About shape of the interplanetary shock front

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLES IN THE INNER HELIOSPHERE CRISM- 2011, Montpellier, 27 June – 1 July, Collaborators:
Advertisements

Dror Malka and Zeev Zalevsky
Olga Khabarova & Vladimir obridko Heliophysical Laboratory, Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation RAS (IZMIRAN), Moscow,
The Radial Variation of Interplanetary Shocks C.T. Russell, H.R. Lai, L.K. Jian, J.G. Luhmann, A. Wennmacher STEREO SWG Lake Winnepesaukee New Hampshire.
DEFINITION, CALCULATION, AND PROPERTIES OF THE Dst INDEX R.L. McPherron Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics University of California Los Angeles.
Petukhov I.S., Petukhov S.I. Yu.G. Shafer Institute for Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy SB RAS 21st European Cosmic Ray Symposium in Košice, Slovakia.
Paul T.M. Loto’aniu 1,2 and H.J. Singer 1 NOAA Space Environment Center 1 CIRES, University of Colorado 2 Paul T.M. Loto’aniu 1,2 and H.J. Singer 1 NOAA.
Plasma entry in the Mercury’s magnetosphere S. Massetti S. Massetti INAF-IFSI Interplanetary Space Physics Institute, Roma - Italy.
III–2 Magnetic Fields Due to Currents.
YERAC On the structure of radio pulsar magnetospheres On the structure of radio pulsar magnetospheres Igor F. Malov, Еlena Nikitina Pushchino Radio.
Plasma in the Heliosheath John Richardson M.I.T. Collaborators: J. Belcher, J. Kasper, E. Stone, C. Wang.
March 2, 2011 Fill in derivation from last lecture Polarization of Thomson Scattering No class Friday, March 11.
Section 1: Finding Locations on EarthFinding Locations on Earth
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
1/20 Obtaining Shape from Scanning Electron Microscope Using Hopfield Neural Network Yuji Iwahori 1, Haruki Kawanaka 1, Shinji Fukui 2 and Kenji Funahashi.
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
Normal Distribution Section 2.2. Objectives  Introduce the Normal Distribution  Properties of the Standard Normal Distribution  Use Normal Distribution.
Chapter 2 Section 2.4 Lines and Planes in Space. x y z.
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
Geoeffectiveness of Solar and Interplanetary Events Yuri I. Yermolaev, Michail Yu. Yermolaev, Georgy N. Zastenker, Anatoli A. Petrukovich, Lev M. Zelenyi.
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
6.2 Gravitational field and gravitational field strength
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
Radio Sounding of the Near-Sun Plasma Using Polarized Pulsar Pulses I.V.Chashei, T.V.Smirnova, V.I.Shishov Pushchino Radio Astronomy Obsertvatory, Astrospace.
Intermittency Analysis and Spatial Dependence of Magnetic Field Disturbances in the Fast Solar Wind Sunny W. Y. Tam 1 and Ya-Hui Yang 2 1 Institute of.
Yu.G. Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy of SB RAS Transparency of a magnetic cloud boundary for cosmic rays I.S. Petukhov, S.I. Petukhov.
Global Structure of the Inner Solar Wind and it's Dynamic in the Solar Activity Cycle from IPS Observations with Multi-Beam Radio Telescope BSA LPI Chashei.
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT SIMULATIONS: A PARAMETER STUDY FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF MULTI-SPACECRAFT SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLE OBSERVATIONS.
CHAPTER 2.3 PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS. 2.3 GAUSSIAN OR NORMAL ERROR DISTRIBUTION  The Gaussian distribution is an approximation to the binomial distribution.
Modeling 3-D Solar Wind Structure Lecture 13. Why is a Heliospheric Model Needed? Space weather forecasts require us to know the solar wind that is interacting.
Dipole radiation during collisions LL2 Section 68.
Measurements of the Orientation of the Heliospheric Magnetic Field Neil Murphy Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
1 The law of gravitation can be written in a vector notation (9.1) Although this law applies strictly to particles, it can be also used to real bodies.
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
The heliospheric magnetic flux density through several solar cycles Géza Erdős (1) and André Balogh (2) (1) MTA Wigner FK RMI, Budapest, Hungary (2) Imperial.
1 NSSC National Space Science Center, Chinese academy of Sciences FACs connecting the Ionosphere and Magnetosphere: Cluster and Double Star Observations.
Celestial Mechanics VII
U.A. Dyudina, A.P. Ingersoll, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA, Objectives We study lightning on Jupiter using spatially resolved.
Inferring the Heliospheric Magnetic Field Back to the Maunder Minimum
Parametric equations Parametric equation: x and y expressed in terms of a parameter t, for example, A curve can be described by parametric equations x=x(t),
Motion in Two Dimensions
GROUND-LEVEL EVENT (GLE)
ICME in the Solar Wind from STEL IPS Observations
Electric Fields Due to Continuous Charge Distributions
35th International Cosmic Ray Conference
Rick Leske, A. C. Cummings, C. M. S. Cohen, R. A. Mewaldt,
Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements
Positional Astronomy Chapter 3 Fundamentals of Radio Interferometry
Search for Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station G. LA VACCA University of Milano-Bicocca.
Xuepu Zhao Oct. 19, 2011 The Base of the Heliosphere: The Outer (Inner) Boundary Conditions of Coronal (Heliospheric) models.
Long-term variations of vector and tensor anisotropies of cosmic rays
Lecture 2 : Electric charges and fields
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
Characterizing Interplanetary Shocks at 1 AU
Solar Modulation Davide Grandi AMS Group-INFN Milano-Bicocca.
VECTORS APPLICATIONS NHAA/IMK/UNIMAP.
Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities
A large XMM-Newton project on SN 1006
Motion in Two Dimensions
ESS 261 Topics in magnetospheric physics Space weather forecast models ____ the prediction of solar wind speed April 23, 2008.
A large XMM-Newton project on SN 1006
Xi Luo1, Ming Zhang1, Hamid K. Rassoul1, and N.V. Pogorelov2
Introduction to Space Weather
Motion in Two Dimensions
Dynamic Processes Shape Spatiotemporal Properties of Retinal Waves
9. Gravitation 9.1. Newton’s law of gravitation
PHYS 1443 – Section 003 Lecture #10
Antenna Theory Chapter.4.7.4~4.8.1 Antennas
by Andreas Keiling, Scott Thaller, John Wygant, and John Dombeck
Presentation transcript:

About shape of the interplanetary shock front PETUKHOV IVAN , PETUKHOV STANISLAV Yu.G. Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy SB RAS The 32nd International Cosmic Ray Conference August 11-18, 2011, Beijing

At present, the shape of the front of interplanetary shock is only known from model calculations (Smith and Draer, 1990; Wandas et al, 1997). To what extent do the calculations reproduce the properties of real shocks is not known, because local measurements on the spacecraft themselves do not provide information about large-scale shape of the surface. We have determined the characteristic shape of the shock front from the analysis of the set components of the vector normal to the surface of the interplanetary shock front.

JGR, v. 115, A09215,2010 Eventually set consists of 257 observations C.Wang, H.Li, J.D. Richardson, and J.R. Kan Interplanetary shock characteristics and associated geosynchronous magnetic field variations estimated from sudden impulses observed on the ground. Total 296 values ​​of the normals to the shock front. 10 - no data on the plasma before front 29 - structure "similar" to the shock front Eventually set consists of 257 observations GSE - Geocentric Solar Ecliptic - X - the line from Earth to the Sun Z - normal to the ecliptic plane, toward the North GSM - Geocentric Solar Magnetospheric Z - the projection axis magnetic dipole on the plane YZ in the GSE Used 64-second data of ACE. Used a new method for determining the Rankine-Hugoniot relations (Lin et. Al., 2006).

According to the binomial distribution with 95% Sky plane projection 257 NE NW For N=257; 2Sigma=0,06 Probabilities 0,52<PN<0,64; average PN=0,58 0,36<РS<0,48; average РS=0,42 0,48<РW<0,60; average РW=0,54 0,40<РE<0,52; average РE=0,46 69 80 50 58 SE SW The reasons for the asymmetry may be: 1) different activity on the solar surface; 2) asymmetry front surface that forms during its propagation in interplanetary space; North part nN>0 East part nT>0 If radius of curvature decreases with distance from the central region

Interplanetary shock fronts have a characteristic shape. To derive the shock front shape, we need to introduce some assumptions Interplanetary shock fronts have a characteristic shape. The shape of the propagating front is conserved. The radial component of the vector of the normal along the front changes monotonically. Random distribution of measurement points on the solid angle is equally probable.

We introduce the heliocentric Cartesian coordinate system XOY plane which is located in the plane of the solar equator. The X axis is the axis of axial symmetry of the surface of the shock front. Let us introduce two angles: the angle measured from the X axis, the angle δ is measured in the plane YOZ from the axis Y. Angular size of a shock front (Cane, Richardson, 2003) The whole solid angle divided by some sectors y R Ψmax x Sun Earth

2) divide all values into some groups. 1) Since the curvature changes monotonically, we order the values of all radial component of the normal vector in decreasing order 2) divide all values into some groups. The angle and number of values in each group is defined by the relation In each group, we compute the mean and standard deviation that define the shape of the front in the XOY plane Сама модель

y ni R βi Ψi x The angle between the normal and the radius, in each interval is given by The direction of the reference angle beta will determine which of the shock wave curvature. Calculation of the shape of the front hold for 3 values: 1) 2)

The derived shape of the front black lines - the circles given for estimate forms

the derived shape is approximated by two parabolas

In order to validate the method and the sufficient number of measurements to determine the shape of the surface we solve the problem using Monte Carlo simulation. 1) we set the shape of the shock; 2) we define the components of the vector normal for random points on the surface of the shock ; 3) using developed method, we obtain the surface shape. Green line – define shape, cyan points – random points, red line – obtain shape.

Comparison of the calculated variant form of the front IS - Lario D Comparison of the calculated variant form of the front IS - Lario D., Sanahuja B. and Heras A. M. / / Astrophys. J. 509, 1, 415 (1998). with the appropriate cross section of the front. As you can see, the form of the fronts are in good agreement.

Conclusion. A new method for determining the shape of the front of interplanetary shock wave using a set of measurements of components of the shock normal. The large-scale asymmetry of the surface front is estimated. The typical front shape has been obtained. Adequacy of the method is proved by Monte–Carlo method.