Figure 4 TAVI for bicuspid aortic valve disease

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

© 2012 EuroIntervention. All rights reserved. EuroIntervention 2009;5: A comparison of patient characteristics and 30-day mortality outcomes after.

Advertisements

Patient disposition Dichtl W, et al. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102:743-8 AVR = aortic valve replacement; MDCT = multidetector computed tomographic.

Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: A Bicuspid Aortic Valve Imaging Classification for.

Bicuspid Aortic Valves

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

From: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve ReplacementA Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(5):

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

5th Meeting on Acute Cardiac Care and Emergency Medicine, 2016 Vilnius

Management strategy for patients with aortic stenosis

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Circ Cardiovasc Interv

by Mario Gössl, Garvan C. Kane, William Mauermann, and David R. Holmes

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Figure 10 Assessment of myocardial fibrosis

Figure 5 TAVI with a self-expanding valve in

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Reproduced with permission from Yancy, C. W. et al. 2017

Number of balloon aortic valvuloplasty and TAVI procedures in the UK—the increase in stand-alone BAV mirrors the increase in TAVI (TAVI data from the 25.

Figure 5 BMI and cardiorespiratory fitness levels

Figure 8 Implanted devices for the management of heart failure

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Figure 4 BMI and mortality in patients with heart failure

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Figure 2 Pathological specimens showing the most common reasons for bioprosthetic valve failure Figure 2 | Pathological specimens showing the most common.

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Figure 2 Three-year survival rates on the basis of body composition

Figure 3 3D printing of aortic and mitral valves

Median total new lesion volume

Figure 8 4D magnetic resonance imaging patterns

Figure 4 Effects of delaying cardioprotective medications after anthracycline administration Figure 4 | Effects of delaying cardioprotective medications.

Figure 4 Valve-in-valve implantations in degenerated surgical valves

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Figure 2 Imaging of atherosclerotic plaque burden

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Management of Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Figure 1 Cardiovascular risk and disease across the life-course

Figure 1 Decision tree integrating the assessment,

Johannes Steiner et al. JACC 2017;70:

Figure 1 Types of surgical and transcatheter aortic valves

Figure 2 Global cost of HF per capita in 2012

Figure 2 A patient with aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Figure 6 The neurogenic components of angina

Suggested pathway for assessment of aortic valve replacement dysfunction. Suggested pathway for assessment of aortic valve replacement dysfunction. Transthoracic.

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Baseline Clinical Characteristics

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Multimodality imaging of aortic stenosis.

Sutureless replacement versus transcatheter valve implantation in aortic valve stenosis: A propensity-matched analysis of 2 strategies in high-risk patients

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Sung-Han Yoon et al. JACC 2017;69:

Transesophageal echocardiographic scoring for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Impact of aortic cusp calcification on postoperative aortic regurgitation

Deterministic univariate sensitivity analyses (BAV, balloon aortic valvuloplasty; ICU, intensive care unit; MM, medical management; QALY, quality-adjusted.

Comparison of survival in patients with BAV (A) and TAV (B) in the US cohort using Kaplan-Meier curves, stratified by whether or not they had suffered.

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Presentation transcript:

Figure 4 TAVI for bicuspid aortic valve disease Figure 4 | TAVI for bicuspid aortic valve disease. a | Anatomy of the bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Type I BAV involves fusion of the right coronary cusp (RCC) and left coronary cusp (LCC), creating a fused left–right cusp (LRC). Type II BAV involves fusion of the RCC and noncoronary cusp (NCC) to create a fused right–noncoronary cusp (RNC). Type III BAV involves fusion of the LCC and NCC to create fused left–noncoronary cusp (LNC). b | Kaplan–Meier curve showing all-cause mortality in propensity-score matched patients with either bicuspid or tricuspid aortic stenosis (AS) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with a first-generation transcatheter heart valve. A, anterior; L, left; P, posterior; R, right. Panel a adapted from Martin, P. S. et al. Embryonic development of the bicuspid aortic valve. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2, 248–272 (2015), which is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). Panel b adapted from Yoon, S. H. et al. Outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 69, 2579–2589 (2017), with permission from Elsevier. Panel a adapted from Martin, P. S. et al. Embryonic development of the bicuspid aortic valve. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2, 248–272 (2015), which is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). Panel b adapted from Yoon, S. H. et al. Outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 69, 2579–2589 (2017), with permission from Elsevier Puri, R. et al. (2017) Future of transcatheter aortic valve implantation — evolving clinical indications Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2017.116