Lecture 11 - Radiofrequency Cavities III

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
11/27/2007ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop Mike Neubauer 1 RF Power and Cooling Requirements Overview from “Main Linac Power and Cooling Information”
Advertisements

CHAPTER 3 MICROWAVE ‘O’ TYPE TUBES
Compact Linear Collider. Overview The aim of the CLIC study is to investigate the feasibility of a high luminosity linear e-/e+ collider with a centre.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
Baseline Configuration - Highlights Barry Barish ILCSC 9-Feb-06.
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
R&D For Accelerating Structures H. Padamsee. TESLA Niobium, one meter length, rf = 1.3 GHz Copper, 53 cm, rf = 11.4 GHz.
Conventional Source for ILC (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost) Junji Urakawa, KEK LCWS2012 Contents : 0. Short review of 300Hz conventional positron source.
LEP3 RF System: gradient and power considerations Andy Butterworth BE/RF Thanks to R. Calaga, E. Ciapala.
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
RF particle acceleration Kyrre N. Sjøbæk * FYS 4550 / FYS 9550 – Experimental high energy physics University of Oslo, 26/9/2013 *k.n.sjobak(at)fys.uio.no.
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
1 C-Band Linac Development Satoshi Ohsawa 2004.Feb.19LCPAC.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
Christopher Nantista ARD R&D Status Meeting SLAC February 3, …… …… …… … ….
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Development of Dielectric PETS Chunguang Jing and Wei Gai ANL and Euclid CLIC workshop 2013.
CLIC RF manipulation for positron at CLIC Scenarios studies on hybrid source Freddy Poirier 12/08/2010.
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
RF scheme of electron linear accelerator with energy MeV Levichev A.E. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS.
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
Cold versus Warm, parameters impacting LC reliability and efficiency contribution to the discussion on risk factors Giorgio Bellettini, Seul ITRP meeting,
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Comparison of Fermilab Proton Driver to Suggested Energy Amplifier Linac Bob Webber April 13, 2007.
Jan Low Energy 10 Hz Operation in DRFS (Fukuda) (Fukuda) 1 Low Energy 10Hz Operation in DRFS S. Fukuda KEK.
Page 1 Polarized Electron Sources for Linear Colliders October, 2010 A. Brachmann, J. C. Sheppard, F. Zhou SLAC SLAC October 18-22, 2010.
Conventional source developments (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost, Part-II) Junji Urakawa, KEK PosiPol-2012 at DESY Zeuthen Contents : 0. Short review.
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
High intensity electron beam and infrastructure Paolo Valente * INFN Roma * On behalf of the BTF and LINAC staff.
A CW Linac scheme for CLIC drive beam acceleration. Hao Zha, Alexej Grudiev 07/06/2016.
ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop
Prospects for developing new tubes
How does a klystron work? TE-MPE Section Meeting Karolina Kulesz
Present and possible future schemes for hadron therapy linacs Alberto Degiovanni for the ADAM team HG2017 Workshop , Valencia.
High efficiency work and MBK development for accelerators
Visit for more Learning Resources
Development of X-band 50MW klystron in BVERI
Positron capture section studies for CLIC Hybrid source - baseline
ILC - Upgrades Nick Walker – 100th meeting
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
NC Accelerator Structures
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
Have a chance to operate your own beam at CERN
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Brief Review of Microwave Dielectric Accelerators
Developments on Proposed
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
Why are particle accelerators so inefficient?
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Recent high-gradient testing results from the CLIC XBoxes
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Superbeams with SPL at CERN
Injection facility for Novosibirsk Super Charm Tau Factory
SuperB project. Injection scheme design status
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Overview of SRF system of Ring and Linac (1)
Electron Source Configuration
Matthias Liepe Zachary Conway CLASSE, Cornell University June 1, 2009
Linear Colliders Lecture 4 The real designs
Status of the CLIC Injector studies
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Part2: Cavities and Structures
Status of CTC activities for the Damping rings
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Physics Design on Injector I
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 11 - Radiofrequency Cavities III Emmanuel Tsesmelis (CERN/Oxford) John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science 19 November 2009

Table of Contents III Power Generators for Accelerators Triode Amplifier, Tetrode Amplifier, Klystron Large Hadron Collider (LHC) International Linear Collider (ILC) Compact Linear Collider (CLIC)

Power Generators for Accelerators The sinusoidal power needed to drive the accelerating structures ranges between a few kW to a few MW. RF power amplifiers Triodes & tetrodes: few MHz to few hundred MHz Klystrons: above a few hundred MHz Proven to be the most effective power generator for accelerator applications

Triode Amplifier Three active electrodes Cathode (filament) Grid Anode (plate) Anode current obeys Langmuir-Child Law k = perveance of tube μ = amplification factor Va = anode voltage Vg = grid voltage

Tetrode Amplifier Four active electrodes Cathode (filament) Control Grid Screen Grid – reduce space charge between cathode and Control Grid Anode (plate) Anode current obeys Langmuir-Child Law k = perveance of tube μa = anode amplification factor μs = screen grid amplification factor Va = anode voltage Vcg = control grid voltage Vsg= screen grid voltage

Klystrons Principle of operation Electrons emitted from round cathode with large surface area. Accelerated by voltage of a few tens of kV. Yields a round beam with a current of between a few amperes and tens of amperes. Electrodes close to the cathode focus the beam and solenoid along the tube ensure good beam collimation. Outgoing particles from cathode have a well-defined velocity and pass through cavities operated in TM011 mode. Wave excited in this resonator by external pre-amplifier. Klystrons are similar to a small linear accelerator.

Klystrons Depending on phase, will modulate velocity with resonant frequency of particles (accelerate, decelerate, or have no influence). In subsequent zero-field drift, faster particles move ahead, while slower ones lag behind. Changes hitherto uniform particle density distribution and bunches of particles are formed with separation given by λ of driving wave.

Klystrons Continuous current from cathode becomes pulsed current with frequency of coupled pulsed current. A second cavity mounted at this location is resonantly excited by pulsed current and the RF wave generated in this second cavity is then coupled out. A better coupling of beam to output cavity achieved by inserting additional cavity resonators, each tuned to frequencies close to operating frequency.

Klystrons Klystron output power U0 = klystron supply voltage (e.g. 45 kV) Ibeam = beam current (e.g. 12.5 A) η = klystron efficiency (45% - 65%)

Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

Superconducting Cavities (SC) The use of superconducting material (Nb) at low temperature (2-4 K) reduces considerably the ohmic losses and almost all the RF power from the source is made available to the beam (i.e. ~100% efficiency). In contrast to normal conducting cavities, SC cavities favour the use of lower frequencies. Offers a larger opening to the beam. Reduces the interaction of the beam with the cavity that is responsible for beam instability.

Superconducting Cavities Characteristics Q0 as high as 109 – 1010 are achievable. Leads to much longer filling times. Higher electric field gradients are reached for acceleration – 25-30 MV/m. Reduces number of cavities or a higher energy can be reached with a given number of cavities. Single-cell or multi-cell. Used for both lepton and hadron machines.

LHC RF Parameters Injected beam will be captured, accelerated and stored using the 400 MHz SC cavity system. A 200 MHz capture system may be installed if the injected beam emittance increases when intensities much higher than nominal are reached.

Parameter Specification Two independent RF systems. One per each beam cooled with 4.5 K saturated He gas Each RF system has eight single-cell cavities Each cavitiy has 2 MV accelerating voltage, corresponding to a field strength of 5.5 MV/m R/Q = 45 Ω RF Power System Each cavity is driven by individual RF system with a single klystron, circulator and load. Maximum of 4800 kW of RF power will be generated by the 16 (300 kW) 400 MHz klystrons. Each klystron will feed via a Y-junction circulator and a WR2300 waveguide line, a single-cell SC cavity. High Voltage Interface Each of the 4 main 100 kV power converters, re-used from LEP, will power 4 klystrons.

Large Hadron Collider The Main Beam and RF Parameters

Cavity Material As frequency of 400 MHz is close to that of LEP (352 MHz), the same proven LEP technology of Nb sputtered cavities is applied to the LHC. Nb Sputtering on Cu Advantage over solid Nb in that susceptibility to quenching is very much reduced. Local heat generated by small surface defects or impurities is quickly conducted away by the Cu. Nb-sputtered cavities are insensitive to the Earth´s B-field

Large Hadron Collider Design of a four-cavity cryomodule A four-cavity module during assembly Four cavities, each equipped with their He tank and power coupler, are grouped together in a single cryomodule. Reduces overall static thermal losses and requires less total space for installation than a single cavity configuration.

Linear Colliders

Linear Collider Baseline LEP: 209 GeV next Electron-Positron Collider Centre-of-mass-energy: 0.5 - 3 TeV Luminosity: >2*1034 Physics motivation: "Physics at the CLIC Multi-TeV Linear Collider: Report of the CLIC Physics Working Group,“ CERN Report 2004-5 Storage Ring not possible, energy loss DE ~ E4  two linacs, experiment at centre Linac I Linac II total energy gain in one pass: high acceleration gradient beam can only be used once: small beam dimensions at crossing point Boundary conditions: site length Power consumption

Basic Differences ILC-CLIC ILC: Superconducting RF 500 GeV CLIC: normal conducting copper RF 3 TeV Accelerating gradient: 31.5 MV/m 100 MV/m (35 MV/m target) RF Peak power: 0.37 MW/m , 1.6 ms, 5 Hz 275 MW/m, 240 ns, 50 Hz RF average power: 2.9 kW/m 3.7 kW/m Total length: 31 km 48.4 km Site power : 230 MW 392 MW Particles per bunch: 20 * 109 3.7 * 109 2625 bunches / pulse of 0.96 ms 312 bunches / pulse of 156 ns Bunch spacing 369 ns 0.5 ns

International Linear Collider (ILC)

The ILC Baseline Design Schematic lay-out of the ILC complex for 500 GeV CM Basic ILC design parameters (Values at 500 GeV CM)

ILC Design Criteria Choice of gradient is key cost and performance parameter Dictates length of linacs Baseline average operational accelerating gradient of 31.5 MV/m represents the primary challenge to the global ILC R&D Quality factor Q relates to the cryogenic cooling power

Cavities Basic element of the superconducting RF is a nine-cell 1.3 GHz niobium cavity Each cavity is about 1 m. long Operated at 2K Nine cavities are mounted together in a string and assembled in a common low-temperature cryostat (cryomodule) About 17 000 cavities are needed for the ILC Key to high-gradient performance is ultra-clean and defect-free inner surface of cavity consisting of Nb material and electron beam welds Use of electropolishing in clean-room environment

Cavity Design Parameters ILC 9-cell superconducting cavity design parameters

Superconducting RF Structures A TESLA nine-cell 1.3 GHz superconducting niobium cavity. ILC prototype cryomodules. Clean room environments are mandatory for the cavity preparation and assembly.

RF Distribution Units RF unit diagramme The linacs are composed of RF units, each of which is formed by 3 contiguous superconducting RF cryomodules containing a total of 26 nine-cell cavities. Each RF unit has a stand-alone RF source: Conventional pulse-transformer type high-voltage modulator (120 kV) A 10 MW multi-beam klystron Waveguide system that distributes RF power to the cavities To operate the cavities at 2 K, they are immersed in a saturated He II bath

Technical Systems Multi-Beam Klystrons (MBK) Waveguide 10 MW L-band source High efficiency by using multiple low space charge (low perveance) beams Waveguide Distribution system consists of Al WR650 waveguide (6.50” x 3.25”) Losses can be reduced by plating the inner walls of waveguide with Cu

Multi-Beam Klystrons Toshiba E3736

Compact Linear Collider (CLIC)

CLIC Acceleration System CLIC = Compact Linear Collider (length < 50 km) Acceleration in travelling wave structures: CLIC parameters: Accelerating gradient: 100 MV/m RF frequency: 12 GHz 64 MW RF power / accelerating structure of 0.233m active length  275 MW/m total active length for 1.5 TeV: 15’000 m Pulse length 240 ns, 50 Hz RF out RF in Beam Efficient RF power production !!!!!

The CLIC Two Beam Scheme Individual RF power sources ?  Not for the 1.5 TeV linacs Two Beam Scheme: Drive Beam supplies RF power 12 GHz bunch structure low energy (2.4 GeV - 240 MeV) high current (100A)

The CLIC Two Beam scheme decelerator, 24 sectors of 876 m Main Beam Drive Beam 240 ns 5.8ms 2904 bunches 83 ps (12 GHz) 139ms, 24 trains Time structure of Drive Beam Bunch charge: 8.4 nC, Current in train: 100 A

CLIC Drive Beam Generation Accelerate long bunch train with low bunch rep rate (500 MHz) with low frequency RF (1 GHz) (klystrons) interleave bunches between each other to generate short (280 ns) trains with high bunch rep rate (12 GHz) EPS 2009 G.Geschonke, CERN

The Full CLIC scheme Not to scale!

Why 100 MV/m and 12 GHz ? After > 60 * 106 structures: Structure limits: RF breakdown – scaling RF pulse heating Beam dynamics: emittance preservation – wake fields Luminosity, bunch population, bunch spacing efficiency – total power Figure of merit: Luminosity per linac input power Take into account cost model After > 60 * 106 structures: 100 MV/m 12 GHz chosen, previously 150 MV/m, 30 GHz

CLIC Accelerating Module Main Beam Drive Beam Transfer lines Drive Beam Main Beam

Accelerating Structures Objective: Withstand of 100 MV/m without damage breakdown rate < 10-7 Strong damping of HOMs Technologies: Brazed disks - milled quadrants

Power Extraction : PETS Travelling wave structures Small R/Q : 2.2 kW/m (accelerating structure: 15-18 kW/m) 100 A beam current 136 MW RF @ 240 ns per PETS (2 accelerating structures) 0.21 m active length total number : 35’703 per linac 8 Sectors damped on-off possibility Status: CTF3: up to 45 MW peak (3 A beam, recirculation) SLAC: 125 MW @ 266 ns

Center-of-mass energy CLIC Main Parameters Center-of-mass energy CLIC 500 GeV CLIC 3 TeV Beam parameters Conservative Nominal Total (Peak 1%) luminosity 0.9(0.6)·1034 2.3(1.4)·1034 1.5(0.73)·1034 5.9(2.0)·1034 Repetition rate (Hz) 50 Loaded accel. gradient MV/m 80 100 Main linac RF frequency GHz 12 Bunch charge109 6.8 3.72 Bunch separation (ns) 0.5 Beam pulse duration (ns) 177 156 Beam power/beam (MWatts) 4.9 14 Hor./vert. norm. emitt (10-6/10-9) 3/40 2.4/25 2.4/20 0.66/20 Hor/Vert FF focusing (mm) 10/0.4 8 / 0.1 8 / 0.3 4 / 0.07 Hor./vert. IP beam size (nm) 248 / 5.7 202 / 2.3 83 / 2.0 40 / 1.0 Hadronic events/crossing at IP 0.07 0.19 0.57 2.7 Coherent pairs at IP 10 5 107 3.8 108 BDS length (km) 1.87 2.75 Total site length km 13.0 48.3 Wall plug to beam transfert eff 7.5% 6.8% Total power consumption MW 129.4 415