Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Role of Bmi-1 and Ring1A in H2A Ubiquitylation and Hox Gene Silencing
Advertisements

Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
E6 Oncoprotein Represses p53-Dependent Gene Activation via Inhibition of Protein Acetylation Independently of Inducing p53 Degradation  Mary C. Thomas,
Ho-Geun Yoon, Doug W. Chan, Albert B. Reynolds, Jun Qin, Jiemin Wong 
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages (June 2010)
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Nithya Raman, Elisabeth Weir, Stefan Müller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages (June 2010)
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
Direct Interactions of OCA-B and TFII-I Regulate Immunoglobulin Heavy-Chain Gene Transcription by Facilitating Enhancer-Promoter Communication  Xiaodi.
Volume 125, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Vanessa Brès, Tomonori Yoshida, Loni Pickle, Katherine A. Jones 
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
The TRIM Family Protein KAP1 Inhibits HIV-1 Integration
Young-Hee Cho, Sang-Dong Yoo, Jen Sheen  Cell 
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
The Human PAF1 Complex Acts in Chromatin Transcription Elongation Both Independently and Cooperatively with SII/TFIIS  Jaehoon Kim, Mohamed Guermah, Robert.
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Joshua C. Black, Janet E. Choi, Sarah R. Lombardo, Michael Carey 
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Dimethylation of H3K4 by Set1 Recruits the Set3 Histone Deacetylase Complex to 5′ Transcribed Regions  TaeSoo Kim, Stephen Buratowski  Cell  Volume 137,
Andrei Kuzmichev, Thomas Jenuwein, Paul Tempst, Danny Reinberg 
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 121, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Amanda O'Donnell, Shen-Hsi Yang, Andrew D. Sharrocks  Molecular Cell 
Eaf3 Chromodomain Interaction with Methylated H3-K36 Links Histone Deacetylation to Pol II Elongation  Amita A. Joshi, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell  Volume.
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Hua Gao, Yue Sun, Yalan Wu, Bing Luan, Yaya Wang, Bin Qu, Gang Pei 
Volume 137, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (November 1996)
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
The PHD Finger/Bromodomain of NoRC Interacts with Acetylated Histone H4K16 and Is Sufficient for rDNA Silencing  Yonggang Zhou, Ingrid Grummt  Current.
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Christy J. Fryer, J.Brandon White, Katherine A. Jones  Molecular Cell 
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Feng Xu, Kangling Zhang, Michael Grunstein  Cell 
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Role of Bmi-1 and Ring1A in H2A Ubiquitylation and Hox Gene Silencing
Presentation transcript:

Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 290-301 (October 2009) Two Mammalian MOF Complexes Regulate Transcription Activation by Distinct Mechanisms  Xiangzhi Li, Lipeng Wu, Callie Ann Sprunger Corsa, Steve Kunkel, Yali Dou  Molecular Cell  Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 290-301 (October 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.07.031 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 MSL1v1 Is Essential for Regulating the Nucleosomal Activity of the MOF-MSL1v1 Complex (A) Immunoblots of proteins copurified with Myc-MSL1v1. Antibodies used are indicated on right. (B) Immunoblot analysis of MOF complexes following fractionation on the superose 6 sizing column. Positions of molecular weight markers are indicated on top. (C) Schematic for comparing MSL1 and MSL1v1 proteins. Both the coiled-coil domain (red) and the MOF-interacting domain (PEHE, blue) are conserved in the two proteins. However, only MSL1 contains an MSL3-interacting domain (yellow) C-terminal to the PEHE domain. (D) Coomassie stain of the recombinant MOF or MOF complexes (as indicated on right) purified from baculovirus-infected insect cells. The MOF-MSL1v1 and the MSL complexes were purified through a FLAG epitope on either MSL1v1 or MSL3 proteins. (E) In vitro HAT assays for MOF, MOF-MSL1v1, or the MSL complex. Both HeLa nucleosomes (top) and free recombinant histone octamers (bottom) were used as substrates. [3H]acetyl-CoA was used as the cofactor. Molecular Cell 2009 36, 290-301DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.07.031) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 MOF-MSL1v1 Is Specifically Required to Acetylate p53 K120 In Vitro (A) Coomassie stain of the purified recombinant p53 and p53 K120A proteins. (B) In vitro HAT assay using wild-type p53 or p53 K120A as the substrate. Proteins present in the assay are indicated on top. [3H]acetyl-CoA was used as the cofactor. Molecular Cell 2009 36, 290-301DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.07.031) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Distinct Domains of MSL1v1 Are Required for MOF-MSL1v1-Mediated Acetylation of Nucleosomal H4 and p53 (A and B) Schematic for MSL1v1 deletion mutants used in the HAT assay. (C and D) In vitro HAT assay using HeLa nucleosomes or p53 as substrates. Different MOF-containing complexes used for the assay are indicated on top. Equivalent amounts of MOF were used in all cases. [3H]acetyl-CoA was used for detection. (E) MSL1v1 705–982, but not MSL1v1 Δ800 or MSL1, binds to GST-p53. Bound proteins were analyzed by immunoblot using anti-FLAG antibody. One percent input was loaded on the gel as controls. Molecular Cell 2009 36, 290-301DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.07.031) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 MOF-MSL1v1-Mediated p53 K120 Acetylation Is Important for Transcription Activation In Vitro (A) Schematic of in vitro transcription assay using DNA templates (An and Roeder, 2004). (B) DNA-templated transcription assays with no p53, p53 K120A, and wild-type p53, as indicated. (C) In vitro transcription assay using purified p53, MOF, and the MOF-MSL1v1 complex with or without acetyl-CoA as indicated. (D) In vitro transcription assay using purified p53, MOF, the full-length MOF-MSL1v1, MOF-MSL1v1 705–982, and MOF-MSL1v1 Δ800 as indicated. The transcription reactions in (C) and (D) were performed according to the scheme in (A). Molecular Cell 2009 36, 290-301DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.07.031) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 MSL1v1 Is Important for Global H4 K16 Acetylation and p53 K120 Acetylation In Vivo (A) siRNAs or shRNA against MOF, MSL1v1, or MSL1 were used to transfect 293T cells, as indicated on top. The protein level after knockdown was demonstrated by immunoblot using antibodies against respective proteins. Immunoblot for H3 was used as the loading control. (B) siRNA or shRNA treatments for MOF, MSL1v1, or MSL1 reduced global H4 K16 acetylation. The immunoblot of whole-cell lysate using anti-H4 K16 antibody is shown on top. Immunoblot using anti-H3 antibody was used as the loading control. (C) siRNA or shRNA treatments for MOF or MSL1v1 affect the global p53 K120 acetylation. Acetylated p53 in the knockdown cells was immunoprecipitated with anti-p53 K120ac antibody and detected by anti-p53 antibody (bottom). Two percent input of each sample was included on top. Molecular Cell 2009 36, 290-301DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.07.031) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 MOF-MSL1v1 Activates PUMA and BAX Expression by Acetylating p53 K120 In Vivo (A) RT-PCRs were performed using RNAs recovered from H1299 cells after transfecting with different expression vectors, as indicated on bottom. The gene tested is indicated on top of each panel. For each sample, gene expression level after normalizing against 5S rRNA was compared with that of the control cells, which is arbitrarily set at 1. (B) RT-PCRs were performed as in (A), except that MSL1v1 Δ800 was used. (C) RT-PCRs were performed as in (A) for 293T cells after knocking down MOF, MSL1v1, or MSL1, respectively. (D) Top, ChIP experiments using anti-p53 K120ac antibody were performed in cells cotransfected with various expression vectors as indicated. Bottom, ChIP experiment using anti-H4 K16ac antibody was performed in cells transfected with different expression vectors as indicated. Primers for either transcription start site (P) or around stop codon (3′ UTR) were used for quantitative PCR. (E) ChIP experiments were performed as in (D) in 293T cells treated with MOF, MSL1v1, MSL1, and control siRNA or shRNA. Both p53 K120 acetylation and K16 acetylation levels in (D) and (E) are normalized to 2% input. Means and standard deviations from at least three independent experiments were presented in (A)–(E). Standard deviations are indicated by error bars. Molecular Cell 2009 36, 290-301DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.07.031) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Model for the Roles of Two MOF Complexes in Transcription Activation (A) ChIP experiments using anti-Myc antibody were performed in cells transfected with MOF/Myc-MSL1v1 or MOF/Myc-MSL1/3 with or without p53. ChIP was quantified using four primer pairs, as indicated in gene schematics. Signals in all cases were presented as percent input. Standard deviations are indicated by error bars. (B) The MOF-MSL1v1 complex is recruited to the promoter of target genes through coordinated interactions with the histone methyltransferase MLL as well as the transcription factor p53. Once recruited, MOF-MSL1v1 acetylates both p53 and H4 K16 to facilitate transcription initiation. The recruitment of the MSL complex by trimethylated H3K36 (Larschan et al., 2007) plays important roles in acetylating H4 K16 downstream of the genes, which facilitates transcription elongation (Bell et al., 2007; Kind et al., 2008). Molecular Cell 2009 36, 290-301DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.07.031) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions