2018 AASHTO Civil Rights Conference

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Independent External Review of Health Care Decisions in Vermont Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration.
Advertisements

The Allegation An allegation may be submitted by : Any Person. An allegation may be filed with the PLSB through: The Department of Education A Public.
Determining Responsive Bids and Responsible Bidders and Offerors Presenter: J. Peter Stamps, CPPO, VCO VA Dept of General Services.
2014 Changes in DBE Certification Standards and DBE Final Rule Overview State of Hawai’i Department of Transportation Office of Civil Rights Disadvantaged.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
INTERSTATE CERTIFICATION Bob Ashby TRB January 2015.
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION AVECO July 14 – 18, 2014 Centralized Certification.
Marcy Mealy Procurement Specialist CDBG Program
Independent Educational Evaluations Developed by Contra Costa SELPA As Recommended for LEA Board Policy
Q and A Regarding 34 CFR § (b)(4). On December 1, 2008, USDOE issued a series of new regulations for IDEA. These newly amended regulations took.
THE INTERACTIVE PROCESS PROTOCOL (USING JOB OFFER FORMS) 1.
New Foreclosure Law in Maryland Presentation by the Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation Friday, June 18, 2010.
TASFAA Annual Conference 2010 Galveston, Texas. So What? The Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, requires an institution of higher education participating.
Office of Business Development Training
Partnership Agreements Delegation of SBA’s Contract Execution Authority to other Federal Government Agencies.
1 Exemption AdministrationTraining Related to Accepting Certificates Prepared by the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board Audit Committee Prepared January.
U.S. Small Business Administration
1 Exemption Administration Training Prepared by the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board Audit Committee Prepared January, 2011.
TELECARE CORP HIPAA AND THE AMENDMENT PROCESS Updated 11/17/09.
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT (LADOTD)
Hospital Presumptive Eligibility AHCCCS Training July 2014.
CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS.  Review the Complaint Is the complaint within the jurisdiction of your agency? If not, forward to appropriate agency.Is the complaint.
Planning an Audit The Audit Process consists of the following phases:
Encouraging Diversity Growth & Equity 123: Demonstration of Good Faith Todd McGonigle EDGE Program Manager Phone (614) FAX (614)
Verification. What is Verification? Verification is confirmation of eligibility for free and reduced price meals under NSLP and SBP. -Verification is.
EService Process Descriptions. COSCA/NACM Standards for Electronic Filing Processes Technical and Business Approaches Section 1.2A Court rules may provide.
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) UNION COLLEGE.
Methods of Administration MOA Element 8 Complaint Processing Procedures.
Rabbanai T. Morgan Current as of 26 January 2006 Protests.
Office of Civil Rights “We Are Who We Serve” Federal Aviation Administration New Rule’s Impact on DBE/ACDBE Certification 2011 National Airport Civil Rights.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July Supplemental Oversight AS9104/2A & Special.
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
Transportation Research Board Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Hot Topics Martha Kenley FHWA National DBE Program Manager
DBE ISSUES OF NOTE TRB – January 11, ACCUMULATION OF SUBSTANTIAL WEALTH Not everyone who meets the PNW cap automatically is economically disadvantaged.
June 25, 2013 Wendell Point, Ph.D. Civil Rights Program Consultant 1.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
Improving Compliance with ISAs Presenters: Al Johnson & Pat Hayle.
RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTOR LAW Presented by Susan Groth, September 11, 2014.
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Each Submitter’s Responsibility for Outreach Efforts.
Building Capacity of SMEs for Participation in Public Procurement Draft Presentation for Training of Trainers June 2014.
HIPAA Training Workshop #3 Individual Rights Kaye L. Rankin Rankin Healthcare Consultants, Inc.
© 2016 Universal Service Administrative Company. All rights reserved Applicant Training Audit Compliance September – November 2016.
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE program (dbe)
NEWLY ELECTED OFFICIAL ORIENTATION Florida Property Appraisers Florida Tax Collectors February 7-10, 2017.
Florida Department of Transportation Equal Opportunity Office
The Demand for Audit and Other Assurance Services
Invoicing 2016 E-rate Program Applicant Training
Overpayment Process Training October 2008.
The Demand for Audit and Other Assurance Services
Surviving a Federal Program Review
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Each Bidder’s (or Proposer’s) Responsibility for Outreach Efforts.
HUBZone and NHO Enterprises: What You Need To Know
Wyoming Statutes §§ through
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Welcome to the City of Chicago Department of Procurement Services
SCSEP Grievance Policies & Procedures
CAEP Orientation: Newcomers
Step 3: Legally Binding agreements and contracts
SSA Adverse Decisions and Administrative Finality
CHALLENGES TO VOTER REGISTRATION APPLICATIONS AND REGISTERED VOTERS
Procedural review of initial WG ballot on P802.1CF
Introduction to Invoicing
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart
NEW SBA Form 159 Notice (a) & 504
The Office of Open Records webinar will begin soon
Exemption AdministrationTraining Related to Accepting Certificates
Client Process Pack.
STARTING FUNDING YEAR (FY) 2020
Chapter 15: Administrative Procedures
Presentation transcript:

2018 AASHTO Civil Rights Conference DBE Program Interstate Certification FHWA Office of Civil Rights Martha Kenley National DBE Program Manger

Interstate Certification Background and Purpose Reduce administrative barriers, burdens, and costs for DBEs that want to be certified in multiple states Make certification process easier for recipients and certifying agencies. Stopped short of national reciprocity The interstate certification rule creates a bright-line distinction between applications for interstate certification and applications for initial certification. It is designed to make the certification process easier for recipients, certifying agencies in each state’s Unified Certification Program (UCP), and certified DBEs. The rule aims to reduce administrative burdens and costs on DBEs that seek to pursue contracting opportunities in other states and to promote greater consistency and uniformity in the application of certification requirements while maintaining program integrity.   The Department reiterates that the ultimate purpose of the interstate certification rule is to facilitate certification of currently certified firms in other jurisdictions. States, however, are not obligated to honor other states’ certification decisions without review. A State (State B) may, at its discretion, accept a firm’s certification from its home state (State A) without further procedures. Alternatively, State B may choose not to accept State A’s certification, reviewing limited information specified in the interstate certification regulation before making a decision on whether or not to certify the firm.

Interstate Certification 26.83 Time Frames Applicant sends Home State A certification letter to State B, requests certification State B confirms with State A or on-line State B may accept State A’s certification without further action

Interstate Certification If State B does not choose to accept Applicant sends all documents to State B Copy of State A application and all other supporting documents, affidavits of no change, correspondence Copy of notices from other States about application status, denials, decertifications Copy of any certification appeals with DOT Affidavit that all information is true and correct State B has 7 days to request onsite from State A State A has 7 days to provide onsite to State B See 26.85 (c) “you” refers to applicant firm

Interstate Certification State B has 60 days from receipt of all applicant materials to certify firm If, within 60 days of receipt of all applicant information State B finds good cause to object to State A certification must send notice to applicant of specific reasons for determination and offer applicant opportunity to respond via writing or in person. State B must have meeting within 30 days of applicant’s request

Interstate Certification Applicant firm has Burden of Proof— Applicant need only address issues raised by State B State B must issue written decision within 30 days of applicant’s written response or meeting with decision maker (later of the two) Applicant may appeal to DOCR

Interstate Certification Good Cause to Reject Evidence of fraud New information Certification factually erroneous or inconsistent with regulations Laws of State B require different result (professional licensing) Applicant does not submit documentation required under the regulations

Common Misunderstandings Over-reliance on Home State Requiring too much information from out-of-state applicant Believing UCP must always choose option A or option B Must ask home state to perform new onsite How to add additional NAICS Codes

Option A or Option B? Should not be an “Option B” State Make decision whether to choose Option A or Option B on case-by-case basis

Let the Home State Go! Once State B certifies a DBE through the interstate certification process, it becomes a DBE in State B and must be treated like any other DBE on its directory of certified firms. State B must require DBE to submit annual affidavits of no change and notify State B of any material change in its company. State B must not rely on the DBE’s home state to conduct a third-party complaint investigation, although it can request materials from the home state if State B opted to certify the DBE using Option One

Let the Home State Go! A DBE must be certified in its home state before State B can certify the firm through interstate certification. Once the DBE is certified in State B, however, State B cannot decertify the DBE merely because it has been decertified by its home state. State B should inquire from State A the reason for its decertification and determine if the reason would trigger a determination of reasonable cause to decertify the DBE in State B, based upon one of the criteria set forth in the Regulation.

How to Perform Regular Audits  To perform regular audits on its certified DBEs located out-of-state, State B should perform an on-site review at any in-state facility in which the DBE operates, even if it is not its primary office. If the DBE has no in-state facility, State B may perform an onsite review in the most practicable means possible, taking advantage of current technology. Home State A is under no obligation to perform an additional onsite review, although it may volunteer to do so.

Why Decisions Overturned on Appeal State B didn’t properly follow interstate process State B asks for too much information, i.e., “we require this information from all applicants;” “that’s just part of our process.” State B substitutes judgment call of State A: Control, e.g., “it’s obvious the woman has not expertise!” Accumulation of Substantial Wealth

Cannot Ask for More Information A DBE certified in its home state is not required to submit additional information beyond the information identified in 49 C.F.R. §26.85(c). UCPs may not require a DBE to supplement its home state certification package or on-site review materials with information State B thinks is missing or that State B believes State A should have collected but did not. Recipients must decide whether to certify a DBE from another state based on their evaluation of the information delineated in the rule.

However. . . The interstate certification rule does not prohibit UCPs from conveying to the firm that the information it provided from its home state is incomplete under §26.85(c), and encouraging the firm to provide that information if it is in the firm’s possession. In addition, the rule encourages State B to attempt to obtain the information directly from State A.

However. . . If a home state has lost all or part of the DBE’s file, including required documents that supported its decision to certify the DBE, and the DBE has not kept its own copies, State B may ask the DBE seeking interstate certification to provide only the following new documents: a personal net worth statement, an affidavit certifying that the owner upon whom the home state’s evaluation was based is socially and economically disadvantaged, and tax returns confirming business size, so that State B can properly evaluate its qualifications.

Request for Additional NAICS Codes The DBE may seek certification in State B in additional NAICS codes that it believes apply to the work it may already perform or seek to perform in the future. UCPs should process this request for an expansion of their assigned NAICS codes pursuant to 49 C.F.R. §26.71(n). If a UCP determines that the firm’s request for additional NAICS codes requires an onsite review, it may perform one in the most practicable means possible, taking advantage of current technology.

NAICS Codes (cont) Home State A is under no obligation to perform an additional onsite review, although it may volunteer to do so. Note that when a firm asks State B to assign it a new NAICS code, State B may not require State A to assign the new NAICS code prior to investigating the firm’s eligibility for the new code in State B.