Human Performance Iowa State University T. Gilmour Reeve Director of Strategic Planning Office of the.
Texas A&M University at Galveston Strategic Planning Process Proposal.
URPC Budget Update January 29, CA Governor’s Budget Reflects ongoing economic recovery o Projects economy will continue to grow in 2016 and 2017.
Risk management. Definition and Aim  Risk management is examine systematically all risks and react on them, taking into account all the effects of.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Higher Education Leadership Conference Rich Petrick, Vice Chancellor for Finance Ohio Board of Regents 6/12/2016.
Writing and updating strategic and annual plans Richard Maggs Astana September 2014.
7 Motivation Concepts.
SUPPORT FOR YOUR STUDENT EQUITY PLAN
Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP
M.Phil. (TU) 01/2010), Ph.D. Scholar
Commission on Innovation and Excellence in Education (Kirwan Commission) Formed in June 2016.
Management & Planning Tools
Budget Review Process Committee What is our purpose
Joshua Garrison Director of Policy and Legislation
SWOT analysis.
What’s Happening and What Do We Do Now?
Educational Leadership and Policy Studies
Creating and Revising Curriculum: The Role of Program Review
Ohio Pooled Collateral System
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TOOLS
OSU Policy & Outlook Program
“Nuts and Bolts” of the Student Centered Funding Formula
Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP
University Funding Formula Update
Managing Change and Other Keys to Successful Implementation
Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP
Meeting of the Finance Committee September 14, 2012
Libraries are in challenging times
Building up IFEES – from strategy to action…
Associate Director of Financial Aid
SOME IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS AND STEPS
Building a Unified and Coherent Statewide System of Support
Power point presentation
Regulation: Educational Sites Richard Stevens
Planning and Spending ASK:
What Faculty Advisors and Deans Need to Know About Financial Aid
Creating Awareness through Training and Development
House Appropriations Committee Louisiana Board of Regents
Chancellor’s Office 1102 Q Street, 3rd Floor Conference Room
LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY: PROCESS OVERVIEW
Presentation transcript:

higher education Funding Formulas & performance funding State of Louisiana Higher Education Governance Commission September 28, 2011

Richard L. Petrick Executive Director Ohio Business Alliance for Higher Education and the Economy

Overview Principles of formula funding – elements to include Pitfalls and problems – elements to avoid Performance funding in Ohio – one example Post-budget considerations – monitoring & evaluation is needed Process of decision-making is extremely important

Five principles to consider State decides what to value, and measures and rewards processes & outcomes related to those goals. Intentional Resources will be reallocated based on campus performance. Dynamic Campuses should know upper and lower bounds of short-term outcomes, and how their performance will affect the outcome. Predictable Math that drives the formula may be complex, but concepts should not be. Simple One size does not fit all. Mission Sensitive

Pitfalls and problems to avoid Thresholds create cliffs; continuous metrics don’t. Thresholds “Hold harmless” and guaranteed increases create artificial protection, and are difficult to eliminate. Guarantees Integrate all metrics into a single formula; bolt-ons tend to disappear in tough times. “Bolt-ons” New policies need time to take effect; frequent major policy changes kill the will -- and ability -- to respond to any state initiative. Frequent changes Often viewed positively to help a campus through a rough patch; but supplements – like zombies – almost never die. Supplemental core funding

FY 2010 - 2011 performance formulas in Ohio Course and degree completions, weighted by cost, with premium for at-risk students + dynamic setasides University main campuses Course completions only, weighted by cost, with at-risk premium Regional campuses “Success Points” + enrollments Community colleges

Five principles, applied to Ohio Student success goals specified in the state’s 10-year Strategic Plan. Therefore, shift from enrollment-based formula to outcomes-based formula. Intentional Reallocation of funds has occurred, but effect of formula is phased in over time.. Dynamic A ‘stop-loss’ provides a floor for loss of state funds. Predictable Math is extremely complex; but everyone understands the idea of funding student success outcomes and not inputs. Simple Ohio has three separate formulas; also provides premium for success of at-risk students. Mission Sensitive

Post-budget evaluations and assessments Design Advocacy Implemen-tation Evaluation Revision

Post-budget evaluations and assessments Design Advocacy Implemen-tation Evaluation Revision Program review Outcome evaluation

Policy-making process Problems down Solutions up

Thank you