Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enhanced Sensitivity to Sunitinib by Inhibition of Akt1 Expression in Human Castration- resistant Prostate Cancer PC3 Cells Both In Vitro and In Vivo 
Advertisements

Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Tumor-Derived Jagged1 Promotes Osteolytic Bone Metastasis of Breast Cancer by Engaging Notch Signaling in Bone Cells  Nilay Sethi, Xudong Dai, Christopher.
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Sp1 Suppresses miR-3178 to Promote the Metastasis Invasion Cascade via Upregulation of TRIOBP  Hui Wang, Kai Li, Yu Mei, Xuemei Huang, Zhenglin Li, Qingzhu.
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Reduction in the requirement of oncogenic Ras signaling to activation of PI3K/AKT pathway during tumor maintenance  Kian-Huat Lim, Christopher M. Counter 
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Chromatin Effector Pygo2 Mediates Wnt-Notch Crosstalk to Suppress Luminal/Alveolar Potential of Mammary Stem and Basal Cells  Bingnan Gu, Kazuhide Watanabe,
Modulation of K-Ras-Dependent Lung Tumorigenesis by MicroRNA-21
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Mutant IDH1 Promotes Glioma Formation In Vivo
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
A Flt3L Encounter: mTOR Signaling in Dendritic Cells
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 1-2 (January 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Coordinate Transcriptional Regulation by ERG and Androgen Receptor in Fusion- Positive Prostate Cancers  Yu Chen, Charles L. Sawyers  Cancer Cell  Volume.
Notch Activation as a Driver of Osteogenic Sarcoma
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Da Yong Lee, Scott M. Gianino, David H. Gutmann  Cancer Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages e5 (September 2018)
Rolando Perez-Lorenzo, Kamraan Z. Gill, Che-Hung Shen, Feng X
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
AKT1 Activation Promotes Development of Melanoma Metastases
A Constitutive Intrinsic Inflammatory Signaling Circuit Composed of miR-196b, Meis2, PPP3CC, and p65 Drives Prostate Cancer Castration Resistance  Ji-Hak.
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Adult Murine Prostate Basal and Luminal Cells Are Self-Sustained Lineages that Can Both Serve as Targets for Prostate Cancer Initiation  Nahyun Choi,
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Inhibition of KLF4 by Statins Reverses Adriamycin-Induced Metastasis and Cancer Stemness in Osteosarcoma Cells  Yangling Li, Miao Xian, Bo Yang, Meidan.
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Roxanne Toivanen, Adithi Mohan, Michael M. Shen  Stem Cell Reports 
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Macrophages Contribute to the Progression of Infantile Hemangioma by Regulating the Proliferation and Differentiation of Hemangioma Stem Cells  Wei Zhang,
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages e5 (September 2018)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Heat Shock Transcription Factor 1 Is a Key Determinant of HCC Development by Regulating Hepatic Steatosis and Metabolic Syndrome  Xiongjie Jin, Demetrius.
SGK3 Mediates INPP4B-Dependent PI3K Signaling in Breast Cancer
miR-124 Inhibits Lung Tumorigenesis Induced by K-ras Mutation and NNK
Promotion Effects of miR-375 on the Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose- Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells  Si Chen, Yunfei Zheng, Shan Zhang, Lingfei.
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
NOTCH and PI3K-AKT Pathways Intertwined
Lu Zheng, Nan You, Xiaobing Huang, Huiying Gu, Ke Wu, Na Mi, Jing Li 
Rita U. Lukacs, Sanaz Memarzadeh, Hong Wu, Owen N. Witte 
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Shrimp miR-34 from Shrimp Stress Response to Virus Infection Suppresses Tumorigenesis of Breast Cancer  Yalei Cui, Xiaoyuan Yang, Xiaobo Zhang  Molecular.
Haploinsufficiency at the Nkx3.1 locus
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Negative Regulation of Tumor Suppressor p53 by MicroRNA miR-504
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 167, Issue 2, Pages e9 (October 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Turning Reciprocal Feedback Regulation into Combination Therapy
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 792-804 (June 2011) Cell Autonomous Role of PTEN in Regulating Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Growth  David J. Mulholland, Linh M. Tran, Yunfeng Li, Houjian Cai, Ashkan Morim, Shunyou Wang, Seema Plaisier, Isla P. Garraway, Jiaoti Huang, Thomas G. Graeber, Hong Wu  Cancer Cell  Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 792-804 (June 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.05.006 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Early Castration Does Not Prevent Initiation of Pten Null CaP (A) Pb-Cre+;PtenL/L mutants were castrated (Cx) at 2, 4, or 6 weeks and aged to 10 weeks. (B) Mutants Cx at 2 weeks were evaluated for carcinoma, PI3K (P-AKT, P-S6) activation coinciding with PTEN loss. Prostates were also evaluated for invasiveness based on SMA loss but maintained E-Cadherin expression (arrow). Scale bars represent 100 μm. (C) Cell proliferation, Ki67+; Cyclin D1+ (Cyc D1) cells, in 2 and 6 week Cx cohorts in comparison to WT Cx controls (∗∗p < 0.01). Scale bars represent 150 μm. Error bars represent mean ± SD. See also Figure S1. Cancer Cell 2011 19, 792-804DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2011.05.006) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 PTEN Loss Can Suppress Androgen-Responsive Gene Expression (A and B) Expression profile (mean ± SEM) of AR-activated (A) and -suppressed (B) genes in WT and Pten-null murine prostates after castration. (C) Heat map of expression ratios of androgen-responsive genes in WT (14 day post-castration) and intact Pten null mutants with respect to intact WT mice. (D) Variation in expression of androgen-responsive genes based on PTEN CN in human CaP samples. Left view is a summary of human samples based on PTEN CN (the numbers inside parentheses indicate the number of metastatic cases); right is a comparative analysis of AR-activated (red circles) and -suppressed (blue circles) gene expression values in two human CaP data sets. (E) Top view shows gene expression and NCA-derived activities of EGR1, JUN, and AR transcription factors in induced PTEN expression in Pten−/− cells. Bottom view illustrates the activity of AR in murine models when the PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway was manipulated genetically or pharmacologically. (F) Expression (mean ± SD) of Ezh2 (left), and AR and EZH2 cotarget genes (right) in PIN and cancer (CAN) stages of Pten null prostate. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.005. See also Figure S2 and Table S1. Cancer Cell 2011 19, 792-804DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2011.05.006) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Epithelial AR Is Not Required for the Initiation of Pten Null CaP (A) Deletion of epithelial AR in the anterior lobe of Pten null CaP (Pb-Cre+;PtenL/L;ArL/Y) mutants and the impact on cell proliferation (Ki67+ cells), apoptosis (red arrow), and cancer formation (scale bars, 200 μm [top] and 50 μm [bottom]). (B) Cell proliferation (left) and apoptotic indexes (right) in Cre− (C-), Pb-Cre+;ArL/Y (C+;Ar); Pb-Cre+;PtenL/L (C+;Pt) and Cre+;PtenL/L;ArL/Y (C+;Pt;Ar) mutants. (C) Frequency of invasiveness based on SMA breakdown in Pb-Cre+;PtenL/L and Cre+;PtenL/L;ArL/Y mutants during progression. Error bars represent mean ± SD. See also Figure S3. Cancer Cell 2011 19, 792-804DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2011.05.006) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Epithelial AR Is Not Required for Transformation by Pten Deletion or Myristoylated Akt in Regeneration Assays (A) Evaluating the impact of Cre-mediated deletion of Pten and Ar on histopathology and PI3K signaling. The top panel shows the outline of the experiment, and the bottom panels show results of tissues stained as indicated. Scale bars represent 100 μm. (B) Evaluating AR deletion and myristoylated AKT expression in primary Pb-Cre+;ArL/Y mutants and the impact on prostate histopathology and PI3K signaling. The top panel shows the outline of the experiment, and the bottom panels show results of tissues stained as indicated. Scale bars represent 200 μm [top] and 50 μm [bottom]. See also Figure S4. Cancer Cell 2011 19, 792-804DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2011.05.006) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 AR Downregulates AKT Activity by Stimulating FKBP5 and PHLPP-Mediated, AKT Dephosphorylation (A) PI3K activation (P-AKT, P-S6) in AR+ regions (arrows) versus AR− regions (arrowheads) in castrated Pb-Cre+;PtenL/L;ArL/Y mutants (scale bars, 150 μm [low magnification] and 75 μm [high magnification]). (B) Effect of AR deletion on FKBP5 expression in Pb-Cre+PtenL/L;ArL/Y mutants (scale bars, 50 μm). (C and D) Expression of FKBP5, PHLPP, and P-AKT in AR+ regions (arrowheads) compared to AR null regions (arrows) in castrated Pb-Cre+;PtenL/L;ArL/Y mutants at 2 days (C) and 4 weeks (D) after castration (scale bars, 75 μm). See also Figure S5. Cancer Cell 2011 19, 792-804DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2011.05.006) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Heterogeneous AR Expression in Human CaPs Correlating with PI3K/AKT Signaling and FKBP5 and PHLPP Levels (A) PTEN and AR expression in human CaP (scale bars, 500 μm). (B) PI3K pathway components (P-AKT, P-S6, P-4EBP1) in Pten−;AR− regions of Pb-Cre+;PtenL/L;ArL/Y mice and in PTEN-negative;AR-low/negative regions of human CaPs. Error bars, mean ± SD. (C) Unsupervised clustering analysis of PTEN, PHLPP, AR, and FKBP5 in human TMA samples (n = 91) (left). Chi-square test p values (n = 91) were used to quantitate the strength of association between each pair (right, table). Protein level was categorized to high (IHC >1) and low (≤1) levels). See also Figure S6. Cancer Cell 2011 19, 792-804DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2011.05.006) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Cooperative Effects of AR and mTOR Inhibition In Vitro and In Vivo (A) In vitro response of Pten null;Ar+ murine (CaP8) and human (LNCaP) prostate cancer cells to AR knockdown (sh-AR) or pharmacological inhibition of AR (MDV3100, 10 μM) with and without rapamycin (R: 1 nM) treatment (Sc, control sh oligo). (B and D) In vivo response to treatments with castration, MDV3100, rapamycin, or their combinations as measured by cell proliferation (Ki67+ cells) and (C and D) tumor burden in Pb-Cre+;PtenL/L and Pb-Cre+;PtenL/L:ArL/Y mutants. Scale bars represent 2 mm (C), 200 μm (D), and 75 μm (D, inset). Error bars represent mean ± SD. See also Figure S7. Cancer Cell 2011 19, 792-804DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2011.05.006) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 PTEN Loss Promotes CRPC Development by Two Collaborative Mechanisms By regulating EGR1, c-JUN, and EZH2 expression and activities, PTEN loss suppresses AR TFA and output, leading to reduced prostate epithelial differentiation and survival. Collaboratively, PTEN loss activates the PI3K/AKT-signaling pathway and reduces the AR-regulated FKBP5-PHLPP negative feedback loop, further enhancing AKT activation, leading to androgen/AR-independent prostate epithelial proliferation. Cancer Cell 2011 19, 792-804DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2011.05.006) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions