LONELINESS What we know (so far) An overview of evidence reviews:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The matrix Standard. Welcome Mark Wem emqc International Strategic Associate & matrix Assessor Dubai 15 th October 2012.
Advertisements

Program Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Program evaluation and program development  Logic of program evaluation (Program theory)  Four-Step Model  Comprehensive.
Institute for Social Research - Zagreb Centre for Educational Research and Development THE STATUS OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY IN NATIONAL.
PHSB 612: Interventions Diane M. Dowdy, Ph.D. Spring 2008.
Scottish Improvement Science Collaborating Centre Strengthening the evidence base for improvement science: lessons learned Dr Nicola Gray, Senior Lecturer,
Leading Effective Intervention Objectives To give subject leaders an overview of the Strategy’s plans to refresh and develop intervention and targeted.
Presentation By L. M. Baird And Scottish Health Council Research & Public Involvement Knowledge Exchange Event 12 th March 2015.
Smoke-free Legislation in England The Research Agenda Linda Bauld University of Bath.
Laura Feeney & Mandy Cowden. Vision Communities where all people feel supported & engaged and everyone can achieve their full potential Improve support.
Wellbeing and mental health Hard evidence: a mental health case study Heema Shukla Independent Policy Developer Wellbeing and mental health.
Cyfnewidfa Cydraddoldeb a Hawliau Dynol Digwyddiad Rhanbarthol Equality and Human Rights Exchange Regional Event 13 September 2016, Disability Sport Wales.
New Care Models: Learning from the care homes vanguards
Facilitating Meaningful Social Inclusion with Older People
Non-Housing Outcomes of Accessible and Affordable Housing
Self-directed Support Implementation Des McCart National Lead on SDS and Commissioning JIT is a strategic improvement partnership between the Scottish.
A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games Wakana Ishimaru Leo Liang.
New Care Models: Learning from the care homes vanguards
Creating Community Change
Self Assessment for Pastoral Care
Chapter 7 Occupational Science: The Study of Occupation
The Government’s perspective on measuring disability employment
Quality and Effectiveness Framework Learner Voice
Key recommendations Successful components of physical activity interventions fall into three categories: Planning and developing physical activity initiatives.
Introduction to evaluating and measuring impact in career development Presented by – Date – Doubt, the essential preliminary of all improvement and.
Who we are We work for well run evidence based public care
the impact of career guidance
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
Making Housing Matter 5 July 2016, Skainos Centre.
Evaluation of 15 projects – ‘Supporting School Leavers’
Person Centred Care in NHS Wales
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
Stepping Up An equal society for every
CENTER FOR COORDINATION OF RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITIES  (IFCU) Continuing of Education for Disadvantaged Adolescents in.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Introduction to Positive Behavior Support Planning
Evidence-Based Practices: Tier 1
National care homes lead, new care models programme, NHS England
An Overview of Economics in the new Junior Cycle Specification
THE BUSINESS ANALYSIS PROCESS MODEL
Enhanced Health in Care Homes: Progress and learning William Roberts, EHCH Care Model
Margaret Hurley Social Prescribing Development Lead - VAST
NHS Education for Scotland Always Event Project
How can we make loneliness
Peer Mediation T 4 T.
Our new quality framework and methodology:
Structures for Implementation
Can physical activity reduce work-related stress? What do we know?
Margaret Hurley Social Prescribing Development Lead - VAST
Graded Care Profile 2 Awareness session Why do we need it? What is it?
Health, Learning and Work Supporting the local community through learning and development Training Development Support.
Developing National Measures of Loneliness
A Focus on Outcomes and Impact
1. Reduce harms from the main preventable causes of poor health
Take Control Over Underwriting Quality and Leakage
Carlo Gianelle, Fabrizio Guzzo
Social prescribing in County Durham
Brightlife Key Learning
The Compelling Case for Integrated Community Care: Setting the Scene
Maureen McAteer, Scottish Government
Youth Work and Outdoor Learning: tools for building resilience?
Use of Health Impact Assessment at National Policy Level in England
Background: the draft strategy
Understanding your Impact on Well-Being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015 Contributing to and Reporting on the 7 Wellbeing Goals, Local Wellbeing.
PYP PLANNER Year level/ Subject: Dates unit taught:
Developing a Scottish Toolkit for Fair Access
A Fairer Scotland for Older People is the result of a Scottish Government engagement process with older people across Scotland through the involvement.
Quality Framework Overview
Fire Starter Festival 27 January – 14 February 2020 #fsf2019
Background: the draft strategy
TRANSFORMING TO A SUSTAINABLE AND EQUITABLE DISABILITY SUPPORT SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

LONELINESS What we know (so far) An overview of evidence reviews: the effectiveness of interventions to address loneliness at all stages of the life-course

Loneliness | Review of reviews 1. What is loneliness? 2. What this review is (and is not!) 3. State of the evidence 4. Specific interventions 5. Now what?

1. What is loneliness?

What is loneliness? | Review of reviews Common experience Affected by life events Being lonely can become a serious issue when it becomes a day-to-day reality as it’s important for our health and wellbeing, and the way we function in our communities

What is loneliness? | Review of reviews It is different to social isolation Loneliness is an experience, and is subjective Loneliness occurs when there is a gap between our actual and desired social relationships… … and when the quality or quantity of these relationships does not meet our expectations.

What is loneliness? | Review of reviews It affects wellbeing at all ages but high-quality research aimed at assessing effectiveness focuses on older age.

2. What this review is (and is not!)

What this review is | Review of reviews This review of reviews begins the process of mapping the evidence base and identifying the potential gaps and areas to focus on.

What this review is | Review of reviews The review asked the question: What is the effectiveness of interventions to alleviate loneliness in people of all ages across the life-course?

What this review is | Review of reviews The review ONLY includes studies that: had controlled designs measured loneliness were published in the last 10 years However, it does include insights from unpublished research and evaluations conducted in the UK.

What this review is | Review of reviews There were 364 reviews to sift through. Published findings come from the USA, the Netherlands, Finland, Japan, New Zealand, Sweden, Taiwan and the UK. Unpublished papers from England, Wales, Scotland and Switzerland.

What this review is | Review of reviews Because evidence could only be found for older adults these findings focus on over-55s.

3. State of the evidence

State of the evidence | Review of reviews It’s hard to compare results because of the variability of types of INTERVENTION SETTING and MEASURES USED

State of the evidence | Review of reviews Future research is needed on how loneliness impacts different ages ethnicities socio-economic groups

State of the evidence | Review of reviews Building on existing community assets and networks to reduce loneliness was a key feature in a number of the interventions

State of the evidence | Review of reviews We need to find out how loneliness relates to other mediating factors, such as SOCIAL CONNECTION and SOCIAL SUPPORT

State of the evidence | Review of reviews More, large-scale, controlled studies would allow us to draw solid conclusions

3. Specific interventions

Specific interventions | Review of reviews One size will not fit all Inconclusive evidence on one-to-one versus group-based interventions People with high levels of loneliness benefitted the most from loneliness interventions

Specific interventions | Review of reviews We don’t yet know what approaches alleviate loneliness But several mechanisms for reducing loneliness were identified Tailor interventions Avoid stigma Support meaningful relationships

Specific interventions | Review of reviews Understanding the findings Please note that this categorisation isn’t a robust assessment of effectiveness of the different interventions. It’s a way to categorise the different activities and highlight what we know about them. No effect found Effect inconclusive Positive effect P Published studies G Grey literature or unpublished studies

Specific interventions | Review of reviews Remember! These findings only cover the interventions included in the studies looked at by the review. It does not cover ALL interventions.

Specific interventions | Review of reviews The approaches reviewed

Specific interventions | Review of reviews Leisure activities Physical activities P Music G Indoor and outdoor gardening P G

Specific interventions | Review of reviews Therapies Animal assisted therapy P Reminiscence therapy P Cognitive enhancement P Humour therapy P

Specific interventions | Review of reviews Social and community interventions Community sharing/companionship G Social and community interventions P Advice and signposting services G

Specific interventions | Review of reviews Educational approaches Relationship training P Self-management P Skills training P G

Specific interventions | Review of reviews Befriending P It’s a complex picture Most commonly reviewed, but covers many activities One systematic review and meta-analysis of befriending interventions found no significant benefit.

Specific interventions | Review of reviews System-wide approaches 4R programmes P Eden Alternative P

5. Now what?

Now what? | Review of reviews This review is a first step We need to: Develop a conceptual and theoretical framework for loneliness Use and report on an appropriate set of loneliness measures Improve, build up and track progress of the evidence base

Now what? | Review of reviews What works in practice: ● Build the evidence base: Fill the evidence gaps and move the evidence base forward through well-designed, rigorous and appropriate research methods. ● Intervention design: use a tailored approach, avoid stigma, support meaningful relationships. ● Monitoring and evaluation: plan how to collect evidence - be clear about what you are measuring, use consistent, comparable measures.

Now what? | Review of reviews What works in policy: ● Consider how social connection and loneliness relate to the objectives of the policy, programme or project and how they can be supported at the margins. ● Include social connection and loneliness when developing and shortlisting options. ● Explore how better social connection and reduced loneliness can help achieve other outcomes. ● Understand and compare the social impacts on different groups. ● Build social connection, wellbeing or loneliness measures into pilots, evaluations and research.

Now what? | Review of reviews Supportive social relationships are essential to human wellbeing. Their quality is not just dependent on individual circumstances, but is substantially influenced by society. It might be tempting to treat loneliness solely as an individual phenomenon. However we must widen our understanding of loneliness to appreciate the social and situational factors involved.

Thank you These slides can be used under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Please acknowledge the What Works Centre for Wellbeing as the source. To help us monitor our impact, we’d appreciate if you let us know how you used them. @whatworksWB info@whatworkswellbeing.org Whatworkswellbeing.org Licensed under Creative Commons: AttributionNon Commercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)