H. BAJAS | June 2014, CERN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 17 Vocabulary "The Electromagnetic Spectrum"
Advertisements

MQXF Quench Protection Analysis HiLumi workshop – KEK, Tsukuba Vittorio Marinozzi 11/18/2014.
Hardware Pace Using Slope Detection Tony Calabria 10/22/2012.
EET 2351 Lecture 2 Professor: Dr. Miguel Alonso Jr.
A simple modification of the Hodgkin and Huxley equations explains type 3 excitability in squid giant axons by John R Clay, David Paydarfar, and Daniel.
TeraPixel APS for CALICE Progress meeting 9th Dec 2005 Jamie Crooks, Microelectronics/RAL.
1 M. Marchevsky --- WAMSDO, CERN 2013 Detecting mechanical vibrations in superconducting magnets for quench detection and diagnostics M. Marchevsky, Lawrence.
ASC 2012, 10/10/2012Test results and analysis of LQS03 – G. Ambrosio 1 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Test Results and Analysis of LQS03 Third Long Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole.
Test Result overview: Timeline, highlights and challenges H. Bajas TE-MSC-TF.
HQ02b : Test plan overview Test plan overview: Main elements and Open questions H. Bajas TE-MSC-TF H. BAJASUpdate meeting on HQ02b assembly and test plan02/05/2014.
Adaptive Protection of Distribution Feeders Alexander Apostolov, Benton Vandiver.
Overview of main results from first HQ02a test For HQ meeting 7/30/13.
HL-LHC/LARP, QXF Test Facility Workshop– R. Carcagno QXF Test Requirements Ruben Carcagno BNL Workshop December 17, 2013.
First draft of the CLIQ test plan for the HQ2b magnet Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to Hugo Bajas & GianLuca Sabbi 02/05/2014.
How to achieve higher redundancy of the UPS for QPS ? -The lack of redundancy concerns the supply lines from UPS to consumer but equally parts of the UPS.
E. Todesco HL-LHC: OUTLOOK ON PROTECTION FOR IR MAGNETS (WP3) E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland CERN, 23 rd April 2015 MPE meeting.
LARP CM15 Magnet Testing Working Group SLAC, November 2 nd 2010.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
May 16, USB 2.0 Signal Protocols Jon Lueker Intel Corporation.
LQ Quench Protection – G. Ambrosio 1 LQ DS video Mtg – May. 23, 2007 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Quench Protection Giorgio Ambrosio LQ DS.
E. Todesco PROTECTION IN MAGNET DESIGN E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With help from B. Auchmann, L. Bottura, H. Felice, J. Fleiter, T. Salmi, M.
May 8, USB 2.0 Signal Protocols Jon Lueker Intel Corporation.
HQ01e3 test summary December 2012 M. Marchevsky, LBNL.
AT-MEI Group, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 MPP Unbalance between apertures of MB B30R7 MPP meeting 18/06/2008 Unbalance between apertures of Dipole.
Optocoupler Isolation Circuits for Industrial Application
WAMSDO-2013, New Techniques, GdR WAMSDO, January 2013 Gijs de Rijk CERN 1 NEW TECHNIQUES.
QXF quench heater delay simulations Tiina Salmi, T. Salmi.
Quench antenna and acoustic emission studies in HQ02a2 M. Marchevsky, LBNL.
Background 2 Outline 3 Scopus publications 4 Goal and a signal model 5Harmonic signal parameters estimation.
Cold powering test results of MBHSP102 Gerard Willering, TE-MSC-TF With thanks to Jerome and Vincent and all others from TF for their contribution.
Sensory Receptors: Transduction and Coding Narrado por: Renato M.E. Sabbatini, PhD.
10/16/2013QXF Requirements – G. Sabbi, E. Todesco 1 QXF requirements relevant to optimization and selection of conductor and cable parameters GianLuca.
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
The requirements of Ideal pulse-type counter :  1 Every particle entering the detector should produce a pulse at the exit of the counter,
Protection of 600 A bus bars, follow up W. Venturini Delsolaro and A. Verweij MPP meeting, 17/10/2006.
AC Loss Measurements on the HQ2 Magnet Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to H. Bajas, G. Chlachidze, V. Marinozzi, M. Tartaglia, X. Wang HQ Meeting
HQ02A2 TEST RESULTS November 7, 2013 FERMILAB. HQ02 test at Fermilab 2  First HQ quadrupole with coils (#15-17, #20) of the optimized design o Only coil.
TQC03e Test Status  Magnetic measurements at 300 K  Z-scan at ±10 A  Magnetic measurements at 4.6 K (I max up to 6.5 kA)  Quench training and ramp.
Fermilab’s TRAC Summer Experience Joshua Louis Naperville District 203.
MQXFSM1 results Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev 10 June 2015LARP meeting.
Mechanical strain measurements on MQXFS1 Magnet using CERN system M.Guinchard and P.Grosclaude European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) 27 April,
Inner Triplet Protection Strategy LHC & HL-LHC Daniel Wollmann with Inputs from B. Auchmann, G. Ambrosio, R. Denz, P. Fessia, E. Ravaioli, F. Rodrigues.
Readiness for RF capture Cavities – all 16 cavities commissioned with RF feedback loops closed klystron polar loop still to commission on 2 cavities 2.
Cold powering test results of the 11 T cosθ model magnets at CERN Gerard Willering With thanks to Jerome Feuvrier, Vincent Desbiolles, Hugo Bajas, Marta.
Content: Distortion at electronic loads
Feedback: Part C – Oscillators Slides taken from:
S. Feher MICE Magnet Readiness Review RAL, June 28th, 2016
Demodulation PWM Signal
11T Magnet Test Plan Guram Chlachidze
MQY-30 Test Result Report
Quench protection on the test benches
Feather_0.4: 4-run test report
Update on test results MBHDP102 Re-discussion of test program
HQ01e-3 magnetic measurements
MBHSP02 test STATUS and first results
Focus Coil Quench Detector
EN-ICE Technical Committee SM18 activities & projects
Quench detection electronics for the HL-LHC magnet circuits of the LHC
What do you know about them?
BLM changes HV software interlock (SIS)
Detection thresholds in LARP Magnets
Flux jumps in HQ Hugo BAJAS
Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev
Multi-vibrators
Single rate plateau curve with different gas mixture
Koen Vervaeke, Hua Hu, Lyle J. Graham, Johan F. Storm  Neuron 
Nb3Sn QPS strategies How to protect.
HL-LHC Long term behaviour of magnets Test facility limitations
Quench Detector Reaction Times
Rony Azouz, Charles M. Gray  Neuron 
Presentation transcript:

H. BAJAS | June 2014, CERN

H. BAJAS | Flux Jump in HQ01-e , December 2012, CERN

HQ01e: C5, C7, C8, C9 HQ02: C15, C16, C17, C20 RRP 54/61 and 108/127 RRP 108/127 (jc >2800) [P. Wanderer 2009] [A. Godeke, 2014] SMC-11T: C1, C2 MBHSP: C105, C106, C108 RRP 108/127 [B. Bordinini, 2014]

7 voltage signals can triggered the protection scheme (redundancy) Typical time windows and threshold: V_sum and Dif : Vmax = 100 mV for 10 ms Splices Vmax = 10 mV for 8 ms Leads Vmax = 80 mV for 500 ms H. BAJAS | June 2014, CERN

On the direct signal HQ01e: C5, C7, C8, C9 RRP 54/61 and 108/127 H. BAJAS | June 2014, CERN

On the direct signal HQ01e: C5, C7, C8, C9 RRP 54/61 and 108/127 Amplitude up to 2 V and duration between 5 to 60 ms: Trip of the protection H. BAJAS | June 2014, CERN

FJ amplitudes higher @ 4.2 K than @ 1.9 K On the differential signal HQ01e: C5, C7, C8, C9 FJ amplitudes higher @ 4.2 K than @ 1.9 K FJ frequency lower @ 4.2 K than @ 1.9K Amplitude up to 2 V at 4.2 K and 750 mV at 1.9 K. Need to adapt threshold to pass flux jump occurrence current range H. BAJAS | June 2014, CERN

50 A/s 10 A/s The higher ramp rate, the lower the flux jump frequency. Effect of the Ramp Rate Voltage 10 A/s 50 A/s Voltage The higher ramp rate, the lower the flux jump frequency. H. BAJAS | June 2014, CERN

Flux Jumps amplitude  at the limit of the detection (100 mV / 10 ms) HQ02: C15, C16, C17, C20 RRP 108/127 (jc >2800) MBHSP: C105, C106, C108 Flux Jumps amplitude  at the limit of the detection (100 mV / 10 ms) 1.9 K measurement Very similar behavior between RRP (HQ vs.11T) H. BAJAS | June 2014, CERN

HQ02: C15, C16, C17, C20 RRP 108/127 (jc >2800) MBHSP: C105, C106, C108 Flux Jumps amplitude  at the limit of the detection (100 mV / 10 ms)  200 mV / 5ms 100 mV 7 ms H. BAJAS | June 2014, CERN

The occurrence of the spike depends on the cable RRP filament size. The amplitudes of the spike is higher at 4.2 K. The frequency of the spike is higher at 1.9 K. The frequency of the spikes is lower at higher ramp rate. First HQ generation: issue with regard to voltage spikes with amplitude and duration within our «reference» quench detection setting (100 mV, 10 ms). Second HQ generation: voltage spikes below our criteria if (200 mV, 5ms). No trip of the detection system H. BAJAS | June 2014, CERN

RRP 108/127 1.9 K H. BAJAS | June 2014, CERN