A Thousand Paper-Cuts:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use of Prior Statements, Depositions and Corollary Proceedings: Searing Impeachment and Effective Rehabilitation FITZPATRICK,
Advertisements

© The McCoy Law Firm 2012 James McCoy The McCoy Law Firm Coit Rd., Ste. 560 Dallas, Texas (214)
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
P A R T P A R T Foundations of American Law The Nature of Law The Resolution of Private Disputes Business and The Constitution Business Ethics, Corporate.
Preparing Your Company Employees to Testify. Types of Company Witnesses Fact Witnesses – Persons with personal knowledge of relevant facts Fact Witnesses.
FRAUD EXAMINATION ALBRECHT, ALBRECHT, & ALBRECHT Legal Follow-Up Chapter 18.
Evidence and Argument Evidence – The asserted facts that the arbitrator will consider in making a decision – Information – What is presented at the hearing.
American Tort Law Carolyn McAllaster Clinical Professor of Law Duke University School of Law.
Testifying Skills Julia Pallentino MSN, JD, ARNP.
Anatomy of a Malpractice Lawsuit Presented by: Gary H. Barnes, Esq. Gary H. Barnes, Professional Association Burlington, VT N. Venice, FL Insurance Coverage.
Part I Sources of Corrections Law. Chapter 4 - Going to Court Introduction – Chapter provides information on appearing in court, either as a witness or.
An Attorney’s View Sara Beachy Assistant Attorney General State of Wisconsin Department of Justice June 3, 2015.
Discovery III Expert Witness Disclosure And Discovery Motions & Sanctions.
Expert Witnesses Texas Rules of Evidence Article VII. Opinions and Expert Testimony Judge Sharen Wilson.
What is the problem? Jampole v. Touchy, 673 S.W.2d 569 (Tex. 1984) “The ultimate purpose of discovery is to seek the truth, so that disputes may be.
Simplified Rules of Evidence How to Behave in the Courtroom.
Advanced Civil Litigation Class 9Slide 1 Advantages of a Deposition You can ask specific follow-up questions based on the answers you get You can ask specific.
Direct Examinations DO NOW: VOCABULARY ON LINE ON MY WEBSITE.
English 9H Ms. Bugasch November 4, 2013 “D” Day Goals 1. Evidence Submittal and Approval 2. Students will be able to: -Understand the purpose of cross-examination.
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
FRAUD EXAMINATION ALBRECHT, ALBRECHT, & ALBRECHT Legal Follow-Up Chapter 18.
Mon. Nov. 26. Work Product “Privilege” A witness, X, who is friendly to the D was interviewed by P’s attorney and a statement was drawn up Is there any.
Material Covered in Assignment 4-1: The Attorney-Client Privilege A. Rationale for the Attorney-Client Privilege (p. 318) B. Criteria for Attorney-Client.
Legal Document Preparation Class 12Slide 1 Functions of the Discovery Process Narrow the issues –After investigation, you can more easily determine which.
Chapter 4 Resolving Disputes: Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Options Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION DISCOVERY OVERVIEW.
Actions That Are Not Unauthorized Practice of Law You may do these things.
Fool me twice… Shame on Me Metro Toronto Convention Centre February 2, 2010.
Privilege, Privacy, Waiver & Ethical Considerations.
Charles University – Law Faculty October 2012 © Peter Kolker 2012 Class III
Resolution of Fraud FRAUD EXAMINATION ALBRECHT & ALBRECHT Legal Follow-Up Chapter 16.
Week Nine Seminar 1.  By the time that the pleadings have been settled, discovery has been completed, and motions have been resolved, everyone has a.
Forms of Pretrial Discovery in the Auto Property Damage Case Mark Demian and Jeffrey Dubin Javitch, Block & Rathbone LLP.
Help! I’ve been called to give evidence in Court…  The doctor’s survivor guide for preparing for and attending court Sofia Papachristos, Special Counsel,
Produced for Lawline By: Andrea M. Paparella, Esq
Women in Products Liability 2016 Annual Regional CLE November 3, 2016
Mock Trials Court Systems and Practices.
B2-1 Lawyers.
Selecting "The Right" Testifying Expert and Best Practices for Getting the Most Out of Your Expert During the Pretrial Phase of the Litigation ABA Section.
BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES
IOWA MOCK TRIAL 101: Middle School Mock Trial Basics
PREPARING YOUR CLIENT TO TESTIFY AT TRIAL
PRE-SUIT CONSIDERATIONS
Unit B Customized by Professor Ludlum Nov. 30, 2016.
I. Why You Might Be Called
Chapter 4 Resolving Disputes: Litigation and Alternative Dispute
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Civil Cases Chapter 16 Section 1.
Testifying in Administrative and Criminal Proceedings
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Anthony F. DellaPelle, Esq, CRE®
ADVANCED CROSS-EXAMINATION
Andrew Kalamut, McCarthy Tétrault
Criminal Trial Components
Ethics for Lawyers – and how that impacts your child’s case
What to Expect at a Medicaid Fair Hearing
TRIAL.
OBJECTIONS.
Strategies to Avoid or Quickly Resolve Thorny Legal Issues
The Litigation Process
How Witnesses are Examined
TIPS FOR IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF YOUR DEPOSITIONS
Class III Objectives Subject Matter:
What is Mock Trial? Steps in what we do…...
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
Civil Pretrial Practice
Appellate Practice Basics
How The Legal Industry is Changing
Expert Witnesses in Canada – An Appraiser’s Perspective
Business Law Final Exam
Presentation transcript:

A Thousand Paper-Cuts:    F&M Alumni Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Series A Thousand Paper-Cuts: The Key to an Effective Cross-Examination  October 11, 2017 Anthony F. DellaPelle, Esq., CRE ‘84 McKirdy, Riskin, Olson & DellaPelle, P.C. Mark E. Duckstein, Esq. ‘84 Sills, Cummis & Gross, P.C.

The Panel Anthony F. Della Pelle, Esq., CRE ‘84 Practice limited to eminent domain, condemnation, redevelopment and real estate tax appeals 30+ years representing property owners and special counsel to condemning authorities in eminent domain matters New Jersey “Super Lawyer” (“Top 100” - 2009-2017; “Top 10” – 2012) Anthony F. Della Pelle, Esq., CRE ‘84 adellapelle@mckirdyriskin.com www.mckirdyriskin.com Shareholder: McKirdy, Riskin, Olson & DellaPelle, PC Certified Civil Trial Attorney by N.J. Supreme Court New Jersey Representative, Owners’ Counsel of America Member, Counselors of Real Estate®

The Panel Mark E. Duckstein, Esq. ‘84 mduckstein@sillscummis.com www.sillscummis.com Practice concentrated on the representation of corporations and other business enterprises in complex litigation involving real estate, commercial torts and contract disputes. Extensive experience representing commercial and retail landlords, insurance companies, major lending institutions, commercial warehousing companies, and hospitals and health care providers. The Best Lawyers in America®* 2013-2018, Commercial Litigation Partner: Sills, Cummis & Gross, P.C.

CROSS EXAMINATION BASICS Purpose and Objectives Discredit Obtain concessions/admissions Demonstrate bias, lack of candor, partisanship, etc. Reveal other traits, such as reputation, appearance, competence, lack of cooperation Preparation Develop and understand theme of the case Gather background Internet research Industry research – informal/formal – published articles can be a treasure trove! Prior inconsistent statements Research regarding all material cited and relied upon in report Review other discovery – interrogatories, document production, requests for admissions, etc.

CROSS EXAMINATION BASICS (cont’d) C. Careful Analysis of Report(s) Become an expert in the field Use other experts to assist Check and verify each fact D. Forum – consider the forum and tailor cross appropriately Deposition Jury/bench trial Arbitration Panel Condemnation Commissioners Zoning/Planning Boards Other forums

II. DISCOVERY, PRIVILEGE AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS WITH EXPERTS Understand the rules regarding experts and discovery Consider attorney/client privilege vs. attorney work product protections B. Given the evolving case law in this area, great care must be given to what an attorney decides to physically provide and orally state to the testifying expert. Drafts Communications between expert and client.

III. PRIOR REPORTS/INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS Prior inconsistent statements – sworn statements and testimony; documents; other statements Prior reports prepared by the expert who testifies are admissible for use or impeachment. Review for missing or inaccurate information Expert loses credibility “False in one, false in all” jury charge Must draft reports be produced for use on cross-examination? It doesn’t matter what label has been put on the prior report, “draft”, “attorney’s work product”, “confidential”, etc. If prepared by the witness, it qualifies as a prior report.

IV. PREPARING WITNESSES FOR TESTIMONY Witness demeanor and appearance Deposition testimony Trial/hearing testimony Direct examination Cross examination – cooperative or combative? Volunteering information? Examination by judge, arbitrators or public Play to the audience KISS and other tips Rebuttal testimony Witness sequestration/active consultation while in court/hearing Preparation and use of trial exhibits – electronic vs. paper

V. PRINCIPLES OF CROSS EXAMINATION Be brief? Know the answer to every question asked Control the witness Limit answers to yes or no Make sure the trier of fact understands and pays attention Never ask why Never let the witness explain Lead the witness down the forbidden path – play to his/her strength (weakness) Gain concessions? Go for the jugular

Prepare, prepare, prepare Don’t telegraph the strategy in discovery VI. CONCLUSION Have a simple strategy Prepare, prepare, prepare Don’t telegraph the strategy in discovery Be able to support your facts with documents or other testimony Take your time. Build a foundation and climb the mountain Be professional and polite Know the answer to the questions Don’t waste time, energy or words – constantly score Stop when you are ahead Be brief. Or not!