Volume 25, Issue 19, Pages (October 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 17, Issue 17, Pages (September 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Ying Zhang, Pengcheng Wang, Wanchen Shao, Jian-Kang Zhu, Juan Dong 
Spatial Auxin Signaling Controls Leaf Flattening in Arabidopsis
Volume 22, Issue 18, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 18, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 24, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
A Feedback Mechanism Controlling SCRAMBLED Receptor Accumulation and Cell- Type Pattern in Arabidopsis  Su-Hwan Kwak, John Schiefelbein  Current Biology 
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages e4 (April 2017)
Spatiotemporal Brassinosteroid Signaling and Antagonism with Auxin Pattern Stem Cell Dynamics in Arabidopsis Roots  Juthamas Chaiwanon, Zhi-Yong Wang 
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (June 2007)
Richard Sibout, Stéphanie Plantegenet, Christian S. Hardtke 
Volume 23, Issue 20, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Kim Min Jung , Ciani Silvano , Schachtman Daniel P.   Molecular Plant 
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Phosphorylation of the Polarity Protein BASL Differentiates Asymmetric Cell Fate through MAPKs and SPCH  Ying Zhang, Xiaoyu Guo, Juan Dong  Current Biology 
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Ying Zhang, Pengcheng Wang, Wanchen Shao, Jian-Kang Zhu, Juan Dong 
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 26, Issue 14, Pages (July 2016)
The WUSCHEL Related Homeobox Protein WOX7 Regulates the Sugar Response of Lateral Root Development in Arabidopsis thaliana  Danyu Kong, Yueling Hao, Hongchang.
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 25, Issue 23, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 18, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages e5 (June 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 14, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 16, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 18, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Physcomitrella patens Auxin-Resistant Mutants Affect Conserved Elements of an Auxin- Signaling Pathway  Michael J. Prigge, Meirav Lavy, Neil W. Ashton,
Volume 17, Issue 13, Pages (July 2007)
Arabidopsis WRKY45 Interacts with the DELLA Protein RGL1 to Positively Regulate Age-Triggered Leaf Senescence  Ligang Chen, Shengyuan Xiang, Yanli Chen,
Arabidopsis NF-YCs Mediate the Light-Controlled Hypocotyl Elongation via Modulating Histone Acetylation  Yang Tang, Xuncheng Liu, Xu Liu, Yuge Li, Keqiang.
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
HOS1 Facilitates the Phytochrome B-Mediated Inhibition of PIF4 Function during Hypocotyl Growth in Arabidopsis  Ju-Heon Kim, Hyo-Jun Lee, Jae-Hoon Jung,
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
A ROP GTPase Signaling Pathway Controls Cortical Microtubule Ordering and Cell Expansion in Arabidopsis  Ying Fu, Tongda Xu, Lei Zhu, Mingzhang Wen, Zhenbiao.
BZR1 Interacts with HY5 to Mediate Brassinosteroid- and Light-Regulated Cotyledon Opening in Arabidopsis in Darkness  Qian-Feng Li, Jun-Xian He  Molecular.
Allele-Specific Suppression of a Defective Brassinosteroid Receptor Reveals a Physiological Role of UGGT in ER Quality Control  Hua Jin, Zhenyan Yan,
Brassinosteroids Regulate the Differential Growth of Arabidopsis Hypocotyls through Auxin Signaling Components IAA19 and ARF7  Xiao-Yi Zhou, Li Song,
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (November 2012)
The CDG1 Kinase Mediates Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction from BRI1 Receptor Kinase to BSU1 Phosphatase and GSK3-like Kinase BIN2  Tae-Wuk Kim, Shenheng.
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Johannes Mathieu, Norman Warthmann, Frank Küttner, Markus Schmid 
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages e4 (November 2018)
Volume 24, Issue 16, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 24, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2018)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 25, Issue 19, Pages 2584-2590 (October 2015) OCTOPUS Negatively Regulates BIN2 to Control Phloem Differentiation in Arabidopsis thaliana  Pauline Anne, Marianne Azzopardi, Lionel Gissot, Sébastien Beaubiat, Kian Hématy, Jean-Christophe Palauqui  Current Biology  Volume 25, Issue 19, Pages 2584-2590 (October 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.033 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2015 25, 2584-2590DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.033) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 OPS-Overexpressing Plants Display Constitutive BR Response Phenotypes (A–C) 7-day-old light-grown seedlings on Arabidopsis medium 1% sucrose supplemented with or without 1 μM BL. (A) OPS-OE phenotype is mimicked by BL treatment of WT seedlings. Bar, 5 mm. (B) Hypocotyl length of seedlings shown in (A); error bars, SD, 30 < n < 40, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 as determined by a Student’s t test. (C) OPS-OE accumulates unphosphorylated BES1 protein as shown by anti-BES1 western blot. Coomassie staining of the blotted membrane is shown below as loading control. (D) Simplified scheme of the BR pathway in absence (left) or presence (right) of BRs. In absence of BRs, BIN2 kinase is active and phosphorylates the two transcription factors BES1 and BZR1 that are unable to induce BR response. BRs are perceived by BRI1 receptor kinase at the plasma membrane and the signal is transduced inside the cell by a phosphorylation-cascade ultimately inhibiting the repressor BIN2. The subsequent accumulation of unphosphorylated forms of BES1 and BZR1 induces the BR response such as the negative feedback on the BR biosynthetic gene DWARF4 or the induction of cell elongation (correlated to SAUR-AC1 induction). (E) Transcripts level of DWARF4 and SAURAC1, measured by qRT-PCR on 7-day-old seedlings of BR-defective (bri1-116) or BR-constitutive (bzr1-D) mutants compared to WT (Col) and OPS-OE plants. Current Biology 2015 25, 2584-2590DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.033) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 OPS Activates the BR Pathway at the Signaling Level (A and B) 7-day-old dark-grown seedlings grown on Arabidopsis medium without sucrose supplemented or not with 2 μM BRZ. (A) BRZ treatment inhibits hypocotyl elongation in darkness. OPS-OE is even more resistant to BRZ treatment than brzr1-D. Bar, 2 mm. (B) Corresponding hypocotyl length. n > 30 mean ± SD. ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗p < 0.01 as determined by a Student’s t test. (C) 7-day-old seedlings grown on Arabidopsis medium supplemented with DMSO, 1% sucrose with or without 1 μM BRZ or 1 μM BL. (D) Corresponding western blotting using anti-BES1 antibody. (E) Coomassie staining of the blotted membrane used as loading control (large subunit Rubisco band). Current Biology 2015 25, 2584-2590DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.033) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 OPS Is Epistatic to BRI1 and BIN2 to Induce BR Response through a Control of BIN2 Subcellular Localization (A–D) OPS-OE suppresses bri1-116 and bin2-1D mutants. (A) Phenotypes of 7-day-old seedlings of the indicated genotype grown on Arabidopsis medium containing 1% sucrose. Bar, 5 mm. (B) Hypocotyl length measurement of seedlings shown in (A); error bars, SD, 20 < n < 30. ∗∗∗p < 0.001 as determined by a Student’s t test. (C) OPS-OE restores accumulation of unphosphorylated BES1 in bri1-116 and bin2-1D as shown by anti-BES1 western blotting. (D) Coomassie staining of the blotted membrane is used as a loading control. (E and F) OPS interaction with BIN2 in yeast and tobacco epidermal cells. (E) OPS interacts with BIN2 in split-ubiquitin system in yeast. NubG and NubI are used as negative and positive control, respectively. (SD-LTH + 25 mM 3AT medium.) (F) OPS and BIN2 interact at the plasma membrane in plant cells. Interaction is visualized in split-YFP assay by confocal microscopy in epidermal cells of transiently transformed Nicotiana benthamiana epidermal cells. Green, YFP signal; red, autofluorescence. Bar, 100 μm. (G–I) Influence of OPS on BIN2 subcellular distribution. (G) Confocal imaging of Nicotiana benthamiana epidermal cells transiently expressing mCherry-BIN2 in presence or absence of OPS-GFP. Bar, 50 μm. (H) Quantification of subcellular distribution changes of BIN2 in presence of OPS. Nucleus/plasma membrane ratio of mean fluorescence intensity measured ROI. Error bars, SD (n = 20), ∗∗∗p < 0.001 as determined by a Student’s t test. (I) mCherry-BIN2 localization visualized by confocal microscopy. Fluorescent signal is displayed as inverted gray values for clearer visualization. Red arrowheads show nuclear signal Current Biology 2015 25, 2584-2590DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.033) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 BIN2 Inhibition Partially Rescues ops Root Phloem Defect in a BES1- and BZR1-Dependent Manner (A) Examples of phloem phenotypes in root of 7-day-old seedlings observed by confocal imaging with propidium iodide (PI) staining. Normal: a gradual thickening of the cell wall is observed with increased PI staining along the protophloem cells file (black arrowhead). Gap: undifferentiated cells within differentiated cells identified by non-thickening of the cell-wall (white asterisk). (B and C) Quantification of phloem phenotypes as described in (A). Percentage of roots presenting the phenotypes described in (A) in at least one of the two phloem cell files observed in the meristematic region of root (within 300 μm from the root quiescent center). N, number of roots observed. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗p < 0.05 as determined by a Fisher’s exact test. (B) Bikinin treatment (25 μM in DMSO) restores ops phloem defects. (C) bzr1-D and bes1-D partially rescue ops-2 phloem defects in roots. (D) bzr1-D and bes1-D partially restore ops-2 root length of 7-day-old light-grown seedlings. Error bars, SD (n > 20), ∗∗∗p < 0.001 as determined by a Student’s t test. (E) Expression pattern of pBIN2::GUS in 7-day-old primary root. Side panels are a closeup view of the protophloem cell files. (F) Expression pattern of pBES1::BES1-YFP (yellow) and pBZR1::BZR1-CFP (cyan) in 7-day-old primary root counter-stained with propidium iodide (PI, red). Protophloem cell files are recognizable by the cell-wall thickening (white arrowhead). Bar, 20 μm. Current Biology 2015 25, 2584-2590DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.033) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions